Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joel L. Weissfeld is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joel L. Weissfeld.


Journal of Hypertension | 1991

Hyperkinetic borderline hypertension in Tecumseh, Michigan

Stevo Julius; Lisa Krause; Nicholas J. Schork; Agnes D. Mejia; Kerin A. Jones; Cosmas van de Ven; Ernest H. Johnson; M. Abed Sekkarie; Sverre E. Kjeldsen; Jurij Petrin; Robert L. Schmouder; Rakesh K. Gupta; James Ferraro; Pietro Nazzaro; Joel L. Weissfeld

Of 691 healthy (untreated) villagers of Tecumseh, Michigan (average age 32.6 years), 99 had a clinical blood pressure exceeding 140/90 mmHg. Thirty-seven per cent of these borderline hypertensives had increased heart rate, cardiac index, forearm blood flow and plasma norepinephrine. These subjects had elevated self-determined home blood pressure (average of 14 measurements). The present hyperkinetic borderlines had elevated blood pressure at 5, 8, 21 and 23 years of age and their parents also had higher blood pressure. The prevalence of high blood pressure in Tecumseh, its long history, elevated blood pressure readings outside the physicians office and family background of hypertension, suggests that the hyperkinetic state is a significant clinical condition. Previous studies on hospital-based populations proved that the hyperkinetic state is caused by an excessive autonomic drive. The association of the hyperkinetic state with elevated norepinephrine in this study suggests that a sympathetic hyperactivity is present in a large proportion of unselected subjects with mild blood pressure elevation.


Medical Care | 2008

Informed Decision-Making and Colorectal Cancer Screening : Is it Occurring in Primary Care?

Bruce S. Ling; Jeanette M. Trauth; Michael J. Fine; Maria K. Mor; Abby L. Resnick; Clarence H. Braddock; Sylvia Bereknyei; Joel L. Weissfeld; Robert E. Schoen; Edmund M. Ricci; Jeff Whittle

Background:Current recommendations advise patients to participate in the decision-making for selecting a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening option. The degree to which providers communicate the information necessary to prepare patients for participation in this process is not known. Objective:To assess the level of informed decision-making occurring during actual patient-provider communications on CRC screening and test for the association between informed decision-making and screening behavior. Research Design:Observational study of audiotaped clinic visits between patients and their providers in the primary care clinic at a Veterans Administration Medical Center. Subjects:Male patients, age 50–74 years, presenting to a primary care visit at the study site. Measures:The Informed Decision-Making (IDM) Model was used to code the audiotapes for 9 elements of communication that should occur to prepare patients for participation in decision-making. The primary outcome is completion of CRC screening during the study period. Results:The analytic cohort consisted of 91 patients due for CRC screening who had a test ordered at the visit. Six of the 9 IDM elements occurred in ≤20% of the visits with none addressed in ≥50%. CRC screening occurred less frequently for those discussing “pros and cons” (12% vs. 46%, P = 0.01) and “patient preferences” (6% vs. 47%, P = 0.001) compared with those who did not. Conclusions:We found that a lack of informed decision-making occurred during CRC screening discussions and that particular elements of the process were negatively associated with screening. Further research is needed to better understand the effects of informed decision-making on screening behavior.


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2009

Physicians Encouraging Colorectal Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Enhanced Office and Patient Management on Compliance With Colorectal Cancer Screening

Bruce S. Ling; Robert E. Schoen; Jeanette M. Trauth; Abdus S. Wahed; Theresa Eury; Deborah M. Simak; Francis X. Solano; Joel L. Weissfeld

BACKGROUNDnColorectal cancer screening is underused. Our objective was to evaluate methods for promoting colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice.nnnMETHODSnA 2 x 2 factorial randomized clinical trial measured the effects of a tailored vs nontailored physician recommendation letter and an enhanced vs nonenhanced physician office and patient management intervention on colorectal cancer screening adherence. The enhanced and nonenhanced physician office and patient management interventions varied the amount of external support to help physician offices develop and implement colorectal cancer screening programs. The study included 10 primary care physician office practices and 599 screen-eligible patients aged 50 to 79 years. The primary end point was medical-record-verified flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Statistical end-point analysis (according to randomization intent) used generalized estimating equations to account for correlated outcomes according to physician group.nnnRESULTSnDuring a 1-year period, endoscopy in the lower gastrointestinal tract (lower endoscopy) occurred in 289 of 599 patients (48.2%). This finding included the following rates of lower endoscopy: 81 of 152 patients (53.3%) in the group that received the tailored letter and enhanced management; 103 of 190 (54.2%) in the group that received the nontailored letter and enhanced management; 58 of 133 (43.6%) in the group that received the tailored letter and nonenhanced management; and 47 of 124 (37.9%) in the group that received the nontailored letter and nonenhanced management. Enhanced office and patient management increased the odds of completing a colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy by 1.63-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.41; P = .01). However, the tailored letter increased the odds of completion by only 1.08-fold (95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.62; P = .71).nnnCONCLUSIONSnApproximately one-half of the screen-eligible primary medical care patients aged 50 to 79 years obtained lower endoscopic colorectal cancer screening within 1 year of recommendation. An enhanced office and patient management system significantly improved colorectal cancer screening adherence.nnnTRIAL REGISTRATIONnclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00327457.


Health Education & Behavior | 1990

Health Beliefs in a Population: The Michigan Blood Pressure Survey:

Joel L. Weissfeld; John P. Kirscht; Bruce M. Brock

In a general population sample, we examined relationships between sociodemographic characteristics and health beliefs. Individual questionnaire measures for components of the health belief model were combined to form six scales. In analyses which adjusted for perceived levels of health, sociodemographic markers of social disadvantage (e.g., black race, or low socioeconomic status) appeared to associate with favorable health beliefs, that is, with health beliefs often associated with health promoting behaviors. Specifically, we found that blacks expressed greater concern about health. Women believed they tended to get sick more often and to suffer more severely from illness. Female and older respondents placed greater value on the kinds of services provided by members of the health professions. Female, black, older, and lower socioeconomic status respondents placed greater value on such healthful personal habits as exercise, alcohol avoidance, and proper diet. These results suggested that the poor health suffered by relatively disadvantaged members of society are not, in some manner, a consequence of funda mental beliefs about health.


Health Education & Behavior | 2003

Using the Transtheoretical Model to Stage Screening Behavior for Colorectal Cancer

Jeanette M. Trauth; Bruce S. Ling; Joel L. Weissfeld; Robert E. Schoen; Mutlu Hayran

This study sought to describe the colorectal cancer (CRC)-screening behavior of a population of two lower income communities near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The transtheoretical model was used to characterize individuals according to their stage of readiness to engage in one of two recommended CRC screening tests—the Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) or Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (FSG) test. A telephone survey was conducted of 50- to 79-year-old men and women in Aliquippa and Clairton in the spring of 1999. Analyses based on 414 survey respondents showed associations between FOBT or FSG behavioral stage and factors including gender, age, recent doctor checkup, chronic need for prescription medications, history of cervical Pap smear testing, history of prostate-specific antigen blood testing, and prior doctor recommendation in favor of FOBT or FSG testing. This study appears to be one of the first applications of this theory to understanding CRC screening behavior in a community intervention.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005

Factors Affecting Older African American Women's Decisions to Join the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial

Jeanette M. Trauth; Jan C. Jernigan; Laura A. Siminoff; Donald Musa; Derietra Neal-Ferguson; Joel L. Weissfeld

PURPOSEnThe purpose of this study is to describe the factors associated with the decisions of older African American women to join the PLCO (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian) Cancer Screening Trial when recruited.nnnMETHODSnAfrican American women between ages 55 and 74 years who were never diagnosed with a PLCO cancer were eligible for our study. Two methods of recruitment were used. First, mailings were sent to a random sample of women describing the PLCO followed by a telephone call to determine interest in the PLCO. If women were not interested in PLCO but consented to participate in our study, they were interviewed immediately. Second, we followed up with African American women who responded to mass mailings sent out before the start of our study by the Pittsburgh PLCO office. Women completed an interview about their cancer and clinical trial knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. The responses of women who joined the PLCO Trial are contrasted with the responses of women who did not join.nnnRESULTSnNumerous factors were associated with the decision of older African American women to join the PLCO, including perceptions of cancer prevention and detection, the experience of having a loved one with cancer, knowledge of and experience with clinical trials, and beliefs regarding the benefits and risks of clinical trial participation.nnnCONCLUSIONnMinority recruitment to cancer clinical trials could be increased by designing interventions focused on individual, organizational, and community needs.


Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 1989

EFFECTS OF DECEPTIVE SELF-REPORTS OF QUITTING ON THE RESULTS OF TREATMENT TRIALS FOR SMOKING: A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT

Joel L. Weissfeld; James J. Holloway; John P. Kirscht

Problems with self-report measures for smoking motivate the use of biochemical tests in treatment trials for smoking. These biochemical tests, unfortunately, are not perfect. In this paper, we present an algebraic model of bias in treatment trials for smoking. Bias is expressed in terms of the deception rate among continued smokers in a control group, the relative deception rate among continued smokers in an experimental group, and the sensitivity and specificity of a biochemical test which may be used either to confirm self-reports of quitting or to replace self-report entirely. For given test specificity and sensitivity, the model defines deception rates for which different biochemical testing strategies are preferred. The model is presented in the context of current knowledge on the phenomenon of deception among adult smokers. The paper concludes that better judgements regarding the role of biochemical tests in treatment trials for smoking require more precise information regarding the magnitude and determinants of deception.


Medical Decision Making | 1990

A Mathematical Representation of the Expert Panel's Guidelines for Nigh Blood Cholesterol Case-finding and Treatment

Joel L. Weissfeld; Lisa A. Weissfeld; James J. Holloway; Annette M. Bernard

The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) for high blood cholesterol case-finding and treatment recommended discrete treatments according to the results of sequential mea surements of continuous variables (total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C]). These measurements are subject to intra- and interindividual variability. The authors describe a computer simulation of the NCEP that acknowledges these complexities. The simulation reduces the NCEP into steps, which are represented in a decision tree. The calculation of probabilities at chance nodes takes into account the conditional nature of sequential mea surements of blood cholesterol. The simulation tracks medical resource use and estimates LDL-C reductions within 20 strata, each defining 5% of population distribution for LDL-C. This approach enables a detailed representation of the case-finding process—the sequence of blood cholesterol tests and associated cut-off values that identify individuals needing more intensive evaluation and treatment. Key words: mathematical modeling; screening programs; hypercholesterolemia. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:135-146)


Gastroenterology | 1998

Patient satisfaction with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy

Robert E. Schoen; Joel L. Weissfeld; Nj Bowen; A Baun

BACKGROUNDnScreening flexible sigmoidoscopy is an underused cancer prevention procedure. Physicians often cite patient discomfort as a reason for not requesting sigmoidoscopy, but patient experiences and attitudes toward sigmoidoscopy have not been well studied.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo measure patient satisfaction and the determinants of satisfaction with screening sigmoidoscopy.nnnMETHODSnAn instrument to assess satisfaction with screening sigmoidoscopy was developed. Responses were evaluated with a factor analysis, tested for reproducibility and internal consistency, and validated against an external standard.nnnRESULTSnA total of 1221 patients (666 men and 555 women; mean age, 61.8 years) were surveyed after sigmoidoscopy. Examinations were performed by a nurse practitioner (n = 668), internist (n = 344), or gastrointestinal specialist (n= 184). More than 93% of the participants strongly agreed or agreed they would be willing to undergo another examination, and 74.9% would strongly recommend the procedure to their friends. Regarding pain and discomfort, 76.2% strongly agreed or agreed that the examination did not cause a lot of pain, 78.1% stated that it did not cause a lot of discomfort, and 68.5% thought that it was more comfortable than they expected. Fifteen percent to 25% of the patients indicated they had a lot of pain, great discomfort, or more discomfort than expected. Women were more likely to have significant pain or discomfort than men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-4.3; P<.001).nnnCONCLUSIONSnApproximately 70% of individuals who undergo screening sigmoidoscopy are satisfied and find the procedure more comfortable than expected, whereas only 15% to 25% find the procedure unpleasant. Physicians should not project discomfort onto patients as a reason for not requesting screening sigmoidoscopy.


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2000

Patient Satisfaction With Screening Flexible Sigmoidoscopy

Robert E. Schoen; Joel L. Weissfeld; Nancy J. Bowen; Galen Switzer; Andrew Baum

Collaboration


Dive into the Joel L. Weissfeld's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul F. Pinsky

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce S. Ling

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert S. Bresalier

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chyke A. Doubeni

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lance A. Yokochi

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip C. Prorok

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge