Johanna Sasse

Genetic variants in FKBP5 affecting response to antidepressant drug treatment.

INTRODUCTION Hyperactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is a pathogenic mechanism of depression, and genetic polymorphisms in HPA axis genes have been described to influence response to antidepressant drugs. In particular, two polymorphisms in FKBP5, a co-chaperone of the glucocorticoid receptor, were strongly associated with response to therapy. We aimed to analyze whether these findings could be reproduced in a different sample of otherwise comparable inpatients with major depression. METHODS Genotyping for the two variants within the FKBP5 gene was performed using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism and Taqman real-time PCR in a cohort of 179 inpatients who were monitored for the first 3 weeks of antidepressant drug treatment. The early response to antidepressant drugs was assessed as percentage of decline in Hamilton depression score after 3 weeks, responders versus nonresponders were distinguished by a 50% decrease. RESULTS The FKBP5 variants rs3800373 and rs1360780 were highly linked, and carriers of the FKBP5 variants had a trend towards a higher chance to respond (p = 0.04; odds ratio: 1.8; 95% CI: 0.98-3.3). When analyzing drug-specific subgroups, the effect was seen mainly in the subgroups of patients treated with antidepressant drug combinations or with venlafaxine. CONCLUSION In this study, an effect of FKBP5 variants on antidepressant drug response was confirmed in an independent cohort of depressed patients; however, with an odds ratio of 1.8 the effect size was smaller than that described earlier.

The International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen): An Initiative by the NIMH and IGSLI to Study the Genetic Basis of Response to Lithium Treatment

For more than half a decade, lithium has been successfully used to treat bipolar disorder. Worldwide, it is considered the first-line mood stabilizer. Apart from its proven antimanic and prophylactic effects, considerable evidence also suggests an antisuicidal effect in affective disorders. Lithium is also effectively used to augment antidepressant drugs in the treatment of refractory major depressive episodes and prevent relapses in recurrent unipolar depression. In contrast to many psychiatric drugs, lithium has outlasted various pharmacotherapeutic ‘fashions’, and remains an indispensable element in contemporary psychopharmacology. Nevertheless, data from pharmacogenetic studies of lithium are comparatively sparse, and these studies are generally characterized by small sample sizes and varying definitions of response. Here, we present an international effort to elucidate the genetic underpinnings of lithium response in bipolar disorder. Following an initiative by the International Group for the Study of Lithium-Treated Patients (www.IGSLI.org) and the Unit on the Genetic Basis of Mood and Anxiety Disorders at the National Institute of Mental Health,lithium researchers from around the world have formed the Consortium on Lithium Genetics (www.ConLiGen.org) to establish the largest sample to date for genome-wide studies of lithium response in bipolar disorder, currently comprising more than 1,200 patients characterized for response to lithium treatment. A stringent phenotype definition of response is one of the hallmarks of this collaboration. ConLiGen invites all lithium researchers to join its efforts.

Lithium’s Emerging Role in the Treatment of Refractory Major Depressive Episodes: Augmentation of Antidepressants

Background: The late onset of therapeutic response and a relatively large proportion of nonresponders to antidepressants remain major concerns in clinical practice. Therefore, there is a critical need for effective medication strategies that augment treatment with antidepressants. Methods: To review the available evidence on the use of lithium as an augmentation strategy to treat depressive episodes. Results: More than 30 open-label studies and 10 placebo-controlled double-blind trials have demonstrated substantial efficacy of lithium augmentation in the acute treatment of depressive episodes. Most of these studies were performed in unipolar depression and included all major classes of antidepressants, however mostly tricyclics. A meta-analysis including 10 randomized placebo-controlled trials has provided evidence that lithium augmentation has a statistically significant effect on the response rate compared to placebo with an odds ratio of 3.11, which corresponds to a number-needed-to-treat of 5. The meta-analysis revealed a mean response rate of 41.2% in the lithium group and 14.4% in the placebo group. One placebo-controlled trial in the continuation treatment phase showed that responders to acute-phase lithium augmentation should be maintained on the lithium-antidepressant combination for at least 12 months to prevent early relapses. Preliminary studies to assess genetic influences on response probability to lithium augmentation have suggested a predictive role of the –50T/C single nucleotide polymorphism of the GSK3β gene. Conclusion: Augmentation of antidepressants with lithium is currently the best-evidenced augmentation therapy in the treatment of depressed patients who do not respond to antidepressants.

Lithium Augmentation Therapy in Refractory Depression: Clinical Evidence and Neurobiological Mechanisms

Objective: This systematic review examines the evidence and discusses the clinical relevance of lithium augmentation as a treatment strategy for refractory major depressive episodes. It also examines hypotheses on the mode of action of lithium augmentation, with a focus on serotonin (5-HT) and neuroendocrine systems, and proposes recommendations for future research. Method: We searched the Medline computer database and the Cochrane Library for relevant original studies published in English from January 1966 to February 2003. The key words were as follows: lithium, augmentation strategies, lithium augmentation, major depression, refractory depression, treatment-resistant depression, neuroendocrinology, and serotonin. Results: Of 27 prospective clinical studies published since 1981, 10 were double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, 4 were randomized comparator trials, and 13 were open-label trials. Five of 9 acute-phase placebo-controlled trials demonstrated that lithium augmentation had substantial efficacy. In the acute-treatment trials, the average response rate in the lithium group was 45%, and in the placebo group, 18% (P < 0.001). One placebo-controlled trial showed the efficacy of lithium augmentation in the continuation-phase treatment. Summarizing the open and controlled data, approximately 50% of patients responded to lithium augmentation within 2 to 6 weeks. Animal studies offer robust evidence that lithium augmentation increases 5-HT neurotransmission, possibly by a synergistic action of lithium and the antidepressant on brain 5-HT pathways. Conclusions: Augmentation of antidepressants with lithium is the best-documented augmentation therapy in the treatment of refractory depression. Emerging data from animal studies suggest that the 5-HTergic system is involved in the augmentatory effect of lithium.

Self-reporting software for bipolar disorder: Validation of ChronoRecord by patients with mania

With the widespread recognition of the value of active patient participation in their care, ChronoRecord software was developed to automate daily self-reporting by patients with bipolar disorder. A prior study demonstrated concurrent validity between self-ratings on ChronoRecord and clinician ratings on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), but validity with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) could not be shown due to a lack of data when the outpatients were manic (Bauer et al., Bipolar Disorders 6, 67-74, 2004). This study expanded upon the prior validation study to include inpatients with mania. Self-reported mood ratings on ChronoRecord and clinician ratings on the YMRS were obtained on the same day from 27 inpatients (57 ratings); these data were also combined with the ratings from the 80 outpatients (total 107 patients, 340 ratings). Using Pearson correlation, the self-reported ratings on ChronoRecord were significantly correlated with the YMRS. The accuracy of ChronoRecord to discriminate hypomania and mania was high, as described by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Post-hoc analysis of the level of agreement between ChronoRecord and YMRS ratings was excellent or good in all cases using the kappa statistic. These data demonstrate concurrent validity between ChronoRecord and YMRS.

Relationship among latitude, climate, season and self-reported mood in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE Many researchers have analyzed seasonal variation in hospital admissions for bipolar disorder with inconsistent results. We investigated if a seasonal pattern was present in daily self-reported daily mood ratings from patients living in five climate zones in the northern and southern hemispheres. We also investigated the influence of latitude and seasonal climate variables on mood. METHOD 360 patients who were receiving treatment as usual recorded mood daily (59,422 total days of data). Both the percentage of days depressed and hypomanic/manic, and the episodes of depression and mania were determined. The observations were provided by patients from different geographic locations in North and South America, Europe and Australia. These data were analyzed for seasonality by climate zone using both a sinusoidal regression and the Gini index. Additionally, the influence of latitude and climate variables on mood was estimated using generalized linear models for each season and month. RESULTS No seasonality was found in any climate zone by either method. In spite of vastly different weather, neither latitude nor climate variables were associated with mood by season or month. CONCLUSION Daily self-reported mood ratings of most patients with bipolar disorder did not show a seasonal pattern. Neither climate nor latitude has a primary influence on the daily mood changes of most patients receiving medication for bipolar disorder.

The Hypomania Checklist-32 and the Mood Disorder Questionnaire as screening tools — going beyond samples of purely mood-disordered patients

BACKGROUND Bipolar disorders are often not recognized. Several screening tools have been developed, e.g., the Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32) and the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) to improve this situation. Whereas the German HCL-32 has been used in non-clinical samples, neither the HCL-32 nor the MDQ has been validated in German samples of mood-disordered patients. Additionally, hardly any prior study has included patients with non-mood disorders or has considered potential effects of comorbid conditions. Therefore the goal of this study was to test the validity of both scales in a diverse patient sample while also taking into account psychiatric comorbidity. METHOD A multi-site study was conducted involving seven centers. Patients (n=488) completed the HCL-32 and MDQ and were independently interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID). RESULTS Sensitivity for bipolar I was similar for HCL-32 and MDQ (.88 and .84) but slightly different for bipolar II (.90 and .83), specificity, however, was higher for MDQ. In general, a comorbid condition led to increased scores in both tools regardless of whether the primary diagnosis was bipolar or not. LIMITATIONS AND DISCUSSION: Although we included not just mood-disordered patients, detailed subgroup analyses for all diagnostic categories were not possible due to sample sizes. In summary, HCL-32 and MDQ seem fairly comparable in detecting bipolar disorders although their effectiveness depends on the goal of the screening, psychiatric comorbidity, and potentially the setting.

Efficacy of Quetiapine Monotherapy in Rapid-Cycling Bipolar Disorder in Comparison With Sodium Valproate

Background: Rapid-cycling bipolar disorder is often characterized by a lack of response to psychopharmacological treatment, and a standard therapy has not been developed yet. The aim of this study was to examine the long-term efficacy and safety of a monotherapy with quetiapine or sodium valproate (VPA) in patients with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. Methods: This open-label, randomized, parallel group monotherapy pilot study was conducted at 3 German centers. A sample of 38 remitted or partly remitted patients with bipolar disorder and rapid cycling (quetiapine n = 22; VPA n = 16) were treated with quetiapine or VPA (flexible dose design) for 12 months. Results: Forty-one percent of the patients with quetiapine and 50% with VPA completed the trial. On the basis of ITT-LOCF, Life Chart Method data showed that patients being treated with quetiapine had significantly less moderate to severe depressive days than patients on VPA (mean ± SD, 11.7 ± 16.9 days vs 27.7 ± 24.9 days; P = 0.04) while they did not differ in the number of days with manic or hypomanic symptoms. Furthermore, according to the Clinical Global Impression Scale, bipolar version, the responder rates tended to be higher for quetiapine than for VPA. There were no differences found evaluating the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale, and the Young Mania Rating Scale. The incidence of adverse events, especially of orthostatic dysregulation, sedation, and weight gain, was significantly higher in the quetiapine group. Conclusions: In this study, quetiapine was more effective than VPA on the number of depressive days and similar to VPA in the treatment of manic symptoms. Quetiapine was associated with a greater incidence of side effects, particularly orthostatic dysregulation, sedation, and weight gain.

Spezifische Behandlungsaspekte bipolar erkrankter Frauen

ZusammenfassungIm vorliegenden Artikel werden Besonderheiten im Krankheitsverlauf und in der Pharmakotherapie bipolar erkrankter Frauen diskutiert. Geschlechtstypische Unterschiede betreffen sowohl Symptomatik und Krankheitsverlauf als auch Aspekte, die mit der speziellen biologischen Situation der Frau zusammenhängen. Typisch für bipolare Frauen ist die Dominanz depressiver Krankheitssymptome und das im Vergleich zu bipolaren Männern etwa 8fach höhere Risiko für einen ungünstigen Krankheitsverlauf im Sinne eines „rapid cycling“. Abhängig von der gegenwärtigen Lebensphase sind bezüglich der pharmakologischen Behandlung weiblicher Patientinnen die Aspekte Fertilität, Kontrazeption und Schwangerschaft in besonderem Maße mit einzubeziehen. Trotz hoher Relevanz für den Krankheitsverlauf ist das sexuelle Erleben und Verhalten bipolarer Frauen bisher ebenso wenig untersucht worden wie spezifische sexuelle Veränderungen in manischen und depressiven Erkrankungsphasen.SummaryThis manuscript summarizes specific issues in the disease course and pharmacological treatment of women with bipolar disorders. Gender differences relevant to the female biology manifest in symptoms, outcome, and course. The preponderance of depressive symptoms is typical, and the risk of rapid cycling is estimated to be eight times higher for women than for men. Comorbid anxiety and eating disorders occur more frequently in female patients. In planning treatment it is important to take fertility, contraception, and pregnancy into consideration and adjust the pharmacotherapy to harmonize with the patient’s current phase of life. Little is known about potential sexual dysfunctions of bipolar women. Further research should include clinical and observational studies focusing on gender-specific differences in symptomatology, treatment, and long-term outcome of bipolar disorders.This manuscript summarizes specific issues in the disease course and pharmacological treatment of women with bipolar disorders. Gender differences relevant to the female biology manifest in symptoms, outcome, and course. The preponderance of depressive symptoms is typical, and the risk of rapid cycling is estimated to be eight times higher for women than for men. Comorbid anxiety and eating disorders occur more frequently in female patients. In planning treatment it is important to take fertility, contraception, and pregnancy into consideration and adjust the pharmacotherapy to harmonize with the patients current phase of life. Little is known about potential sexual dysfunctions of bipolar women. Further research should include clinical and observational studies focusing on gender-specific differences in symptomatology, treatment, and long-term outcome of bipolar disorders.

The value of pharmacogenetic tests in antidepressive medication therapy

ZusammenfassungGenetische Faktoren beeinflussen zu einem hohen Maße die Pharmakokinetik und Wirkung von Antidepressiva. Die modernen Methoden der Genotypisierung ermöglichen eine schnelle und kostengünstige Bestimmung genetischer Varianten und können deshalb als klinische Diagnostik zur Verbesserung der individuellen Verträglichkeit der Arzneitherapie eingesetzt werden. Die Bedeutung genetischer Varianten in Enzymen des Arzneimittelstoffwechsels, Arzneistofftransportern, Neurotransmitterrezeptoren und -transportern sowie in Molekülen der Signaltransduktion wurden in zahlreichen Studien an gesunden Probanden und an Patienten untersucht. Während genetische Varianten in den arzneistoffmetabolisierenden Zytochrom-P450-Enzymen der Leber für große interindividuelle Unterschiede in der oralen Clearance, Halbwertszeit und Bioverfügbarkeit verantwortlich sind, sind die Auswirkungen genetischer Varianten im Bereich der Antidepressiva-Zielstrukturen weniger eindeutig charakterisiert. Da genetische Zusammenhänge nur dann in der Praxis von Bedeutung sind, wenn sie zu konkreten Folgen für die Therapie führen, soll in diesem Artikel ein Überblick über die derzeitig vorhandene Literatur gegeben werden. Aufgezeigt werden soll, in welchen Fällen die Bestimmung pharmakogenetischer Varianten zu einer individuelleren Arzneimitteltherapie durch genotypbasierte Anpassung der Arzneimitteldosierung führen könnte.SummaryThe pharmacokinetics and effect of antidepressants are influenced by genetic factors. Modern methods of genotyping allow fast and inexpensive identification of genetic variants and thus can be used in clinical diagnostics to improve the tolerance to drug therapy. Numerous studies have investigated the significance of genetic variants in drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug and natural substrate transporters, neurotransmitter receptors, and molecules involved in signal transduction. While the interindividual differences in oral clearance, half-life, and bioavailability caused by genetic variants in the cytochrome P450 liver enzymes can be overcome by individual adjustment of dosage according to certain genotypes, the effects of genetic variants in antidepressive target structures are more difficult to translate into clinical recommendations. This article gives an overview of the currently available literature and points to situations in which the determination of pharmacogenetic variants might change drug therapy or therapeutic strategies for the individual patient. Dose adjustments for common antidepressant drugs based upon differences in pharmacokinetic parameters caused by genetic variability will be given.