Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Johannes Mohrmann is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Johannes Mohrmann.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017

The global aerosol-cloud first indirect effect estimated using MODIS, MERRA, and AeroCom

Daniel T. McCoy; Frida A.-M. Bender; Johannes Mohrmann; Dennis L. Hartmann; Robert Wood; Daniel P. Grosvenor

Aerosol-cloud interactions (ACI) represent a significant source of forcing uncertainty in global climate models (GCMs). Estimates of radiative forcing due to ACI in Fifth Assessment Report range fr ...


Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | 2018

Ultraclean Layers and Optically Thin Clouds in the Stratocumulus-to-Cumulus Transition. Part I: Observations

Robert Wood; Kuan-Ting O; Christopher S. Bretherton; Johannes Mohrmann; Bruce A. Albrecht; Paquita Zuidema; Virendra P. Ghate; Chris Schwartz; Ed Eloranta; Susanne Glienke; Raymond A. Shaw; Jacob P. Fugal; Patrick Minnis

AbstractA common feature of the stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition (SCT) is the presence of layers in which the concentration of particles larger than 0.1 μm is below 10 cm−3. These ultraclean layers (UCLs) are explored using aircraft observations from 14 flights of the NSF–NCAR Gulfstream V (G-V) aircraft between California and Hawaii. UCLs are commonly located in the upper part of decoupled boundary layers, with coverage increasing from less than 5% within 500 km of the California coast to ~30%–60% west of 130°W. Most clouds in UCLs are thin, horizontally extensive layers containing drops with median volume radii ranging from 15 to 30 μm. Many UCL clouds are optically thin and do not fully attenuate the G-V lidar and yet are frequently detected with a 94-GHz radar with a sensitivity of around −30 dBZ. Satellite data indicate that UCL clouds have visible reflectances of ~0.1–0.2 and are often quasi laminar, giving them a veil-like appearance. These optically thin veil clouds exist for 1–3 h or more, are...


Climate Dynamics | 2018

Assessment of aerosol–cloud–radiation correlations in satellite observations, climate models and reanalysis

Frida A.-M. Bender; L. Frey; Daniel T. McCoy; Daniel P. Grosvenor; Johannes Mohrmann

Representing large-scale co-variability between variables related to aerosols, clouds and radiation is one of many aspects of agreement with observations desirable for a climate model. In this study such relations are investigated in terms of temporal correlations on monthly mean scale, to identify points of agreement and disagreement with observations. Ten regions with different meteorological characteristics and aerosol signatures are studied and correlation matrices for the selected regions offer an overview of model ability to represent present day climate variability. Global climate models with different levels of detail and sophistication in their representation of aerosols and clouds are compared with satellite observations and reanalysis assimilating meteorological fields as well as aerosol optical depth from observations. One example of how the correlation comparison can guide model evaluation and development is the often studied relation between cloud droplet number and water content. Reanalysis, with no parameterized aerosol–cloud coupling, shows weaker correlations than observations, indicating that microphysical couplings between cloud droplet number and water content are not negligible for the co-variations emerging on larger scale. These observed correlations are, however, not in agreement with those expected from dominance of the underlying microphysical aerosol–cloud couplings. For instance, negative correlations in subtropical stratocumulus regions show that suppression of precipitation and subsequent increase in water content due to aerosol is not a dominating process on this scale. Only in one of the studied models are cloud dynamics able to overcome the parameterized dependence of rain formation on droplet number concentration, and negative correlations in the stratocumulus regions are reproduced.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017

Drivers of seasonal variability in marine boundary layer aerosol number concentration investigated using a steady-state approach: Drivers of MBL aerosol seasonality

Johannes Mohrmann; Robert Wood; Jeremy McGibbon; Ryan Eastman; Edward Luke

Marine boundary layer (MBL) aerosol particles affect the climate through their interaction with MBL clouds. Although both MBL clouds and aerosol particles have pronounced seasonal cycles, the factors controlling seasonal variability of MBL aerosol particle concentration are not well constrained. In this paper an aerosol budget is constructed representing the effects of wet deposition, free-tropospheric entrainment, primary surface sources, and advection on the MBL accumulation mode aerosol number concentration (Na). These terms are then parameterized, and by assuming that on seasonal time scales Na is in steady state, the budget equation is rearranged to form a diagnostic equation for Na based on observable variables. Using data primarily collected in the subtropical northeast Pacific during the MAGIC campaign (Marine ARM (Atmospheric Radiation Measurement) GPCI (GCSS Pacific Cross-Section Intercomparison) Investigation of Clouds), estimates of both mean summer and winter Na concentrations are made using the simplified steady state model and seasonal mean observed variables. These are found to match well with the observed Na. To attribute the modeled difference between summer and winter aerosol concentrations to individual observed variables (e.g., precipitation rate and free-tropospheric aerosol number concentration), a local sensitivity analysis is combined with the seasonal difference in observed variables. This analysis shows that despite wintertime precipitation frequency being lower than summer, the higher winter precipitation rate accounted for approximately 60% of the modeled seasonal difference in Na, which emphasizes the importance of marine stratocumulus precipitation in determining MBL aerosol concentrations on longer time scales.


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2017

Predicting decadal trends in cloud droplet number concentration using reanalysis and satellite data

Daniel T. McCoy; Frida A.-M. Bender; Daniel P. Grosvenor; Johannes Mohrmann; Dennis L. Hartmann; Robert Wood; P. R. Field


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2018

Drivers of Seasonal Variability in Marine Boundary Layer Aerosol Number Concentration Investigated Using a Steady State Approach

Johannes Mohrmann; Robert Wood; Jeremy McGibbon; Ryan Eastman; Edward Luke


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017

The global aerosol-cloud first indirect effect estimated using MODIS, MERRA, and AeroCom: MODIS-MERRA Indirect Effect

Daniel T. McCoy; Frida A.-M. Bender; Johannes Mohrmann; Dennis L. Hartmann; Robert Wood; Daniel P. Grosvenor


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2018

Cloud System Evolution in the Trades—CSET Following the Evolution of Boundary Layer Cloud Systems with the NSF/NCAR GV

Bruce A. Albrecht; Virendra P. Ghate; Johannes Mohrmann; Robert J. K. Wood; Paquita Zuidema; Christopher S. Bretherton; Christian Schwartz; Edwin Eloranta; Susanne Glienke; Shaunna L. Donaher; Mampi Sarkar; Jeremy McGibbon; Alison D. Nugent; Raymond A. Shaw; Jacob P. Fugal; Patrick Minnis; Robindra Paliknoda; Louis Lussier; Jorgen B. Jensen; Jothiram Vivekanandan; Scott Ellis; Peisang Tsai; Robert A. Rilling; Julie Haggerty; Teresa L. Campos; Meghan Stell; Michael Reeves; Stuart Beaton; John J. Allison; Gregory Stossmeister


15th Conference on Cloud Physics/15th Conference on Atmospheric Radiation | 2018

Lagrangian Case Studies of Marine Boundary Layer Evolution from Combined Satellite-Aircraft Observations

Johannes Mohrmann


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017

MODIS,MERRA,AeroComを用いて推定した全球エアロゾル‐雲第一間接効果【Powered by NICT】

Daniel T. McCoy; Johannes Mohrmann; Dennis L. Hartmann; Robert Wood; Daniel P. Grosvenor

Collaboration


Dive into the Johannes Mohrmann's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Wood

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward Luke

Brookhaven National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge