Johan Brügemann

Differential effects of high-frequency versus low-frequency exercise training in rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES We sought to study the influence of frequency of exercise training during cardiac rehabilitation on functional capacity (i.e., peak oxygen consumption [VO2] and ventilatory anaerobic threshold [VAT]) and quality of life (QoL). BACKGROUND Although the value of cardiac rehabilitation is now well established, the influence of the different program characteristics on outcome has received little attention, and the effect of frequency of exercise training is unclear. Functional capacity is regularly evaluated by peak VO2 but parameters of submaximal exercise capacity such as VAT should also be considered because submaximal exercise capacity is especially important in daily living. METHODS Patients with coronary artery disease (n = 130, 114 men; mean age 52 +/- 9 years) were randomized to either a high- or low-frequency program of six weeks (10 or 2 exercise sessions per week of 2 h, respectively). Functional capacity and QoL were assessed before and after cardiac rehabilitation. Global costs were also compared. RESULTS Compared with baseline, mean exercise capacity increased in both programs: for high- and low-frequency, respectively: peak VO2 = 15% and 12%, Wmax = 18% and 12%, VAT = 35% and 12% (all p < 0.001). However, when the programs were compared, only VAT increased significantly more during the high-frequency program (p = 0.002). During the high-frequency program, QoL increased slightly more, and more individuals improved in subjective physical functioning (p = 0.014). We observed superiority of the high-frequency program, especially in younger patients. Mean costs were estimated at 4,455 and 2,273 Euro, respectively, for the high- and low-frequency programs. CONCLUSIONS High-frequency exercise training is more effective in terms of VAT and QoL, but peak VO2 improves equally in both programs. Younger patients seem to benefit more from the high-frequency training.

Daily Physical Activity in Stable Heart Failure Patients

Background:Physical activity is the only nonpharmacological therapy that is proven to be effective in heart failure (HF) patients in reducing morbidity. To date, little is known about the levels of daily physical activity in HF patients and about related factors. Objective:The objectives of this study were to (a) describe performance-based daily physical activity in HF patients, (b) compare it with physical activity guidelines, and (c) identify related factors of daily physical activity. Methods:The daily physical activity of 68 HF patients was measured using an accelerometer (SenseWear) for 48 hours. Psychological characteristics (self-efficacy, motivation, and depression) were measured using questionnaires. To have an indication how to interpret daily physical activity levels of the study sample, time spent on moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activities was compared with the 30-minute activity guideline. Steps per day was compared with the criteria for healthy adults, in the absence of HF-specific criteria. Linear regression analyses were used to identify related factors of daily physical activity. Results:Forty-four percent were active for less than 30 min/d, whereas 56% were active for more than 30 min/d. Fifty percent took fewer than 5000 steps per day, 35% took 5000 to 10 000 steps per day, and 15% took more than 10 000 steps per day. Linear regression models showed that New York Heart Association classification and self-efficacy were the most important factors explaining variance in daily physical activity. Conclusions:The variance in daily physical activity in HF patients is considerable. Approximately half of the patients had a sedentary lifestyle. Higher New York Heart Association classification and lower self-efficacy are associated with less daily physical activity. These findings contribute to the understanding of daily physical activity behavior of HF patients and can help healthcare providers to promote daily physical activity in sedentary HF patients.

Lack of prevention of heart failure by serial electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE To investigate the occurrence of heart failure complications, and to identify variables that predict heart failure in patients with (recurrent) persistent atrial fibrillation, treated aggressively with serial electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic drugs to maintain sinus rhythm. DESIGN Non-randomised controlled trial; cohort; case series; mean (SD) follow up duration 3.4 (1.6) years. SETTING Tertiary care centre. SUBJECTS Consecutive sampling of 342 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (defined as > 24 hours duration) considered eligible for electrical cardioversion. INTERVENTIONS Serial electrical cardioversions and serial antiarrhythmic drug treatment, after identification and treatment of underlying cardiovascular disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES heart failure complications: development or progression of heart failure requiring the institution or addition of drug treatment, hospital admission, or death from heart failure. RESULTS Development or progression of heart failure occurred in 38 patients (11%), and 22 patients (6%) died from heart failure. These complications were related to the presence of coronary artery disease (p < 0.001, risk ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6 to 6.5), rheumatic heart disease (p < 0.001, risk ratio 5.0, 95% CI 2.4 to 10.2), cardiomyopathy (p < 0.001, risk ratio 5.0, 95% CI 2.0 to 12.4), atrial fibrillation for < 3 months (p = 0.04, risk ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.7), and poor exercise tolerance (New York Heart Association class III at inclusion, p < 0.001, risk ratio 3.5, 95% CI 1.9 to 6.7). No heart failure complications were observed in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS Aggressive serial electrical cardioversion does not prevent heart failure complications in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. These complications are predominantly observed in patients with more severe underlying cardiovascular disease. Randomised comparison with rate control treatment is needed to define the optimal treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation in relation to heart failure.

Importance of heart rate during exercise for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy for patients with severe heart failure and mechanical dyssynchrony. Response is only achieved in 60–70% of patients.

Long-term outcome of electrical cardioversion in patients with chronic atrial flutter

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term outcome of serial electrical cardioversion therapy in patients with chronic atrial flutter. DESIGN: Prospective study, case series. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 50 consecutive patients with chronic (> 24 hours) atrial flutter without a previous relapse on antiarrhythmic drugs. INTERVENTIONS: Elective electrical cardioversion therapy, if necessary repeated, to obtain and keep patients in sinus rhythm. If the first cardioversion resulted in sinus rhythm, patients were not given antiarrhythmic drugs. Relapses were managed by repeated cardioversions then anti-arrhythmic drugs were used serially in a set sequence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Maintenance of sinus rhythm. RESULTS: Mean (SD) follow up was 3.5 (1.7) years. The first cardioversion was successful in 48 patients (96%). After a single shock and without antiarrhythmic drugs being used, 42% of the patients maintained sinus rhythm in the long-term. Only left atrial size was inversely related to the efficacy of one shock (P = 0.025). With serial cardioversion 90% of the patients were kept in sinus rhythm for 5 years. Univariate analysis showed that a long duration of arrhythmia and impaired cardiac function were both related to poor outcome. During follow up 3 patients died of progression of heart failure and another 5 died suddenly. None of these 5 patients was on antiarrhythmic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical cardioversion was an effective and safe method of converting chronic atrial flutter to sinus rhythm. To maintain sinus rhythm, more than half of the patients required multiple shocks and prophylactic antiarrhythmic drugs. Sudden death was relatively frequent in the study population; the limited data available from this study suggest that such deaths were caused by the underlying disease and not drug related proarrhythmia.

Routine versus aggressive upstream rhythm control for prevention of early atrial fibrillation in heart failure: background, aims and design of the RACE 3 study.

BackgroundRhythm control for atrial fibrillation (AF) is cumbersome because of its progressive nature caused by structural remodelling. Upstream therapy refers to therapeutic interventions aiming to modify the atrial substrate, leading to prevention of AF.ObjectiveThe Routine versus Aggressive upstream rhythm Control for prevention of Early AF in heart failure (RACE 3) study hypothesises that aggressive upstream rhythm control increases persistence of sinus rhythm compared with conventional rhythm control in patients with early AF and mild-to-moderate early systolic or diastolic heart failure undergoing electrical cardioversion.DesignRACE 3 is a prospective, randomised, open, multinational, multicenter trial. Upstream rhythm control consists of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, statins, cardiac rehabilitation therapy, and intensive counselling on dietary restrictions, exercise maintenance, and drug adherence. Conventional rhythm control consists of routine rhythm control therapy without cardiac rehabilitation therapy and intensive counselling. In both arms, every effort is made to keep patients in the rhythm control strategy, and ion channel antiarrhythmic drugs or pulmonary vein ablation may be instituted if AF relapses. Total inclusion will be 250 patients. If upstream therapy proves to be effective in improving maintenance of sinus rhythm, it could become a new approach to rhythm control supporting conventional pharmacological and non-pharmacological rhythm control.

Efficacy of serial electrical cardioversion therapy in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after valve replacement and implications for surgery to cure atrial fibrillation

Chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs often in the setting of mitral and aortic valve disease. Eventually, these patients undergo valve replacement which improves cardiac function but does not prevent AF. This study investigates which patient may benefit from additional surgery for the cure of AF performed in combination with valve surgery. Seventy-four patients were retrospectively included from our prospective database of patients referred for serial cardioversion therapy between 1986 and 1993. All these patients had chronic AF after valve replacement. After the first electrical cardioversion, patients did not receive antiarrhythmic drugs. Relapses were managed by repeated cardioversions, and then antiarrhythmic drugs were instituted. After a median follow-up of 7 years (range 1.3 to 23), 39 patients had intractable AF. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with a history of chronic AF before surgery (risk ratio 5.4, confidence intervals 2.5 to 11.3, p = 0.0001) had a poor arrhythmia outcome. In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a lower success rate (p = 0.0017) in patients with mitral valve disease than in those with aortic valve disease. Congestive heart failure (41% vs 6%, p = 0.0007) and cardiovascular mortality (23% vs 9%, p = 0.09) were seen most often in patients with an unsuccessful cardioversion strategy. Thus, patients scheduled for mitral valve surgery with a history of chronic AF should be considered candidates for additional surgery for AF concomitantly performed during valve surgery.

The clinical course of hepatitis E virus infection in patients of a tertiary Dutch hospital over a 5-year period

BACKGROUND Hepatitis E virus (HEV) has long been known as a major cause of acute hepatitis in developing countries with occasional travel-related cases in developed countries, most of them belonging to genotype 1. Currently, genotype 3 HEV is recognized as an emerging public health issue in developed countries and can cause a chronic hepatitis in immunocompromised patients. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to get an overview of the clinical course of HEV infection, from July 2007 to December 2012, and further characterize HEV in patients of the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) over a 5-year time period. METHODS Since the second half of 2007, patients in the UMCG with unexplained hepatitis were screened for HEV and clinical data were collected. HEV was characterized by sequencing of the ORF1 and ORF2 regions. RESULTS In total, 34 patients of the 1129 tested patients showed HEV viremia. The majority of the infected patients were immunocompromised; 18 were solid organ transplant (SOT) patients and 9 were patients immunocompromised for other reasons. Seven patients diagnosed with HEV were immunocompetent. Viral genotyping revealed genotype 3 isolates, mostly genotype 3c. CONCLUSION Non-travel related HEV hepatitis is an important diagnosis. In immunocompromised patients HEV infection often has major clinical impact, necessitating medical intervention including antiviral treatment. In immunocompetent patients, the detection could expand our understanding about the route of transmission and the relation with the zoonotic origin. Therefore, besides an increasing awareness for HEV among clinicians and medical microbiologists, diagnostics should be routinely incorporated into standard patients care.

Current Treatment Recommendations in Antiarrhythmic Therapy

SummaryOver the past decade, various studies have demonstrated that class I antiarrhythmic drugs should be avoided in patients with heart failure, cardiac ischaemia or a previous myocardial infarction. In contrast, class II drugs (β-blockers) reduce morbidity and may even lower mortality in patients suffering from moderate to severe heart failure. In these patients, careful titration of the drug dosage, frequently during hospital admission, may be necessary.If in the setting of heart failure ventricular arrhythmias are symptomatic and/or sustained, patients can be treated effectively, after appropriate treatment of the underlying disease, with the class III drug amiodarone. Unfortunately, this drug does not lower overall mortality, implying that prophylactic institution of amiodarone is not indicated. Pure class III antiarrhythmic drugs like d-sotalol, ibutilide and dofetilide show a high rate of torsade de pointes. Currently, only ibutilide has been approved for clinically monitored intravenous administration. Class IV drugs, the calcium channel blockers, are still very useful for rate control of atrial fibrillation and conversion or prevention of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias and circus movement tachycardias using a (concealed) bypass tract.Finally, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator seems to improve overall survival in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. This may imply that an increasing number of patients will be candidates for such a device. However, it will be necessary to await publication of data involving these devices from current ongoing studies.

Reocclusion three months after successful thrombolytic treatment of acute myocardial infarction with anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activating complex

Thirty consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were treated with anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activating complex (APSAC) within 4 hours after onset of symptoms. After 1.5 and 48 hours, patency of the infarct-related vessel and the quantitative degree of residual diameter stenosis were studied by selective coronary angiography. Ventriculograms were made to determine the global left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients showing patency at 48 hours were reevaluated angiographically after 3 months. At 1.5 and 48 hours after APSAC administration patent vessels were demonstrated in 65 and 69% of patients, respectively. Mean residual stenosis decreased significantly from 56 +/- 11% at 1.5 hours to 46 +/- 13% at 48 hours (p less than 0.01). Patients not responding to thrombolytic therapy showed significant deterioration of the left ventricular function during the first 48 hours after AMI. Side effects were minor and mainly associated with invasive procedures. Despite adequate oral anticoagulation, angiographically documented reocclusion at 3 months amounted to 28%. Reocclusion, however, was neither associated with clinically documented reinfarction, nor with a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction. Our study shows that APSAC is an effective thrombolytic agent in AMI but that late reocclusion may occur. Oral anticoagulants appear to be less effective in the prevention of reocclusion in the treatment regimen after thrombolysis.