Johan Christiaens

Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture?

Abstract This study develops a content analysis framework that provides information on the comprehensiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting, an important aspect of social and environmental accountability. Comprehensive reporting, as defined here, requires three types of information for each disclosed CSR item: (i) vision and goals, (ii) management approach, and (iii) performance indicators. The feasibility of the framework to assess the comprehensiveness of CSR reporting is demonstrated using the 2005 annual reports of a sample of publicly traded Belgian companies. The content analysis reveals a low level of comprehensive reporting. This finding complements those of prior studies on the completeness of CSR reporting and, therefore, feeds the debate regarding the extent to which CSR reporting can be considered a mechanism for discharging social and environmental accountability.

Financial Accounting Reform in Flemish Municipalities: An Empirical Investigation

This paper examines the cross-sectional differences in the level of adoption and implementation of the financial accounting reform in Flemish municipalities. For the first time ever in Belgian governments a cash-based budgetary accounting system is obligatorily being supplemented by an accrual accounting system. This study is based on an empirical analysis of municipal accounting practices and annual accounts 1995 in Flanders. The findings indicate that municipalities are coping with a lot of problems regarding transferability of business accounting and the study reveals significant factors explaining the level of compliance with the reformed accounting regulations.

Can Resource Dependence and Coercive Isomorphism Explain Nonprofit Organizations' Compliance With Reporting Standards?

Nonprofit organizations worldwide are confronted with an increasing demand for accountability and improved financial transparency. Financial reporting by nonprofit organizations is no longer an exception; it has become a rule.The usefulness of a financial report to an organization’s stakeholders depends on its quality. The latter is safeguarded by reporting standards as well as the commitment of the organization to fully implement these standards. Although resource dependence and coercive isomorphism have been used in earlier nonprofit organization research, no empirical research has linked these theories to compliance with financial reporting standards. Using a unique setting in which a large number of (very) large Belgian nonprofit organizations are confronted with far-reaching changes in financial reporting regulations, the effect of resource dependence and coercive isomorphism on accounting and financial reporting compliance is documented.

Accrual Accounting Reforms: Only for Businesslike (Parts of) Governments

Based on governmental accounting experiences and on the rising criticism of accrual accounting, this paper proposes that accrual accounting in governments will only succeed in businesslike (parts of) governments in the coming years. This proposition leans on the inappropriate transfer of the accrual accounting framework from the profit sector, the underestimation of difficulties considering accrual budgeting and the lack of attention to the political dimension. This paper points out that the advocates of accrual accounting have neglected some important considerations.

Financial Accounting Reform in Flemish Universities: An Empirical Study of the Implementation

This paper presents an overview of the current accounting reform towards accrual accounting in Flemish universities. The focus is on the concept of the reformed accounting legislation and on the empirical outcomes of implementation based on an examination of annual accounts. An important issue is the unsuccessful mixing up of the traditional budgetary accounting system with the new financial accounting system. The empirical examination reveals a lot of accounting problems in the area of the reformed regulations as well as in the accounting practices and that the comparability of the annual reporting is not guaranteed even after years of experience.

GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING REFORM: EVOLUTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION IN FLEMISH MUNICIPALITIES

Some studies measured the success of adopting governmental accounting reforms revealing conceptual and practical problems. However, these empirical studies only consider the starting point assuming that implementation difficulties are just transition problems that will disappear automatically in time. This study concentrates on how implementing a governmental reform evolves after a number of years. Looking at 1995, 1997 and 1999, it reveals that the level of compliance in Flemish municipalities increased only slightly in 1997 and remained unchanged in 1999. It evidences that there is no self-regulating effect of implementing governmental reforms, even after a period of almost 5 years of experience.

Converging New Public Management Reforms and Diverging Accounting Practices in Flemish Local Governments

This paper aims at presenting a comparative study of the diverging development of accounting reforms in Flemish local governments in terms of accounting from a technical point of view. On the one hand, the objectives and the framework of current governmental accounting reforms aiming at improving New Public Management are currently converging. On the other hand, a conceptual examination reveals that the prescribed accounting practices are widely diverging and apparently this is also the case for the practical implementation of the reformed accounting systems. By way of conclusion, a number of possible reasons for this unsuccessful proliferation are presented.

Capital assets in governmental accounting reforms: comparing Flemish technical issues with international standards

Although some efforts have been made over the last twenty years, governmental capital assets are still the subject of many unresolved questions. This paper first presents an overview of the current differing accounting standards or research efforts with respect to governmental capital assets and then analyses the criteria of recognition, valuation and disclosure of capital assets in the reform of three kinds of Flemish governments. Their reformed accounting system is compared with IPSAS 17 (IFAC), which is an important internationally driven milestone in respect of capital assets. There appears to be a lack of a conceptual framework regarding capital assets and an attempt is made to structure the existing ideas. Another important issue in governmental accounting is drawing up the ‘first balance sheet’, which is necessary when accounting reforms are implemented. This study indicates that the fact that no separate accounting framework for capital assets with respect to the first balance sheet is distinguished, causes a lot of confusion in the discussion about accounting standards. Finally, the paper aims to provide actual cases as illustrations in analysing governmental accounting standards for capital assets. The examination of the adoption of the governmental accounting reforms, reveals that such reforms do not usually take the specific governmental characteristics of capital assets into account.

The effect of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial reporting: an international comparison

Over the past 25 years, significant New Public Management (NPM) reforms, particularly towards accrual accounting, have characterized the public sector in many countries. The diversity in public financial information systems created a need for harmonization, resulting in the elaboration of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). Despite their relevance, little is known on the adoption process of IPSAS. This study aims to examine to what extent IPSAS(-like) accrual accounting is adopted in central/local governments worldwide as well as to investigate which factors affect the differing level of their adoption. Methodologically, a specific questionnaire constructed to obtain relevant information from local experts was sent worldwide to a sample of countries. The study reveals an important move to accrual accounting, particularly to IPSAS accrual accounting, for which there still remains a level of reluctance mainly in central governments, especially in countries where businesslike accrual accounting has been developed. Points for practitioners IPSAS have become the international reference for the development of public sector accounting systems worldwide. For this reason, IPSAS deserve the attention of accounting policy-makers, practitioners and scholars. The current study offers a comparative study of the level of adopting IPSAS worldwide as well as an explanation of the reasons behind the differing levels of adoption. The present study reveals that the transition towards IPSAS necessitates a long period of implementation whereby existing local business accounting regulations hinder jurisdictions from implementing international standards. The explanatory findings provide input for reformers and legislators when designing and developing financial information reforms.

Theme: Whole of government accounting— international trends

Whole of government accounting (WGA) is an integral part of the accruals accounting and financial reporting changes accompanying public sector reforms internationally. The adoption of accruals accounting is generally rationalized for micro-economic purposes, such as economic efficiency. At this micro-economic level, WGA reflects the governance changes in the public sector involving the provision of public services through decentralized entities (public, private or public and private), and the increasing role of co-ordination and control performed by governments (Osborne and Gaebler, 1992; Christensen and Laegraid, 2007). According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, 2004, p. 4), these decentralized governance structures ‘created new challenges for governments to maintain central direction and control’. Consequently, WGA developments help governments to retain a whole of government approach towards the fulfilment of public interest, as well as to be accountable for the ‘whole basket’ of services provided (Grossi and Mussari, 2008). Macro-economic rationales support the use by governments of fiscal rules, such as commitments to balanced budgets and specified debt levels. With the introduction of such rules, rationales for WGA have been extended to include macro-economic purposes as well, and the reporting boundaries have been extended. HM Treasury in the UK has gone furthest with this, seeking to encompass the whole of the public sector, including all levels of government within one WGA. The idea of WGA is ambiguous, because it may refer to a government (central, regional or local) producing a single financial report that encompasses all government activity within its area of authority. Alternatively, it may refer to a central government’s efforts to produce a single financial report that encompasses public sector activities throughout the country. This would mean including the WGAs of all governments at lower levels, as well as the central government’s activities in its own right. Clearly WGA is a complex development that carries with it multiple tensions, both in relation to the stated aims, and in relation to the accounting rules adopted. In attempting to fulfil micro-level objectives, efforts to converge governmental accounting practices with business-style accounting—such as the International Federation of Accountants’ efforts to converge International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) with the International Accounting Standards Board’s International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)—may be difficult, but they become even more complicated with efforts to fulfil macrolevel objectives at the same time by aligning the accounting requirements with macro-level statistical accounting requirements (see, for example, IPSAS 22). This themed edition of Public Money & Management contains articles based on papers initially presented last year at an international workshop in Italy on ‘Whole of government financial reporting: international trends’. The workshop, organized jointly by the University of Siena and the University of Sydney, was held at Santa Chiara College in Siena from 31 August to 2 September 2008 with the aim of creating an atmosphere in which scholars and practitioners could analyse and debate the similarities and differences among diverse WGA approaches adopted internationally. Attending the workshop were approximately 50 scholars and experts from 16 countries (Australia, Belgium, China, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the USA), as well as representatives from extra-national organizations (the European Commission and the United Nations). The workshop commenced with guest speakers. The first, Professor Klaus Lüder of Speyer University, noted that, although the fragmentation of governmental structures as part of the public sector reforms had increased the perceived need for WGA, reform proponents, especially those from the AngloAmerican countries, had sought WGA from the beginning. Lüder observed a lack of clarity surrounding what is meant by WGA and a gradual extension of the concept of ‘whole of government’ for financial reporting purposes. While WGA may begin at the level he labelled Theme: Whole of government accounting— international trends