Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John A. Smolin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John A. Smolin.


Physical Review A | 1996

Mixed state entanglement and quantum error correction

Charles H. Bennett; John A. Smolin; William K. Wootters

Entanglement purification protocols (EPPs) and quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) provide two ways of protecting quantum states from interaction with the environment. In an EPP, perfectly entangled pure states are extracted, with some yield D, from a mixed state M shared by two parties; with a QECC, an arbitrary quantum state |\ensuremath{\xi}〉 can be transmitted at some rate Q through a noisy channel \ensuremath{\chi} without degradation. We prove that an EPP involving one-way classical communication and acting on mixed state M^(\ensuremath{\chi}) (obtained by sharing halves of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pairs through a channel \ensuremath{\chi}) yields a QECC on \ensuremath{\chi} with rate Q=D, and vice versa. We compare the amount of entanglement E(M) required to prepare a mixed state M by local actions with the amounts


Physical Review A | 1995

Elementary gates for quantum computation.

Adriano Barenco; Charles H. Bennett; Richard Cleve; Norman Margolus; Peter W. Shor; Tycho Sleator; John A. Smolin; Harald Weinfurter

{\mathit{D}}_{1}


theory and application of cryptographic techniques | 1991

Experimental quantum cryptography

Charles H. Bennett; François Bessette; Gilles Brassard; Louis Salvail; John A. Smolin

(M) and


Physical Review Letters | 1996

Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels

Charles H. Bennett; Gilles Brassard; Sandu Popescu; Benjamin Schumacher; John A. Smolin; William K. Wootters

{\mathit{D}}_{2}


Physical Review Letters | 2001

Remote State Preparation

Charles H. Bennett; Peter W. Shor; John A. Smolin; Barbara M. Terhal; William K. Wootters

(M) that can be locally distilled from it by EPPs using one- and two-way classical communication, respectively, and give an exact expression for E(M) when M is Bell diagonal. While EPPs require classical communication, QECCs do not, and we prove Q is not increased by adding one-way classical communication. However, both D and Q can be increased by adding two-way communication. We show that certain noisy quantum channels, for example a 50% depolarizing channel, can be used for reliable transmission of quantum states if two-way communication is available, but cannot be used if only one-way communication is available. We exhibit a family of codes based on universal hashing able to achieve an asymptotic Q (or D) of 1-S for simple noise models, where S is the error entropy. We also obtain a specific, simple 5-bit single-error-correcting quantum block code. We prove that iff a QECC results in high fidelity for the case of no error then the QECC can be recast into a form where the encoder is the matrix inverse of the decoder. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.


Physical Review A | 1999

Quantum nonlocality without entanglement

Charles H. Bennett; Christopher A. Fuchs; Tal Mor; Eric M. Rains; Peter W. Shor; John A. Smolin; William K. Wootters

We show that a set of gates that consists of all one-bit quantum gates (U(2)) and the two-bit exclusive-or gate (that maps Boolean values (x,y) to (x,x ⊕y)) is universal in the sense that all unitary operations on arbitrarily many bits n (U(2 n )) can be expressed as compositions of these gates. We investigate the number of the above gates required to implement other gates, such as generalized Deutsch-Toffoli gates, that apply a specific U(2) transformation to one input bit if and only if the logical AND of all remaining input bits is satisfied. These gates play a central role in many proposed constructions of quantum computational networks. We derive upper and lower bounds on the exact number of elementary gates required to build up a variety of two- and three-bit quantum gates, the asymptotic number required for n-bit Deutsch-Toffoli gates, and make some observations about the number required for arbitrary n-bit unitary operations.


IEEE Transactions on Information Theory | 2002

Entanglement-assisted capacity of a quantum channel and the reverse Shannon theorem

Charles H. Bennett; Peter W. Shor; John A. Smolin; Ashish V. Thapliyal

We describe results from an apparatus and protocol designed to implement quantum key distribution, by which two users, who share no secret information initially: (1) exchange a random quantum transmission, consisting of very faint flashes of polarized light; (2) by subsequent public discussion of the sent and received versions of this transmission estimate the extent of eavesdropping that might have taken place on it, and finally (3) if this estimate is small enough, distill from the sent and received versions a smaller body of shared random information, which is certifiably secret in the sense that any third partys expected information on it is an exponentially small fraction of one bit. Because the system depends on the uncertainty principle of quantum physics, instead of the usual mathematical assumptions such as the difficulty of factoring, it remains secure against an adversary with unlimited computing power.


Physical Review Letters | 1999

Unextendible product bases and bound entanglement

Charles H. Bennett; Tal Mor; Peter W. Shor; John A. Smolin; Barbara M. Terhal

Two separated observers, by applying local operations to a supply of not-too-impure entangled states ({\em e.g.} singlets shared through a noisy channel), can prepare a smaller number of entangled pairs of arbitrarily high purity ({\em e.g.} near-perfect singlets). These can then be used to faithfully teleport unknown quantum states from one observer to the other, thereby achieving faithful transfrom one observer to the other, thereby achieving faithful transmission of quantum information through a noisy channel. We give upper and lower bounds on the yield


Physical Review Letters | 1999

Entanglement-Assisted Classical Capacity of Noisy Quantum Channels

Charles H. Bennett; Peter W. Shor; John A. Smolin; Ashish V. Thapliyal

D(M)


Physical Review A | 1998

Optimal universal and state-dependent quantum cloning

Dagmar Bruß; Artur Ekert; Christopher A. Fuchs; Chiara Macchiavello; John A. Smolin

of pure singlets (

Collaboration


Dive into the John A. Smolin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter W. Shor

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bei Zeng

University of Guelph

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge