John A. Moyer

A randomized study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a single dose of the TRPV1 antagonist mavatrep in patients with osteoarthritis

Abstract Background/Aims Transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) receptor antagonists have been evaluated in clinical studies for their analgesic effects. Mavatrep, a potent, selective, competitive TRPV1 receptor antagonist has demonstrated pharmacodynamic effects consistent with target engagement at the TRPV1 receptor in a previous single-dose clinical study. The current study was conducted to evaluate the analgesic effects of a single dose of mavatrep. Methods In this randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, 3-way crossover, phase 1b study, patients with painful knee osteoarthritis were treated with a single-dose of 50 mg mavatrep, 500 mg naproxen twice-daily, and placebo. Patients were randomized to 1 of 6 treatment sequences. Each treatment sequence included three treatment periods of 7 days duration with a 7 day washout between each treatment period. The primary efficacy evaluation was pain reduction measured by the 4-h postdose sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) based on the 11-point (0-10) Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain after stair-climbing (PASC). The secondary efficacy evaluations included 11-point (0-10) NRS pain scores entered into the Actiwatch between clinic visits, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index subscales (WOMAC) questionnaire, and use of rescue medication. Safety and tolerability of single oral dose mavatrep were also assessed. Results Of 33 patients randomized, 32 completed the study. A statistically significantly (p<0.1) greater reduction in PASC was observed for mavatrep versus placebo (4-h SPID least square mean [LSM] [SE] difference: 1.5 [0.53]; p = 0.005 and 2-h LSM [SE] difference of PID: 0.7 [0.30]; p = 0.029). The mean average daily current pain NRS scores were lower in the mavatrep and naproxen treatment arm than in the placebo arm (mavatrep: 7 day mean [SD], 3.72 [1.851]; naproxen: 7 day mean [SD], 3.49 [1.544]; placebo: 7 day mean [SD], 4.9 [1.413]). Mavatrep showed statistically significant improvements as compared with placebo on the WOMAC subscales (pain on days 2 [p = 0.049] and 7 [p = 0.041], stiffness on day 7 [p = 0.075]), and function on day 7 [p = 0.077]). The same pattern of improvement was evident for naproxen versus placebo. The mean (SD) number of rescue medication tablets taken during the 7-day treatment period was 4.2 (6.49) for mavatrep treatment, 2.8 (5.42) for naproxen, and 6.3 (8.25) for placebo treatment. All patients that received mavatrep reported at least 1 treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE). Feeling cold (79%), thermohypoesthesia (61%), dysgeusia (58%), paraesthesia (36%), and feeling hot (15%) were the most common TEAEs in the mavatrep group. Total 9% patients receiving mavatrep experienced minor thermal burns. No deaths or serious AEs or discontinuations due to AEs occurred. Conclusion Overall, mavatrep was associated with a significant reduction in pain, stiffness, and physical function when compared with placebo in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Mavatrep’s safety profile was consistent with its mechanism of action as a TRPV1 antagonist. Implications Further studies are required to evaluate whether lower multiple doses of mavatrep can produce analgesic efficacy while minimizing adverse events, as well as the potential for improved patient counselling techniques to reduce the minor thermal burns related to decreased heat perception. Trial Registration 2009-010961-21 (EudraCT Number).

Evaluation of JNJ-26489112 in patients with photosensitive epilepsy: A placebo-controlled, exploratory study ,

PURPOSE To evaluate the activity of JNJ-26489112 in patients with photosensitive epilepsy and determine the doses that result in reduction or complete suppression of the intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) induced photoparoxysmal-EEG response (PPR). METHODS In this multicenter, single-blind, within subject, placebo-controlled, sequential dose, exploratory study, 12 adult patients (3 men; 9 women) with idiopathic photosensitive epilepsy, with and without concomitant antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy, underwent standardized IPS under three eye conditions (open, during closure, and closed) for up to 12h after receiving a single oral dose of placebo on day 1, JNJ-26489112 on day 2, and a second dose of placebo on day 3. Based on review of the blinded EEG data, the standardized photosensitive range (SPR) (i.e., upper and lower frequencies of the IPS-induced PPR), was calculated for each eye condition at each time point. A positive response was defined as a reduction of the SPR in ≥3 out of 4 consecutive time points in ≥1 eye condition on either day 2 or 3 compared with baseline (day 1) while complete suppression was defined as disappearance of an IPS-induced PPR (i.e., SPR=0). For the first four patients (Cohort 1), JNJ-26489112 dose was 1000 mg, and the dose was escalated to a maximum of 3000 mg in subsequent cohorts. Blood and plasma samples were collected for pharmacokinetic evaluations along with measurements of concurrent AED concentrations. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS The majority of patients showed a positive response on day 2 following JNJ-26489112 administration: 3/4 patients (1000 mg dose), 3/4 patients (2000 mg dose), and 2/3 patients (3000 mg). There was an apparent dose-dependent effect observed in patients who exhibited complete suppression of the SPR: 0/4 patients (1000 mg dose), 1/4 patient (2000 mg dose), and 2/3 patients (3000 mg dose). The median tmax of JNJ-26489112 (range: 3.73-5.04 h) in plasma was similar across all 3 dose groups and plasma exposure of JNJ-26489112 increased proportionally with dose; approximate mean Cmax of 16, 28, and 42 μg/mL for the 1000-, 2000-, and 3000 mg cohorts, respectively. Concentrations of other AEDs did not appear to be affected by co-administration of JNJ-26489112. JNJ-26489112 was generally well-tolerated with the most frequent adverse events (>10%) reported being mild headache, dizziness, and nausea. CONCLUSION Single oral doses of JNJ-26489112 were well-tolerated and the pharmacodynamic effects appeared to be dose-related in patients with idiopathic, photosensitive epilepsy.

A multiple-dose double-blind randomized study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and analgesic efficacy of the TRPV1 antagonist JNJ-39439335 (mavatrep)

Abstract Background and aims: This double-blind (DB), randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential-group, multiple-ascending dose, phase 1 study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of JNJ-39439335 in healthy men (part 1), and in participants with knee osteoarthritis (part 2). Methods: Both parts 1 and 2 consisted of screening (upto 21 days), 21-day DB treatment phase [eight participants/group: JNJ-39439335 (part 1: 2–50 mg; part 2: 10–50 mg): n=6; placebo: n=2] and follow-up (total study duration ~10 weeks). Results: Plasma concentrations and systemic exposure of JNJ-39439335 increased in slightly higher than dose-proportional fashion (steady-state reached by day 14). Renal excretion of JNJ-39439335 was negligible. Marked dose-related increases in pharmacodynamic heat pain assessments were observed in JNJ-39439335-treated participants, which persisted throughout the treatment with no signs of tolerance with repeated dosing. No effect on pharmacodynamic cold pain or mechanical pain assessments were seen. Effects on pharmacodynamic capsaicin-induced flare assessments in JNJ-39439335-treated participants versus placebo were consistent with effects observed with single-dose, and did not demonstrate tolerance with multiple dosing. In participants with knee osteoarthritis, significant improvements versus placebo were observed in a stair-climbing-induced pain model. All JNJ-39439335-treated participants reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE); most common (≥50% incidence) TEAEs in part 1 were feeling hot (79%), thermohypoesthesia (71%), paresthesia (58%) and feeling cold (50%), and in part 2, were minor thermal burns (50%). Conclusions: JNJ-39439335 (doses 2–50 mg) was well-tolerated, and associated with acceptable multiple-dose pharmacokinetic profile. JNJ-39439335 demonstrated sustained pharmacodynamic effects (heat pain perception, heat pain latency, capsaicin-induced flare), and an efficacy signal in participants with osteoarthritis pain. Implications: Given the efficacy signal observed and the unique safety profile, larger phase 2 studies are needed to better understand the potential of JNJ-39439335 in the treatment of chronic pain. Analgesic efficacy of lower doses administered over a longer period of time and improved patient counseling techniques to reduce the minor thermal burns can be explored to minimize the adverse events.

Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of TRPV1 Antagonist Mavatrep (JNJ‐39439335) Tablet and Capsule Formulations in Healthy Men: Two Open‐Label, Crossover, Single‐Dose Phase 1 Studies

To improve room temperature stability and oral bioavailability of mavatrep (JNJ‐39439335, a transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype‐1 antagonist), various formulations were initially developed and evaluated in 2 phase 1 open‐label, randomized, 3‐way crossover studies in healthy participants. Study 1 evaluated 2 new overencapsulated tablet formulations (formulations B and C) relative to an overencapsulated early tablet formulation (formulation A), using mavatrep HCl salt form. Because these tablets were still not room‐temperature stable, in study 2: two free‐base solid dispersion amorphous formulations (formulations D and E) were evaluated relative to the best encapsulated formulation from study 1 (formulation C) and also food effect. Both studies had screening (∼4 weeks), treatment (study 1: n = 18, 6‐sequenced; formulations B and C [2 × 25 mg] versus A [2 × 25 mg]; study 2, part 1: n = 24, formulations D and E [2 × 12.5 mg] versus C [1 × 25 mg]; study 2, part 2: n = 16, best formulation from part 1 fed versus fasted, 2 × 12.5 mg) with a 21‐day washout period and a follow‐up. Mavatrep exhibited consistent pharmacokinetics across formulations. Following rapid absorption (median tmax, 1.5–6.5 hours), plasma concentrations declined multiexponentially (mean t1/2, 67–104 hours). The new encapsulated tablet formulation (formulation C, capsule filler: poloxamer 407) was the best formulation (Cmax and AUC values 2‐3‐fold > than the other 2) from study 1. Using this as a reference in study 2, part 1, only small (<20%) differences in mean Cmax and AUC were observed between the 3 formulations (C, D, and E). Formulation E (gelatin capsule with amorphous solid dispersion [12.5 mg free base], hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, vitamin E polyethylene glycol succinate, silicified microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium stearate, colloidal silicon dioxide) showed improved room‐temperature stability and provided the best overall bioavailability with small variability. Small effects of a high‐fat meal on oral bioavailability were observed for formulation E, but were not clinically meaningful. Mavatrep safety profiles were similar across formulations and under fasted and fed conditions. No new safety concerns were reported.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Mavatrep (JNJ-39439335), a TRPV1 Antagonist in Healthy Japanese and Caucasian Men: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Sequential-Group Phase 1 Study

This single‐center, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, sequential‐group phase 1 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of mavatrep (JNJ‐39439335), a transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 antagonist, in healthy Japanese and caucasian subjects. In part 1, a single‐ascending‐dose study, 50 subjects (25 each healthy Japanese and caucasians) were enrolled and received a single oral dose of 10, 25, or 50 mg mavatrep. Caucasian subjects were matched to Japanese subjects with respect to age (±5 years) and body mass index (±5 kg/m2). In part 2, a multiple‐ascending‐dose study, 36 Japanese subjects were enrolled and received once‐daily oral doses of 10, 25, or 50 mg of mavatrep for 21 days. The single‐dose PK of mavatrep and its metabolites was similar in the Japanese and caucasian subjects after adjustment of body weight. Following multiple dosing in Japanese subjects, a steady‐state condition was reached in approximately 14 days. M2 and M3 are major circulating metabolites with mean exposure > 10% of mavatrep. Nonrenal clearance was the major route of elimination for mavatrep, M2, and M3. Mavatrep exhibited a long half‐life, ranging from 68 to 101 and 82–130 hours for Japanese and caucasian subjects, respectively. After single and multiple dosing, mavatrep was well tolerated. The most common adverse events observed were thermohypoesthesia, feeling cold, chills, and feeling hot. Mavatrep and its metabolites exhibited similar PK profiles after single ascending doses in healthy Japanese and caucasian men.