Johanna Senk
Forschungszentrum Jülich
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Johanna Senk.
high performance computing symposium | 2016
Johanna Senk; Alper Yegenoglu; Olivier Amblet; Yury Brukau; Andrew P. Davison; David R. Lester; Anna Lührs; Pietro Quaglio; Vahid Rostami; Andrew Rowley; Bernd Schuller; Alan B. Stokes; Sacha van Albada; Daniel Zielasko; Markus Diesmann; Benjamin Weyers; Michael Denker; Sonja Grün
Workflows for the acquisition and analysis of data in the natural sciences exhibit a growing degree of complexity and heterogeneity, are increasingly performed in large collaborative efforts, and often require the use of high-performance computing (HPC). Here, we explore the reasons for these new challenges and demands and discuss their impact with a focus on the scientific domain of computational neuroscience. We argue for the need of software platforms integrating HPC systems that allow scientists to construct, comprehend and execute workflows composed of diverse data generation and processing steps using different tools. As a use case we present a concrete implementation of such a complex workflow, covering diverse topics such as HPC-based simulation using the NEST software, access to the SpiNNaker neuromorphic hardware platform, complex data analysis using the Elephant library, and interactive visualization methods for facilitating further analysis. Tools are embedded into a web-based software platform under development by the Human Brain Project, called the Collaboratory. On the basis of this implementation, we discuss the state of the art and future challenges in constructing large, collaborative workflows with access to HPC resources.
Frontiers in Neuroscience | 2018
Sacha J. van Albada; Andrew Rowley; Johanna Senk; Michael Hopkins; Maximilian Schmidt; Alan B. Stokes; David R. Lester; Markus Diesmann; Steve B. Furber
The digital neuromorphic hardware SpiNNaker has been developed with the aim of enabling large-scale neural network simulations in real time and with low power consumption. Real-time performance is achieved with 1 ms integration time steps, and thus applies to neural networks for which faster time scales of the dynamics can be neglected. By slowing down the simulation, shorter integration time steps and hence faster time scales, which are often biologically relevant, can be incorporated. We here describe the first full-scale simulations of a cortical microcircuit with biological time scales on SpiNNaker. Since about half the synapses onto the neurons arise within the microcircuit, larger cortical circuits have only moderately more synapses per neuron. Therefore, the full-scale microcircuit paves the way for simulating cortical circuits of arbitrary size. With approximately 80, 000 neurons and 0.3 billion synapses, this model is the largest simulated on SpiNNaker to date. The scale-up is enabled by recent developments in the SpiNNaker software stack that allow simulations to be spread across multiple boards. Comparison with simulations using the NEST software on a high-performance cluster shows that both simulators can reach a similar accuracy, despite the fixed-point arithmetic of SpiNNaker, demonstrating the usability of SpiNNaker for computational neuroscience applications with biological time scales and large network size. The runtime and power consumption are also assessed for both simulators on the example of the cortical microcircuit model. To obtain an accuracy similar to that of NEST with 0.1 ms time steps, SpiNNaker requires a slowdown factor of around 20 compared to real time. The runtime for NEST saturates around 3 times real time using hybrid parallelization with MPI and multi-threading. However, achieving this runtime comes at the cost of increased power and energy consumption. The lowest total energy consumption for NEST is reached at around 144 parallel threads and 4.6 times slowdown. At this setting, NEST and SpiNNaker have a comparable energy consumption per synaptic event. Our results widen the application domain of SpiNNaker and help guide its development, showing that further optimizations such as synapse-centric network representation are necessary to enable real-time simulation of large biological neural networks.
Neuroinformatics | 2016
Sacha J. van Albada; Stokes Alan; Michael Hopkins; Dave R. Lester; Rowley Andrew G.; Steve B. Furber; Francesco Galluppi; Markus Diesmann; Maximilian Schmidt; Johanna Senk
Archive | 2015
Jochen Martin Eppler; Rajalekshmi Deepu; Claudia Bachmann; Tiziano Zito; Alexander Peyser; Jakob Jordan; Robin Pauli; Luis Riquelme; Sacha J. van Albada; Abigail Morrison; Tammo Ippen; Moritz Helias; Hesam Setareh; Marc-Oliver Gewaltig; Hannah Bos; Frank Michler; Ali Shirvani; Renato Duarte; Maximilian Schmidt; Espen Hagen; Jannis Schuecker; Wolfram Schenck; Moritz Deger; Hans E. Plesser; Susanne Kunkel; Johanna Senk
arXiv: Neurons and Cognition | 2018
Johanna Senk; Karolína Korvasová; Jannis Schuecker; Espen Hagen; Tom Tetzlaff; Markus Diesmann; Moritz Helias
arXiv: Neurons and Cognition | 2018
Johanna Senk; Corto Carde; Espen Hagen; Torsten W. Kuhlen; Markus Diesmann; Benjamin Weyers
arXiv: Neurons and Cognition | 2018
Johanna Senk; Espen Hagen; Sacha J. van Albada; Markus Diesmann
ENCODS2018 - European Neuroscience Conference by Doctoral Students | 2018
Paulina Dabrowska; Alexa Riehle; Michael von Papen; Nicole Voges; Markus Diesmann; Thomas Brochier; Sonja Grün; Johanna Senk
CNS 2017, Workshop “Theoretical Neuroscience in the Human Brain Project”, | 2017
Sonja Grün; Michael Denker; Robin Gutzen; Andrew P. Davison; Nicole Voges; Espen Hagen; Michael von Papen; Johanna Senk
JARA-HPC Symposium | 2016
Johanna Senk; Michael Denker; Anna Lührs; Olivier Amblet; Benjamin Weyers; David R. Lester; Sonja Grün; Alper Yegenoglu; Alan B. Stokes; Vahid Rostami; Markus Diesmann; Yury Brukau; Andrew P. Davison; Daniel Zielasko; Bernd Schuller; Sacha van Albada; Pietro Quaglio; Andrew Rowley