John C. Hayek
Indiana University Bloomington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John C. Hayek.
Research in Higher Education | 2003
Robert M. Carini; John C. Hayek; George D. Kuh; John M. Kennedy; Judith A. Ouimet
We examined the responses of 58,288 college students to 8 scales involving 53 items from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to gauge whether individuals respond differently to surveys administered via the Web and paper. Multivariate regression analyses indicated that mode effects were generally small. However, students who completed the Web-based survey responded more favorably than paper on all 8 scales. These patterns generally held for both women and men, and younger and older students. Interestingly, the largest effect was found for a scale of items involving computing and information technology.
Journal of College Student Development | 2004
Shaun R. Harper; Robert M. Carini; Brian K. Bridges; John C. Hayek
Differences in student engagement between women and men at historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) are examined in this study. Data were collected from 1,167 African American undergraduate students at 12 four-year HBCUs that participated in the National Survey of Student Engagement. Controlling for several factors that might obscure gender differences, the results counter previous research regarding gender gaps on HBCU campuses by illustrating that African American women enjoy an equally engaging experience as their same-race male counterparts.
The Journal of Higher Education | 2006
Ernest Pascarella; Ty M. Cruce; Paul D. Umbach; Gregory C. Wolniak; George D. Kuh; Robert M. Carini; John C. Hayek; Robert M. Gonyea; Chun Mei Zhao
Academic selectivity plays a dominant role in the publics understanding of what constitutes institutional excellence or quality in undergraduate education. In this study, we analyzed two independent data sets to estimate the net effect of three measures of college selectivity on dimensions of documented good practices in undergraduate education. With statistical controls in place for important confounding influences, an institutions median student SAT/ACT score, a nearly identical proxy for that score, and the Barrons Selectivity Score explained from less than 0.1% to 20% of the between-institution variance and from less than 0.1% to 2.7% of the total variance in good practices. The implications of these findings for what constitutes quality in undergraduate education, college choice decisions, and the validity of national college rankings are discussed.
Archive | 2006
George D. Kuh; Jillian Kinzie; Jennifer A. Buckley; Brian K. Bridges; John C. Hayek
Archive | 2004
Megan M. Palmer; John C. Hayek; Don Hossler; Stacy A. Jacob; Heather Cummings; Jillian Kinzie
Journal of College Student Development | 2002
John C. Hayek; Robert M. Carini; Patrick T. O'Day; George D. Kuh
Research in Higher Education | 2006
Gary R. Pike; John C. Smart; George D. Kuh; John C. Hayek
Assessment Update | 2004
John C. Hayek; George D. Kuh
Educause Quarterly | 2002
John C. Hayek; George D. Kuh
Archive | 1999
John C. Hayek; George D. Kuh