Johannes Hartl

Hepatitis E Seroprevalence in Europe: A Meta-Analysis

There have been large numbers of studies on anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence in Europe, however, the results of these studies have produced high variability of seroprevalence rates, making interpretation increasingly problematic. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a clearer understanding of anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence in Europe and identify risk groups for HEV exposure by a meta-analysis of published studies. Methods: All European HEV-seroprevalence studies from 2003 to 2015 were reviewed. Data were stratified by assay, geographical location, and patient cohort (general population, patients with HIV, solid-organ transplant recipients, chronic liver disease patients, and individuals in contact with swine/wild animals). Data were pooled using a mixed-effects model. Results: Four hundred thirty-two studies were initially identified, of which 73 studies were included in the analysis. Seroprevalence estimates ranged from 0.6% to 52.5%, increased with age, but were unrelated to gender. General population seroprevalence varied depending on assays: Wantai (WT): 17%, Mikrogen (MG): 10%, MP-diagnostics (MP): 7%, DiaPro: 4%, Abbott 2%. The WT assay reported significantly higher seroprevalence rates across all cohorts (p < 0.001). Individuals in contact with swine/wild animals had significantly higher seroprevalence rates than the general population, irrespective of assay (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between any other cohorts. The highest seroprevalence was observed in France (WT: 32%, MP: 16%) the lowest in Italy (WT: 7.5%, MP 0.9%). Seroprevalence varied between and within countries. The observed heterogeneity was attributed to geographical region (23%), assay employed (23%) and study cohort (7%). Conclusion: Seroprevalcence rates primarily depend on the seroassy that is used, followed by the geographical region and study cohort. Seroprevalence is higher in individuals exposed to swine and/or wild animals, and increases with age.

Transient elastography in autoimmune hepatitis: Timing determines the impact of inflammation and fibrosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS There is an unmet need for the non-invasive monitoring of fibrosis progression in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of transient elastography in patients with AIH and to investigate the impact of disease activity on its diagnostic accuracy. METHODS Optimal cut-offs were defined in a prospective pilot study (n=34) and the diagnostic performance of transient elastography validated in an independent second cohort (n=60). To explore the impact of disease activity on liver stiffness, patients were stratified according to biochemical response and the time interval between start of immunosuppression and transient elastography. RESULTS Liver stiffness strongly correlated with histological fibrosis stage (pilot study: ρ=0.611, p<0.001; validation cohort: ρ=0.777, p<0.0001). ROC curves defined an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.95 for diagnosing cirrhosis at the optimal cut-off of 16kPa. The performance of transient elastography was impaired when patients were analysed in whom transient elastography was performed within 3months from start of treatment. In this setting, liver stiffness correlated with histological grading (ρ=0.558, p=0.001), but not with staging. In contrast, using the cut-off of 16kPa, the accuracy for diagnosing cirrhosis was excellent in patients treated for 6months or longer (area under the receiver operating curve 1.0). CONCLUSIONS Liver inflammation has a major impact on liver stiffness in the first months of AIH treatment. However, transient elastography has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for separating severe from non-severe fibrosis after 6months of immunosuppressive treatment. LAY SUMMARY Transient elastography is a special ultrasound scan, which assesses liver stiffness as a surrogate marker for liver fibrosis/scarring. Transient elastography has been shown to be a reliable non-invasive method to assess liver fibrosis in various chronic liver diseases, it takes less than 5min and has a high patient acceptance. The current study validated for the first time this technique in a large cohort of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and demonstrates that it is a reliable tool to detect liver fibrosis in treated AIH. For the monitoring of potential disease progression under treatment, the validation of liver stiffness as non-invasive marker of liver fibrosis will greatly improve patient care in autoimmune hepatitis.

Hepatitis E virus: Infection beyond the liver?

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections are not limited to the liver but may also affect other organs. Several diseases, including Guillain-Barré syndrome, neuralgic amyotrophy, glomerulonephritis, cryoglobulinemia, pancreatitis, lymphoma, thrombopenia, meningitis, thyroiditis and myocarditis have been observed in the context of hepatitis E. To date, the definite pathophysiological links between HEV and extrahepatic manifestations are not yet established. However, it is suggested that HEV infection might be causative based on serological studies, case series, in vitro data and animal models. In particular, neuronal and renal diseases as well as pancreatitis seem to be caused by HEV, while a causative relationship between HEV and other diseases is more doubtful. Either direct cytopathic tissue damage by extrahepatic replication, or immunological processes induced by an overwhelming host immune response, are possible origins of HEV-associated extrahepatic manifestations. Hepatologists should be aware of the possibility that acute or chronically HEV-infected patients could develop extrahepatic manifestations. Neurologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists and other groups of physicians should consider HEV infection as a potential differential diagnosis when observing one of the diseases described in this review. Ribavirin and steroids have been used in small groups of patients with extrahepatic manifestations of HEV, but the efficacy of these drugs still needs to be verified by large, multicenter studies. This article comprehensively reviews the published literature regarding HEV and extrahepatic manifestations. We discuss the probability of specific extrahepatic diseases being caused by previous or ongoing HEV infection, and summarize the published knowledge about antiviral treatment in extrahepatic disorders.

Efficacy and Limitations of Budesonide as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Many patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) develop steroid‐specific side effects or require doses of steroids that are unacceptable for long‐term treatment. We investigated the efficacy of budesonide as an alternative steroid for patients previously treated with prednisolone who developed side effects or were unable to reduce their dose of prednisolone below acceptable levels. We also report the effects of more than 12 months of budesonide treatment in a large cohort of patients with AIH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 60 patients (51 female) with AIH who were treated initially with prednisolone (mean time, 47 mo) but then switched to budesonide, managed at a single center in Germany from 2001 through June 2016. Patients were evaluated after 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and at the last follow‐up evaluation; response to treatment with budesonide was assessed based on normal serum levels of aminotransferases and IgG (biochemical response). RESULTS: Thirty patients were switched to budesonide therapy because of prednisolone‐induced side effects and 30 patients switched because of prednisolone dependency. Overall, a biochemical response was detected in 55% of patients after 6 months of budesonide treatment, in 70% after 12 months, and in 67% after 24 months. At the last follow‐up evaluation (mean time, 63 mo) 23 patients (38%) still were receiving budesonide treatment. Fifteen patients (25%) had switched back to prednisolone therapy because of insufficient response to budesonide or its side effects. Fifteen patients with osteopenia at the beginning of budesonide treatment were followed up and evaluated by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. After a median of 24 months of budesonide treatment, bone mineral density had improved in 6 patients, remained stable in 8 patients, and worsened in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with AIH that confirmed the therapeutic value of budesonide beyond 12 months of treatment in patients who are intolerant to or dependent on prednisolone. Although budesonide‐induced side effects appear to be mild in real life, effectiveness was limited in a considerable proportion of patients; close monitoring is advised.

Acute Hepatitis E: Two Sides of the Same Coin

The relevance of acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections has been underestimated for a long time. In the past, HEV infection had been interpreted falsely as a disease limited to the tropics until the relevance of autochthonous HEV infections in the Western world became overt. Due to increased awareness, the incidence of diagnosed autochthonous HEV infections (predominantly genotype 3) in industrialized countries has risen within the last decade. The main source of infections in industrialized countries seems to be infected swine meat, while infections with the tropical HEV genotypes 1 and 2 usually are mainly transmitted fecal-orally by contaminated drinking water. In the vast majority of healthy individuals, acute HEV infection is either clinically silent or takes a benign self-limited course. In patients who develop a symptomatic HEV infection, a short prodromal phase with unspecific symptoms is followed by liver specific symptoms like jaundice, itching, uncoloured stool and darkened urine. Importantly, tropical HEV infections may lead to acute liver failure, especially in pregnant women, while autochthonous HEV infections may lead to acute-on-chronic liver failure in patients with underlying liver diseases. Immunosuppressed individuals, such as transplant recipients or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, are at risk for developing chronic hepatitis E, which may lead to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in the long term. Importantly, specific treatment options for hepatitis E are not approved by the regulation authorities, but off-label ribavirin treatment seems to be effective in the treatment of chronic HEV-infection and may reduce the disease severity in patients suffering from acute liver failure.

Validation of Transient Elastography and Comparison with Spleen Length Measurement for Staging of Fibrosis and Clinical Prognosis in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Background Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) develop progressive liver fibrosis and end-stage liver disease. Non-invasive and widely available parameters are urgently needed to assess disease stage and the risk of clinical progression. Transient elastography (TE) has been reported to predict fibrosis stage and disease progression. However, these results have not been confirmed in an independent cohort and comparison of TE measurement to other non-invasive means is missing. Methods In a retrospective study we collected data from consecutive PSC patients receiving TE measurements from 2006 to 2014 (n = 139). Data from 62 patients who also underwent a liver biopsy were used to assess the performance of TE and spleen length (SL) measurement for the staging of liver fibrosis. Follow-up data from this cohort (n = 130, Hamburg) and another independent cohort (n = 80, Paris) was used to compare TE and SL as predictors of clinical outcome applying Harrel’s C calculations. Results TE measurement had a very good performance for the diagnosis and exclusion of higher fibrosis stages (≥F3: AUROC 0.95) and an excellent performance for the diagnosis and exclusion of cirrhosis (F4 vs. < F4: AUROC 0.98). Single-point TE measurement had very similar predictive power for patient outcome as previously published. In a combined cohort of PSC patients (n = 210), SL measurements had a similar performance as TE for the prediction of patient outcome (5 x cross-validated Harrel’s C 0.76 and 0.72 for SL and TE, respectively). Conclusions Baseline TE measurement has an excellent performance to diagnose higher fibrosis stages in PSC. Baseline measurements of SL and TE have similar usefulness as predictive markers for disease progression in patients with PSC.

Autoimmune hepatitis: From current knowledge and clinical practice to future research agenda

Autoimmune hepatitis is a chronic inflammatory liver disease. Unknown triggers lead to a mainly T cell‐mediated immune response targeting the liver, the main auto‐antigen of which has not been identified yet. The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis is based on the elevation of immunoglobulin G/hypergammaglobulinemia, detection of characteristic autoantibodies as well as a typical pattern on liver histology. Exclusion of other causes of hepatitis and response to immunosuppressive treatment support the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. The mainstay of autoimmune hepatitis treatment has, from its first description to the current time, consisted of predniso(lo)ne to induce remission, in combination with azathioprine, which is used to maintain it. Nonetheless, side effects and non‐response with ongoing inflammation despite standard therapy demand treatment alternatives. Only through a better understanding of the pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis can a more selective and effective treatment be offered to patients in the future. Until this goal is reached, improvement of diagnostic approaches and optimization of current therapy rank highest on the research agenda for autoimmune hepatitis.

Clinical phenotype and outcome of hepatitis E virus–associated neuralgic amyotrophy

Objective: To determine the clinical phenotype and outcome in hepatitis E virus–associated neuralgic amyotrophy (HEV-NA). Methods: Cases of NA were identified in 11 centers from 7 European countries, with retrospective analysis of demographics, clinical/laboratory findings, and treatment and outcome. Cases of HEV-NA were compared with NA cases without evidence of HEV infection. Results: Fifty-seven cases of HEV-NA and 61 NA cases without HEV were studied. Fifty-six of 57 HEV-NA cases were anti-HEV IgM positive; 53/57 were IgG positive. In 38 cases, HEV RNA was recovered from the serum and in 1 from the CSF (all genotype 3). Fifty-one of 57 HEV-NA cases were anicteric; median alanine aminotransferase 259 IU/L (range 12–2,961 IU/L); in 6 cases, liver function tests were normal. HEV-NA cases were more likely to have bilateral involvement (80.0% vs 8.6%, p < 0.001), damage outside the brachial plexus (58.5% vs 10.5%, p < 0.01), including phrenic nerve and lumbosacral plexus injury (25.0% vs 3.5%, p = 0.01, and 26.4% vs 7.0%, p = 0.001), reduced reflexes (p = 0.03), sensory symptoms (p = 0.04) with more extensive damage to the brachial plexus. There was no difference in outcome between the 2 groups at 12 months. Conclusions: Patients with HEV-NA are usually anicteric and have a distinct clinical phenotype, with predominately bilateral asymmetrical involvement of, and more extensive damage to, the brachial plexus. Involvement outside the brachial plexus is more common in HEV-NA. The relationship between HEV and NA is likely to be causal, but is easily overlooked. Patients presenting with NA should be tested for HEV, irrespective of liver function test results. Prospective treatment/outcome studies of HEV-NA are warranted.

Spleen size for the prediction of clinical outcome in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Dear Sir, We read with interest the work of van der Meer et al 1 who propose a risk score for patients with chronic Hepatitis C. The authors demonstrate that the assessment of readily available and objective parameters can stratify patients according to the risk of disease progression. Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) usually develop progressive liver fibrosis and end-stage liver disease within 10–20 years.2 Simple and non-invasive means for disease stratification and prediction of prognosis are urgently needed. Indeed, the International PSC Study Group recently declared the research on surrogate end-point markers as a high-priority task,3 since several clinical studies investigating novel treatment strategies …

Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based triple therapy in hepatitis C genotype 4 infection

BACKGROUND There are only limited data on sofosbuvir-based treatment regimens in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4-infected patients. AIMS To evaluate safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based triple-therapy in HCV genotype 4 infection. METHODS All HCV genotype 4-infected patients who started sofosbuvir-based triple-therapy at our two centres between January and June 2014 were prospectively included (N=24) and compared to genotype 4 patients treated with peginterferon/ribavirin between January 2001 and December 2012 (N=63). RESULTS The demographics in the sofosbuvir group and the controls were comparable (males 87.5% and 82.5%; mean age 46.7±9.0 years and 42.0±9.8 years, respectively). Sustained virological response was achieved in 83.3% in the sofosbuvir group and in 47.6% of controls (P=0.003). Fatigue (P=0.007), flu-like (P=0.015), gastrointestinal (P<0.001), dermatologic (P<0.001) and psychiatric symptoms (P=0.022) were more common in the control group. CONCLUSIONS In our real-life cohort, sofosbuvir-based triple therapy confirmed its high efficacy and safety for chronic genotype 4 hepatitis C.