Johannes Kirchmair

Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection--what can we learn from earlier mistakes?

Within the last few years a considerable amount of evaluative studies has been published that investigate the performance of 3D virtual screening approaches. Thereby, in particular assessments of protein–ligand docking are facing remarkable interest in the scientific community. However, comparing virtual screening approaches is a non-trivial task. Several publications, especially in the field of molecular docking, suffer from shortcomings that are likely to affect the significance of the results considerably. These quality issues often arise from poor study design, biasing, by using improper or inexpressive enrichment descriptors, and from errors in interpretation of the data output. In this review we analyze recent literature evaluating 3D virtual screening methods, with focus on molecular docking. We highlight problematic issues and provide guidelines on how to improve the quality of computational studies. Since 3D virtual screening protocols are in general assessed by their ability to discriminate between active and inactive compounds, we summarize the impact of the composition and preparation of test sets on the outcome of evaluations. Moreover, we investigate the significance of both classic enrichment parameters and advanced descriptors for the performance of 3D virtual screening methods. Furthermore, we review the significance and suitability of RMSD as a measure for the accuracy of protein–ligand docking algorithms and of conformational space sub sampling algorithms.

Computational Prediction of Metabolism: Sites, Products, SAR, P450 Enzyme Dynamics, and Mechanisms

Metabolism of xenobiotics remains a central challenge for the discovery and development of drugs, cosmetics, nutritional supplements, and agrochemicals. Metabolic transformations are frequently related to the incidence of toxic effects that may result from the emergence of reactive species, the systemic accumulation of metabolites, or by induction of metabolic pathways. Experimental investigation of the metabolism of small organic molecules is particularly resource demanding; hence, computational methods are of considerable interest to complement experimental approaches. This review provides a broad overview of structure- and ligand-based computational methods for the prediction of xenobiotic metabolism. Current computational approaches to address xenobiotic metabolism are discussed from three major perspectives: (i) prediction of sites of metabolism (SOMs), (ii) elucidation of potential metabolites and their chemical structures, and (iii) prediction of direct and indirect effects of xenobiotics on metabolizing enzymes, where the focus is on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily of enzymes, the cardinal xenobiotics metabolizing enzymes. For each of these domains, a variety of approaches and their applications are systematically reviewed, including expert systems, data mining approaches, quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs), and machine learning-based methods, pharmacophore-based algorithms, shape-focused techniques, molecular interaction fields (MIFs), reactivity-focused techniques, protein–ligand docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and combinations of methods. Predictive metabolism is a developing area, and there is still enormous potential for improvement. However, it is clear that the combination of rapidly increasing amounts of available ligand- and structure-related experimental data (in particular, quantitative data) with novel and diverse simulation and modeling approaches is accelerating the development of effective tools for prediction of in vivo metabolism, which is reflected by the diverse and comprehensive data sources and methods for metabolism prediction reviewed here. This review attempts to survey the range and scope of computational methods applied to metabolism prediction and also to compare and contrast their applicability and performance.

Comparative performance assessment of the conformational model generators omega and catalyst: a large-scale survey on the retrieval of protein-bound ligand conformations.

In continuation of our studies to evaluate the ability of various conformer generators to produce bioactive conformations, we present the extension of our work on the analysis of Catalysts conformational subsampling algorithm in a comparative evaluation with OpenEyes currently updated tool Omega 2.0. Our study is based on an enhanced test set of 778 drug molecules and pharmacologically relevant compounds extracted from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We elaborated protocols for two common conformer generation use cases and applied them to both programs: (i) high-throughput settings for processing large databases and (ii) high-quality settings for binding site exploration or lead structure refinement. While Catalyst is faster in the first case, Omega 2.0 better reproduces the bound ligand conformations from the PDB in less time for the latter case.

Predicting drug metabolism: experiment and/or computation?

Drug metabolism can produce metabolites with physicochemical and pharmacological properties that differ substantially from those of the parent drug, and consequently has important implications for both drug safety and efficacy. To reduce the risk of costly clinical-stage attrition due to the metabolic characteristics of drug candidates, there is a need for efficient and reliable ways to predict drug metabolism in vitro, in silico and in vivo. In this Perspective, we provide an overview of the state of the art of experimental and computational approaches for investigating drug metabolism. We highlight the scope and limitations of these methods, and indicate strategies to harvest the synergies that result from combining measurement and prediction of drug metabolism.

Comparative analysis of protein-bound ligand conformations with respect to catalyst's conformational space subsampling algorithms.

We examined the quality of Catalysts conformational model generation algorithm via a large scale study based on the crystal structures of a sample of 510 pharmaceutically relevant protein-ligand complexes extracted from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Our results show that the tested algorithms implemented within Catalyst are able to produce high quality conformers, which in most of the cases are well suited for in silico drug research. Catalyst-specific settings were analyzed, such as the method used for the conformational model generation (FAST vs BEST) and the maximum number of generated conformers. By setting these options for higher fitting quality, the average RMS values describing the similarity of experimental and simulated conformers were improved from an RMS of 1.06 with max. 50 FAST generated conformers to an RMS of 0.93 with max. 255 BEST generated conformers, which represents an improvement by 12%. Each method provides best fitting conformers with an RMS value<1.50 in more than 80% of all cases. We analyzed the computing time/quality ratio of various conformational model generation settings and examined ligands in high energy conformations. Furthermore, properties of the same ligands in various proteins were investigated, and the fitting qualities of experimental conformations from the PDB and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) were compared. One of the most important conclusions of former studies, the fact that bioactive conformers often have energy high above that of global minima, was confirmed.

CAESAR : A new conformer generation algorithm based on recursive buildup and local rotational symmetry consideration

A highly efficient conformer search algorithm based on a divide-and-conquer and recursive conformer build-up approach is presented in this paper. This approach is combined with consideration of local rotational symmetry so that conformer duplicates due to topological symmetry in the systematic search can be efficiently eliminated. This new algorithm, termed CAESAR (Conformer Algorithm based on Energy Screening and Recursive Buildup), has been implemented in Discovery Studio 1.7 as part of the Catalyst Component Collection. CAESAR has been validated by comparing the conformer models generated by the new method and Catalyst/FAST. CAESAR is consistently 5-20 times faster than Catalyst/FAST for all data sets investigated. The speedup is even more dramatic for molecules with high topological symmetry or for molecules that require a large number of conformers to be sampled. The quality of the conformer models generated by CAESAR has been validated by assessing the ability to reproduce the receptor-bound X-ray conformation of ligands extracted for the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and assessing the ability to adequately cover the pharmacophore space. It is shown that CAESAR is able to reproduce the receptor-bound conformation slightly better than the Catalyst/FAST method for a data set of 918 ligands retrieved from the PDB. In addition, it is shown that CEASAR covers the pharmacophore space as well or better than Catalyst/FAST.

Antiviral potential and molecular insight into neuraminidase inhibiting diarylheptanoids from Alpinia katsumadai.

At present, neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors are the mainstay of pharmacological strategies to fight against global pandemic influenza. In the search for new antiviral drug leads from nature, the seed extract of Alpinia katsumadai has been phytochemically investigated. Among the six isolated constituents, four diarylheptanoids showed in vitro NA inhibitory activities in low micromolar ranges against human influenza virus A/PR/8/34 of subtype H1N1. The most promising constituent, katsumadain A (4; IC(50) = 1.05 +/- 0.42 microM), also inhibited the NA of four H1N1 swine influenza viruses, with IC(50) values between 0.9 and 1.64 muM, and showed antiviral effects in plaque reduction assays. Considering the flexible loop regions of NA, extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to study the putative binding mechanism of the T-shaped diarylheptanoid 4. Docking results showed well-established interactions between the protein and the core of this novel NA-inhibiting natural scaffold, excellent surface complementarity to the simulated binding pocket, and concordance with experimentally derived SAR data.

Pharmacophore modeling and parallel screening for PPAR ligands

We describe the generation and validation of pharmacophore models for PPARs, as well as a large scale validation of the parallel screening approach by screening PPAR ligands against a large database of structure-based models. A large test set of 357 PPAR ligands was screened against 48 PPAR models to determine the best models for agonists of PPAR-α, PPAR-δ, and PPAR-γ. Afterwards, a parallel screen was performed using the 357 PPAR ligands and 47 structure-based models for PPARs, which were integrated into a 1537 models comprising in-house pharmacophore database, to assess the enrichment of PPAR ligands within the PPAR hypotheses. For these purposes, we categorized the 1537 database models into 181 protein targets and developed a score that ranks the retrieved targets for each ligand. Thus, we tried to find out if the concept of parallel screening is able to predict the correct pharmacological target for a set of compounds. The PPAR target was ranked first more often than any other target. This confirms the ability of parallel screening to forecast the pharmacological active target for a set of compounds.

Fast and efficient in silico 3D screening: toward maximum computational efficiency of pharmacophore-based and shape-based approaches.

In continuation of our recent studies on the quality of conformational models generated with CATALYST and OMEGA we present a large-scale survey focusing on the impact of conformational model quality and several screening parameters on pharmacophore-based and shape-based virtual high throughput screening (vHTS). Therefore, we collected known active compounds of CDK2, p38 MAPK, PPAR-gamma, and factor Xa and built a set of druglike decoys using ilib:diverse. Subsequently, we generated 3D structures using CORINA and also calculated conformational models for all compounds using CAESAR, CATALYST FAST, and OMEGA. A widespread set of 103 structure-based pharmacophore models was developed with LigandScout for virtual screening with CATALYST. The performance of both database search modes (FAST and BEST flexible database search) as well as the fit value calculation procedures (FAST and BEST fit) available in CATALYST were analyzed in terms of their ability to discriminate between active and inactive compounds and in terms of efficiency. Moreover, these results are put in direct comparison to the performance of the shape-based virtual screening platform ROCS. Our results prove that high enrichment rates are not necessarily in conflict with efficient vHTS settings: In most of the experiments, we obtained the highest yield of actives in the hit list when parameter sets for the fastest search algorithm were used.

Discovery of Novel PPAR Ligands by a Virtual Screening Approach Based on Pharmacophore Modeling, 3D Shape, and Electrostatic Similarity Screening

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are important targets for drugs used in the treatment of atherosclerosis, dyslipidaemia, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and other diseases caused by abnormal regulation of the glucose and lipid metabolism. We applied a virtual screening workflow based on a combination of pharmacophore modeling with 3D shape and electrostatic similarity screening techniques to discover novel scaffolds for PPAR ligands. From the resulting 10 virtual screening hits, five tested positive in human PPAR ligand-binding domain (hPPAR-LBD) transactivation assays and showed affinities for PPAR in a competitive binding assay. Compounds 5, 7, and 8 were identified as PPAR-alpha agonists, whereas compounds 2 and 9 showed agonistic activity for hPPAR-gamma. Moreover, compound 9 was identified as a PPAR-delta antagonist. These results demonstrate that our virtual screening protocol is able to enrich novel scaffolds for PPAR ligands that could be useful for drug development in the area of atherosclerosis, dyslipidaemia, and type 2 diabetes.