Joelle Guitard

Hepatitis E Virus and Chronic Hepatitis in Organ-Transplant Recipients

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is considered an agent responsible for acute hepatitis that does not progress to chronic hepatitis. We identified 14 cases of acute HEV infection in three patients receiving liver transplants, nine receiving kidney transplants, and two receiving kidney and pancreas transplants. All patients were positive for serum HEV RNA. Chronic hepatitis developed in eight patients, as confirmed by persistently elevated aminotransferase levels, serum HEV RNA, and histologic features of chronic hepatitis. The time from transplantation to diagnosis was significantly shorter and the total counts of lymphocytes and of CD2, CD3, and CD4 T cells were significantly lower in patients in whom chronic disease developed.

Hepatitis E virus and the kidney in solid-organ transplant patients.

Background. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is an emerging disease in industrialized countries. Few data regarding genotype 3 HEV extrahepatic manifestations exist. Methods. We assessed kidney function and histology in solid-organ transplant patients during HEV infection. In all, 51 cases of genotype 3 HEV infections were diagnosed (34 kidney, 14 liver, and 3 kidney-pancreas transplant patients). Of these, 43.2% were cleared of the virus spontaneously within 6 months of infection, whereas 56.8% evolved to chronic hepatitis. Twelve of these patients completed a 3-month antiviral therapy and were followed up for 6 months posttreatment. Kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] obtained by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation) and proteinuria were assessed before infection, during HEV infection and during follow-up. Kidney biopsies were obtained from patients with high proteinuria and decreased eGFR levels. Results. During HEV infection, there was a significant decrease in eGFR in both kidney- and liver-transplant patients. Glomerular diseases were observed in kidney biopsies obtained during the acute and chronic phases. This included membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and relapses in IgA nephropathy. The majority of patients had cryoglobulinemia that became negative after HEV clearance. Kidney function improved and proteinuria decreased after HEV clearance. Conclusion. HEV-associated glomerulonephritis seems to be an HEV-related extrahepatic manifestation. Further studies are required to confirm these observations.

Leflunomide treatment for polyomavirus BK-associated nephropathy after kidney transplantation.

Polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy (PVAN) affects 1–10% of kidney‐transplant (KT) patients, with graft failure/loss in approximately 90% of cases. Reducing immunosuppression is the key treatment option, but addition of leflunomide may improve BK Virus (BKV) clearance and graft survival. In a prospective open‐labeled study, 12 KT patients with biopsy‐proven PVAN were treated with reduced immunosuppression and leflunomide. BKV viremia and graft function were followed. PVAN was diagnosed at 6 months (3–192) post‐transplant; median serum creatinine concentration (sCC) was 189 μmol/l (92–265). After 16 months (8–30) of follow‐up, the sCC was 150 μmol/l (90–378, NS). Renal function improved in six cases (50%), remained stable in two (16.6%) and deteriorated in four (33.4%), with graft loss in two (17%). Clearance of BKV viremia was observed in five (42%) cases. Side effects included anemia in six cases leading to leflunomide withdrawal in two patients, and mild thrombocytopenia. In KT patients diagnosed with PVAN, leflunomide plus reduced immunosuppression improved graft function in 66.6%, cleared BKV viremia in 42%, and resulted in side effects in 17%. This limited efficacy contrasts with other reports and falls short of expectation. We conclude that active screening, earlier diagnosis and intervention remain the cornerstones of treatment.

Rituximab therapy for de novo mixed cryoglobulinemia in renal transplant patients.

Background. Type II or III cryoglobulins are fairly prevalent in renal-transplant (RT) patients, and are often related to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, they rarely result in graft dysfunction. They are sustained by proliferation of oligoclonal B-cells. Systemic B-cell depletion and clinical remission of the systemic effects of cryoglobulins have been achieved in HCV-positive immunocompetent patients with a human/mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody that specifically reacts with the CD20 antigen (i.e., rituximab). Thus, this provides the rationale to use rituximab for cryoglobulin-related graft dysfunction in RT patients. Methods. Three RT patients, of whom one was HCV-positive, developed renal-function impairment long after transplantation, as well as de novo nephrotic syndrome (n=2) and severe hypertension (n=2). This latter case was related to type III cryoglobulinemia and was associated with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. In addition to their baseline standard immunosuppression, the patients were given weekly rituximab infusions of 375 mg/m2 (two infusions in patient and four infusions for the other two cases). Results. This treatment resulted in a dramatic improvement in renal parameters, particularly in a sustained remittence of nephrotic syndrome, a sustained clearance of cryoglobulins in two cases, but also in severe infectious complications in two cases. Conclusion. We conclude that rituximab therapy is highly effective in cryoglobulin-related renal dysfunction in RT patients; however, due to chronic immunosuppression, this is at the expense of infectious complications.

Acute renal failure following liver transplantation with induction therapy.

AIMS To identify the predictive factors for acute renal failure (ARF) in a retrospective study of 100 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLT) performed in 94 patients between 2000 and 2003. METHODS Acute renal failure (ARF) was defined using the RIFLE criteria, i.e. injury when creatinine doubles or GFR halves, and failure when creatinine trebles or GFR decreases by > 75%. Patients on dialysis pre OLT (n = 3) were excluded from the study. Immunosuppression included steroids, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), with (n = 32) or without mycophenolate mofetil. A total of 85% of patients also received induction therapy with antithymocyte globulins (29%) or anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies (56%). RESULTS 39 patients (41.5%) and 21 (22.3%) patients developed injury, and failure, respectively. Of these, 10 (10.6%) underwent dialysis. Univariate analysis revealed that acute renal dysfunction with a RIFLE score > or = 3 was significantly associated with a pre-operative serum creatinine level of > 100 micromol/l, pre-operative creatinine clearance of < 75 ml/mn, need for a transfusion (> 10 red packed units), post-operative diuresis of < 100 ml/h, use of vasopressive drugs, times to aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT) aminotransferase peaks of > 20 and > 24 hours, respectively, relaparotomy, CNIs transient discontinuation, and the use of lower daily dosage of CNIs at post-OLT Days 3, 5, 7 and 15. In multivariate analysis, failure was significantly associated with time to AST peak (> 20 h) (OR 6.35 (1.2 - 33.6), p = 0.029), post-operative diuresis (< 100 ml/h) (OR 9.8 (2.03 47.3), p = 0.004), post-operative use of vasopressive drugs (OR 9.91 (2.02 - 48.7), p = 0.004), and transient CNIs withdrawal (OR 51.08 (7.58-344.1), p < 0.0001). Finally, the occurrence of ARF was significantly associated with an increased number of days on mechanical ventilation, on stay-in intensive care unit (ICU), and on overall hospitalization time. CONCLUSION ARF is quite common after OLT and significantly increases the post-operative time at the hospital, thereby increasing the OLT cost. Its independent predictive factors are mainly related to perioperative events.

Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in maintenance liver transplant patients.

Although large retrospective studies have identified the presence of donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) to be a risk factor for rejection and impaired survival after liver transplantation, the long‐term predicted pathogenic potential of individual DSAs after liver transplantation remains unclear. We investigated the incidence, prevalence and consequences of DSAs in maintenance liver transplant (LT) recipients. Two hundred sixty‐seven LT recipients, who had undergone transplantation at least 6 months previously and had been screened for DSAs at least twice using single‐antigen bead technology, were included and tested annually for the presence of DSAs. At a median of 51 months (min–max: 6–220) after an LT, 13% of patients had DSAs. At a median of 36.5 months (min–max: 2–45) after the first screening, 9% of patients have developed de novo DSAs. The sole predictive factor for the emergence of de novo DSAs was retransplantation (OR 3.75; 95% CI 1.28–11.05, p = 0.025). Five out of 21 patients with de novo DSAs (23.8%) developed an antibody‐mediated rejection. Fibrosis score was higher among patients with DSAs. In conclusion, monitoring for the development of DSAs in maintenance LT patients is useful in case of graft dysfunction and to identify patients with a high risk of developing liver fibrosis.

Treatment of focal segmental glomerular sclerosis with rituximab: 2 case reports.

BACKGROUND Primary focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) recurs in 20 - 40% of patients after kidney transplantation. Rituximab has been used to treat several glomerular diseases. PATIENTS AND RESULTS We treated two renal-transplant patients with recurrence of FSGS with rituximab. Despite a prophylactic perioperative therapy of plasmapheresis (PE) and i.v. cyclosporine A, Patient 1 developed significant proteinuria, at 1 day after his first kidney transplantation. After two infusions of rituximab (375 mg/m2) he had complete remission. A second relapse, which occurred on Day 40, was also successfully treated by PE and one additional infusion of rituximab. 10 months after transplantation, he still has complete remission from recurrent nephrotic syndrome. Patient 2 also developed significant proteinuria, but 1 day after a second kidney transplantation. Nephrotic syndrome persisted despite 27 sessions of PE and cyclophosphamide therapy. At 13 months after transplantation, he received four infusions of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)), but this was ineffective. CONCLUSION There is a need to demonstrate whether or not rituximab therapy is of interest to prevent and to treat nephritic syndrome in renal-transplant patients who suffer from FSGS.

Donor-Specific Antibodies after Ceasing Immunosuppressive Therapy, with or without an Allograft Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Within the last few years, anti-human leukocyte antigen detection assays have significantly improved. This study asked, using the Luminex single-antigen assay, whether an allograft nephrectomy allowed donor-specific alloantibodies to appear that were not previously detected in the serum when the failed kidney was still in place. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS After losing the kidney allograft and stopping immunosuppressive therapy, the proportions of donor-specific alloantibodies and nondonor-specific alloantibodies were compared in patients who had (n=48; group I) and had not (n=21; group II) undergone an allograft nephrectomy. Allograft nephrectomies were performed at 150 days after kidney allograft loss, and the time between allograft nephrectomy and last follow-up was 538 ± 347 days. RESULTS At kidney allograft loss, donor-specific alloantibodies were detected in three group II patients (14.2%) and six group I patients (12.5%). At last follow-up, donor-specific alloantibodies were detected in 11 patients (52.4%) without and 39 patients (81%) with an allograft nephrectomy (P=0.02). Anti-human leukocyte antigen class I donor-specific alloantibodies were positive in 23.8% of group II and 77% of group I patients (P<0.001); anti-human leukocyte antigen class II donor-specific alloantibodies were positive in 42.8% of group II and 62.5% of group I patients. Independent predictive factors for developing donor-specific alloantibodies after losing kidney allograft and stopping immunosuppressants were number of anti-human leukocyte antigen A/B mismatches at transplantation (zero versus one or more) and allograft nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS The development of donor-specific alloantibodies was significantly greater in patients with a failed kidney who had undergone an allograft nephrectomy compared with those patients who had not undergone allograft nephrectomy.

Predictive factors for posttransplant diabetes mellitus within one-year of liver transplantation.

Introduction. The aims of our single-center study were to identify whether pretransplant diabetes had an impact on patient survival and, secondly, the predictive factors for development of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) (as defined by American Diabetes Association/World Health Organization). Patients and Methods. One hundred seventy-nine consecutive adult orthotopic liver-transplant patients were included in this study. Immunosuppression was based on calcineurin inhibitors with steroids, with or without mycophenolate mofetil, and with or without induction therapy. To evaluate the predictive factors for NODM, donor and recipient pre- and posttransplant data were included. Results. At transplantation, 38 patients had diabetes (group I), and the 141 nondiabetic patients constituted group II. In group I, paternal history of diabetes was more frequent (P=0.03), as was length of exposure to smoking (P=0.03), higher pretransplant glycemia (P<0.001), and shorter cold-ischemia (P=0.027) compared with group II. Pretransplant diabetes in group I resulted in a mortality rate of 39.5% at 1 year compared with 19.1% in group II (P=0.009). In group II, in multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors for NODM at M12 were pretransplant glycemia (P=0.037), alcohol-induced end-stage liver disease (P=0.04), and cumulative steroid dose within 1-year posttransplant (P=0.05). Conclusion. Of the independent predictive risk factors for NODM, only steroid dose is modifiable, emphasizing the need for individualized immunosuppression.

Renal involvement in Castleman disease

BACKGROUND Castleman disease (CD), or angiofollicular lymph-node hyperplasia, is an atypical lymphoproliferative disorder with heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Renal involvement in CD has been described in only single-case reports, which have included various types of renal diseases. METHODS Nineteen patients with histologically documented CD and renal biopsies available were included. Clinical features and renal histological findings were reviewed, and the available samples were immunolabelled with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody. RESULTS Nineteen CD cases were identified: 89% were multicentric, and 84% were of the plasma-cell or mixed type. Four cases (21%) were associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Among HIV-negative patients, two main patterns of renal involvement were found: (i) a small-vessel lesions group (SVL) (60%) with endotheliosis and glomerular double contours in all patients and with superimposed glomerular/arteriolar thrombi or mesangiolysis in most; and (ii) AA amyloidosis (20%). Renal histology was more heterogeneous among HIV-positive patients. Decreases in glomerular VEGF were observed only in some patients with SVL, whereas VEGF staining was normal in all other histological groups. Interestingly, glomerular VEGF loss associated with SVL was correlated with plasma C-reactive protein levels, a marker of CD activity. CONCLUSIONS Small-vessel lesions are the most frequent renal involvement in CD, whereas loss of glomerular VEGF is correlated with CD activity and could have a role in SVL pathophysiology.