Johanna Link

Combined Spectral and Spatial Modeling of Corn Yield Based on Aerial Images and Crop Surface Models Acquired with an Unmanned Aircraft System

Precision Farming (PF) management strategies are commonly based on estimations of within-field yield potential, often derived from remotely-sensed products, e.g., Vegetation Index (VI) maps. These well-established means, however, lack important information, like crop height. Combinations of VI-maps and detailed 3D Crop Surface Models (CSMs) enable advanced methods for crop yield prediction. This work utilizes an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) to capture standard RGB imagery datasets for corn grain yield prediction at three early- to mid-season growth stages. The imagery is processed into simple VI-orthoimages for crop/non-crop classification and 3D CSMs for crop height determination at different spatial resolutions. Three linear regression models are tested on their prediction ability using site-specific (i) unclassified mean heights, (ii) crop-classified mean heights and (iii) a combination of crop-classified mean heights with according crop coverages. The models show determination coefficients \({R}^{2}\) of up to 0.74, whereas model (iii) performs best with imagery captured at the end of stem elongation and intermediate spatial resolution (0.04m\(\cdot\)px\(^{-1}\)).Following these results, combined spectral and spatial modeling, based on aerial images and CSMs, proves to be a suitable method for mid-season corn yield prediction.

Identification of powdery mildew (Erysiphe graminis sp. tritici) and take-all disease (Gaeumannomyces graminis sp. tritici) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by means of leaf reflectance measurements

The ability to identify diseases in an early infection stage and to accurately quantify the severity of infection is crucial in plant disease assessment and management. A greenhouse study was conducted to assess changes in leaf spectral reflectance of wheat plants during infection by powdery mildew and take-all disease to evaluate leaf reflectance measurements as a tool to identify and quantify disease severity and to discriminate between different diseases. Wheat plants were inoculated under controlled conditions in different intensities either with powdery mildew or take-all. Leaf reflectance was measured with a digital imager (Leica S1 Pro, Leica, Germany) under controlled light conditions in various wavelength ranges covering the visible and the near-infrared spectra (380–1300 nm). Leaf scans were evaluated by means of L*a*b*-color system. Visual estimates of disease severity were made for each of the epidemics daily from the onset of visible symptoms to maximum disease severity. Reflectance within the ranges of 490780 nm (r2 = 0.69), 510780nm (r2 = 0.74), 5161300nm (r2 = 0.62) and 5401300 nm (r2 = 0.60) exhibited the strongest relationship with infection levels of both powdery mildew and take-all disease. Among the evaluated spectra the range of 490780nm showed most sensitive response to damage caused by powdery mildew and take-all infestation. The results of this study indicated that disease detection and discrimination by means of reflectance measurements may be realized by the use of specific wavelength ranges. Further studies have to be carried out, to discriminate powdery mildew and take-all infection from other plant stress factors in order to develop suitable decision support systems for site-specific fungicide application.

Crop Models as Decision Support Systems in Crop Production

The current challenges crop production faces in the context of required yield increases while reducing fertilizer, water and pesticide inputs have created an increasing demand for agronomic knowledge and enhanced decision support guidelines, which are difficult to obtain on spatial scales appropriate for use in a multitude of global cropping systems. Nowadays crop models are increasingly being used to improve cropping techniques and cropping systems (Uehera and Tsuji, 1993; Penning de Vries and Teng, 1993; Boote et al., 1996). This trend results from a combination of mechanistic models designed by crop physiologists, soil scientists and meteorologists, and a growing awareness of the inadequacies of field experiments for responding to challenges like climate change. A general management decision to be made underlies the principle that a crop response to a certain input factor can only be expected if there is a physiological requirement and if other essential plant growth factors are in an optimum state. Hence, the challenge for a farmer is to determine how to use information with respect to the management decisions he has to make, in other words he has to find an efficient, relevant and accurate way how to evaluate data for specific management decisions. Crop models enable researchers to speculate on the long-term consequences of changes in agricultural practices and cropping systems on the level of an agro-ecosystem. Finally, models make it possible to identify very rapidly the adaptations required to enable cropping systems to respond to changes in the economic or regulatory context (Rossing et al., 1997). The following chapter gives an overview on the current knowledge and use of crop models and addresses the problems associated with these methods. In a second part the use of crop growth models for decision support in terms of yield variability, fertilizer and irrigation strategies will be discussed in the context of two global case studies, one in China and the other one in Germany. The discussion focuses on the currently available modeling techniques and addresses the necessary future research areas in this context.

Spatial variability and temporal stability of corn (Zea maysL.) grain yields – relevance of grid size

Abstract Corn yields are frequently heterogeneous across space and time. A 5-year field monitoring was conducted to determine spatial variability and temporal stability of corn grain yields within three farmer fields. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the spatial variability and temporal stability of yields. Therefore yield data was analysed at the field scale and for three different grid sizes. Results indicated that the grid size required to capture the spatial variability and temporal stability of yield differed over the fields. In general, smaller grid sizes were able to describe yield variability more precisely, whereas larger grid sizes were able to more accurately describe yield stability. To develop units for site-specific management, grid size should be determined in consideration of temporal yield stability and in consideration of the underlying factor leading to spatial yield variability. If the underlying factor is highly variable within the field, smaller grid sizes are useful. If the underlying factor is less variable within the field larger grid sizes seem to be more suitable for site-specific management.