Johannes Oldenburg

Mutations in VKORC1 cause warfarin resistance and multiple coagulation factor deficiency type 2

Coumarin derivatives such as warfarin represent the therapy of choice for the long-term treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events. Coumarins target blood coagulation by inhibiting the vitamin K epoxide reductase multiprotein complex (VKOR). This complex recycles vitamin K 2,3-epoxide to vitamin K hydroquinone, a cofactor that is essential for the post-translational γ-carboxylation of several blood coagulation factors. Despite extensive efforts, the components of the VKOR complex have not been identified. The complex has been proposed to be involved in two heritable human diseases: combined deficiency of vitamin-K-dependent clotting factors type 2 (VKCFD2; Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) 607473), and resistance to coumarin-type anticoagulant drugs (warfarin resistance, WR; OMIM 122700). Here we identify, by using linkage information from three species, the gene vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (VKORC1), which encodes a small transmembrane protein of the endoplasmic reticulum. VKORC1 contains missense mutations in both human disorders and in a warfarin-resistant rat strain. Overexpression of wild-type VKORC1, but not VKORC1 carrying the VKCFD2 mutation, leads to a marked increase in VKOR activity, which is sensitive to warfarin inhibition.

VKORC1 haplotypes and their impact on the inter-individual and inter-ethnical variability of oral anticoagulation.

In order to elucidate the role of VCORC1 sequence variants in warfarin sensitivity, we established a complete SNP map of the VKORC1 gene locus in 200 blood donors from Western Germany. Nearly all of the genetic variability of the VKORC1 gene in Europeans is reflected by three main haplotypes. Recently described polymorphisms associated with low warfarin dose requirement (dbSNP:rs9934438; dbSNP:rs17878363) were found in complete linkage disequilibrium with the VKORC1*2 haplotype. In two patient cohorts of European origin with either increased coumarin sensitivity (n= 14) or partial coumarin resistance (n=36) the VKORC1*2 frequency varied highly significant between the two groups and also when compared to 200 blood donor controls (coumarin sensitive 96%, coumarin resistant 7%, controls 42%) thus demonstrating a strong association between these two phenotypes and the VKORC1 haplotype (p = 1.6 x 10(-8) for coumarin sensitive and p = 1.9 x 10(-8) for coumarin resistant). Analysis of database derived VKORC1 genotypes of African Americans and Chinese revealed that haplotype frequencies in these populations differ significantly from the European sample (for VKORC1*2: Europeans 42%, Chinese 95%, African Americans 14%). These observations suggest VKORC1 as principal genetic modulator of the ethnic differences in warfarin response. Since hereditary pharmacodynamic (VKORC1) and pharmacokinetic (CYP2C9) factors account for up to 50% of the inter-individual variability of the warfarin response, these genetic markers may serve as clinically relevant predictors of warfarin dosing in future studies.

Immune Tolerance for the Treatment of Factor VIII Inhibitors ‐ Twenty Years' ‘Bonn Protocol’

Around 20 years ago, a mother admitted her hemophilic son, 1 % years of age, knowing that he had an inhibitor, to our center by ambulance. He showed severe bleeding episodes into his right shoulder, right upper arm and right chest. The inhibitor titer at that time was :>500 Bethesda units (BU). Some months earlier, in 1974, we had heard about a publication by Kurczinsky and Penner [ I ] about the successful treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with an inhibitor with activated prothrombin complex concentrates. When calling a manufacturer (Immuno), asking for a similar product, we were told that this was still in development, and not available at the moment. In this serious situation, we decided to combine high dosages of factor VIII with a regular prothrombin concentrate. This regimen was given twice a day to the patient, and the bleeding could be controlled. After 3 weeks the patient recovered completely, and he could be dismissed from the hospital. Astonishingly, during this treatment the inhibitor titer decreased to slightly more than 40 BU. Therefore, it appeared to be reasonable to evaluate this procedure also in other hemophilic patients with an inhibitor suffering from acute bleeding episodes. We observed that in some patients there was a booster effect on the inhibitor, and in some not, but the inhibitor titer decreased in all cases after some weeks of treatment. We decided not to stop the treatment, but to continue this procedure, and realized that the inhibitor finally disappeared. Subsequently, also the half-life of factor VIIl normalized. However, it took around 2 years to develop the dosage schedule that we are using today. Methods

Genetic risk factors for inhibitors to factors VIII and IX.

Summary.  The formation of alloantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) is the most severe complication of replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia. In the last decade, genetic factors have been shown to constitute a decisive risk determinant for the development of inhibitors. In severe haemophilia A and B, mutations that result in an absent or truncated FVIII/FIX protein are associated with a 20–80% risk of inhibitor formation. In mild to moderate haemophilia, missense mutations represent the main mutation type, with an inhibitor prevalence of 5%. These patients synthesize some endogenous, although non‐functional protein that is sufficient to induce immune tolerance. However, in patients with missense mutations clustered in the A2 and C2 domains (C1/C2 junction), the risk of inhibitor formation is fourfold greater than in patients with mutations outside this region, indicating that inhibitor prevalence in missense mutations is also dependent on localization of the mutation. Recently, a significant association between inhibitor formation and polymorphisms in genes coding for cytokines (IL‐10) and other immunoregulatory factors (TNF‐α) has been shown. These genetic factors constitute the individual genetic risk profile of a haemophilic patient. This risk is imprinted and fixed; however, environmental factors such as treatment schedule may increase or decrease the inhibitor risk in an individual patient. Improved understanding of these complex interactions may lead to the development of preventive measures to minimize inhibitor formation.

F8 gene mutation type and inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A: systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review was designed to provide more precise effect estimates of inhibitor development for the various types of F8 gene mutations in patients with severe hemophilia A. The primary outcome was inhibitor development and the secondary outcome was high-titer-inhibitor development. A systematic literature search was performed to include cohort studies published in peer-reviewed journals with data on inhibitor incidences in the various F8 gene mutation types and a mutation detection rate of at least 80%. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) of inhibitor development for different types of F8 gene mutations were calculated with intron 22 inversion as the reference. Data were included from 30 studies on 5383 patients, including 1029 inhibitor patients. The inhibitor risk in large deletions and nonsense mutations was higher than in intron 22 inversions (pooled OR = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.3-5.7 and OR = 1.4, 95% CI, 1.1-1.8, respectively), the risk in intron 1 inversions and splice-site mutations was equal (pooled OR = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5 and OR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5), and the risk in small deletions/insertions and missense mutations was lower (pooled OR = 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.6 and OR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4, respectively). The relative risks for developing high titer inhibitors were similar.

Intensity of factor VIII treatment and inhibitor development in children with severe hemophilia A: the RODIN study

The objective of this study was to examine the association of the intensity of treatment, ranging from high-dose intensive factor VIII (FVIII) treatment to prophylactic treatment, with the inhibitor incidence among previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. This cohort study aimed to include consecutive patients with a FVIII activity < 0.01 IU/mL, born between 2000 and 2010, and observed during their first 75 FVIII exposure days. Intensive FVIII treatment of hemorrhages or surgery at the start of treatment was associated with an increased inhibitor risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-3.0). High-dose FVIII treatment was associated with a higher inhibitor risk than low-dose FVIII treatment (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0-4.8). Prophylaxis was only associated with a decreased overall inhibitor incidence after 20 exposure days of FVIII. The association with prophylaxis was more pronounced in patients with low-risk F8 genotypes than in patients with high-risk F8 genotypes (aHR, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.19-2.0 and aHR, 0.85, 95% CI, 0.51-1.4, respectively). In conclusion, our findings suggest that in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A, high-dosed intensive FVIII treatment increases inhibitor risk and prophylactic FVIII treatment decreases inhibitor risk, especially in patients with low-risk F8 mutations.

Inhibitor development in correlation to factor VIII genotypes

Summary.  Alloantibodies (inhibitors) against factor VIII (FVIII) develop in 20–30% of patients with severe haemophilia A and render classical FVIII substitution therapy ineffective. Several studies have shown that genetic factors, the type of FVIII gene mutation and immune response genes (e.g. the Major Histocompatibility Complexes), influence the risk of inhibitor formation. In particular, the type of FVIII gene mutation has proven to be a decisive risk factor. Patients with severe molecular gene defects (e.g. large deletions, nonsense mutations, intron‐22 inversion) and no endogenous FVIII synthesis have a 7–10 times higher inhibitor prevalence than patients with milder molecular gene defects (e.g. missense mutations, small deletions, splice site mutations). To date, at least 10 distinct classes of mutations have been shown which have differing risks of associated inhibitor formation. A challenging observation in inhibitor patients is the heterogeneity of the antibody epitopes with respect to their number and their specifity. At least five epitopes in the FVIII molecule have been identified that constitute the targets for antibodies in most inhibitor patients. These epitopes are located in the ar3 region and the A2, A3, C1, C2 domains which correspond to the functional binding sites of the ligands of the FVIII protein. At present, the determinants of the characteristics of these epitopes and the subsequent inhibitor titre are unknown. A relationship of the mutation site and the epitope localization has been shown for some individual patients with mild haemophilia A. However, in severely affected haemophilia A patients, the influence of patient genetics on inhibitor titre and epitope specifity has yet to be elucidated.

Polymorphisms in the CTLA-4 gene and inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A

J . ASTERMARK ,* X . WANG, J . OLDENBURG, E . BERNTORP ,* and A . -K . LEFVERT ON B E HA L F O F T HE MIBS STUDY GROUP *Department for Coagulation Disorders, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Immunological Research Laboratory, Center for Molecular Medicine and Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and Institute of Experimental Haematology and Transfusion Medicine, University Clinic Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Interethnic variability of warfarin maintenance requirement is explained by VKORC1 genotype in an Asian population

Chinese and Malay subjects have been reported to require less maintenance warfarin than Indians that could not be accounted for by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 variants. Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1) is the target enzyme of warfarin, and VKORC1 intronic variants and haplotypes have recently been shown to influence VKORC1 activity and warfarin requirements.

Impact of polymorphisms of the major histocompatibility complex class II, interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 genes on inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A.

Summary.  Background: Approximately 25% of severe hemophilia A (HA) patients develop antibodies to factor VIII protein. Patients: In the present case‐controlled cohort study, 260 severely affected, mutation‐type‐matched HA patients were studied for association of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II molecules and polymorphisms in the genes encoding interleukin‐10 (IL‐10), tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) and cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4) and development of inhibitors. Results: Our results demonstrate a higher frequency of DRB1*15 and DQB1*0602 alleles as well as of the haplotype DRB1*15/DQB1*0602 in inhibitor patients [odds ratio (OR) 1.9; P < 0.05]. In TNF‐α, the A allele of the −308G>A polymorphism was found with higher frequency in the inhibitor cohort (0.22 vs. 0.13, OR 1.80). This finding was more pronounced for the homozygous A/A genotype (OR 4.7). For IL‐10, the −1082G allele was observed more frequently in patients with inhibitors (0.55 vs. 0.43; P = 0.008). The functional cytokine phenotype was determined for the first time, on the basis of the genetic background, and this showed that 12% of patients with inhibitors were high‐TNF‐α/high‐IL‐10 producers, as compared with 3% of non‐inhibitor patients (OR 4.4). A trend for a lower frequency of the A allele of the CT60 polymorphism in CTLA‐4 was found in inhibitor patients (0.42 vs. 0.50). Conclusions: In conclusion, the reported data clearly highlighted the participation of HLA molecules in inhibitor formation in a large cohort of patients. The higher frequencies of the −308G>A polymorphism in TNF‐α and −1082A>G in IL‐10 in inhibitor patients confirmed the earlier published data. The CT60 single‐nucleotide polymorphism in CTLA‐4 is of apparently less importance.