Johanna Sjöström

Docetaxel Compared with Sequential Methotrexate and 5-Fluorouracil in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer after Anthracycline Failure: a Randomised Phase III Study with Crossover on Progression by the Scandinavian Breast Group

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel to methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure. A randomised multicentre trial was conducted in 283 patients with advanced breast cancer who had failed previous anthracycline treatment. Docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (n = 143) was compared with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF; n = 139) given at day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks at dosages of 200 mg/ m2 and 600 mg/m2, respectively. After progression, crossover to the alternative treatment group was recommended. There was a significantly higher overall response rate in the docetaxel 42% (CR 8% + PR 34%) than in the MF arm 21% (CR 3% + PR 18%) (P < 0.001). The median time to progression (TTP) was 6.3 months in the docetaxel arm and 3.0 months in the MF arm (P < 0.001). Docetaxel also had a significantly higher response rate of 27% following crossover compared with MF (12%). Significantly more side-effects (leucopenia, infections, neuropathy, oedema, asthenia, skin, nail changes, alopecia) were seen in the docetaxel than in the MF group. However, grade 3 and 4 side-effects were infrequent with both drugs, with the exception of fatigue, alopecia and infections. Median overall survival (OS) including crossover phase was 10.4 months in the docetaxel and 11.1 months in the MF arm (P = 0.79). Based on the response rate and the primary endpoint of TTP, docetaxel is superior to sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure.

HER2 expression in breast cancer primary tumours and corresponding metastases. Original data and literature review

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the HER2 expression in breast cancer is retained in metastases. The HER2 expression in primary tumours and the corresponding lymph node metastases were evaluated in parallel samples from 47 patients. The HercepTest was used for immunohistochemical analyses of HER2 overexpression in all cases. CISH/FISH was used for analysis of gene amplification in some cases. HER2 overexpression (HER2-scores 2+ or 3+) was found in 55% of both the primary tumours and of the lymph node metastases. There were only small changes in the HER2-scores; six from 1+ to 0 and one from 3+ to 2+ when the metastases were compared to the corresponding primary tumours. However, there were no cases with drastic changes in HER2 expression between the primary tumours and the corresponding lymph node metastases. The literature was reviewed for similar investigations, and it is concluded that breast cancer lymph node metastases generally overexpress HER2 to the same extent as the corresponding primary tumours. This also seems to be the case when distant metastases are considered. It has been noted that not all patients with HER2 overexpression respond to HER2-targeted Trastuzumab treatment. The stability in HER2 expression is encouraging for efforts to develop complementary forms of therapy, for example, therapy with radionuclide-labelled Trastuzumab.

How apoptosis is regulated, and what goes wrong in cancer

Programmed cell death (apoptosis) is an evolutionarily conserved pathway needed for embryonic development and tissue homoeostasis.1 Apoptosis is the normal physiological response to many stimuli, including irreparable DNA damage. Various diseases evolve because of hyperactivation (neurodegenerative diseases, immunodeficiency, ischaemia-reperfusion injury) or suppression of programmed cell death (cancer, autoimmune disorders).2 In cancer, the balance between proliferation and programmed cell death is disturbed, and defects in apoptotic pathways allow cells with genetic abnormalities to survive. Most cytotoxic and hormonal treatments, as well as radiation, ultimately kill cancer cells by causing irreparable cellular damage that triggers apoptosis. Consequently, the efficacy of cancer treatments depends not only on the cellular damage they cause but also on the cells ability to respond to the damage by inducing apoptotic machinery. Accordingly, mutations in apoptotic pathways may result in resistance to drugs and radiation. Such mutations might serve as predictors of chemoresistance and, most importantly, as new treatment targets. Mitochondria and cell surface receptors mediate the two main pathways …

A multivariate analysis of tumour biological factors predicting response to cytotoxic treatment in advanced breast cancer.

The study was designed to identify factors that could predict response to chemotherapy in breast cancer. A total of 173 patients with measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in a randomized trial between November 1987 and January 1991 to receive a monthly dose of 5-fluorouracil (500 mg m(-2)), epirubicin (60 mg m(-2)) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg m(-2)) either administered in four weekly doses or in an every-4-week dose as first-line cytotoxic treatment. In 103 evaluable patients we performed a multivariate analysis of the tumour biological factors, i.e. histological grade, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), S-phase fraction (SPF), ploidy, p53, c-erbB-2, Bcl-2 and Bax expression, which showed significance in the univariate analysis according to treatment response, time to progression (TTP) or overall survival (OS). In the univariate analysis only SPF, grade and the proapoptotic protein Bax correlated with the response to cytotoxic treatment. In the multivariate analysis SPF had the strongest correlation, followed by grade and Bax. In the univariate analysis grade, PR, Bax and Bcl-2 correlated significantly with TTP, whereas in the multivariate analysis only PR showed a statistically significant correlation. In the univariate analysis PR and Bax correlated with OS and both retained its significance in the multivariate analysis. The factors that correlated significantly with the response to cytotoxic treatment in the univariate analysis, i.e. grade, SPF and Bax, seemed to predict independently the response to treatment in the multivariate analysis also. TTP and OS could be predicted partly by the same factors, although the association was quite weak. More studies and new tumour biological factors are needed to identify the group of breast cancer patients who get the most benefit from chemotherapy.

Phase III Study of Intravenous Vinorelbine in Combination With Epirubicin Versus Epirubicin Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403)

PURPOSE To determine whether the addition of intravenous (IV) vinorelbine to epirubicin increased the progression-free survival in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 387 patients were randomly assigned to receive IV epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, or epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) IV on day 1. Both regimens were given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 1 year but discontinued prematurely in the event of progressive disease or severe toxicity. In addition, epirubicin was discontinued at a cumulative dose of 1000 mg/m(2) (950 mg/m(2) from June 1999). Prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was not allowed. Reported results were all based on intent-to-treat analyses. RESULTS Overall response rates to vinorelbine and epirubicin, and epirubicin alone, were 50% and 42%, respectively (P =.15). The complete response rate was significantly superior in the combination arm (17% v 10%; P =.048) as was median duration of progression-free survival (10.1 months v 8.2 months; P =.019). Median survival was similar in the two arms (19.1 months v 18.0 months; P =.50). Leukopenia related complications, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the combination arm. The incidences of cardiotoxicity and constipation were similar in both arms. CONCLUSION Addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin conferred a significant advantage in terms of complete response rate and progression-free survival, but not in terms of survival.

C-erbB-2 expression does not predict response to docetaxel or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer.

Breast cancer patients with c-erbB-2-positive tumours seem to benefit from anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The predictive value of c-erbB-2 for taxane sensitivity is not yet clear. The purpose of this study was to assess whether c-erbB-2 expression is associated with clinical sensitivity to docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). A total of 283 patients with metastatic breast cancer were initially enrolled in a randomised multicentre trial comparing docetaxel with sequential MF in advanced breast cancer. Paraffin-embedded blocks of the primary tumour were available for 131 patients (46%). c-erbB-2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry using a polyclonal antibody to the c-erbB-2 protein. C-erbB-2 expression was scored in a semi-quantitative fashion using a 0 to 3+ scale. Staining scores 2+ or greater were considered positive. Response evaluation was performed according to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. Overall 54 (42%) patients had c-erbB-2-positive tumours. There was no association between treatment outcome and c-erbB-2 overexpression. The overall response rates (RR) (n=128) among c-erbB-2-negative and -positive patients were 35 and 44%, respectively (P=0.359). In the MF arm (n=62), the RR was somewhat higher in the c-erbB-2 overexpressors (33% versus 18%, P=0.18). In the docetaxel arm the RRs were very similar, regardless of the c-erbB-2 expression (53% versus 53%). While several studies have suggested a prognostic and putative predictive significance of c-erbB-2 overexpression in early breast cancer, the significance of c-erbB-2 expression as a predictive factor for response to various cytotoxic treatments in advanced breast cancer is still controversial. In this study, c-erbB-2 expression could not predict response to either MF or T. Thus, tumours over-expressing c-erbB-2 are not uniformly more sensitive to taxanes and c-erbB-2 expression cannot yet be applied clinically as a predictive factor for response in advanced breast cancer.

Quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving either docetaxel or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. A multicentre randomised phase III trial by the Scandinavian Breast Group

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of two alternative chemotherapy regimes on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with advanced breast cancer. In a multicentre trial, 283 patients were randomised to receive either docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). QoL was assessed at baseline and before each treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Initial compliance in the QoL study was 96% and the overall compliance 82%. QoL data were available for 245 patients (T 130 and 115 MF). Both treatment groups showed some improvement in emotional functioning during treatment, with a significant difference favouring the MF group at treatment cycles 5 and 6. In the T group, the scores on the other functional scales remained stable throughout the first six cycles. There were significant differences favouring the MF group on the social functioning scale at treatment cycle 6 and on the Global QoL scale at treatment cycles 5 and 6. On most symptom and single-item scales there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. However, at baseline, the T patients reported more appetite loss, at treatment cycles 2-4, the MF patients reported more nausea/vomiting, and at treatment cycle 6, the T patients reported more symptoms of fatigue, dyspnoea and insomnia. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the mean change scores of the functional and symptom scales. Interindividual variance was, however, larger in the T group. Differences in QoL between the two treatment groups were minor. Hence, given the expectancy of comparable QoL outcomes, the choice of treatment should be made on the basis of the expected clinical effect.

Cyclin A as a marker for prognosis and chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer

We wanted to study cyclin A as a marker for prognosis and chemotherapy response. A total of 283 women with metastatic breast cancer were initially enrolled in a randomised multicentre trial comparing docetaxel to sequential methotrexate-fluorouracil (MF) in advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure. Paraffin-embedded blocks of the primary tumour were available for 96 patients (34%). The proportion of cells expressing cyclin A was determined by immunohistochemistry using a mouse monoclonal antibody to human cyclin A. Response evaluation was performed according to WHO recommendations. The median cyclin A positivity of tumour cells was 14.5% (range 1.2–45.0). Cyclin A correlated statistically significantly to all other tested proliferation markers (mitotic count, histological grade and Ki-67). A high cyclin A correlated significantly to a shorter time to first relapse, risk ratio (RR) 1.94 (95% CI 1.24–3.03) and survival from diagnosis, RR 2.49 (95% CI 1.45–4.29), cutoff point for high/low proliferation group 10.5%. Cyclin A did not correlate to chemotherapy response or survival after anthracycline, docetaxel or MF therapy. Of all tumour biological factors tested (mitotic count, histological grade and Ki-67), cyclin A seemed to have the strongest prognostic value. Cyclin A is a good marker for tumour proliferation and prognosis in breast cancer. In the present study, cyclin A did not predict chemotherapy response.

Predictive factors for response to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer

Most breast cancer patients receive chemotherapy at some phase of their illness but only about half of them benefit from it. Identifying the factors predicting response to chemotherapy would also assist the clinician in selection of appropriate patients for chemotherapy, thus saving others from unnecessary exposure to toxic agents. At the present time, there is no tumour biological factor available for clinical use in the prediction of chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer apart from oestrogen receptor status, which predicts response to hormonal therapy, or the HER2 receptor, which predicts response to trastuzumab. Interestingly, they both are also targets for those therapies. Several groups have tried to find such predictive factors for chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer but the results are so far disappointing. This review collects the rapidly expanding data published so far on the predictive value of tumour biological factors for chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer. In conclusion, none of them is yet good enough for clinical use in advanced breast cancer.

Tumour microvessel density as predictor of chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of intratumoural microvessel density in breast cancer. We studied immunohistochemically primary tumours of 104 patients with metastasised breast cancer who took part in a randomised multicentre trial comparing docetaxel to sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. Vessels were highlighted with factor VIII staining and counted microscopically. Microvessel density was compared with clinical response to chemotherapy and patient survival. The microvessel density of the primary tumour was not significantly associated with patients response to chemotherapy, time to progression or overall survival in the whole patient population or in the docetaxel or methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil groups. However, disease-free survival was longer in patients with low microvessel density (P=0.01). These findings suggest that microvessel density of the primary tumour cannot be used as a predictive marker for chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer.