John D. Hayler
GlaxoSmithKline
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John D. Hayler.
Green Chemistry | 2007
David J. C. Constable; Peter J. Dunn; John D. Hayler; Guy R. Humphrey; Johnnie L. Leazer; Russell J. Linderman; Kurt T. Lorenz; Julie Manley; Bruce A. Pearlman; Andrew Wells; Aleksey Zaks; Tony Y. Zhang
In 2005, the ACS Green Chemistry Institute (GCI) and the global pharmaceutical corporations developed the ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable to encourage the integration of green chemistry and green engineering into the pharmaceutical industry. The Roundtable has developed a list of key research areas. The purpose of this perspective is to summarise how that list was agreed, provide an assessment of the current state of the art in those areas and to highlight areas for future improvement.
Green Chemistry | 2016
Denis Prat; Andy Wells; John D. Hayler; Helen F. Sneddon; C. Robert McElroy; Sarah Abou-Shehada; Peter J. Dunn
A selection guide of common solvents has been elaborated, based on a survey of publically available solvent selection guides. In order to rank less classical solvents, a set of Safety, Health and Environment criteria is proposed, aligned with the Global Harmonized System (GHS) and European regulations. A methodology based on a simple combination of these criteria gives an overall preliminary ranking of any solvent. This enables in particular a simplified greenness evaluation of bio-derived solvents.
Green Chemistry | 2014
Denis Prat; John D. Hayler; Andy Wells
Several solvent selection guides have been published, in different formats, reflecting the culture of their institutions. The data given in these guides have been compiled, and where possible combined, in order to allow a ranking comparison. Of the 51 solvents considered, an acceptable alignment of the classifications could be met, permitting a ranking into four categories: recommended, problematic, hazardous and highly hazardous. 17 solvents (33%) could not be unequivocally ranked by this simplified analysis, thus reflecting differences in the weighing of criteria between the institutions.
Green Chemistry | 2016
Catherine Mary Alder; John D. Hayler; Richard K. Henderson; Anikó M. Redman; Lena Shukla; Leanna E. Shuster; Helen F. Sneddon
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has previously reported on the development of a GSK solvent guide, the incorporation of lifecycle impact and the expansion of the guide including a customisable version intended for posting in different business areas. This guide has recently been enhanced by: (1) adding 44 additional solvents, many of which have literature claims to be “green”; (2) adjusting the way in which multiple health, environment, safety, and waste categories are combined to reach a single composite score and colour assignment; (3) updating the data behind all scores, especially toxicology and health hazard assessment, and revising the methodology to reflect current guidelines and data. The full methodology behind this work is hereby shared. The new GSK Solvent Sustainability Guide enables GSK scientists to objectively assess solvents. It facilitates both comparison of individual sustainability criteria, and a composite score and colour for rank ordering, incorporating multiple facets of sustainability.
Green Chemistry | 2001
David J. C. Constable; Alan D. Curzons; Luisa M. Freitas dos Santos; Graham Richard Geen; Robert E. Hannah; John D. Hayler; John Kitteringham; Michael A. McGuire; John Edward Richardson; Paul W. Smith; R. Lee Webb; Marvin Sungwhan Yu
A set of metrics has been developed which enables a simple assessment to be made of batch processes in terms of waste, energy usage, and chemistry efficiency. It is intended to raise awareness of green chemistry by providing a tool to assist chemists in monitoring progress in the reduction of environmental impact as they design new routes and modify processes.
Green Chemistry | 2013
Joseph P. Adams; Catherine Mary Alder; Ian Andrews; Ann M. Bullion; Matthew Campbell-Crawford; Michael G. Darcy; John D. Hayler; Richard K. Henderson; Catriona A. Oare; Israil Pendrak; Anikó M. Redman; Leanna E. Shuster; Helen F. Sneddon; Matthew D. Walker
Reagent guides ranking commonly used reagents for 15 transformations have been developed to reduce the environmental impact of drug discovery and development. Reagents have been scored by a combination of health, safety and environmental risk phrases, life cycle analysis (where possible) and an assessment of the chemistry including considerations of atom efficiency, stoichiometry, work-up and other issues. Guides covering alkene reduction, amide formation, C–H bromination, C–H chlorination, deoxychlorination, epoxidation, ester formation, ether formation, fluorination, iodination, ketone reduction, nitro reduction, oxidation of alcohols to aldehydes and ketones, reductive amination and sulfur oxidation are shared, with an explanation of the methodology behind their generation.
Green Chemistry | 2017
Frank Roschangar; Juan Colberg; Peter J. Dunn; Fabrice Gallou; John D. Hayler; Stefan G. Koenig; Michael E. Kopach; David K. Leahy; Ingrid Mergelsberg; John L. Tucker; Roger A. Sheldon; Chris H. Senanayake
Green and sustainable drug manufacturing go hand in hand with forward-looking visions seeking to balance the long-term sustainability of business, society, and the environment. However, a lack of harmonization among available metrics has inhibited opportunities for green chemistry in industry. Moreover, inconsistent starting points for analysis and neglected complexities for diverse manufacturing processes have made developing objective goals a challenge. Herein we put forward a practical strategy to overcome these barriers using data from in-depth analysis of 46 drug manufacturing processes from nine large pharmaceutical firms, and propose the Green Aspiration Level as metric of choice to enable the critically needed consistency in smart green manufacturing goals. In addition, we quantify the importance of green chemistry in the often overlooked, yet enormously impactful, outsourced portion of the supply chain, and introduce the Green Scorecard as a value added sustainability communication tool.
Synthetic Communications | 1997
Graham Richard Geen; Robert G. Giles; Trevor John Grinter; John D. Hayler; Simon Howie; Graham Johnson; Inderjit S. Mann; Vance Novack; Paul W. Oxley; John Kirby Smithkline Beecham Pharma. Quick; Neil Smith
Abstract A direct and high yielding route to 2-(5-tetrazolyl)benzopyran-4-ones 1, including pranlukast 1a is described. This involves the Claisen condensation reaction between the relevant hydroxyacetophenone 2 and the ethyl ester of tetrazole-2-carboxylic acid 5 to give the 1,3-diketone 6, which is then cyclised to give the desired benzopyran-4-ones 1.
Green Chemistry | 2015
Denis Prat; Andy Wells; John D. Hayler; Helen F. Sneddon; C. Robert McElroy; Sarah Abou-Shehada; Peter J. Dunn
Correction for ‘CHEM21 selection guide of classical- and less classical-solvents’ by Denis Prat, et al., Green Chem., 2015, DOI: 10.1039/c5gc01008j.
Green Chemistry | 2018
Frank Roschangar; Yanyan Zhou; David J.C. Constable; Juan Colberg; David P. Dickson; Peter J. Dunn; Martin D. Eastgate; Fabrice Gallou; John D. Hayler; Stefan G. Koenig; Michael E. Kopach; David K. Leahy; Ingrid Mergelsberg; Ulrich Scholz; Austin G. Smith; Manuel Henry; Jason A. Mulder; Jörg Brandenburg; Juan R. Dehli; Daniel R. Fandrick; Keith R. Fandrick; Frieder Gnad-Badouin; Georg Zerban; Klaus Groll; Paul T. Anastas; Roger A. Sheldon; Chris H. Senanayake
Following our goal to devise a unified green chemistry metric that inspires innovation in sustainable drug manufacturing across the pharmaceutical industry, we herein disclose joint efforts by IQ, the ACS GCI PR and academia, leading to the significantly improved ‘innovation Green Aspiration Level’ (iGAL) methodology. Backed by the statistical analysis of 64 drug manufacturing processes encompassing 703 steps across 12 companies, we find that iGAL affords an excellent proxy for molecular complexity and presents a valuable molecular weight-based ‘fixed’ goal. iGAL thereby accurately captures the impact of green process inventiveness and improvements, making it a useful innovation-driven green metric. We conclude by introducing the comprehensive, yet easy-to-use and readily adaptable Green Chemistry Innovation Scorecard web calculator, whose graphical output clearly and effectively illustrates the impact of innovation on waste reduction during drug manufacture.