John Charity

The long-term results of the original Exeter polished cemented femoral component: a follow-up report.

We present a long-term follow-up report of the results of the original Exeter polished cemented stems inserted between November 1970 and the end of 1975 at our institution by surgeons of widely differing experience using crude cementing techniques. The results of this series were reported in 1988 (Fowler et al. Orthopaedic Clinics of North America. 1988;19:477) and again in 1993 (Timperley et al. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1993;75-B:33). There have been no failures from aseptic femoral component loosening since the 1993 report. From the original series of 433 hips, there were, at the end of 2003, 26 living patients with 33 hips. Of the latter, there were 25 hips in 20 patients with their original femoral components still in situ. Twenty-eight (6.46%) hips from the original series have been lost to follow-up, although none since 1992. With the end point reoperation for aseptic stem loosening, the survivorship is 93.5% (95% confidence interval, 90.0%-97.0%). The reoperation rate for aseptic femoral component loosening is 3.23% into the 33rd year of follow-up.

Original ArticleThe Long-Term Results of the Original Exeter Polished Cemented Femoral Component: A Follow-up Report

We present a long-term follow-up report of the results of the original Exeter polished cemented stems inserted between November 1970 and the end of 1975 at our institution by surgeons of widely differing experience using crude cementing techniques. The results of this series were reported in 1988 (Fowler et al. Orthopaedic Clinics of North America. 1988;19:477) and again in 1993 (Timperley et al. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1993;75-B:33). There have been no failures from aseptic femoral component loosening since the 1993 report. From the original series of 433 hips, there were, at the end of 2003, 26 living patients with 33 hips. Of the latter, there were 25 hips in 20 patients with their original femoral components still in situ. Twenty-eight (6.46%) hips from the original series have been lost to follow-up, although none since 1992. With the end point reoperation for aseptic stem loosening, the survivorship is 93.5% (95% confidence interval, 90.0%-97.0%). The reoperation rate for aseptic femoral component loosening is 3.23% into the 33rd year of follow-up.

The use of long cemented stems for femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND Following revision total hip arthroplasty involving femoral impaction grafting, fractures usually have occurred distal to a standard-length stem in an area of weakened bone that was left inadequately supported. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the use of a long stem decreases the rate of femoral fracture after revision hip surgery. We hypothesized that the use of a long-stem femoral component would decrease the risk of these fractures. METHODS From 1991 to 2000, 567 revision total hip arthroplasties were performed with use of femoral impaction grafting. Of these, forty-two procedures in forty patients (average age, 73.8 years) were performed with use of a stem that was > or = 220 mm in length. The average number of previous revisions was 1.85. Thirty-four of the forty hips with preoperative radiographs had preoperative bone loss that was classified as grade III or IV according to the Endo-Klinik system. Major complications were recorded, and survival analysis was performed. RESULTS No patient was lost to follow-up. Sixteen patients (sixteen hips) died at an average of fifty-two months postoperatively. The average duration of clinical follow-up for the hips in which the implant survived for more than forty-eight months was 7.5 years. The rate of major postoperative complications was 29%. Two postoperative femoral fractures occurred. Six patients (six hips) required a femoral reoperation. The survival rate with revision hip surgery as the end point was 90% at both five and ten years. The rate of survival with any failure as the end point was 82% at five years and 64% at ten years. CONCLUSIONS The use of a long stem for femoral impaction grafting did not completely resolve the problem of postoperative fractures in these patients with substantial loss of bone stock undergoing revision hip surgery. Poor bone stock, technical errors, and other patient-related factors continue to account for the high postoperative fracture rate.

The safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous total hip replacement AN ANALYSIS OF 2063 CASES

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous total hip replacement (THR) and that of staged bilateral THR and unilateral THR was conducted using DerSimonian-Laird heterogeneity meta-analysis. A review of the English-language literature identified 23 citations eligible for inclusion. A total of 2063 bilateral simultaneous THR patients were identified. Meta-analysis of homogeneous data revealed no statistically significant differences in the rates of thromboembolic events (p = 0.268 and p = 0.365) and dislocation (p = 0.877) when comparing staged or unilateral with bilateral simultaneous THR procedures. A systematic analysis of heterogeneous data demonstrated that the mean length of hospital stay was shorter after bilateral simultaneous THR. Higher blood transfusion requirements were expected following bilateral simultaneous THR than staged or unilateral THR, and surgical time was not different between groups. This procedure was also found to be economically and functionally efficacious when performed by experienced surgeons in specialist centres.

Revision total hip replacement using the cement-in-cement technique for the acetabular component: Technique and results for 60 hips

The technique of femoral cement-in-cement revision is well established, but there are no previous series reporting its use on the acetabular side at the time of revision total hip replacement. We describe the technique and report the outcome of 60 consecutive acetabular cement-in-cement revisions in 59 patients at a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (5 to 12). All had a radiologically and clinically well-fixed acetabular cement mantle at the time of revision. During the follow-up 29 patients died, but no hips were lost to follow-up. The two most common indications for acetabular revision were recurrent dislocation (46, 77%) and to complement femoral revision (12, 20%). Of the 60 hips, there were two cases of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (3.3%) requiring re-revision. No other hip was clinically or radiologically loose (96.7%) at the latest follow-up. One hip was re-revised for infection, four for recurrent dislocation and one for disarticulation of a constrained component. At five years the Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 100% for aseptic loosening and 92.2% (95% CI 84.8 to 99.6), with revision for any cause as the endpoint. These results support the use of cement-in-cement revision on the acetabular side in appropriate cases. Theoretical advantages include preservation of bone stock, reduced operating time, reduced risk of complications and durable fixation.

Posterior Longitudinal Split Osteotomy for Femoral Component Extraction in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

We present a technique of single posterior longitudinal split osteotomy. This technique allows the expansion of the proximal femur and easier extraction of uncemented femoral components. Since 1998 we have performed this osteotomy in 12 revision total hip arthroplasties in 11 patients who had either stable fibrous ingrowth or a small amount of bony ingrowth. All were revised to a cemented Exeter stem (Stryker Benoist Gerard, Caen, France). No patient required conversion from a longitudinal split to an extended trochanteric osteotomy. At mean follow-up of 48 months, there were significant improvements in both pain and function. There were no complications due to this technique. Mean in-cement taper engagement (subsidence) was 1.1 mm (range, 0-2 mm). Femoral impaction grafting did not adversely affect the cement mantle or increase in-cement taper engagement. With appropriate patient selection, this is a simple, reliable, and extensile technique to assist in the extraction of uncemented ongrowth femoral components whether hydroxyapatite-coated or not.

The Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty.

AIMS We report on the outcome of the Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented all-polyethylene acetabular component with a mean follow-up of 12 years (10 to 13.9). This study reviewed 203 hips in 194 patients. 129 hips in 122 patients are still in situ; 66 hips in 64 patients were in patients who died before ten years, and eight hips (eight patients) were revised. Clinical outcome scores were available for 108 hips (104 patients) and radiographs for 103 hips (100 patients). PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review was undertaken of a consecutive series of 203 routine primary cemented total hip arthroplasties (THA) in 194 patients. RESULTS There were no acetabular component revisions for aseptic loosening. Acetabular revision was undertaken in eight hips. In four hips revision was necessitated by periprosthetic femoral fractures, in two hips by recurrent dislocation, in one hip for infection and in one hip for unexplained ongoing pain. Oxford and Harris hip scores demonstrated significant clinical improvement (all p < 0.001). Radiolucent lines were present in 37 (36%) of the 103 acetabular components available for radiological evaluation. In 27 of these, the line was confined to zone 1. No component had migrated. CONCLUSION Kaplan-Meier survivorship, with revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint, was 100% at 12.5 years and for all causes was 97.8% (95% confidence interval 95.6 to 100) when 40 components remained at risk. The Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented acetabular component demonstrates excellent survivorship at 12.5 years. TAKE HOME MESSAGE The Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented acetabular component has excellent clinical outcomes and survivorship when used with the Exeter stem in total hip arthroplasty.

Details of a Tendon–Sparing Posterior Approach in Hemiarthroplasty in the Treatment of Displaced Intracapsular Neck of Femur Fracture

This paper details a tendon–sparing surgical technique allowing hemiarthroplasty through a posterior approach in all cases whilst preserving the Quadriceps coxa. The SPAIRE (Sparing Piriformis and Internus, Repair Externus) technique, described by Hanly et al. for routine use in total hip replacement, theoretically offers the functional benefits of the posterior approach with reduced risk of dislocation. It may also facilitate early mobilisation after hip fracture surgery with potential reduction in medical complications and mortality. In this study, we report our initial experience using the same SPAIRE technique for hemiarthroplasty to treat all patients with displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures, irrespective of skeletal dimension and BMI. Our results suggest that the SPAIRE technique is feasible and safe to be used in all cases requiring hemiarthroplasty. Further research should be encouraged to investigate the role of the SPAIRE technique in fractured neck of femur surgery.

The Exeter Trauma Stem: A radiographic follow-up at minimum of five years post implantation.

INTRODUCTION The Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS) has been recommended by National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines in the United Kingdom as a proven, cemented stem. A single laboratory study in the literature has raised possible concerns about the polished finish of the ETS and subsequent potential for accelerated loosening although there is little clinical evidence to support or refute this. METHODS The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of the ETS at a minimum of five years post implantation. Primary outcomes were radiological loosening at a minimum of five years along with survivorship of the implant. Patient demographics were prospectively collected and followed up. RESULTS 218 ETSs (in 214 patients) were implanted from June 2002 until August 2008 in a single centre by a wide variety of surgeons of differing grades. Of these, 16 underwent revision surgery for fracture (2), dislocation (3), infection (1) and acetabular erosion (10) but there were no revisions for aseptic loosening of the implant. There were 64.0% (137/214) patients that had died by the time of this study. Of the remaining patients, 90 had radiographs of their hips at a minimum of 5 years with 36 of these at a minimum of 7 years post implantation. None of these had evidence of loosening. CONCLUSION The ETS is a robust and suitable stem for implantation in patients with hip fractures. There are no clinical suspicions or increased rates of loosening with the ETS in our study. The concerns about surface finish are not borne out in our clinical study which shows no evidence of loosening at a minimum of five years post operation. It confers many advantages including ease of revision and it should continue to be used as per NICE guidelines.