Johan Ræder

NON - OPIOID POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA

Although significant improvement has been made in the treatment of pain in the postoperative period, many patients still experience unnecessary discomfort resulting in distress, higher morbidity and prolonged stay in hospital. The standard pillar of postoperative treatment of severe pain is the use of opioids. However, adverse reactions to opioids make their use unfavourable. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of pain has helped clinicians to a more balanced approach to postoperative pain treatment. The development of the multimodal approach to postoperative analgesia, with the use of different drugs acting via different routes to give good analgesia, with minimal side-effects, represents a major development in the treatment of postoperative pain. Early, aggressive mobilisation and feeding must follow in order to restore normal conditions quickly. Alternatives to opioids should be used as extensively as possible. Local anaesthesia, used as regional blocks or as wound infiltration, is most beneficial. Paracetamol has good basic analgesic properties, and should probably be used in dosages higher than recommended today. The combination with a NSAID results in better and longer-lasting analgesia. The intravenous form propacetamol will increase the possibilities of its use. The new concept of selective COX-2 inhibiting NSAIDs will result in analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs with fewer side-effects. The well-known inexpensive group of corticosteroids have good analgesic and anti-emetic properties, and are especially interesting to use in patients who do not tolerate NSAIDs. The alpha2-receptor agonists like clonidine, when administered epidurally or intrathecally, are useful adjuncts, but their adverse effects on sedation and hypotension limit their use. NMDA-receptor antagonists are of limited value in the postoperative period. Adenosine and neostigimine are still on a research level but may lead to new, clinically useful analgesic drugs. In the future, cannabinoids, cholecystokinin-receptor antagonists and neurokinin-1 antagonists may become important analgesic drugs.

Skin conductance correlates with perioperative stress

Background: Skin conductance (SC) as a measure of emotional state or arousal may be a tool for monitoring surgical stress in anaesthesia. When an outgoing sympathetic nervous burst occurs to the skin, the palmar and plantar sweat glands are filled up, and the SC increases before the sweat is removed and the SC decreases. This creates a SC fluctuation. The purpose of this study was to measure SC during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with propofol and remifentanil anesthaesia and to evaluate whether number and amplitude of SC fluctuations correlate with perioperative stress monitoring.

Betamethasone Reduces Postoperative Pain and Nausea After Ambulatory Surgery

The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of a single-dose glucocorticoid on the incidence and severity of pain and nausea and vomiting (PONV) after ambulatory surgery. Seventy-eight ASA physical status I-III patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy or hallux valgus correction were studied using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol. One group received 12 mg of betamethasone IM 30 min before the start of surgery (Group B), whereas the placebo group (Group P) received saline. General anesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl and maintained with isoflurane in both groups. Pain (measured using a visual analog scale, verbal score, and analgesic requirements), PONV, and other side effects were evaluated postoperatively. Patients in Group B experienced significantly less postoperative pain, less PONV, and better patient satisfaction during the first 24 h after surgery. In conclusion, a single dose of betamethasone (12 mg) seemed to produce analgesic and antiemetic effects after day-case surgery. Implications: In a placebo-controlled study, the use of corticosteroid prophylaxis (betamethasone) produced a significant reduction in both postoperative pain and nausea in outpatients who received the corticosteroid injection before ambulatory foot or hemorrhoid operations. (Anesth Analg 1998;87:319-23)

Desflurane versus propofol maintenance for outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background: The aims of the study were to evaluate costs and clinical characteristics of desflurane‐based anaesthetic maintenance versus propofol for outpatient cholecystectomy.

Does Ketamine Have Preemptive Effects in Women Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy Procedures

Ketamine may produce “preemptive” analgesia when administered before surgically induced trauma. Therefore, we hypothesized that pre- versus postincisional administration of ketamine would improve pain control after abdominal hysterectomy procedures. Eighty-nine patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups according to a placebo-controlled, double-blinded protocol: Group 1 (placebo) received saline 0.04 mL/kg IV immediately before and after surgery; Group 2 (preincision), received ketamine 0.4 mg/kg IV before skin incision and saline at the end of the operation; and Group 3 (postincision), received saline before skin incision, and ketamine 0.4 mg/kg IV was given after skin closure. The general anesthetic technique was standardized in all three treatment groups. During the first postoperative hour, Group 3 experienced significantly less pain than Groups 1 and 2, as assessed by using both visual analog and verbal rating scales. There were no significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 with respect to pain scores, postoperative opioid analgesic requirements, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. We conclude that a single dose of ketamine 0.4 mg/kg IV fails to produce preemptive analgesic effects. Implications Even though ketamine 0.4 mg/kg IV has short-lasting acute analgesic effects, it failed to produce a preemptive effect when given before abdominal hysterectomy procedures.

The effect of dexamethasone on side effects after coronary revascularization procedures.

Corticosteroids decrease side effects after noncardiac elective surgery. We designed this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to test the hypothesis that standard doses of dexamethasone (4 mg ×2) would reduce postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain, decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), and improve appetite after cardiac surgery, thereby facilitating the recovery process. A total of 300 patients undergoing coronary revascularization surgery were enrolled in this clinical study. The anesthetic management was standardized in all patients. Dexamethasone (4 mg/mL) or saline (1 mL) was administered after the induction of anesthesia and a second dose of the same study drug was given on the morning after surgery. The incidence of AF was determined by analyzing the first 72 h of continuously recorded electrocardiogram records after cardiac surgery. The patients were assessed at 24- and 48-h intervals after surgery, as well as at the time of hospital discharge, to determine the incidence and severity of postoperative side effects (e.g., nausea, vomiting, pain) and patient satisfaction scores. Dexamethasone significantly reduced the need for antiemetic rescue medication on the first postoperative day (30% versus 42%), and the incidences of nausea (15% versus 26%) and vomiting (5% versus 16%) on the second postoperative day (P < 0.05). In addition, dexamethasone significantly reduced the percentage of patients with a depressed appetite on the second postoperative day. However, the corticosteroid failed to decrease the incidence of AF (27% versus 32%) or the total dosage of opioid analgesic medication administered in the postoperative period. We conclude that dexamethasone (8 mg in divided doses) was beneficial in reducing emetic symptoms and improving appetite after cardiac surgery. However, this dose of the corticosteroid does not seem to have antiarrhythmic or analgesic-sparing properties. IMPLICATIONS: Dexamethasone (8 mg IV) was beneficial in reducing emetic symptoms and increasing appetite after cardiac surgery. However, this dose of the corticosteroid failed to decrease postoperative pain or the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation.

High-volume local infiltration analgesia combined with intravenous or local ketorolac+morphine compared with epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND Recently, high-volume local infiltration analgesia (LIA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been introduced, but dosage, timing, and effects of adjuvants are still debated. METHODS We randomized 102 patients undergoing TKA to receive either epidural analgesia (EDA group) or LIA (ropivacaine 150 mg and epinephrine 0.5 mg) combined with ketorolac 30 mg and morphine 5 mg given either locally (LIA group) or i.v. (LIAiv group). Epidural analgesia was maintained for 48 h. Intra-articular re-injection via a catheter with ropivacaine 142.5 mg and either intra-articular or i.v. ketorolac 30 mg was given 24 h after surgery. Pain scores, morphine consumption, side-effects, and readiness for hospital discharge were studied. RESULTS At discharge from the postoperative anaesthetic care unit, verbal pain scores were lower in the EDA group (P=0.004), but discharge was delayed [difference 101 min, 95% CI: (23, 178), P=0.007]. Group LIA reported lower pain scores at rest beyond 24 h after surgery [mean VAS (sd) at 24/48/72 h: LIA group 16/12/10 (14)/(13)/(11); LIAiv group 22/18/15 (17)/(15)/(12); EDA group 27/30/21 (21)/(29)/(19)]. Both the LIA and the LIAiv groups were mobilized faster and were earlier ready for hospital discharge [3.5 days (LIA group) vs 4 days (LIAiv group) vs 5.5 days (EDA group); P<0.001]. Cumulated morphine consumption (72 h) was lowest for the LIA group [80 vs 101 mg (EDA group) vs 118 mg (LIAiv group), P=0.007]. CONCLUSIONS LIA with local adjuvants compared with epidural analgesia results in reduced opioid consumption, faster mobilization, and earlier readiness for hospital discharge. Ketorolac and morphine are more efficient when given locally than systemically. The study has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00562627) before onset of participant enrolment: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00562627?term=spreng&rank=2 (April 21, 2010).

Fast-track surgery for bariatric laparoscopic gastric bypass with focus on anaesthesia and peri-operative care. Experience with 500 cases

Background: Bariatric surgery for morbid obesity implies challenges in anaesthesiological handling. We report our experience from 500 consecutive patients during 3 years.

The effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on cognitive function in patients with hip fracture: randomized controlled trial (Oslo Orthogeriatric Trial).

BackgroundDelirium is a common complication in patients with hip fractures and is associated with an increased risk of subsequent dementia. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on the prevention of delirium and longer-term cognitive decline.MethodsThis was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial in which patients with hip fracture were randomized to treatment in an acute geriatric ward or standard orthopedic ward. Inclusion and randomization took place in the Emergency Department at Oslo University hospital. The key intervention in the acute geriatric ward was Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment including daily interdisciplinary meetings. Primary outcome was cognitive function four months after surgery measured using a composite outcome incorporating the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) and the 10 words learning and recalls tasks from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease battery (CERAD). Secondary outcomes were pre- and postoperative delirium, delirium severity and duration, mortality and mobility (measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)). Patients were assessed four and twelve months after surgery by evaluators blind to allocation.ResultsA total of 329 patients were included. There was no significant difference in cognitive function four months after surgery between patients treated in the acute geriatric and the orthopedic wards (mean 54.7 versus 52.9, 95% confidence interval for the difference -5.9 to 9.5; P = 0.65). There was also no significant difference in delirium rates (49% versus 53%, P = 0.51) or four month mortality (17% versus 15%, P = 0.50) between the intervention and the control group. In a pre-planned sub-group analysis, participants living in their own home at baseline who were randomized to orthogeriatric care had better mobility four months after surgery compared with patients randomized to the orthopedic ward, measured with SPPB (median 6 versus 4, 95% confidence interval for the median difference 0 to 2; P = 0.04).ConclusionsPre- and postoperative orthogeriatric care given in an acute geriatric ward was not effective in reducing delirium or long-term cognitive impairment in patients with hip fracture. The intervention had, however, a positive effect on mobility in patients not admitted from nursing homes.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01009268 Registered November 5, 2009

Perioperative care for the older outpatient undergoing ambulatory surgery.

As the number of ambulatory surgery procedures continues to grow in an aging global society, the implementation of evidence-based perioperative care programs for the elderly will assume increased importance. Given the recent advances in anesthesia, surgery, and monitoring technology, the ambulatory setting offers potential advantages for elderly patients undergoing elective surgery. In this review article we summarize the physiologic and pharmacologic effects of aging and their influence on anesthetic drugs, the important considerations in the preoperative evaluation of elderly outpatients with coexisting diseases, the advantages and disadvantages of different anesthetic techniques on a procedural-specific basis, and offer recommendations regarding the management of common postoperative side effects (including delirium and cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, dizziness, pain, and gastrointestinal dysfunction) after ambulatory surgery. We conclude with a discussion of future challenges related to the growth of ambulatory surgery practice in this segment of our surgical population. When information specifically for the elderly population was not available in the peer-reviewed literature, we drew from relevant information in other ambulatory surgery populations.