Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John A.F. Zupancic is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John A.F. Zupancic.


BMJ | 2009

Effect of peer support on prevention of postnatal depression among high risk women: multisite randomised controlled trial

Cindy-Lee Dennis; Ellen Hodnett; Laura Kenton; Julie Weston; John A.F. Zupancic; Donna E. Stewart; Alexander Kiss

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of telephone based peer support in the prevention of postnatal depression. Design Multisite randomised controlled trial. Setting Seven health regions across Ontario, Canada. Participants 701 women in the first two weeks postpartum identified as high risk for postnatal depression with the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale and randomised with an internet based randomisation service. Intervention Proactive individualised telephone based peer (mother to mother) support, initiated within 48-72 hours of randomisation, provided by a volunteer recruited from the community who had previously experienced and recovered from self reported postnatal depression and attended a four hour training session. Main outcome measures Edinburgh postnatal depression scale, structured clinical interview-depression, state-trait anxiety inventory, UCLA loneliness scale, and use of health services. Results After web based screening of 21 470 women, 701 (72%) eligible mothers were recruited. A blinded research nurse followed up more than 85% by telephone, including 613 at 12 weeks and 600 at 24 weeks postpartum. At 12 weeks, 14% (40/297) of women in the intervention group and 25% (78/315) in the control group had an Edinburgh postnatal depression scale score >12 (χ2=12.5, P<0.001; number need to treat 8.8, 95% confidence interval 5.9 to 19.6; relative risk reduction 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.62). There was a positive trend in favour of the intervention group for maternal anxiety but not loneliness or use of health services. For ethical reasons, participants identified with clinical depression at 12 weeks were referred for treatment, resulting in no differences between groups at 24 weeks. Of the 221 women in the intervention group who received and evaluated their experience of peer support, over 80% were satisfied and would recommend this support to a friend. Conclusion Telephone based peer support can be effective in preventing postnatal depression among women at high risk. Trial registration ISRCTN 68337727.


Annual Review of Public Health | 2011

Prematurity: An Overview and Public Health Implications

Marie C. McCormick; Jonathan S. Litt; Vincent C. Smith; John A.F. Zupancic

The high rate of premature births in the United States remains a public health concern. These infants experience substantial morbidity and mortality in the newborn period, which translate into significant medical costs. In early childhood, survivors are characterized by a variety of health problems, including motor delay and/or cerebral palsy, lower IQs, behavior problems, and respiratory illness, especially asthma. Many experience difficulty with school work, lower health-related quality of life, and family stress. Emerging information in adolescence and young adulthood paints a more optimistic picture, with persistence of many problems but with better adaptation and more positive expectations by the young adults. Few opportunities for prevention have been identified; therefore, public health approaches to prematurity include assurance of delivery in a facility capable of managing neonatal complications, quality improvement to minimize interinstitutional variations, early developmental support for such infants, and attention to related family health issues.


Archives of Disease in Childhood-fetal and Neonatal Edition | 2006

Unstudied infants: outcomes of moderately premature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit

Gabriel J. Escobar; Marie C. McCormick; John A.F. Zupancic; Kim Coleman-Phox; Mary Anne Armstrong; John D. Greene; Eric C. Eichenwald; Douglas K. Richardson

Background: Newborns of 30–34 weeks gestation comprise 3.9% of all live births in the United States and 32% of all premature infants. They have been studied much less than very low birthweight infants. Objective: To measure in-hospital outcomes and readmission within three months of discharge of moderately premature infants. Design: Prospective cohort study including retrospective chart review and telephone interviews after discharge. Setting: Ten birth hospitals in California and Massachusetts. Patients: Surviving moderately premature infants born between October 2001 and February 2003. Main outcome measures: (a) Occurrence of assisted ventilation during the hospital stay after birth; (b) adverse in-hospital outcomes—for example, necrotising enterocolitis; (c) readmission within three months of discharge. Results: With the use of prospective cluster sampling, 850 eligible infants and their families were identified, randomly selected, and enrolled. A total of 677 families completed a telephone interview three months after hospital discharge. During the birth stay, these babies experienced substantial morbidity: 45.7% experienced assisted ventilation, and 3.2% still required supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks. Readmission within three months occurred in 11.2% of the cohort and was higher among male infants and those with chronic lung disease. Conclusions: Moderately premature infants experience significant morbidity, as evidenced by high rates of assisted ventilation, use of oxygen at 36 weeks, and readmission. Such morbidity deserves more research.


Pediatrics | 2005

Prenatal Consultation Practices at the Border of Viability: A Regional Survey

Tara K. Bastek; Douglas K. Richardson; John A.F. Zupancic; Jeffrey P. Burns

Objective.We undertook a survey of all practicing neonatologists in New England to determine their attitudes and practices regarding prenatal consultations for infants at the border of viability. Methods.A self-administered anonymous survey, mailed to every practicing neonatologist in the 6 Northeast states of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont, explored respondent attitudes and practices with respect to a hypothetical clinical scenario of a prenatal consultation for an infant at the border of viability. Results.Our final sample included 149 surveys from 175 eligible neonatologists, giving a response rate of 85%. Seventy-seven percent of respondents indicated that they thought neonatologists and parents should make the decision jointly to withhold resuscitation. Only 40% indicated that the decision actually is made by both parties. A majority of neonatologists (58%) saw their primary role during the prenatal consultation as providing factual information to the parents. Far fewer (27%) thought that their main role was to assist the parents in weighing the risks and benefits of various management options. A majority of respondents indicated that parental understanding of the mothers current medical situation (96%), desired parental role (77%), and parental prior experience with premature or handicapped children (64%) were frequently or always discussed. However, far fewer respondents reported frequently or always asking about parental interpretations of a “good quality of life” (42%), parental prior experiences with death or dying (30%), and parental religious or spiritual beliefs (25%). Short-term outcomes and complications such as the need for surfactant/respiratory distress syndrome (89%) and the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (81%) were discussed more extensively than long-term outcomes such as motor delays or cerebral palsy (68%), cognitive delays or learning disabilities (63%), and chronic lung disease (61%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed 2 characteristics that were significant predictors of shared decision-making for the final decision regarding resuscitation in the delivery room for extremely premature infants, ie, believing that the main role of the neonatologist during prenatal consultations is to help parents weigh the risks and benefits of each resuscitation option (odds ratio: 4.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.6–10.9) and having >10 years of clinical experience (odds ratio: 3.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.5–8.8). Conclusions.Overall, our results showed that neonatologists are quite consistent in discussing clinical issues but quite varied in discussing social and ethical issues. If neonatologists are to perform complete prenatal consultations for infants at the border of viability as described by the latest American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, then they will be expected to address quality-of-life values more robustly, to explain long-term outcomes, and to incorporate parental preferences during their conversations. Potential barriers to shared decision-making have yet to be outlined.


Archives of Disease in Childhood-fetal and Neonatal Edition | 2002

Characterising doctor-parent communication in counselling for impending preterm delivery

John A.F. Zupancic; Haresh Kirpalani; J Barrett; Shawn Stewart; Amiram Gafni; David L. Streiner; M L Beecroft; P Smith

Objective: To examine the counselling of women admitted to hospital in preterm labour. Such women and their partners are often asked to participate in difficult decisions including mode of delivery, fetal monitoring, and resuscitation. Study design: Questionnaire based descriptive study. Study setting: A tertiary level perinatal referral centre. Patients: Forty nine women in preterm labour at 22–30 weeks gestation, admitted in two separate periods between March 1997 and May 1999. Intervention and outcome measure: Within 24 hours of counselling, parents were asked to complete a questionnaire assessing recall of the management plan, desire for involvement in decision making, anxiety, and feelings of control over their health. A parallel questionnaire was completed by the clinicians. Results: Parents and clinicians on recall agreed well about obstetric issues but poorly about neonatal issues. Overall 27% of parents felt: “I would prefer to have the doctors advise me, rather than asking me to decide”. In 79% of cases, clinicians believed parents preferred advice rather than to make decisions, but in 45% of these, they misidentified those who wished to make their decisions. Anxiety levels for one third of the mothers were high, and associated with poorer concordance of recall between parents and clinicians. Conclusions: Serious deficiencies exist in parent-clinician encounters during extremely preterm labour. Concordance between parents and clinicians is poor and anxiety very high. A quarter of parents appear to prefer to relinquish decision making autonomy, but clinicians cannot correctly identify this subgroup. Standardised counselling in the perinatal period, using formal decision aids, should be investigated.


Pediatrics | 2014

Stratification of Risk of Early-Onset Sepsis in Newborns ≥34 Weeks’ Gestation

Gabriel J. Escobar; Karen M. Puopolo; Soora Wi; Benjamin J. Turk; Michael W. Kuzniewicz; Eileen M. Walsh; Thomas B. Newman; John A.F. Zupancic; Ellice Lieberman; David Draper

OBJECTIVE: To define a quantitative stratification algorithm for the risk of early-onset sepsis (EOS) in newborns ≥34 weeks’ gestation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective nested case-control study that used split validation. Data collected on each infant included sepsis risk at birth based on objective maternal factors, demographics, specific clinical milestones, and vital signs during the first 24 hours after birth. Using a combination of recursive partitioning and logistic regression, we developed a risk classification scheme for EOS on the derivation dataset. This scheme was then applied to the validation dataset. RESULTS: Using a base population of 608 014 live births ≥34 weeks’ gestation at 14 hospitals between 1993 and 2007, we identified all 350 EOS cases <72 hours of age and frequency matched them by hospital and year of birth to 1063 controls. Using maternal and neonatal data, we defined a risk stratification scheme that divided the neonatal population into 3 groups: treat empirically (4.1% of all live births, 60.8% of all EOS cases, sepsis incidence of 8.4/1000 live births), observe and evaluate (11.1% of births, 23.4% of cases, 1.2/1000), and continued observation (84.8% of births, 15.7% of cases, incidence 0.11/1000). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to combine objective maternal data with evolving objective neonatal clinical findings to define more efficient strategies for the evaluation and treatment of EOS in term and late preterm infants. Judicious application of our scheme could result in decreased antibiotic treatment in 80 000 to 240 000 US newborns each year.


JAMA | 2014

Effect of an Enhanced Medical Home on Serious Illness and Cost of Care Among High-Risk Children With Chronic Illness A Randomized Clinical Trial

Ricardo A. Mosquera; Elenir B. C. Avritscher; Cheryl Samuels; Tomika S. Harris; Claudia Pedroza; Patricia W. Evans; Fernando Navarro; Susan H. Wootton; Susan E. Pacheco; Guy L. Clifton; Shadé Moody; Luisa Franzini; John A.F. Zupancic; Jon E. Tyson

IMPORTANCE Patient-centered medical homes have not been shown to reduce adverse outcomes or costs in adults or children with chronic illness. OBJECTIVE To assess whether an enhanced medical home providing comprehensive care prevents serious illness (death, intensive care unit [ICU] admission, or hospital stay >7 days) and/or reduces costs among children with chronic illness. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized clinical trial of high-risk children with chronic illness (≥3 emergency department visits, ≥2 hospitalizations, or ≥1 pediatric ICU admissions during previous year, and >50% estimated risk for hospitalization) treated at a high-risk clinic at the University of Texas, Houston, and randomized to comprehensive care (n = 105) or usual care (n = 96). Enrollment was between March 2011 and February 2013 (when predefined stopping rules for benefit were met) and outcome evaluations continued through August 31, 2013. INTERVENTIONS Comprehensive care included treatment from primary care clinicians and specialists in the same clinic with multiple features to promote prompt effective care. Usual care was provided locally in private offices or faculty-supervised clinics without modification. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome: children with a serious illness (death, ICU admission, or hospital stay >7 days), costs (health system perspective). Secondary outcomes: individual serious illnesses, medical services, Medicaid payments, and medical school revenues and costs. RESULTS In an intent-to-treat analysis, comprehensive care decreased both the rate of children with a serious illness (10 per 100 child-years vs 22 for usual care; rate ratio [RR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.28-0.73]), and total hospital and clinic costs (


Acta Paediatrica | 2007

Resuscitation and ventilation strategies for extremely preterm infants: a comparison study between two neonatal centers in Boston and Stockholm

Mireille Vanpée; Ulrika Walfridsson-Schultz; Miriam Katz-Salamon; John A.F. Zupancic; DeWayne M. Pursley; Baldvin Jonsson

16,523 vs


Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine | 2008

Supporting bereaved parents: practical steps in providing compassionate perinatal and neonatal end-of-life care – A North American perspective☆

Constance Williams; David Munson; John A.F. Zupancic; Haresh Kirpalani

26,781 per child-year, respectively; cost ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.38-0.88]). In analyses of net monetary benefit, the probability that comprehensive care was cost neutral or cost saving was 97%. Comprehensive care reduced (per 100 child-years) serious illnesses (16 vs 44 for usual care; RR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.17-0.66]), emergency department visits (90 vs 190; RR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.34-0.67]), hospitalizations (69 vs 131; RR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33-0.77]), pediatric ICU admissions (9 vs 26; RR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.18-0.70]), and number of days in a hospital (276 vs 635; RR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.19-0.67]). Medicaid payments were reduced by


Pediatrics | 2015

Choosing Wisely in Newborn Medicine: Five Opportunities to Increase Value

Timmy Ho; Dmitry Dukhovny; John A.F. Zupancic; Donald A. Goldmann; Jeffrey D. Horbar; DeWayne M. Pursley

6243 (95% CI,

Collaboration


Dive into the John A.F. Zupancic's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara Schmidt

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas Richardson

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge