John D. Day
Intermountain Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John D. Day.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | 2011
T. Jared Bunch; Brian G. Crandall; J. Peter Weiss; M.S.P.H. Heidi T. May Ph.D.; Tami L. Bair; Jeffrey S. Osborn; Jeffrey L. Anderson; Joseph B. Muhlestein; M.P.H. Benjamin D. Horne Ph.D.; Donald L. Lappe; John D. Day
Outcomes in Patients With AF.u2002Introduction:u2002Atrial fibrillation (AF) adversely impacts mortality, stroke, heart failure, and dementia. AF ablation eliminates AF in most patients. We evaluated the long‐term impact of AF ablation on mortality, heart failure (HF), stroke, and dementia in a large system‐wide patient population.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | 2010
T. Jared Bunch; J. Peter Weiss; Brian G. Crandall; Heidi T. May; Tami L. Bair; Jeffrey S. Osborn; Jeffrey L. Anderson; Donald L. Lappe; J. Brent Muhlestein; R N Jennifer Nelson; John D. Day
Background: Radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). With improved safety, the therapy has been offered to increasingly older populations. Arrhythmia mechanisms, medical comorbidities, and safety may vary in the very elderly population.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | 2009
Mark A. Crandall; M.P.H. Benjamin D. Horne Ph.D.; John D. Day; Jeffrey L. Anderson; Joseph B. Muhlestein; Brian G. Crandall; J. Peter Weiss; Jeffrey S. Osborne; Donald L. Lappe; T. Jared Bunch
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of mortality and stroke. However, it is unclear if AF is independently associated with these poor outcomes or it is merely a risk marker of other processes that convey the risk.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | 2009
Mark A. Crandall; M.P.H. Benjamin D. Horne Ph.D.; John D. Day; Jeffrey L. Anderson; Joseph B. Muhlestein; Brian G. Crandall; J. Peter Weiss; Donald L. Lappe; T. Jared Bunch
Background: Inflammation has been shown to have a direct role in the initiation, maintenance, and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) although the underlying mechanisms are unknown. Similarly, it is unclear if inflammatory markers are elevated due to the AF alone or the coexisting cardiovascular diseases that increase the risk of AF.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | 2009
Andrea M. Russo; John D. Day; Kira Q. Stolen; Christopher M. Mullin; Vinayak Doraiswamy; Darin L. Lerew; Brian Olshansky
Introduction: Due to limited enrollment of women in previous trials, there is a paucity of data comparing outcome and arrhythmic events in men versus women with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | 2011
T. Jared Bunch; M.P.H. Benjamin D. Horne Ph.D.; Samuel J. Asirvatham; John D. Day; Brian G. Crandall; J. Peter Weiss; Jeffrey S. Osborn; Jeffrey L. Anderson; Joseph B. Muhlestein; Donald L. Lappe; C. Arden Pope
Background: Previous studies have observed that short‐term exposure to elevated concentrations of particulate matter (PM) air pollution increases risk of acute ischemic heart disease events and heart failure hospitalization, alters cardiac autonomic function, and increases risk of arrhythmias. This study explored the potential associations between short‐term elevations in PM exposure and atrial fibrillation (AF).
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | 2011
Gangadhar Malasana; John D. Day; J. Peter Weiss; Brian G. Crandall; L R N Tami Bair; Heidi T. May; Jeffrey S. Osborn; Jeffrey L. Anderson; Joseph B. Muhlestein; Donald L. Lappe; R N Jennifer Nelson; T. Jared Bunch
A Strategy of Rapid Cardioversion.u2002Background: The significance of early recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear. Atrial remodeling driven by these tachyarrhythmias can result in electrical, contractile, and structural changes that may impair long‐term therapy success. Aggressive attempts to restore sinus rhythm in the temporal period of healing after ablation might improve outcomes.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | 2013
T. Jared Bunch; M.S.P.H. Heidi T. May Ph.D.; Brian G. Crandall; J. Peter Weiss; L R N Tami Bair; Jeffrey S. Osborn; Jeffrey L. Anderson; Joseph B. Muhlestein; Donald L. Lappe; L P A David Johnson; John D. Day
Intracardiac Ultrasound During Left Atrial Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.u2002Background: Esophageal injury during left atrial ablation is associated with a significant risk of mortality and morbidity. There are no validated approaches to reduce injury outside of avoidance, a strategy critically dependent on a precise understanding of the esophageal anatomy and location. Intracardiac ultrasound (ICE) can provide a real‐time assessment of the esophagus during ablation. We hypothesized that ICE can accurately define esophageal anatomy and location to enhance avoidance strategies during ablation.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | 2008
T. Jared Bunch; John D. Day
The term evolution refers to a process of growth, development, or formation. The foundation of evolution is the accumulation of prior successes or failures that have ultimately directed the process. Fundamental to the practice of electrophysiology has been the technology evolution of the cardiac implantable electronic device. In 1958, Rune Elmquist developed the first implantable cardiac pacemaker that was implanted by Åke Senning.1 This device was strictly used for therapy. It delivered an electrical stimulus at a rate of 70–80 beats per minute with a pulse amplitude of 2 V and a width of 1.5 mV. Although the first device failed almost immediately and the second one only lasted approximately 6 weeks, Arne Larson, the first patient to receive them, lived another 43 years and survived to have received over 20 devices of various sizes and technologies.2 The success of the implantable cardiac pacemaker also prompted the need for the technology to evolve. The device accurately and reproducibly delivered a set therapy; but without a means to diagnose and respond to intrinsic cardiac conduction, patients exchanged one set of symptoms for another. The diagnostic evolution of pacemakers remains a contemporary area of research and investigation. Even the simplest of modern devices can sense and respond to intrinsic conduction in the atrium and/or ventricle. Some devices automatically determine lead thresholds and adjust energy delivery to optimize battery life or alert the patient if a possible failure has occurred. Pacemakers can diagnose, record, and act on tachyarrhythmias in both the atrium and ventricle (Fig. 1A). For example, in Figure 1B a pacemaker diagnosed the period of time per day the patient was in atrial fibrillation (AF). This patient underwent radiofrequency ablation of his AF and had an abrupt decline in the percentage per day in the arrhythmia. The device diagnostics was influential in the identification of the AF, as well as the response to therapy. A more recent area of diagnostics is that applied to a specific disease state. A natural transition of the technology occurred as the devices were implanted broadly to patients with ischemic and nonischemic left ventricular dysfunction in that they could record and quantify parameters of heart failure. These parameters include heart rate variability, thoracic impedance, and daily activity.3,4 Although the device does
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | 2009
T. Jared Bunch; John D. Day; Douglas L. Packer
The approach to catheter‐based radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation has evolved, and as a consequence, more energy is delivered in the posterior left atrium, exposing neighboring tissue to untoward thermal injury. Simultaneously, catheter technology has advanced to allow more efficient energy delivery into the myocardium, which compounds the likelihood of collateral injury. This review focuses on the basic principles of thermodynamics as they apply to energy delivery during radiofrequency ablation. These principles can be used to titrate energy delivery and plan ablative approaches in an effort to minimize complications during the procedure.