Johan B. Wempe

Depressive Symptoms as Predictors of Mortality in Patients With COPD

OBJECTIVE Prognostic studies of mortality in patients with COPD have mostly focused on physiologic variables, with little attention to depressive symptoms. This stands in sharp contrast to the attention that depressive symptoms have been given in the outcomes of patients with other chronic health conditions. The present study investigated the independent association of depressive symptoms in stable patients with COPD with all-cause mortality. METHODS The baseline characteristics of 121 COPD patients (78 men and 43 women; mean [+/- SD] age, 61.5 +/- 9.1 years; and mean FEV(1), 36.9 +/- 15.5% predicted) were collected on hospital admission to a pulmonary rehabilitation center. The data included demographic variables, body mass index (BMI), post-bronchodilator therapy FEV(1), and Wpeak (peak workload [Wpeak]). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck depression inventory. The vital status was ascertained using municipal registrations. In 8.5 years of follow-up, 76 deaths occurred (mortality rate, 63%). Survival time ranged from 88 days to 8.5 years (median survival time, 5.3 years). The Cox proportional hazard model was used to quantify the association of the baseline characteristics (ie, age, sex, marital status, smoking behavior, FEV(1), BMI, Wpeak, and depressive symptoms) with mortality. RESULTS Depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 3.33) were associated with mortality in patients with COPD, independent of other factors including male sex (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.92), older age (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.08), and lower Wpeak (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence that depressive symptoms assessed in stable patients with COPD are associated with their subsequent all-cause mortality.

Nocturnal non-invasive ventilation in addition to rehabilitation in hypercapnic patients with COPD

Background: Long-term non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) might improve the outcomes of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with chronic respiratory failure. A study was undertaken to investigate whether nocturnal NIPPV in addition to pulmonary rehabilitation improves health-related quality of life, functional status and gas exchange compared with pulmonary rehabilitation alone in patients with COPD with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. Methods: 72 patients with COPD were randomly assigned to nocturnal NIPPV in addition to rehabilitation (n = 37) or rehabilitation alone (n = 35). Outcome measures were assessed before and after the 3-month intervention period. Results: The Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire total score improved 15.1 points with NIPPV + rehabilitation compared with 8.7 points with rehabilitation alone. The difference of 7.5 points was not significant (p = 0.08). However, compared with rehabilitation alone, the difference in the fatigue domain was greater with NIPPV + rehabilitation (mean difference 3.3 points, p<0.01), as was the improvement in the Maugeri Respiratory Failure questionnaire total score (mean difference −10%, p<0.03) and its cognition domain (mean difference −22%, p<0.01). Furthermore, the addition of NIPPV improved daytime arterial carbon dioxide pressure (mean difference −0.3 kPa; p<0.01) and daily step count (mean difference 1269 steps/day, p<0.01). This was accompanied by an increased daytime minute ventilation (mean difference 1.4 l; p<0.001). Conclusion: Non-invasive ventilation augments the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure as it improves several measures of health-related quality of life, functional status and gas exchange. Trial registration number: NCT00135538.

Daily Physical Activity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease : A Systematic Review

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often limited in their daily physical activity. However, the level, type and intensity of daily physical activity are not known, nor there is a clear insight in the contributing factors. The aim of this review is to describe daily physical activity of COPD patients, and to examine its relationship with demographic factors, pulmonary function, physical fitness, systemic inflammation and quality of life. A systematic literature search was conducted, including studies assessing daily physical activity in all stages of COPD by various different types of measurement techniques. In total, 47 studies were selected; 17 performance-, 20 questionnaire-, and 12 interview-based. Two studies used both a performance- and questionnaire-based method. Overall, COPD patients have a lower level and intensity of daily physical activity compared to healthy controls. This was reported by performance- as well as questionnaire-based studies, yet with a large variation (42–86% and 28–97%, respectively). Reduced daily physical activity is associated with higher levels of airway obstruction, higher levels of systemic inflammation, and lower levels of physical fitness. The association between daily physical activity and quality of life is less clear. In conclusion, this is the first review that examined the level, type and determinants of daily physical activity in COPD. It demonstrates that reduced daily physical activity frequently occurs in COPD patients, yet with a large variation. Methods of measuring and reporting daily physical activity should be more standardized.

Blood eosinophil numbers and activity during 24 hours: Effects of treatment with budesonide and bambuterol

The effects of the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide and the oral long-acting beta-agonist bambuterol on circadian variation of blood eosinophil numbers, serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), serum eosinophil chemotactic activity (ECA), and serum neutrophil chemotactic activity (NCA) were studied in two groups of patients with allergic asthma. Group 1 (n = 8) had a circadian variation of peak expiratory flow (PEF) 15% or greater, and group 2 (n = 9) had a circadian PEF variation less than 15%. Both groups were randomized and crossover treated for 4 weeks with (A) 0.4 mg budesonide at 8 AM and 8 PM, (B) 20 mg bambuterol at 8 PM, and (C) placebo. At the end of each period blood eosinophil numbers, ECP, ECA, and NCA were measured during 24 hours at 4-hour intervals. No significant differences in the inflammatory parameters could be observed between the groups, although eosinophil numbers tended to be higher in group 1 than in group 2. Highest eosinophil numbers were observed at night. Budesonide reduced both eosinophil numbers and ECP levels, especially at night; bambuterol had no effect on both variables. No circadian variation or treatment effects were observed for ECA and NCA. This study suggests a role for the eosinophil in the nocturnal worsening of asthma, and it demonstrates that budesonide produces, in contrast to bambuterol, a reduction of (nocturnal) eosinophil numbers and activity.

Two-year home-based nocturnal noninvasive ventilation added to rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe use of noninvasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure remains controversial as long-term data are almost lacking.The aim was to compare the outcome of 2-year home-based nocturnal NIPPV in addition to rehabilitation (NIPPV + PR) with rehabilitation alone (PR) in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure.MethodsSixty-six patients could be analyzed for the two-year home-based follow-up period. Differences in change between the NIPPV + PR and PR group were assessed by a linear mixed effects model with a random effect on the intercept, and adjustment for baseline values. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL); secondary outcomes were mood state, dyspnea, gas exchange, functional status, pulmonary function, and exacerbation frequency.ResultsAlthough the addition of NIPPV did not significantly improve the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire compared to rehabilitation alone (mean difference in change between groups -1.3 points (95% CI: -9.7 to 7.4)), the addition of NIPPV did improve HRQoL assessed with the Maugeri Respiratory Failure questionnaire (-13.4% (-22.7 to -4.2; p = 0.005)), mood state (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale -4.0 points (-7.8 to 0.0; p = 0.05)), dyspnea (Medical Research Council -0.4 points (-0.8 to -0.0; p = 0.05)), daytime arterial blood gases (PaCO2 -0.4 kPa (-0.8 to -0.2; p = 0.01); PaO2 0.8 kPa (0.0 to 1.5; p = 0.03)), 6-minute walking distance (77.3 m (46.4 to 108.0; p < 0.001)), Groningen Activity and Restriction scale (-3.8 points (-7.4 to -0.4; p = 0.03)), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (115 ml (19 to 211; p = 0.019)). Exacerbation frequency was not changed.ConclusionsThe addition of NIPPV to pulmonary rehabilitation for 2 years in severe COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure improves HRQoL, mood, dyspnea, gas exchange, exercise tolerance and lung function decline. The benefits increase further with time.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.Gov (ID NCT00135538).

The influence of rehabilitation on behaviour modification in COPD

Psychological and social factors are important in functioning and well-being of patients with chronic lung disease. While a rehabilitation programme of 4-10 weeks may optimise physical function, maintenance of results of rehabilitation depends for a substantial part on psychological factors such as mood, coping and lifestyle. Behavioural research suggests that modifying behavioural patterns and coping styles takes time and improvement of depressive state or symptoms may also take months. While no clear recommendations can be abstracted from the present literature concerning composition and duration of psychosocial programmes, we would suggest a duration of the programme of at least 3 months with inclusion of structured psychosocial elements aiming at behaviour modification. Regular physical and social activities in the post-rehabilitation period are necessary for relapse prevention. Evidence for this approach, however, is up to now only circumstantial. Further research should focus on maintaining results of rehabilitation and in particular on the role of psychological factors.

Health-related quality of life in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure

The Maugeri Respiratory Failure (MRF-28) and Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaires were recently developed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with chronic respiratory failure, although not exclusively in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the MRF-28 and SRI are reliable and valid HRQoL questionnaires in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF). In total, 72 COPD patients with CHRF underwent pulmonary function and exercise testing, and completed the MRF-28, the SRI, the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Groningen Activity and Restriction Scale and two dyspnoea indexes. Physical domain scores of the questionnaires correlated with exercise tolerance, dyspnoea and daily activities, while psychological domains correlated strongly with anxiety and depression. Anxiety scores accounted for 51 and 56% of the total explained variance in total CRQ and SRI scores, respectively. The emphasis of the MRF-28 was restrictions in activities of daily living (52% of total variance). In conclusion, the present study showed that the Maugeri Respiratory Failure and Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaires were reliable and valid questionnaires in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. While the emphasis in the Maugeri Respiratory Failure questionnaire is on activities of daily living, the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire, like the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, is more related to anxiety and depression.

EFFECTS OF BUDESONIDE AND BAMBUTEROL ON CIRCADIAN VARIATION OF AIRWAY RESPONSIVENESS AND NOCTURNAL SYMPTOMS OF ASTHMA

Effects of the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide and the oral beta-agonist bambuterol on the nocturnal worsening of asthma were studied in patients with allergic asthma with a circadian peak expiratory flow variation greater than or equal to 15% (group 1, n = 8) and less than 15% (group 2, n = 9). Airflow limitation and airway responsiveness to histamine were measured during 24 hours after 4 weeks of treatment with (A) 0.4 mg budesonide at 8 AM and 8 PM, (B) 20 mg bambuterol at 8 PM, and (C) placebo, in a randomized, crossover design. Patients in group 1 had worse nocturnal symptom scores and a greater airway responsiveness than patients in group 2; in addition, patients in group 1 had a larger increase in responsiveness during the night (1.1 versus 0.6 doubling concentrations [DC]). Both budesonide and bambuterol improved responsiveness more at night than during daytime, thus decreasing circadian variation: at 4 AM, increases in PC20 were 2.0 DC after budesonide and 0.8 DC after bambuterol, compared with placebo. Bambuterol reduced circadian variation in FEV1, but in contrast to budesonide, did not improve 24-hour mean levels of FEV1 and PC20. Both drugs beneficially influenced nocturnal symptoms; the effects of budesonide were stronger than those of bambuterol. Our findings demonstrate that budesonide and bambuterol reduce nocturnal airway responsiveness and asthma symptoms and suggest a relationship between the degree of airway responsiveness and the presence of nocturnal symptoms of asthma.

Separate and combined effects of corticosteroids and bronchodilators on airflow obstruction and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma

We have investigated separate and interactive effects of corticosteroids and bronchodilators on airflow obstruction and airway hyperresponsiveness. Twelve allergic subjects with asthma were treated in a double-blind, crossover, randomized study with budesonide, 1.6 mg daily for 3 weeks, prednisone, 40 mg daily, for 8 days, and placebo. After each period, dose-response curves were measured on 4 study days with doubling doses of salbutamol, ipratropium, a combination of salbutamol and ipratropium, and placebo until a plateau in FEV1 was reached. A histamine challenge was then performed, and the provocation concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was calculated. The budesonide and prednisone regimens were equipotent. FEV1 was 81.2% of predicted after budesonide, 81.0% predicted after prednisone, and 67.5% predicted after placebo, bronchodilatation thus being 13.7% predicted (budesonide) and 13.5% predicted (prednisone). PC20 improved with 2.17 doubling concentrations (DCs) after budesonide, and 1.86 DCs after prednisone, compared with that of placebo. Salbutamol caused stronger bronchodilatation than ipratropium (26.2% versus 14.7% predicted) and a better protection against histamine challenge (3.95 versus 1.12 DC). The effects of corticosteroids and bronchodilators on FEV1 and PC20 were, in general, additive. This study emphasizes different modes of action on both airflow obstruction and airway hyperresponsiveness by corticosteroids and bronchodilators, and it demonstrates no enhancement of bronchodilator action by corticosteroids.

Effects of corticosteroids on bronchodilator action in chronic obstructive lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Short term treatment with corticosteroids does not usually reduce airflow limitation and airway responsiveness in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. We investigated whether corticosteroids modulate the effects of inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium bromide. METHODS: Ten non-allergic subjects with stable disease were investigated; eight completed the randomised, double blind, three period cross over study. Treatment regimens consisted of 1.6 mg inhaled budesonide a day for three weeks, 40 mg oral prednisone a day for eight days, and placebo. After each period cumulative doubling doses of salbutamol, ipratropium, a combination of salbutamol and ipratropium, and placebo were administered on separate days until a plateau in FEV1 was reached. A histamine challenge was then performed. RESULTS: At the end of placebo treatment mean FEV1 was 55.5% predicted after inhaled placebo, 67.9% predicted after salbutamol and 64.0% predicted after ipratropium. Compared with the results after the placebo period the FEV1 with salbutamol increased by 0.7% predicted after treatment with budesonide and by 0.7% predicted after treatment with prednisone; the FEV1 with ipratropium increased by 0.7% predicted after budesonide and by 4.8% predicted after prednisone; none of these changes was significant. After placebo treatment the geometric mean PC20 was 0.55 mg/ml after placebo, 1.71 mg/ml after salbutamol and 0.97 mg/ml after ipratropium. Compared with the placebo period the PC20 with salbutamol was increased by 0.86 doubling concentrations after treatment with budesonide, and by 0.67 doubling concentrations after prednisone; the PC20 with ipratropium increased by 0.03 and 0.34 doubling concentrations after budesonide and after prednisone respectively compared with placebo; none of these changes was significant. CONCLUSIONS: In non-allergic subjects with chronic obstructive lung disease short term treatment with high doses of inhaled or oral corticosteroids does not modify the bronchodilator response to salbutamol or ipratropium or the protection provided by either drug against histamine. Salbutamol produces greater protection from histamine induced bronchoconstriction than ipratropium.