John Bradshaw
Geoscience Australia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John Bradshaw.
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control | 2007
Stefan Bachu; Didier Bonijoly; John Bradshaw; Robert C. Burruss; Sam Holloway; Niels Peter Christensen; Odd Magne Mathiassen
Abstract Implementation of CO2 capture and geological storage (CCGS) technology at the scale needed to achieve a significant and meaningful reduction in CO2 emissions requires knowledge of the available CO2 storage capacity. CO2 storage capacity assessments may be conducted at various scales—in decreasing order of size and increasing order of resolution: country, basin, regional, local and site-specific. Estimation of the CO2 storage capacity in depleted oil and gas reservoirs is straightforward and is based on recoverable reserves, reservoir properties and in situ CO2 characteristics. In the case of CO2-EOR, the CO2 storage capacity can be roughly evaluated on the basis of worldwide field experience or more accurately through numerical simulations. Determination of the theoretical CO2 storage capacity in coal beds is based on coal thickness and CO2 adsorption isotherms, and recovery and completion factors. Evaluation of the CO2 storage capacity in deep saline aquifers is very complex because four trapping mechanisms that act at different rates are involved and, at times, all mechanisms may be operating simultaneously. The level of detail and resolution required in the data make reliable and accurate estimation of CO2 storage capacity in deep saline aquifers practical only at the local and site-specific scales. This paper follows a previous one on issues and development of standards for CO2 storage capacity estimation, and provides a clear set of definitions and methodologies for the assessment of CO2 storage capacity in geological media. Notwithstanding the defined methodologies suggested for estimating CO2 storage capacity, major challenges lie ahead because of lack of data, particularly for coal beds and deep saline aquifers, lack of knowledge about the coefficients that reduce storage capacity from theoretical to effective and to practical, and lack of knowledge about the interplay between various trapping mechanisms at work in deep saline aquifers.
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control | 2007
John Bradshaw; Stefan Bachu; Didier Bonijoly; Robert C. Burruss; Sam Holloway; Niels Peter Christensen; Odd Magne Mathiassen
Associated with the endeavours of geoscientists to pursue the promise that geological storage of CO2 has of potentially making deep cuts into greenhouse gas emissions, Governments around the world are dependent on reliable estimates of CO2 storage capacity and insightful indications of the viability of geological storage in their respective jurisdictions. Similarly, industry needs reliable estimates for business decisions regarding site selection and development. If such estimates are unreliable, and decisions are made based on poor advice, then valuable resources and time could be wasted. Policies that have been put in place to address CO2 emissions could be jeopardised. Estimates need to clearly state the limitations that existed (data, time, knowledge) at the time of making the assessment and indicate the purpose and future use to which the estimates should be applied. A set of guidelines for estimation of storage capacity will greatly assist future deliberations by government and industry on the appropriateness of geological storage of CO2 in different geological settings and political jurisdictions. This work has been initiated under the auspices of the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (www.cslforum.org), and it is intended that it will be an ongoing taskforce to further examine issues associated with storage capacity estimation.
Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7#R##N#Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 5– September 2004, Vancouver, Canada | 2005
John Bradshaw; Tess Dance
Publisher Summary This chapter discusses that the identification of major hydrocarbon provinces from existing world assessments for hydrocarbon potential is used to identify those sedimentary basins at a global level that is highly prospective for CO2 storage. Most sedimentary basins which are minor petroleum provinces and many non-petroliferous sedimentary basins will also be prospective for CO2 storage. CO2 storage potential is a naturally occurring resource, and like any other natural resource there is a need to provide regional access to the better sites if the full potential of the technology is to be realized. Whilst some regions of the world have a paucity of opportunities in their immediate geographic confines, others are well endowed. Some areas whilst having good storage potential in their local region may be challenged by the enormous volume of CO2 emissions that are locally generated. Hubs which centralize the collection and transport of CO2 in a region could encourage the building of longer and larger pipelines to larger and technically more viable storage sites and so reduce costs due to economies of scale.
Environmental Geosciences | 2001
John Bradshaw; Peter Cook
Energy Procedia | 2011
Barry E. Bradshaw; Lynton Spencer; Anna-Liisa Lahtinen; Kamal Khider; Damien J. Ryan; Jim B. Colwell; Alfredo Chirinos; John Bradshaw; John J. Draper; Jonathan Hodgkinson; Mike McKillop
Energy Procedia | 2011
Lynton Spencer; John Bradshaw; Barry E. Bradshaw; Anna-Liisa Lahtinen; Alfredo Chirinos
Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7#R##N#Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 5– September 2004, Vancouver, Canada | 2005
Jonathan Ennis-King; John Bradshaw; Catherine Mary Gibson-Poole; Allison Hennig; Simon Christopher Lang; Lincoln Paterson; Robert Root; Jacques Sayers; Lynton Spencer; Jürgen E. Streit; Jim Undershultz
Environmental Geosciences | 2006
Jacques Sayers; Cameron Marsh; Adam Scott; Yildiray Cinar; John Bradshaw; Allison Hennig; Stuart Barclay; Ric Daniel
Energy Procedia | 2011
Bill Senior; John Bradshaw; Ananth Chikkatur; Mervyn Wright
Archive | 2013
Barry E. Bradshaw; Al Salman; John Bradshaw; Stephen Doyle
Collaboration
Dive into the John Bradshaw's collaboration.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputs