Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John C. Magee is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John C. Magee.


Transplantation | 2000

MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL REDUCES LATE RENAL ALLOGRAFT LOSS INDEPENDENT OF ACUTE REJECTION

Akinlolu Ojo; Herwig Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Julie A. Hanson; Alan B. Leichtman; Diane M. Cibrik; John C. Magee; Robert A. Wolfe; Lawrence Y. Agodoa; Bruce Kaplan

BACKGROUND Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) has been shown to significantly decrease the number of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients during the 1st year. A beneficial effect of MMF on long-term graft survival has been more difficult to demonstrate. This beneficial effect has not been detected, despite the impact of acute rejection on the development of chronic allograft nephropathy and experimental evidence that MMF may have a salutary effect on chronic allograft nephropathy independent of that of rejection. METHODS Data on 66,774 renal transplant recipients from the U.S. renal transplant scientific registry were analyzed. Patients who received a solitary renal transplant between October 1, 1988 and June 30, 1997 were studied. The Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate relevant risk factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for censored graft survival. RESULTS MMF decreased the relative risk for development of chronic allograft failure (CAF) by 27% (risk ratio [RR] 0.73, P<0.001). This effect was independent of its outcome on acute rejection. Censored graft survival using MMF versus azathioprine was significantly improved by Kaplan-Meier analysis at 4 years (85.61% v. 81.9%). The effect of an acute rejection episode on the risk of developing CAF seems to be increasing over time (RR=1.9, 1988-91; RR=2.9, 1992-94; RR=3.7, 1995-97). CONCLUSION MMF therapy decreases the risk of developing CAF. This improvement is only partly caused by the decrease in the incidence of acute rejection observed with MMF; but, is also caused by an effect independent of acute rejection.


Transplantation | 2001

The impact of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation on long-term patient survival.

Akinlolu Ojo; Herwig Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Julie A. Hanson; Alan B. Leichtman; John C. Magee; Diane M. Cibrik; Robert A. Wolfe; Friedrich K. Port; Lawrence Y. Agodoa; Dixon B. Kaufman; Bruce Kaplan

Background. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) ameliorates the progression of microvascular diabetic complications but the procedure is associated with excess initial morbidity and an uncertain effect on patient survival when compared with solitary cadaveric or living donor renal transplantation. We evaluated mortality risks associated with SPK, solitary renal transplantation, and dialysis treatment in a national cohort of type 1 diabetics with end-stage nephropathy. Methods. A total of 13,467 adult-type 1 diabetics enrolled on the renal and renal-pancreas transplant waiting list between 10/01/88 and 06/30/97 were followed until 06/30/98. Time-dependent mortality risks and life expectancy were calculated according to the treatment received subsequent to wait-list registration: SPK; cadaveric kidney only (CAD); living donor kidney only (LKD) transplantation; and dialysis [wait-listed, maintenance dialysis treatment (WLD)]. Results. Adjusted 10-year patient survival was 67% for SPK vs. 65% for LKD recipients (P =0.19) and 46% for CAD recipients (P <0.001). The excess initial mortality normally associated with renal transplantation and the risk of early infectious death was 2-fold higher in SPK recipients. The time to achieve equal proportion of survivors as the WLD patients was 170, 95, and 72 days for SPK, CAD, and LKD recipients, respectively (P <0.001). However, the adjusted 5-year morality risk (RR) using WLD as the reference and the expected remaining life years were 0.40, 0.45, and 0.75 and 23.4, 20.9, and 12.6 years for SPK, LKD, and CAD, respectively. There was no survival benefit in SPK recipients ≥50 years old (RR=1.38, P =0.81). Conclusions. Among patients with type 1 DM with end-stage nephropathy, SPK transplantation before the age of 50 years was associated with long-term improvement in survival compared to solitary cadaveric renal transplantation or dialysis.


Transplantation | 2001

Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical, live donor nephrectomy

J. Stuart Wolf; Robert M. Merion; Alan B. Leichtman; Darrell A. Campbell; John C. Magee; Jeffery D. Punch; Jeremiah G. Turcotte; John W. Konnak

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation is being performed in increasing numbers with the goals of broadening organ supply while minimizing pain and duration of convalescence for donors. Relative advantages in terms of recovery provided by laparoscopy over standard open surgery have not been rigorously assessed. We hypothesized that laparoscopic as compared with open surgical live donor nephrectomy provides briefer, less intense, and more complete convalescence. METHODS Of 105 volunteer, adult, potential living-renal donors interested in the laparoscopic approach, 70 were randomly assigned to undergo either hand-assisted laparoscopic or open surgical live donor nephrectomy at a single referral center. Objective data and subjective recovery information obtained with telephone interviews and validated questionnaires administered 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6-12 months postoperatively were compared between the 23 laparoscopic and 27 open surgical patients. RESULTS There was 47% less analgesic use (P=0.004), 35% shorter hospital stay (P=0.0001), 33% more rapid return to nonstrenuous activity (P=0.006), 23% sooner return to work (P=0.037), and 73% less pain 6 weeks postoperatively (P=0.004) in the laparoscopy group. Laparoscopic patients experienced complete recovery sooner (P=0.032) and had fewer long-term residual effects (P=0.0015). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is associated with a briefer, less intense, and more complete convalescence compared with the open surgical approach.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2004

Everolimus with Optimized Cyclosporine Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of Two Randomized Studies

Stefan Vitko; H. Tedesco; Josette Eris; Julio Pascual; John Whelchel; John C. Magee; Scott B. Campbell; Giovanni Civati; Bernard Bourbigot; Gentil Alves Filho; John Leone; Valter Duro Garcia; Paolo Rigotti; Ronaldo Esmeraldo; Vincenzo Cambi; Tomas Haas; Annette Jappe; Peter Bernhardt; Johanna Geissler; Nathalie Cretin

Two prospective, randomized studies evaluated everolimus 1.5 vs. 3 mg/day with steroids and low‐exposure cyclosporine (CsA) (C2 monitoring) in de novo renal transplant patients. Everolimus dosing was adjusted to maintain a minimum trough level of 3 ng/mL. Study 1 (A2306; n = 237) had no induction therapy; in Study 2 (A2307; n = 256) basiliximab was administered (Days 0 and 4). The primary endpoint was renal function at 6 months. CsA C2 target levels, initially 1200 ng/mL in Study 1 and 600 ng/mL in Study 2, were tapered over time post‐transplant. Median creatinine levels in Study 1 were 133 and 132 μmol/L at 6 months in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups, respectively, and 130 μmol/L in both groups in Study 2. Biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 25.0% and 15.2% of patients in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups in Study 1, and 13.7% and 15.1% in Study 2. Incidence of BPAR was significantly higher in patients with an everolimus trough < 3 ng/mL. There were no significant between‐group differences in the composite endpoint of BPAR, graft loss or death, nor any significant between‐group differences in adverse events in either study. Concentration‐controlled everolimus with low‐exposure CsA provided effective protection against rejection with good renal function.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2005

Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 2004

Francis L. Delmonico; Ellen Sheehy; William H. Marks; Prabhakar K. Baliga; Joshua J. McGowan; John C. Magee

This article discusses issues directly related to the organ donation process, including donor consent, donor medical suitability, non‐recovery of organs, organs recovered but not transplanted, expanded criteria donors (ECD), and donation after cardiac death (DCD). The findings and topics covered have important implications for how to evaluate and share best practices of organ donation as implemented by organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and major donor hospitals in the same donation service areas (DSAs). In 2002 and 2003, US hospitals referred more than one million deaths or imminent deaths to the OPOs of their DSA. Referrals increased by nearly 10% from 2002 to 2003 (1,022,280 to 1,121,392). Donor consents have increased by about 5% and the number of total deceased donors has risen from 6,187 to 6,455. Since multiple organs are recovered from most donors, this increase allowed more than 500 additional wait‐listed candidates to receive an organ transplant than in the prior year. Non‐traditional donor sources have experienced a large rate of increase; in 2003 the number of ECD kidney donors increased by 8% and the number of DCD donors increased by 43%, from 189 donors in year 2002 to 271 donors in 2003.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2005

Extracorporeal support for organ donation after cardiac death effectively expands the donor pool.

Joseph F. Magliocca; John C. Magee; Stephen A. Rowe; Mark T. Gravel; Richard Chenault; Robert M. Merion; Jeffrey Punch; Robert H. Bartlett; Mark R. Hemmila

Background:We sought to evaluate the effect on short-term outcomes of normothermic, extracorporeal perfusion (ECMO) for donation of abdominal organs for transplantation after cardiac death (DCD). Study parameters included increase in number of donors and organs, types of organs procured, and viabili


Annals of Surgery | 2007

Seasonal variation in surgical outcomes as measured by the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).

Michael J. Englesbe; Shawn J. Pelletier; John C. Magee; Paul G. Gauger; Tracy Schifftner; William G. Henderson; Shukri F. Khuri; Darrell A. Campbell

Objective:We hypothesize that the systems of care within academic medical centers are sufficiently disrupted with the beginning of a new academic year to affect patient outcomes. Methods:This observational multiinstitutional cohort study was conducted by analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program–Patient Safety in Surgery Study database. The 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were compared between 2 periods of care: (early group: July 1 to August 30) and late group (April 15 to June 15). Patient baseline characteristics were first compared between the early and late periods. A prediction model was then constructed, via stepwise logistic regression model with a significance level for entry and a significance level for selection of 0.05. Results:There was 18% higher risk of postoperative morbidity in the early (n = 9941) versus the late group (n = 10313) (OR 1.18, 95%, CI 1.07–1.29, P = 0.0005, c-index 0.794). There was a 41% higher risk for mortality in the early group compared with the late group (OR 1.41, CI 1.11-1.80, P = 0.005, c-index 0.938). No significant trends in patient risk over time were noted. Conclusion:Our data suggests higher rates of postsurgical morbidity and mortality related to the time of the year. Further study is needed to fully describe the etiologies of the seasonal variation in outcomes.


Liver Transplantation | 2009

An intention-to-treat analysis of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma using organ procurement transplant network data

Shawn J. Pelletier; Sherry Fu; Veena Thyagarajan; Carlos Romero-Marrero; Mashal J. Batheja; Jeffrey D. Punch; John C. Magee; Anna S. Lok; Robert J. Fontana; Jorge A. Marrero

Single‐center studies have shown acceptable long‐term outcomes following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) when tumors are within the Milan criteria. However, the overall survival and waiting list removal rates have not been described at a national level with pooled registry data. To evaluate this, a retrospective cohort of patients listed for OLT with a diagnosis of HCC between January 1998 and March 2006 was identified from Organ Procurement Transplant Network data. Analysis was performed from the time of listing. Adjusted Cox models were used to assess the relative effect of potential confounders on removal from the waiting list as well as survival from the time of wait listing. A total of 4482 patients with HCC were placed on the liver waiting list during the study period. Of these, 65% underwent transplantation, and 18% were removed from the list because of tumor progression or death. The overall 1‐ and 5‐year intent‐to‐treat survival for all patients listed was 81% and 51%, respectively. The 1‐ and 5‐year survival was 89% and 61% for those listed with tumors meeting the Milan criteria versus 70% and 32% for those exceeding the Milan criteria (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, advanced liver failure manifested by Child‐Pugh class B or C increased the risk of death, while age < 55 years, meeting the Milan criteria, and obtaining a liver transplant were associated with better survival. The current criteria for liver transplantation of candidates with HCC lead to acceptable 5‐year survival while limiting the dropout rate. Liver Transpl 15:859–868, 2009.


Transplantation | 2000

Relationship of recipient age and development of chronic allograft failure.

Herwig Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Akinlolu Ojo; Diane M. Cibrik; Julie A. Hanson; Alan B. Leichtman; John C. Magee; Friedrich K. Port; Bruce Kaplan

BACKGROUND The elderly are the fastest growing segment of the end stage renal disease (ERSD) population. Older renal transplant recipients experience fewer acute rejection episodes than do younger patients. Despite this, death censored graft survival is no better in these older transplant recipients than in younger recipients. We examined the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) database to determine whether recipient age itself has an independent effect on the development of chronic allograft failure (CAF). METHODS We analyzed 59,509 patients from the files of the USRDS. To determine whether age was an independent risk factor for CAF, the population was analyzed separately for Caucasians, African-Americans, and other ethnic groups. All renal transplant recipients from 1988 to 1997 were examined. Both univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using chronic allograft failure as the outcome of interest. RESULTS Actuarial 8-year censored graft survival was significantly decreased in the older age groups 67% for ages 18-49 vs. 61.8% for ages 50-64 vs. 50.7% for ages 65+ (P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, recipient age was a strong and independent risk factor for the development of chronic allograft failure in Caucasians (RR 1.29 for ages 50-64, RR 1.67 for ages older than 65). These findings were reinforced by an analysis that was restricted to living donor transplants without acute rejection. CONCLUSION In Caucasians increased recipient age is an independent risk factor for the development of chronic renal allograft failure.


Pediatric Transplantation | 2010

Assessment of transition readiness skills and adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients

Emily M. Fredericks; Dawn Dore-Stites; Andrew Well; John C. Magee; Gary L. Freed; Victoria Shieck; M. James Lopez

Fredericks EM, Dore‐Stites D, Well A, Magee JC, Freed GL, Shieck V, Lopez MJ. Assessment of transition readiness skills and adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Pediatr Transplantation 2010: 14:944–953.

Collaboration


Dive into the John C. Magee's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald J. Sokol

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathleen B. Schwarz

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yumirle P. Turmelle

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jorge A. Bezerra

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge