Johan Vanhoof

Quadriceps and Grip Strength Are Related to Vitamin D Receptor Genotype in Elderly Nonobese Women

Osteoporotic fragility fractures are related to bone density and injury, which are both related to muscle strength. The influence of genetic factors, such as the vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphism on bone mineral density (BMD), is documented but still controversial, and is not known for muscle strength. In the present study, we investigated the association between the VDR BsmI polymorphism and BMD (femoral neck [FN], lumbar spine [LS], and proximal forearm [FA]) and muscle strength (quadriceps and grip strength) in 501 healthy women older than 70 years. No association was found between the VDR genotypes and BMD in elderly women. However, in nonobese women (body mass index <30 kg/cm2), the BMD in the FN was 5% higher in women with the bb BsmI genotype than in women with the BB genotype (p < 0.05). After correction for muscle strength, no association was found. A significant association between the VDR genotypes and quadriceps and grip strength was observed. In nonobese women, a 23% difference in quadriceps strength (p < 0.01) and 7% in grip strength (NS) was observed between the bb and BB genotype of the VDR. After correction for confounding factors and BMD, this association was significant for quadriceps and grip strength. These results indicate a major association of an allelic variant at the VDR locus with muscle strength in elderly nonobese women, which could explain a small association between VDR polymorphism with BMD in the femoral neck in nonobese women. No such associations were found in obese women, suggesting that factors related to obesity obscure such an association.

Methotrexate in combination with other DMARDs is not superior to methotrexate alone for remission induction with moderate-to-high-dose glucocorticoid bridging in early rheumatoid arthritis after 16 weeks of treatment: the CareRA trial

Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of intensive combination strategies with glucocorticoids (GCs) in the first 16 weeks (W) of early rheumatoid arthritis (eRA) treatment, focusing on high-risk patients, in the Care in early RA trial. Methods 400 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD)-naive patients with eRA were recruited and stratified into high risk or low risk according to classical prognostic markers. High-risk patients (n=290) were randomised to 1/3 treatment strategies: combination therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis (COBRA) Classic (methotrexate (MTX)+ sulfasalazine+60 mg prednisone tapered to 7.5 mg daily from W7), COBRA Slim (MTX+30 mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg from W6) and COBRA Avant-Garde (MTX+leflunomide+30 mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg from W6). Treatment modifications to target low-disease activity were mandatory from W8, if desirable and feasible according to the rheumatologist. The primary outcome was remission (28 joint disease activity score calculated with C-reactive protein <2.6) at W16 (intention-to-treat analysis). Secondary endpoints were good European League Against Rheumatism response, clinically meaningful health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) response and HAQ equal to zero. Adverse events (AEs) were registered. Results Data from 98 Classic, 98 Slim and 94 Avant-Garde patients were analysed. At W16, remission was reached in 70.4% Classic, 73.6% Slim and 68.1% Avant-Garde patients (p=0.713). Likewise, no significant differences were shown in other secondary endpoints. However, therapy-related AEs were reported in 61.2% of Classic, in 46.9% of Slim and in 69.1% of Avant-Garde patients (p=0.006). Conclusions For high-risk eRA, MTX associated with a moderate step-down dose of GCs was as effective in inducing remission at W16 as DMARD combination therapies with moderate or high step-down GC doses and it showed a more favourable short-term safety profile. EudraCT number: 2008-007225-39.

Cyclical etidronate increases bone density in the spine and hip of postmenopausal women receiving long term corticosteroid treatment. A double blind, randomised placebo controlled study

OBJECTIVE To study the effect of cyclic etidronate in secondary prevention of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. METHODS A double blind, randomised placebo controlled study comparing cyclic etidronate and placebo during two years in 37 postmenopausal women receiving long term corticosteroid treatment, mainly for polymyalgia rheumatica (40% of the patients) and rheumatoid arthritis (30%). Bone density was measured in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter. RESULTS After two years of treatment there was a significant difference between the groups in mean per cent change from baseline in bone density in the spine in favour of etidronate (p=0.003). The estimated treatment difference (mean (SD)) was 9.3 (2.1)%. Etidronate increased bone density in the spine (4.9 (2.1)%, p<0.05) whereas the placebo group lost bone (−2.4 (1.6)%). At the femoral neck there was an estimated difference of 5.3 (2.6)% between the groups (etidronate: 3.6 (1.4)%, p<0.05, placebo: −2.4 (2.1)%). The estimated difference at the trochanter was 8.2 (3.0) (etidronate: 9.0 (1.5)%, p<0.0001, placebo: 0.5 (2.3)%). No significant bone loss occurred in the hip in placebo treated patients. CONCLUSIONS Cyclic etidronate is an effective treatment for postmenopausal women receiving corticosteroid treatment and is well tolerated.

Treatment with etidronate for men with idiopathic osteoporosis

In a recent overview of current and potential future drug treatments for osteoporosis, the therapies for osteoporosis in men were discussed briefly.1 Osteoporosis in men is a heterogeneous disease of which 50% of the cases are classified as idiopathic osteoporosis (IOP).2 Long term data on treatment of men with IOP are not yet available. In an uncontrolled open study of 22 white men with IOP, we have studied prospectively, the effect of a two year treatment with cyclic etidronate (400 mg/d during two weeks every three months) and calcium (500 mg/d during 10 weeks every three months). …

Effectiveness of methotrexate with step-down glucocorticoid remission induction (COBRA Slim) versus other intensive treatment strategies for early rheumatoid arthritis in a treat-to-target approach: 1-year results of CareRA, a randomised pragmatic open-label superiority trial

Objectives Combining disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with glucocorticoids (GCs) is an effective treatment strategy for early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA), yet the ideal schedule and feasibility in daily practice are debated. We evaluated different DMARD combinations and GC remission induction schemes in poor prognosis patients; and methotrexate (MTX) with or without GC remission induction in good prognosis patients, during the first treatment year. Methods The Care in ERA (CareRA) trial is a 2-year investigator-initiated randomised pragmatic open-label superiority trial comparing remission induction regimens in a treat-to-target approach. DMARD-inexperienced patients with ERA were stratified into a high-risk or low-risk group based upon presence of erosions, disease activity, rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies. High-risk patients were randomised to a COBRA Classic (MTX + sulfasalazine + prednisone step-down from 60 mg), COBRA Slim (MTX + prednisone step-down from 30 mg) or COBRA Avant Garde (MTX + leflunomide + prednisone step-down from 30 mg) scheme. Low-risk patients were randomised to MTX tight step-up (MTX-TSU) or COBRA Slim. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients in 28 joint disease activity score calculated with C-reactive protein remission at week 52 in an intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes were safety and effectiveness (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT01172639). Results 98 COBRA Classic, 98 COBRA Slim (high risk), 93 COBRA Avant Garde, 47 MTX-TSU and 43 COBRA Slim (low risk) patients were evaluated. Remission was achieved in 64.3% (63/98) COBRA Classic, 60.2% (59/98) COBRA Slim (high risk) and 62.4% (58/93) COBRA Avant Garde patients at W52 (p=0.840); and in 57.4% (27/47) MTX-TSU and 67.4% (29/43) COBRA Slim (low risk) patients (p=0.329). Less adverse events occurred per patient with COBRA Slim (high risk) compared with COBRA Classic or COBRA Avant Garde (p=0.038). Adverse events were similar in MTX-TSU and COBRA Slim (low risk) patients (p=0.871). At W52, 76.0% patients were on DMARD monotherapy, 5.2% used GCs and 7.5% biologicals. Conclusions MTX with a moderate-dose GC remission induction scheme (COBRA Slim) seems an effective, safe, low-cost and feasible initial treatment strategy for patients with ERA regardless of their prognostic profile, provided a treat-to-target approach is followed. Trial registration numbers EudraCT-number 2008-007225-39 and NCT01172639; Results.

Impact of Systematic Implementation of a Clinical Case Finding Strategy on Diagnosis and Therapy of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Introduction: Case finding for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women is advocated in guidelines of osteoporosis, but implementation is unsatisfactory. We studied, in daily practice, the impact of systematic implementation of a previously validated clinical decision rule and fracture history on referral for bone densitometry (DXA) and drug prescription for osteoporosis.

Recovery from Severe Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in an Adolescent Boy

An 18-yr-old boy presented with extreme back pain as the result of multiple vertebral fractures. At age 16 he had developed a tumor of the mesencephalon. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt was established surgically. One year later, he developed progressive neurologic deficits in his upper and lower limbs with an increase in the size of the tumor. He was treated by irradiation and high doses of glucocorticoids. Although the neurologic deficits progressively improved, he developed severe back pain resulting in complete immobilization for 3 mo in spite of neurologic recovery. Multiple vertebral fractures were diagnosed by X-ray. Bone density was extremely low (Z-score of -5.5 in the spine and -3.1 in the femoral neck). The patient was treated with calcium and vitamin D, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, physiotherapy, and progressive mobilization. Glucocorticoids were decreased and could be stopped as the neurologic deficits fully recovered. After 1 yr of treatment with intermittent i.v. pamidronate, bone density had increased by 40% in the spine and by 25% in the femoral neck despite growth arrest. He progressively recovered from back pain and is now, at age 20, fully ambulant, studying mechanical engineering, without neurologic sequelaes and free of glucocorticoids. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed that the tumor had disappeared. This case proves that treatment of symptomatic glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis during puberty can be rewarding, even when multiple and invalidating vertebral fractures already exist.

An exceptional radiographic presentation of bilateral insufficiency fractures of the proximal tibia in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis

We report an exceptional radiographic presentation of bilateral insufficiency fractures of the proximal tibia in a 67 year old women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The patient developed RA at the age of 55. She was consecutively treated with several disease modifying drugs : parenteral gold (1989–90), sulfasalazine (1990–91), and methotrexate (MTX; started in 1991 and discontinued in 2001 because of bone marrow suppression); chloroquine was added from 1993 until 1999. Oral corticosteroids (prednisone 5 mg/day) were started in 1990. Because of persistent hydrops of both knees a bilateral chemical synovectomy (osmium acid) was undertaken in 1990. Afterwards three intra-articular infiltrations with depot corticosteroids were given, and the arthritis of the knees resolved. Bone mineral densitometry (BMD) in 1994 showed a T score (compared with young adults) at the lumbar spine of −2.6 standard deviation (SD) and at the femoral neck of −2.7SD, compatible with osteoporosis. Treatment with calcium supplements and alfacalcidol (50 μg/day) was started as this was the only treatment for glucocorticoid osteoporosis which was reimbursed. Because of further bone loss (follow up BMD still showed a …

OP0180 Remission Induction with Dmard Combinations and Glucocorticoids is not Superior to Remission Induction with MTX Monotherapy and Glucocorticoids: Week 52 Results of the High-Risk Group from the Carera Trial

Background To date, intensive DMARD combination therapy with glucocorticoids (GCs) is the most effective treatment approach for the management of early Rheumatoid Arthritis (eRA). The ideal content of the combination and the dose of GCs are however not yet known. Objectives To compare different intensive combination treatment strategies associated with GCs in eRA patients with a poor prognosis at week (W)52 in the CareRA trial. Methods CareRA is a two year prospective investigator-initiated multicenter RCT rooted in daily practice. DMARD naïve eRA patients were stratified into a high or low-risk group based on classical prognostic markers (presence of erosions, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated protein and DAS28(CRP). High-risk patients (n=290) were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment strategies. 1) Cobra Classic (n=98): Methotrexate (MTX)+Sulphasalazine+60mg prednisone tapered weekly to 7.5mg daily from W7 2) Cobra Slim (n=98): MTX+30mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg daily from W6 3) Cobra Avant-Garde (n=94):MTX+Leflunomide +30mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg daily from W6 From W28, GCs were tapered in all patients and stopped at W34. A predefined treat to target approach was applied. From W40, we aimed for DMARD monotherapy. Efficacy measures were proportions of DAS28(CRP) remission, good EULAR response, clinically meaningful HAQ response, HAQ=0 (ITT analysis). Radiographic progression was measured via the Sharp Van der Heijde score. Adverse events related to therapy (AEs) were registered. Missing data were imputed by last observation carried forward. Results Remission rates were 64.3%, 60.2% and 62.8% in the Classic, Slim and Avant-Garde group respectively (p=0.837). Also no other efficacy outcomes did not differ between groups. 82% of X-ray images were available at baseline. Radiographic progression was minimal. SvH scores were 1.3±2.1, 1.3±2.5 and 1.0±1.4 at baseline and changed over 52 weeks 0.3±0.5, 0.4±1.1 and 0.3±0.6 in the Classic, Slim and Avant-Garde group respectively (p=0.581). The total numbers of AEs were 182 in 65 Classic patients, 125 in 64 Slim patients and 174 in 72 Avant-Garde patients (p=0.026). Serious AEs were reported in 3 Classic, 2 Slim and 3 Avant-Garde patients. Conclusions High rates of remission were achieved at week 52 with csDMARDs and GCs in all remission induction schemes. Cobra Slim showed comparable efficacy with less adverse events compared to DMARD combinations with moderate or high GC dosages. Disclosure of Interest None declared

THU0117 Low-Risk Patients Also Benefit from Remission Induction Treatment in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Week 52 Results from the Carera Trial

Background Early intensive treatment to target is recommended in severe early Rheumatoid Arthritis (eRA). However, data are lacking in patients presenting without markers of poor prognosis. Objectives To compare Methotrexate (MTX) with or without Glucocorticoid (GC) remission induction in a tight control setting over 52 weeks in low-risk patients with eRA. Methods CareRA is a two year prospective investigator-initiated multicenter RCT rooted in daily practice. DMARD naïve eRA patients were stratified into a high or low-risk group according to classical prognostic markers (presence of erosions, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated protein and disease activity). In the low-risk arm, 43 patients were randomized to 15mg MTX monotherapy following a Tight Step Up (MTX-TSU) approach and 47 patients to a Cobra Slim schedule (MTX+30mg prednisone tapered to 5mg daily from W6). GCs were tapered from W28 and stopped at W34. A predefined treat to target approach was applied. Efficacy measures were proportions of DAS28(CRP) remission, good EULAR response, clinically meaningful HAQ response, HAQ=0 and Area Under the Curve (AUC) for DAS28(CRP) (ITT analysis). Radiographic progression was measured via the Sharp Van der Heijde (SvH) method. Adverse events related to therapy (AEs) were registered. No power was calculated in this explorative study. Missing data were imputed via last observation carried forward. Results Remission rates at week 52 were 57.4% and 67.4% in the MTX-TSU and Cobra Slim group respectively (p=0.329). MTX-TSU patients had a higher AUC for DAS28(CRP) than Cobra Slim patients over 52 weeks of treatment (p=0.017). No other efficacy scores differed between groups. 76% of X-ray images were available at baseline. Radiographic progression was minimal. SvH scores were 0.7±1.1 and 0.9±1.5 at baseline and changed over 52 weeks 0.2±0.3 and 0.3±0.4 in the MTX-TSU and Cobra Slim group respectively (p=0.184). The numbers of AEs were 48 in 27 MTX-TSU patients and 49 in 20 Cobra Slim patients (p=0.871). Two serious AEs (pulmonary infection and anemia) were registered in the Cobra Slim group. We observed numerically more treatment adaptations and IM/IA GC injections in MTX-TSU patients. Conclusions Both RA therapies achieved high remission rates in a tight control setting at week 52. However, remission induction with Cobra Slim resulted in a more rapid and sustained disease control. MTX with or without GC remission induction showed a comparable safety profile. Disclosure of Interest None declared