Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John D. Boice is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John D. Boice.


Breast Cancer Research | 2004

Study design: Evaluating gene–environment interactions in the etiology of breast cancer – the WECARE study

Jonine L. Bernstein; Bryan Langholz; Robert W. Haile; Leslie Bernstein; Duncan C. Thomas; Marilyn Stovall; Kathleen E. Malone; Charles F. Lynch; Jørgen H. Olsen; Hoda Anton-Culver; Roy E. Shore; John D. Boice; Gertrud S. Berkowitz; Richard A. Gatti; Susan L. Teitelbaum; Susan A. Smith; Barry S. Rosenstein; Anne Lise Børresen-Dale; Patrick Concannon; W. Douglas Thompson

IntroductionDeficiencies in cellular responses to DNA damage can predispose to cancer. Ionizing radiation can cause cluster damage and double-strand breaks (DSBs) that pose problems for cellular repair processes. Three genes (ATM, BRCA1, and BRCA2) encode products that are essential for the normal cellular response to DSBs, but predispose to breast cancer when mutated.DesignTo examine the joint roles of radiation exposure and genetic susceptibility in the etiology of breast cancer, we designed a case-control study nested within five population-based cancer registries. We hypothesized that a woman carrying a mutant allele in one of these genes is more susceptible to radiation-induced breast cancer than is a non-carrier. In our study, 700 women with asynchronous bilateral breast cancer were individually matched to 1400 controls with unilateral breast cancer on date and age at diagnosis of the first breast cancer, race, and registry region, and counter-matched on radiation therapy. Each triplet comprised two women who received radiation therapy and one woman who did not. Radiation absorbed dose to the contralateral breast after initial treatment was estimated with a comprehensive dose reconstruction approach that included experimental measurements in anthropomorphic and water phantoms applying patient treatment parameters. Blood samples were collected from all participants for genetic analyses.ConclusionsOur study design improves the potential for detecting gene–environment interactions for diseases when both gene mutations and the environmental exposures of interest are rare in the general population. This is particularly applicable to the study of bilateral breast cancer because both radiation dose and genetic susceptibility have important etiologic roles, possibly by interactive mechanisms. By using counter-matching, we optimized the informativeness of the collected dosimetry data by increasing the variability of radiation dose within the case–control sets and enhanced our ability to detect radiation–genotype interactions.


American Journal of Human Genetics | 2004

Chromosomal Abnormalities among Offspring of Childhood-Cancer Survivors in Denmark: A Population-Based Study

Jeanette Falck Winther; John D. Boice; John J. Mulvihill; Marilyn Stovall; Kirsten Frederiksen; E. Janet Tawn; Jørgen H. Olsen

Ionizing radiation and many cancer drugs have the potential to produce germ-cell mutations that might lead to genetic disease in the next generation. In a population-based study, we identified, from records in the Danish Cancer Registry, 4,676 children treated for cancer. Their 6,441 siblings provided a comparison cohort. The results of a search of the Central Population Register identified 2,630 live-born offspring of the survivors and 5,504 live-born offspring of their siblings. The occurrence of abnormal karyotypes diagnosed in these offspring and also in any pregnancies terminated following prenatal diagnosis of a chromosome abnormality was determined from the Danish Cytogenetic Registry. After exclusion of hereditary cases and inclusion of the prenatal cases, after correction for expected viability, the adjusted proportion of live-born children in survivor families with abnormal karyotypes (5.5/2,631.5 [0.21%]) was the same as that among the comparison sibling families (11.8/5,505.8 [0.21%]). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of Down syndrome (relative risk [RR]=1.07; 95% CI 0.16-5.47) or Turner syndrome (RR=1.32; 95% CI 0.17-7.96) among the children of cancer survivors, compared with the children of their siblings. These reassuring results are of importance to the survivors, to their families, and to genetic counselors.


Cancer | 2008

Twenty years of follow-up among survivors of childhood and young adult acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

Daniel A. Mulrooney; Douglas C. Dover; Suwen Li; Yutaka Yasui; Kirsten K. Ness; Ann C. Mertens; Joseph P. Neglia; Charles A. Sklar; Leslie L. Robison; Stella M. Davies; Melissa M. Hudson; G. T. Armstrong; Joanna L. Perkins; Maura O'Leary; Debra L. Friedman; Thomas W. Pendergrass; Brian Greffe; Lorrie F. Odom; Kathy Ruccione; John J. Mulvihill; Jill Ginsberg; A. T. Meadows; Jean M. Tersak; A. Kim Ritchey; Julie Blatt; Gregory H. Reaman; Roger J. Packer; Stella Davies; Smita Bhatia; Stephen Qualman

Limited data exist on the comprehensive assessment of late medical and social effects experienced by survivors of childhood and young adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML).


The Lancet | 2010

Stillbirth and neonatal death in relation to radiation exposure before conception: a retrospective cohort study

Lisa B. Signorello; John J. Mulvihill; Daniel M. Green; Heather M. Munro; Marilyn Stovall; Rita E. Weathers; Ann C. Mertens; John Whitton; Leslie L. Robison; John D. Boice

BACKGROUND The reproductive implications of mutagenic treatments given to children with cancer are not clear. By studying the risk of untoward pregnancy outcomes, we indirectly assessed the risk of transmission of germline damage to the offspring of survivors of childhood cancer who were given radiotherapy and chemotherapy. METHODS We did a retrospective cohort analysis, within the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), of the risk of stillbirth and neonatal death among the offspring of men and women who had survived childhood cancer. Patients in CCSS were younger than 21 years at initial diagnosis of an eligible cancer, were treated at 25 US institutions and one Canadian institution, and had survived for at least 5 years after diagnosis. We quantified the chemotherapy given to patients, and the preconception radiation doses to the testes, ovaries, uterus, and pituitary gland, and related these to the risk of stillbirth or neonatal death using Poisson regression analysis. FINDINGS Among 1148 men and 1657 women who had survived childhood cancer, there were 4946 pregnancies. Irradiation of the testes (16 [1%] of 1270; adjusted relative risk 0.8 [95% CI 0.4-1.6]; mean dose 0.53 Gy [SD 1.40]) and pituitary gland (17 [3%] of 510, 1.1 [0.5-2.4] for more than 20.00 Gy; mean dose 10.20 Gy [13.0] for women), and chemotherapy with alkylating drugs (26 [2%] of 1195 women, 0.9 [0.5-1.5]; ten [1%] of 732 men, 1.2 [0.5-2.5]) were not associated with an increased risk of stillbirth or neonatal death. Uterine and ovarian irradiation significantly increased risk of stillbirth and neonatal death at doses greater than 10.00 Gy (five [18%] of 28, 9.1 [3.4-24.6]). For girls treated before menarche, irradiation of the uterus and ovaries at doses as low as 1.00-2.49 Gy significantly increased the risk of stillbirth or neonatal death (three [4%] of 69, 4.7 [1.2-19.0]). INTERPRETATION Our findings do not support concern about heritable genetic changes affecting the risk of stillbirth and neonatal death in the offspring of men exposed to gonadal irradiation. However, uterine and ovarian irradiation had serious adverse effects on the offspring that were probably related to uterine damage. Careful management is warranted of pregnancies in women given high doses of pelvic irradiation before puberty. FUNDING Westlakes Research Institute, National Cancer Institute, and Childrens Cancer Research Fund.


International Journal of Cancer | 2003

Cancer and other causes of mortality among radiologic technologists in the United States.

Aparna K. Mohan; Michael Hauptmann; D. Michal Freedman; Elaine Ron; Genevieve M. Matanoski; Jay H. Lubin; Bruce H. Alexander; John D. Boice; Michele M. Doody; Martha S. Linet

Data are limited on the role of chronic exposure to low‐dose ionizing radiation in the etiology of cancer. In a nationwide cohort of 146,022 U.S. radiologic technologists (73% female), we evaluated mortality risks in relation to work characteristics. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were computed to compare mortality in the total cohort vs. the general population of the United States. Mortality risks were low for all causes (SMR = 0.76) and for all cancers (SMR = 0.82) among the radiologic technologists. We also calculated relative risks (RR) for the 90,305 technologists who responded to a baseline mailed questionnaire, using Poisson regression models, adjusted for known risk factors. Risks were higher for all cancers (RR = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.93–1.69) and breast cancer (RR = 2.92, 95% CI = 1.22–7.00) among radiologic technologists first employed prior to 1940 compared to those first employed in 1960 or later, and risks declined with more recent calendar year of first employment (p‐trend = 0.04 and 0.002, respectively), irrespective of employment duration. Risk for the combined category of acute lymphocytic, acute myeloid and chronic myeloid leukemias was increased among those first employed prior to 1950 (RR = 1.64, 95% CI = 0.42–6.31) compared to those first employed in 1950 or later. Risks rose for breast cancer (p‐trend = 0.018) and for acute lymphocytic, acute myeloid and chronic myeloid leukemias (p‐trend = 0.05) with increasing duration of employment as a radiologic technologist prior to 1950. The elevated mortality risks for breast cancer and for the combined group of acute lymphocytic, acute myeloid and chronic myeloid leukemias are consistent with a radiation etiology given greater occupational exposures to ionizing radiation prior to 1950 than in more recent times.


Clinical Genetics | 2009

Radiotherapy for childhood cancer and risk for congenital malformations in offspring: A population-based cohort study

Jeanette F. Winther; John D. Boice; Kirsten Frederiksen; Andrea Bautz; John J. Mulvihill; Marilyn Stovall; Jørgen H. Olsen

Offspring of childhood cancer survivors may be at risk of genetic disease due to the mutagenic cancer treatments received by their parents. Congenital malformations were evaluated in a population‐based cohort study of 1715 offspring of 3963 childhood cancer survivors and 6009 offspring of 5657 survivors’ siblings. The Danish Central Population Register, Cancer Registry and Hospital Register were used to identify study subjects and congenital malformations. Gonadal and uterine radiation doses were characterized based on standard radiation‐treatment regimens. The prevalence of congenital malformations at birth in offspring of survivors (44 cases, 2.6%) was slightly higher but not statistically different from that of offspring of siblings (140 cases, 2.3%) [prevalence proportion ratio (PPR), 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.8–1.5] or of the general population (observed‐to‐expected ratio, 1.2; 0.9–1.6). Including malformations diagnosed later in life did not change the ratios appreciably. The risk for malformations was slightly higher in the offspring of irradiated parents than in that of non‐irradiated parents (PPR 1.2 vs 1.0) but was unrelated to gonadal dose. This study provides evidence that cancer therapy of children does not increase the risk for malformations in their offspring. Continued monitoring of genetic risks among their offspring, however, is warranted.


British Journal of Cancer | 2002

Mobile phones and malignant melanoma of the eye.

C Johansen; John D. Boice; Joseph K. McLaughlin; H C Christensen; Jørn Olsen

Recently a four-fold increase in the risk of malignant melanoma of the eye was associated with the use of radiofrequency transmitting devices, including mobile phones in Germany. We contrasted the incidence rates of this rare cancer with the number of mobile phone subscribers in Denmark. We observed no increasing trend in the incidence rate of melanoma, which was in sharp contrast to the exponentially increasing number of mobile phone subscribers starting in the early 1980s. Our study provides no support for an association between mobile phones and ocular melanoma.


British Journal of Cancer | 2003

Sex ratio among offspring of childhood cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy

Jeanette Falck Winther; John D. Boice; B. L. Thomsen; W. J. Schull; Marilyn Stovall; Jørgen H. Olsen

It has been postulated that paternal gonadal exposure would increase the sex ratio by inducing X-chromosomal dominant lethals but that maternal gonadal exposure would decrease the sex ratio by inducing recessive sex-linked lethals. We therefore evaluated the sex ratio (male-to-female ratio) of children born to survivors of childhood cancers in Denmark. Children with cancer were identified from the Danish Cancer Registry from 1943 to 1996 and their offspring from the Central Population Registry. Radiation treatments were determined from records within the Cancer Registry and gonadal radiation exposures were estimated based on the cancer being treated and the likely proximity of the radiation fields to the gonads. Overall, 1100 survivors of childhood cancer became the parents of 2130 children. The sex ratio for male (0.99) and female (1.00) cancer survivors was similar and did not differ significantly from the Danish population (1.06). Radiotherapy did not influence the sex ratio of the children of either male or female survivors, and there was no evidence for dose-related changes over categories of estimated dose to parental gonads. We saw no consistent association between the sex ratio and the interval between cancer diagnosis of the parent and birth of the child. This nationwide study provides no support for the hypothesis that radiation exposure to the gonads results in an inherited genetic effect that would be manifested by a change in the sex ratio of children born after exposure. It may be, however, that sex ratio alterations are not a good or even a valid indicator of possible genetic effects in humans.


British Journal of Cancer | 2008

Risk for contralateral breast cancer among carriers of the CHEK2*1100delC mutation in the WECARE Study

Lene Mellemkjær; Dahl C; Jørgen H. Olsen; Lisbeth Bertelsen; Guldberg P; Jane Christensen; Anne Lise Børresen-Dale; Marilyn Stovall; Bryan Langholz; Leslie Bernstein; Charles F. Lynch; Kathi Malone; Robert W. Haile; Michael Andersson; Duncan C. Thomas; Patrick Concannon; Marinela Capanu; John D. Boice; Jonine L. Bernstein

The protein encoded by the CHEK2 gene is involved in cellular repair of DNA damage. The truncating mutation, CHEK2*1100delC, seems to increase the risk for breast cancer. We investigated whether the CHEK2*1100delC mutation carrier status increases the risk for asynchronous contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and whether it interacts with radiation therapy (RT) or chemotherapy in regard to CBC risk. The germline mutation frequency was assessed in 708 women with CBC and 1395 women with unilateral breast cancer (UBC) in the Womens Environment, Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology (WECARE) Study whose first primary breast cancer was diagnosed before age 55 years and during 1985–1999. Seven women with CBC (1.0%) and 10 women with UBC (0.7%) were CHEK2*1100delC variant carriers (rate ratio (RR)=1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.6–5.4 for CBC vs UBC). Carriers who received RT for their first breast cancer, compared with non-carriers not treated with RT, had an RR of developing CBC of 2.6 (95% CI=0.8–8.7). We found no significant associations between the CHEK2*1100delC mutation and CBC overall or among those treated with RT. However, the sampling variability was such that modest increases in risk could not be excluded. Nonetheless, because this is a rare mutation, it is unlikely to explain a major fraction of CBC in the population.


International Journal of Cancer | 2003

Second Primary Cancers After Thymoma

Lois B. Travis; John D. Boice; William D. Travis

Lois B. TRAVIS*, John D. BOICE, JR. and William D. TRAVIS Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD, USA Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA Department of Pulmonary and Mediastinal Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, USA

Collaboration


Dive into the John D. Boice's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marilyn Stovall

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles F. Lynch

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph K. McLaughlin

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jørgen H. Olsen

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leslie L. Robison

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Stovall

University of Minnesota

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge