John Ashby

The unique role of rodents in the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens

Some of the probable reasons underlying the observation that not all chemicals shown to be genotoxic in vitro are capable of eliciting tumours in rodents or humans are discussed using appropriate examples. It is suggested that a substantial proportion of the resources currently available for conducting rodent carcinogenicity bioassays should be employed in the short-term evaluation in vivo of some of the many hundreds of chemicals recently defined as genotoxic in vitro, rather than in the protracted evaluation of a few chemicals, often of unknown activity in vitro, for carcinogenicity. A decision tree approach to the evaluation of chemicals for human mutagenic/carcinogenic potential is presented which is at variance with the construction and philosophy of many of the current legislative guidelines. The immediate need for the adoption of one of the available short-term in vivo liver assays, and/or the development of a short-term in vivo rodent assay capable of concomitantly monitoring different genetic end-points in a range of organs or tissues is emphasized.

An assessment of the in vivo rat hepatocyte DNA-repair assay

The in vivo rat hepatocyte autoradiographic assay for unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) described by Mirsalis et al, and its in vitro counterpart described earlier by Williams have been employed by us for 4 years. Our experience is that the in vivo assay performs as described in the literature. We have therefore concentrated in this initial paper on the key practical factors we have found to govern the assay sensitivity and reproducibility. This has been achieved by a discussion of the assay performance with two potent rat hepatocarcinogens [the novel azo compound 6-dimethylaminophenylazobenzthiazole (6BT) and the reference agent 2-acetylaminofluorene (2AAF)] and a non-carcinogen of similar structure to 6BT [5-dimethylaminophenylazoindazole (51)]. Assay responses were compared with the effect of these chemicals in the Salmonella mutation assay. We conclude that the in vivo liver UDS assay has a critical role to play as a complement to rodent bone marrow cytogenic assays when conducting assessment studies on agents defined as genotoxic in vitro. However, the in vivo assay is resource-consuming and false results could consequently arise due to incomplete evaluations. Methods to counteract this danger are discussed and criteria for assessing weak UDS responses are suggested.

A non-invasive micronucleus assay in the rat liver

The potent rat-liver mitogen 4-acetylaminofluorene (4AAF) is shown here to provide an effective replacement for the surgical procedure of 2/3 partial hepatectomy (2/3PH) in the in vivo rat-liver micronucleus assay described by Tates and his colleagues. This protocol modification enables the assay to be conducted on a routine basis. Control observations for both 2/3PH and 4AAF-treated rats are presented, together with evidence indicating 4AAF itself to be without activity in the assay, irrespective of the mitogenic stimulus. The activities of the rat carcinogens DMN, 2AAF, DMH and 6BT, and of the non-carcinogens 4AAF and 4N are demonstrated. Recommendations for the conduct of the modified assay are made.

Tabulation and assessment of 113 human surveillance cytogenetic studies conducted between 1965 and 1984

There is an increasing tendency to monitor human exposure to genotoxic chemicals by the assessment of chromosomal aberrations or sister-chromatid exchanges (SCEs) in peripheral blood lymphocytes. In order to assess the sensitivity of these techniques, and to discern minimal criteria for their conduct, a survey of 113 human lymphocyte cytogenetic surveillance studies conducted between 1965 and 1984 has been undertaken. The present survey indicates the urgent need for standardization of study protocols. It is suggested that a common method of reporting chromosomal aberrations should be adopted, and that this should be based on the system described by Scott et al. It is also suggested that a minimum acceptable size of control and exposed populations should be agreed, and that potentially important factors such as the gender, the period and extent of exposure and individual smoking habits be defined in advance of the commission of future surveillance studies. As general awareness of the possible hazard presented by exposure of man to genotoxic chemicals increases, so appropriate preventative industrial hygiene measures will be instituted. This implies that future human cytogenetic surveillance studies may yield either weakly positive or negative data. This emphasizes the current need for agreement on appropriate study protocols. The formation of a central repository for control databases, and its subsequent updating and use by those involved in human cytogenetic surveillance studies, is recommended. Minimal experimental criteria for the design of future studies are also outlined.

Saccharin: An epigenetic carcinogen/mutagen?

Saccharin, together with four of the impurities found in the commercial material and a further nine functional analogues gave negative results in the Salmonella reverse mutation assay of Ames et al. (Mutation Res. 1975, 31, 347) and the cell-transformation assay of Styles (Br. J. Cancer 1977, 36, 558). The significance of these and related in vitro results is evaluated within the context of the ability of commercial saccharin to cause bladder cancer in rats and dominant lethal effects in mice. In particular, evidence that the carcinogenicity and the dominant lethal effect associated with saccharin may be mediated by an epigenetic mechanism is evaluated, as is the possible role played by impurities in the generation of these and other biological effects. The case for separating carcinogens into two classes, namely those that operate by a genotypic mechanism and those that elicit their effects via an epigenetic mechanism, is discussed. The compounds evaluated in the current study were saccharin base, sodium saccharin, o-toluenesulphonamide, o-sulphonamidobenzoic acid, 5-chlorosaccharin, 3-iminosaccharin, 6-chlorosaccharin, 5-chlorobenzisothiazoline-1,1-dioxide, 6-aminosaccharin. 6-nitrosaccharin, 3-chloro-ψ-saccharin, 3,6-dichloro-ψ-saccharin, 3-dimethylamino-ψ-saccharin, 3-piperidinyl-ψ-saccharin and 3-pyrrolidino-ψ-saccharin.

Clastogenicity in vitro of the Na, K, Ca and Mg salts of saccharin; and of magnesium chloride; consideration of significance

The sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium salts of saccharin, and magnesium chloride, have been shown to be clastogenic to Chinese hamster lung (CHL) fibroblasts in vitro, but only at elevated dose levels (8-16 mg/ml). Saccharin acid was inactive to the limits of its solubility (4 mg/ml). When the data are expressed in terms of ionic concentration, each salt showed a similar clastogenic potency. This suggests that ionic effects induced by these salts in the assay medium may be the critical determinant of the clastogenic effects seen, rather than that the saccharin moiety presents a genotoxic insult to the chromosomes of the cells. The metal-chelating agents EDTA and EGTA were non-clastogenic, but the disodium salt of EDTA showed weak activity prior to toxicity at 0.5 mg/ml. The absence of a clastogenic response for the salts of saccharin at dose levels lower than 4 mg/ml is discussed within the context of the threshold-dependent tumour-promoting activity of high dose levels of sodium saccharin to the bladder of male rats. The doubtful value of conducting in vitro clastogenicity studies at dose levels greater than 10(-2) M is discussed.

The genotoxicity of sodium saccharin and sodium chloride in relation to their cancer-promoting properties

The literature indicates that sodium saccharin is non-reactive to DNA and inactive as a gene mutagen in vitro. At elevated dose levels it is capable of producing structural disturbances in eukaryotic chromosomes in vitro, and it shows intermittent activity as a very weak germ-cell and somatic-cell mutagen in vivo. Its possible mode of action in these respects is speculated on and related to its ability to promote bladder tumours in rats at elevated dose levels. A review of the toxicology of sodium chloride reveals a profile of genotoxic activities almost identical to that of sodium saccharin. It is suggested that the recorded genotoxic and cancer-promoting activities of these chemicals will only become apparent at elevated dose levels that define them as significant contributors to the biological medium (solvent) rather than as trace xenobiotic toxins (solutes). The possible activity of acid saccharin, or of its potassium, calcium and ammonium salts, as ionic genotoxins requires urgent evaluation.

The present lack of evidence for unique rodent germ-cell mutagens

Six chemicals, diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), ethanol, cyclohexylamine (CHA), sodium saccharin (NaS), cadmium chloride (CdCl2) and triflupromazine (TFP), were suggested to be unique germ-cell mutagens (Auletta and Ashby, 1988) by the GeneTox Workgroups of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If this is a correct classification it would have major consequences when screening for mutagenicity and when labelling genotoxic substances. However, our re-evaluation of the GeneTox literature, including some more recent publications, has failed to find substantive evidence that any of these chemicals have been unequivocally established as having unique mutagenic activity in germ cells. For DEHP, NaS and TFP the evidence for genotoxic/mutagenic effects is questionable, in both germinal and somatic cells. Ethanol and CdCl2 showed clastogenic activity, but it was not restricted to germ cells. Both, ethanol and cadmium salts, appear to induce aneuploidy. The unconfirmed clastogenic effect of CHA was restricted to rats, but it occurred in both bone marrow and spermatogonia. Therefore, the general observation that rodent germ-cell mutagens are also genotoxic in somatic cells in vivo (Brusick, 1980; Holden, 1982) remains valid.

Concomitant observations of UDS in the liver and micronuclei in the bone marrow of rats exposed to cyclophosphamide or 2-acetylaminofluorene

Oral dosing of between 5-30 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide (CP) to Alderley Park rats induced micronuclei in the bone marrow between 12 and 36 h after dosing, but failed to induce unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) in the liver at similar dose levels and treatment periods. Dose levels of greater than 30 mg/kg were toxic to the liver. In contrast, 2-acetylaminofluorene (2AAF) induced UDS in the rat liver between 4-36 h after dosing, but gave only a weak response in the bone marrow assay at dose levels between 0.5 and 2 g/kg. Selected observations were made for each chemical using both tissues of the same test animal. It is concluded that an assessment of the genotoxicity in vivo of chemicals defined as genotoxic in vitro will contribute to an assessment of their possible mammalian carcinogenicity, and that these should involve assays conducted using both the bone marrow and the liver of rodents. Due to its relative ease of commission, the bone marrow micronucleus assay will usually be conducted first; in the case of negative results it is recommended that a liver genotoxicity assay should be conducted. The case for employing in vivo short-term genotoxicity tests to predict the possible organotropic carcinogenicity or germ cell mutagenicity of a new in vitro genotoxin is discussed.

Slide preparation and sampling as a major source of variability in the mouse micronucleus assay

This paper describes the results of a study in which mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay slides were assessed for homogeneity of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MPE) among polychromatic erythrocytes (PE). The slides were prepared by 3 distinct methods and several methods of slide reading were assessed. Observations made using our slides were confirmed by re-analysis of slides from 3 independent laboratories. It is concluded that the method of slide preparation and assessment can significantly influence the variability of data obtained from a study. The extent of this variability casts doubt upon the validity of certain assumptions concerning this assay--such as sex differences in MPE incidence, responder variability, etc. Results are discussed within the context of the very recent literature for this assay. Some laboratories appear to have adequate methods of slide preparation and data accumulation, while others do not. Methods to improve the sensitivity of this assay are suggested within the context of the recommendations made by the Gene-Tox review group. In particular, it is suggested that individual investigators present evidence of the adequacy of their data accumulation techniques in order to enhance the value of future studies.