Johan Lindmark
Mälardalen University College
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Johan Lindmark.
Waste Management | 2014
Johan Lindmark; Per Eriksson; Eva Thorin
Mixing inside an anaerobic digester is often continuous and is not actively controlled. The selected mixing regime can however affect both gas production and the energy efficiency of the biogas plant. This study aims to evaluate these effects and compare three different mixing regimes, 150 RPM and 25 RPM continuous mixing and minimally intermittent mixing for both digestion of fresh substrate and post-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. The results show that a lower mixing intensity leads to a higher biogas production rate and higher total biogas production in both cases. 25 RPM continuous mixing and minimally intermittent mixing resulted in similar biogas production after process stabilization, while 150 RPM continuous mixing resulted in lower production throughout the experiment. The lower gas production at 150 RPM could not be explained by the inhibition of volatile fatty acids. Cumulative biogas production until day 31 was 295 ± 2.9, 317 ± 1.9 and 304 ± 2.8N ml/g VS added during digestion of fresh feed and 113 ± 1.3, 134 ± 1.1 and 130 ± 2.3N ml/g VS added during post digestion for the 150 RPM, 25 RPM and minimally mixed intensities respectively. As well as increasing gas production, optimal mixing can improve the energy efficiency of the anaerobic digestion process.
Environmental Technology | 2017
Sebastian Schwede; Eva Thorin; Johan Lindmark; Patrik Klintenberg; Ari Jääskeläinen; Anssi Suhonen; Reino Laatikainen; Elias Hakalehto
ABSTRACT A novel biorefinery concept was piloted using protein-rich slaughterhouse waste, chicken manure and straw as feedstocks. The basic idea was to provide a proof of concept for the production of platform chemicals and biofuels from organic waste materials at non-septic conditions. The desired biochemical routes were 2,3-butanediol and acetone–butanol fermentation. The results showed that hydrolysis resulted only in low amounts of easily degradable carbohydrates. However, amino acids released from the protein-rich slaughterhouse waste were utilized and fermented by the bacteria in the process. Product formation was directed towards acidogenic compounds rather than solventogenic products due to increasing pH-value affected by ammonia release during amino acid fermentation. Hence, the process was not effective for 2,3-butanediol production, whereas butyrate, propionate, γ-aminobutyrate and valerate were predominantly produced. This offered fast means for converting tedious protein-rich waste mixtures into utilizable chemical goods. Furthermore, the residual liquid from the bioreactor showed significantly higher biogas production potential than the corresponding substrates. The combination of the biorefinery approach to produce chemicals and biofuels with anaerobic digestion of the residues to recover energy in form of methane and nutrients that can be utilized for animal feed production could be a feasible concept for organic waste utilization.
Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews | 2014
Johan Lindmark; Eva Thorin; Rebei Bel Fdhila; Erik Dahlquist
Applied Energy | 2012
Eva Thorin; Johan Lindmark; Eva Nordlander; Monica Odlare; Erik Dahlquist; Niklas Leksell; Carl-Magnus Pettersson
Applied Energy | 2012
Johan Lindmark; Niklas Leksell; Anna Schnürer; Eva Thorin
Biomass & Bioenergy | 2012
Monica Odlare; J. Abubaker; Johan Lindmark; Mikael Pell; Eva Thorin; Emma Nehrenheim
Energy technology | 2013
Hailong Li; Johan Lindmark; Eva Nordlander; Eva Thorin; Erik Dahlquist; Li Zhao
Desalination | 2011
Johan Lindmark; Eva Thorin; Carl-Magnus Pettersson
Energy Procedia | 2015
Monica Odlare; Johan Lindmark; Anders Ericsson; Mikael Pell
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology | 2014
Johan Lindmark; Anders Lagerkvist; Erik Nilsson; My Carlsson; Eva Thorin; Erik Dahlquist