Johannes Gonnermann

Visual outcome and complications after posterior iris-claw aphakic intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the indications, visual outcomes, and complication rate after implantation of a posterior chamber iris‐claw aphakic intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Eyes without adequate capsule support had posterior chamber iris‐claw aphakic IOL implantation (Verisyse/Artisan) between 2005 and 2010. RESULTS: The study comprised 137 eyes (126 patients). The mean follow‐up was 5 months (range 1 to 48 months). The IOLs were inserted during primary lens surgery in 10 eyes (7.3%), during an IOL exchange procedure for dislocated posterior chamber IOLs in 95 eyes (69.4%), and as a secondary procedure in 32 aphakic eyes (23.3%). The final mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (0.38 ± 0.31 [SD] logMAR) was significantly better than preoperatively (0.65 ± 0.58 logMAR) (P < .05). In 128 eyes (93.4%), postoperative refractive errors were within ±2.00 diopters (D) of emmetropia. Complications included slight temporary pupil ovalization in 34 eyes (24.8%), cystoid macular edema in 12 eyes (8.7%), hyphema in 3 eyes (2.1%), early postoperative hypotony in 7 eyes (5.1%) and elevated intraocular pressure in 6 eyes (4.3%), chronic uveitis in 1 eye (0.7%), toxic anterior segment syndrome in 1 eye (0.7%), and endophthalmitis in 1 eye (0.7%). Iris‐claw IOL disenclavation occurred in 12 eyes (8.7%); all IOLs could be easily repositioned. CONCLUSION: The retropupillary iris‐claw IOL provided good visual outcomes with a favorable complication rate and can be used for a wide range of indications in eyes without adequate capsule support. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Measurement of Dynamic Ocular Surface Temperature in Healthy Subjects Using a New Thermography Device

This article has been retracted.

Retrospective contralateral study comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

PurposeIn this retrospective study, the visual outcomes and postoperative complications after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in the fellow eye were compared. The patient’s satisfaction was evaluated.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 10 patients, who underwent DSAEK in one eye and DMEK surgery in their fellow eye, was performed. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated, including higher-order aberrations (HOA) and contrast thresholds. A subjective questionnaire was used to evaluate patient satisfaction.ResultsBest-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly better in DMEK when compared with DSAEK (0.16±0.10 vs 0.45±0.58 logMAR, P=0.043). Contrast threshold was significantly higher after DMEK than after DSAEK (0.49±0.23 vs 0.25±0.18, P=0.043). Post-keratoplasty astigmatism, mean spherical equivalent, and HOA did not differ. Nine out of ten patients preferred the DMEK procedure. Visual outcome (4.80±1.14 vs 4.50±1.58, P=0.257), surgery associated pain and burden (DMEK: 1.30±0.48 vs DSAEK: 1.30±0.48, P=1.0), estimated time for recovery and rehabilitation (27.6±54.0 vs 24.9±54.8 days, P=0.173), and mean patient satisfaction (5.40±0.84 vs 5.00±1.05, P=0.257) were evaluated equally.ConclusionPatient satisfaction reached high, equal values after DMEK and after DSAEK. Nevertheless, patients preferred DMEK, if given a choice. Reasons for the preference may include better uncorrected and BCVA, and especially a better contrast sensitivity.

Adverse effects and short-term results after selective laser trabeculoplasty.

Purpose:To evaluate the risk of adverse effects and to demonstrate short-term results after selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in glaucoma patients. Methods:Sixty-four eyes of 64 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, not sufficiently treated with local antiglaucomatous therapy, were included in this prospective study. Intraocular pressure (IOP), anterior chamber cells, anterior chamber flare, and vitreous haze (according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working Group) were examined before SLT, for 24 hours, 14 days, 6 weeks, and 3 months after laser. Furthermore, macular thickness measurements in 9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study subfields, including central subfield, measured by Spectralis OCT were performed. The differences between prelaser and postlaser values were obtained. Results:The average of mean preoperative IOP measurement was 19.1±3.972 mm Hg compared with 12.9±2.513 (P<0.001), 13.2±3.331 (P<0.001), 14.1±2.731 (P<0.001), and 13.9±2.922 mm Hg (P<0.001) 24 hours, 14 days, 6 weeks, and 3 months post-SLT, respectively. The central subfield preoperatively was 278.14±74.355 µm compared with 277.14±71.461 (P=0.177), 277.14±71.461 (P=0.354), 287.34±74.363 (P=0.414), and 257.45±68.431 µm (P=0.214) 24 hours, 14 days, 6 weeks, and 3 months after treatment. Anterior chamber cells, anterior chamber flare, and vitreous haze were not denoted at any time of examination. Conclusions:In this study, no significant increase in macular thickness and no other adverse effects were present. Furthermore, SLT was found to significantly lower IOP in glaucoma patients in addition to local therapy. In conclusion, SLT has a good ability to reduce IOP with a minor risk of adverse effects.

Dry Eye Symptoms in Patients after Eyelid Reconstruction with Full-Thickness Eyelid Defects: Using the Tomey TG-1000 Thermographer

Background: Large full-thickness eyelid defects are conventionally reconstructed by either a Hughes flap or Cutler-Beard bridge flap. Since the structure of the eyelid and its components are necessary for the tear film production and stability, we investigated the outcome after eyelid reconstruction focusing on dry eye symptoms using a new thermographic device, the TG-1000. Methods: Seventeen eyes of patients formerly treated with Hughes flaps (n = 16) and a Cutler-Beard bridge flap (n = 1) were compared to untreated healthy eyes (n = 17) regarding the functional and aesthetic outcome. The follow-up ranged from 3 to 63 months (mean 24.88 ± 17.86). Results: There was no significant difference in Schirmer’s test, break-up time and ocular surface temperature (p > 0.05) between patients after full-thickness eyelid reconstruction and a control group. Eleven patients had minor postoperative complications such as notching of the lid margin (11/17), epiphora (1/17), superficial punctate keratitis (6/17), trichiasis (2/17) and a mild tendency to eversion of the lid margin (6/17). More than 75% of the patients rated their postoperative aesthetic outcome as good or even excellent. Conclusion: The new TG-1000 device is a simple and quick tool for screening of dry eye. This study shows that tarsoconjunctival grafts offer good aesthetic and functional outcome with sufficient tear film composition and stability.

Ocular surface temperature gradient is increased in eyes with bacterial corneal ulcers.

Aims: To investigate the ocular surface temperature gradient in eyes with bacterial corneal ulcers. Methods: Prospective examination of 12 eyes with bacterial corneal ulcers (group 1) and 12 control eyes (group 2). Infrared thermal imaging (Tomey TG 1000) was used to study the temperature of the ocular surface. The mean, minimum and maximum temperature of the ocular surface and temperature course over a time period of 10 s of sustained eye opening were evaluated. Furthermore, a correlation between the overall corneal temperature and the temperature at the base of the corneal ulcers was determined. Results: A significant difference between both groups was present. Mean corneal temperature was 35.6°C ± 0.9 in group 1 and 34.8°C ± 0.8 in group 2 (p = 0.033). The temperature course over 10 s of sustained eye opening was –0.6°C ± 0.4 in group 1 and –0.3°C ± 0.2 in group 2 (p = 0.045). There was a close correlation between the mean temperature at the base of the corneal ulcer and the overall corneal temperature (r = 0.92, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Infrared thermal imaging can be used to objectively determine the increased ocular surface temperature in patients with bacterial corneal ulcers. The use of dynamic thermography may offer new options to monitor ocular surface alterations.

Superior Versus Temporal Approach in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE To compare superior vs temporal approach in patients who underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). DESIGN Monocentric, prospective nonmasked study. METHODS A prospective analysis of 53 DMEKs between January and September 2013 was performed at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Only DMEK cases with an incision size of 2.3 mm and with at least 1 month of follow-up were included. The surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), changes in corneal aberrations and in spherical equivalent, visual acuity, endothelial cell density, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS Visual acuity improved significantly (0.70 ± 0.39 logMAR vs 0.32 ± 0.31 logMAR after 1 month (n = 48), 0.19 ± 0.15 logMAR after 3 months (n = 46), and 0.16 ± 0.17 logMAR after 6 months (n = 47) (P < .001)) regardless of the approach. SIA was significantly lower after temporal than after superior approach (1.42 ± 0.91 diopters [D] [n = 13] vs 0.81 ± 0.68 D [n = 13], P = .038). Change in total root mean square of all aberrations (RMS) (P = .046) at 6 mm pupil diameter, and change in total RMS (P = .019), third-order aberrations (P = .007), and fourth-order aberrations (P = .041) at 4 mm pupil diameter, demonstrated significantly lower results after temporal compared to superior approach. A higher rate of eyes after temporal approach underwent at least 1 rebubbling (39.1% vs 26.7%, P = .252). The endothelial cell density (P = .053) and the change in spherical equivalent (P = .145) did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS The temporal approach induces significantly less SIA and corneal aberration. There are no significant differences between superior and temporal approach according to the change in spherical equivalent, visual acuity, and endothelial cell density. The need for rebubbling is higher using the temporal approach.

Fellow Eye Comparison of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes and postoperative complications in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in 1 eye followed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in their fellow eye. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 11 patients, who underwent a PKP procedure first in 1 eye and then a DMEK surgery in their fellow eye, was performed. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Visual and refractive outcomes were also evaluated, including higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast thresholds. A subjective questionnaire was used to evaluate patient satisfaction. Results: Both uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuities were significantly better in the case of DMEK when compared with that in the case of PKP (0.82 vs. 0.37 logMAR, P = 0.005; 0.61 vs. 0.21 logMAR, P = 0.011, respectively). Postkeratoplasty astigmatism, mean spherical equivalent, and HOAs were also significantly lower in eyes after undergoing DMEK than after undergoing PKP (3.90 vs. 0.89 diopters, P = 0.005; −3.90 vs. −0.68 diopters, P = 0.005; 6.81 vs. 1.71 µm, P = 0.043, respectively). Visual outcome and patient satisfaction were significantly better in those who underwent DMEK (2.91 vs. 4.45, P = 0.011; 3.27 vs. 5.64, P = 0.016, respectively). The estimated time for recovery and rehabilitation was significantly shorter after DMEK (64.0 vs. 9.3 days, P = 0.012). Contrast threshold was better after the DMEK. Ten of 11 patients preferred DMEK procedure. Conclusions: The Patients preferred DMEK to PKP. The reasons for better patient satisfaction after DMEK included better uncorrected visual acuity, better best-corrected visual acuity, avoidance of surgery-induced astigmatism, and lower HOA.

Posterior iris-claw aphakic intraocular lens implantation and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Purpose To evaluate clinical outcomes and complications after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and posterior iris-claw aphakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods This prospective cohort study comprised seven consecutive eyes (seven patients) without adequate capsular support and bullous keratopathy undergoing posterior iris-claw aphakic IOL implantation and DMEK. Corneal transparency, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, visual outcomes and complication rates were measured during the follow-up. Results The iris-claw IOLs were inserted during an IOL exchange in three eyes, and as a secondary IOL implantation in one aphakic eye during DMEK procedure. Three eyes had IOL exchange prior to secondary DMEK. Mean follow-up was 7 months (range 3–14 months). The final best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved significantly (0.33±0.31 logMAR) compared with the preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (1.84±0.90 logMAR). The mean endothelial cell loss was 24.8% over the follow-up. Complications included graft dislocation in four eyes; which could be easily reattached with a rebubbling procedure. No graft failures, no cases of pupillary block glaucoma and no IOL dislocations were encountered. Conclusions DMEK and retropupillar iris-claw IOL implantation provide good visual outcomes with a fast visual recovery and appear to be a feasible method for the management of bullous keratopathy but with higher graft detachment rates. Trial registration number NCT02020044.

Trabeculectomy ab interno (trabectome): yet another possibility in the treatment of uncontrolled glaucomatocyclitic crisis under systemic valganciclovir therapy?

PurposeTo assess the outcome of trabectome surgery in the treatment of glaucomatocyclitic crisis (Posner–Schlossman syndrome) in patients with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP).Patients/MethodsTrabectome surgery was performed in seven patients with diagnosed glaucomatocyclitic crisis and uncontrolled IOP where cytomegalovirus DNA was verified by polymerase chain reaction in aqueous humour samples. All patients were treated with oral valganciclovir. After surgery the patients were followed-up for 12 months.ResultsMean IOP before trabectome surgery was 40±10 mm Hg (range 33–58 mm Hg). The mean number of antiglaucoma medication prior to surgery was 3.1±0.4. By the end of the 12 months, IOP in all patients was reduced to normal level (13±1 mm Hg) and their antiglaucoma medication was decreased to 0.8±1.1. No recurring attack of glaucomatocyclitic crisis occurred.DiscussionIn addition to oral valganciclovir therapy, trabectome surgery seems to be a reliable and effective tool for the management of glaucomatocyclitic crisis with uncontrolled IOP.