John A. Howington
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John A. Howington.
Chest | 2013
John A. Howington; Matthew G. Blum; Andrew C. Chang; Alex Balekian; Sudish C. Murthy
BACKGROUND The treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with good or low surgical risk is primarily surgical resection. However, this area is undergoing many changes. With a greater prevalence of CT imaging, many lung cancers are being found that are small or constitute primarily ground-glass opacities. Treatment such as sublobar resection and nonsurgical approaches such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are being explored. With the advent of minimally invasive resections, the criteria to classify a patient as too ill to undergo an anatomic lung resection are being redefined. METHODS The writing panel selected topics for review based on clinical relevance to treatment of early-stage lung cancer and the amount and quality of data available for analysis and relative controversy on best approaches in stage I and II NSCLC: general surgical care vs specialist care; sublobar vs lobar surgical approaches to stage I lung cancer; video-assisted thoracic surgery vs open resection; mediastinal lymph node sampling vs lymphadenectomy at the time of surgical resection; the use of radiation therapy, with a focus on SBRT, for primary treatment of early-stage NSCLC in high-risk or medically inoperable patients as well as adjuvant radiation therapy in the sublobar and lobar resection settings; adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage NSCLC; and the impact of ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status on lung cancer survival. Recommendations by the writing committee were based on an evidence-based review of the literature and in accordance with the approach described by the Guidelines Oversight Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians. RESULTS Surgical resection remains the primary and preferred approach to the treatment of stage I and II NSCLC. Lobectomy or greater resection remains the preferred approach to T1b and larger tumors. The use of sublobar resection for T1a tumors and the application of adjuvant radiation therapy in this group are being actively studied in large clinical trials. Every patient should have systematic mediastinal lymph node sampling at the time of curative intent surgical resection, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy can be performed without increased morbidity. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are reduced and long-term survival is improved when surgical resection is performed by a board-certified thoracic surgeon. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II NSCLC is recommended and has shown benefit. The use of adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for stage I NSCLC is of unproven benefit. Primary radiation therapy remains the primary curative intent approach for patients who refuse surgical resection or are determined by a multidisciplinary team to be inoperable. There is growing evidence that SBRT provides greater local control than standard radiation therapy for high-risk and medically inoperable patients with NSCLC. The role of ablative therapies in the treatment of high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC is evolving. Radiofrequency ablation, the most studied of the ablative modalities, has been used effectively in medically inoperable patients with small (< 3 cm) peripheral NSCLC that are clinical stage I.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2012
Scott J. Swanson; Bryan F. Meyers; Candace Gunnarsson; Matthew Moore; John A. Howington; Michael A. Maddaus; Robert J. McKenna; Daniel L. Miller
BACKGROUND The Premier Perspective Database (Premier Inc, Charlotte, NC) was used to compare hospital costs and perioperative outcomes for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open lobectomy procedures in the United States. METHODS Eligible patients underwent a lobectomy for cancer by a thoracic surgeon, by VATS or open thoracotomy and were captured in the database between third quarter of 2007 and through 2008. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for binary outcomes. Ordinary least-squares regressions were used to estimate continuous outcomes. All models were adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS A total of 3,961 patients underwent a lobectomy by a thoracic surgeon by open (n = 2,907) or VATS (n = 1,054) approach. Hospital costs were higher for open versus VATS;
Chest | 2012
Jessica S. Donington; Mark K. Ferguson; Peter J. Mazzone; John R. Handy; Matthew J. Schuchert; Hiran C. Fernando; Billy W. Loo; Alberto de Hoyos; Frank C. Detterbeck; Arjun Pennathur; John A. Howington; Rodney J. Landreneau; Gerard A. Silvestri
21,016 versus
Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2009
Michael T. Borchers; Scott C. Wesselkamper; Víctor Curull; Alba Ramírez-Sarmiento; Albert Sánchez-Font; Judith Garcia-Aymerich; Carlos Coronell; Josep Lloreta; Alvar Agusti; Joaquim Gea; John A. Howington; Michael F. Reed; Sandra L. Starnes; Nathaniel L. Harris; Mark Vitucci; Bryan L. Eppert; Gregory T. Motz; Kevin M. Fogel; Dennis W. McGraw; Jay W. Tichelaar; Mauricio Orozco-Levi
20,316 (p = 0.027). Adjustment for surgeon experience with VATS over the 6 months prior to each operation showed a significant association between surgeon experience and cost. Average costs ranged from
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques | 2002
Nicholas B. Levine; Ryu Kurokawa; Carl J. Fichtenbaum; John A. Howington; Charles Kuntz
22,050 for low volume surgeons to
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2008
Michael F. Reed; Mark W. Lucia; Sandra L. Starnes; Walter H. Merrill; John A. Howington
18,133 for high volume surgeons. For open lobectomies, cost differences by surgeon experience were not significant and both levels were estimated at
Chest | 2010
John A. Howington; Candace Gunnarsson; Michael A. Maddaus; Robert J. McKenna; Bryan F. Meyers; Daniel L. Miller; Matthew Moore; John A. Rizzo; Scott J. Swanson
21,000. Length of stay was 7.83 versus 6.15 days, for open versus VATS (p = 0.000). Surgery duration was shorter for open procedures at 3.75 versus 4.09 for VATS (p = 0.000). The risk of adverse events was significantly lower in the VATS group, odds ratio of 1.22 (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS Lobectomy performed by the VATS approach as compared with an open technique results in shorter length of stay, fewer adverse events, and less cost to the hospital. Economic impact is magnified as the surgeons experience increases.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2009
Darryl A. Zuckerman; Michael F. Reed; John A. Howington; Jonathan S. Moulton
BACKGROUND The standard treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lobectomy with systematic mediastinal lymph node evaluation. Unfortunately, up to 25% of patients with stage I NSCLC are not candidates for lobectomy because of severe medical comorbidity. METHODS A panel of experts was convened through the Thoracic Oncology Network of the American College of Chest Physicians and the Workforce on Evidence-Based Surgery of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Following a literature review, the panel developed 13 suggestions for evaluation and treatment through iterative discussion and debate until unanimous agreement was achieved. RESULTS Pretreatment evaluation should focus primarily on measures of cardiopulmonary physiology, as respiratory failure represents the greatest interventional risk. Alternative treatment options to lobectomy for high-risk patients include sublobar resection with or without brachytherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and radiofrequency ablation. Each is associated with decreased procedural morbidity and mortality but increased risk for involved lobe and regional recurrence compared with lobectomy, but direct comparisons between modalities are lacking. CONCLUSIONS Therapeutic options for the treatment of high-risk patients are evolving quickly. Improved radiographic staging and the diagnosis of smaller and more indolent tumors push the risk-benefit decision toward parenchymal-sparing or nonoperative therapies in high-risk patients. Unbiased assessment of treatment options requires uniform reporting of treatment populations and outcomes in clinical series, which has been lacking to date.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2011
Sandra L. Starnes; Michael F. Reed; Cris A. Meyer; Ralph Shipley; Abdul Rahman Jazieh; Elsira M. Pina; Kevin Redmond; Lynn C. Huffman; Prakash K. Pandalai; John A. Howington
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a lethal progressive lung disease culminating in permanent airway obstruction and alveolar enlargement. Previous studies suggest CTL involvement in COPD progression; however, their precise role remains unknown. Here, we investigated whether the CTL activation receptor NK cell group 2D (NKG2D) contributes to the development of COPD. Using primary murine lung epithelium isolated from mice chronically exposed to cigarette smoke and cultured epithelial cells exposed to cigarette smoke extract in vitro, we demonstrated induced expression of the NKG2D ligand retinoic acid early transcript 1 (RAET1) as well as NKG2D-mediated cytotoxicity. Furthermore, a genetic model of inducible RAET1 expression on mouse pulmonary epithelial cells yielded a severe emphysematous phenotype characterized by epithelial apoptosis and increased CTL activation, which was reversed by blocking NKG2D activation. We also assessed whether NKG2D ligand expression corresponded with pulmonary disease in human patients by staining airway and peripheral lung tissues from never smokers, smokers with normal lung function, and current and former smokers with COPD. NKG2D ligand expression was independent of NKG2D receptor expression in COPD patients, demonstrating that ligand expression is the limiting factor in CTL activation. These results demonstrate that aberrant, persistent NKG2D ligand expression in the pulmonary epithelium contributes to the development of COPD pathologies.
Diseases of The Esophagus | 2013
Amy K. Yetasook; Dennis Leung; John A. Howington; Mark S. Talamonti; Jin-cheng Zhao; JoAnn Carbray; Michael B. Ujiki
Scedosporium apiospermum, the asexual anamorph of Pseudallescheria boydii, is a ubiquitous saprophytic fungus that usually causes cutaneous/subcutaneous infection but may manifest as an invasive disease, often in immunocompromised hosts. Following an extensive literature review, we think that this case represents the first documented report of a primary infection of the spine in an immunocompetent patient. Despite extensive surgical debridement and itraconazole therapy, the patient died of multisystem organ failure of unknown etiology. Our case and three previously reported cases of P. boydii vertebral osteomyelitis highlight the importance of obtaining repeat cultures in patients with culture-negative vertebral osteomyelitis who fail to adequately respond to empiric standard antibacterial and/or antimycobacterial therapy. Combined surgical debridement and antifungal therapy have been required for eradication of P. boydii spinal infections in two previously reported immunocompromised patients, although the optimal antifungal regimen for this infection has not been established.