John D. Yonge

The pragmatic randomized optimal platelet and plasma ratios trial: what does it mean for remote damage control resuscitation?

Implications from the pragmatic, randomize, optimal platelet and plasma ratios (PROPPR) trial are critical for remote damage control resuscitation (DCR). Utilizing DCR principals in remote settings can combat early mortality from hemorrhage. Identifying the appropriate transfusion strategy is mandatory prior to adopting prehospital hemostatic resuscitation strategies.

Performance improvement and patient safety program-guided quality improvement initiatives can significantly reduce computed tomography imaging in pediatric trauma patients.

Background Morbidity and mortality of cervical spine (C-spine) injury in pediatric trauma patients are high, necessitating quick and accurate diagnosis. Best practices emphasize minimizing radiation exposure through decreased reliance on computed tomography (CT), instead using clinical assessment, physical examination, and alternate imaging techniques. We implemented an institutional performance improvement and patient safety (PIPS) program initiative for C-spine clearance in 2010 because of high rates of CT scans among pediatric trauma patients. Methods A retrospective review of pediatric trauma patients, aged 0 years to 14 years, in the pre- and post-PIPS implementation periods was conducted. Rates of C-spine CT, overall CT, other imaging modalities, radiation exposure, patient characteristics, and injury severity were compared, and compliance with PIPS protocol was reviewed. Results Patient characteristics and injury severity were similar before and after PIPS implementation. C-spine CT rates decreased significantly between groups (30% vs. 13%, p < 0.001), whereas C-spine plain x-ray rates increased significantly (7% vs. 25%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in C-spine magnetic resonance imaging between groups (12% vs. 10%, p = 0.11). In 2007, 71% of patients received a CT scan for any reason. However, the overall CT rate decreased significantly between groups (60% vs. 45%, p < 0.001). There was an estimated 22% decrease in lifetime attributable risk (LAR) for any cancer due to ionizing imaging exposure in males and 38% decrease in females between the pre- and post-PIPS groups. There was a 54% decrease in LAR for thyroid cancer in males and females between groups; 2014 compliance with the protocol was excellent (82–90% per quarter). Conclusions Performance improvement and patient safety program–generated protocol can significantly decrease ionizing radiation exposure. We demonstrate that a simple protocol focused on C-spine imaging has high compliance, decreased C-spine CT scans, and decreased LAR for thyroid cancer. A secondary benefit is a reduction in total CT imaging, with an associated decrease in LAR for all cancers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level IV; diagnostic study, level III.

Damage control laparotomy utilization rates are highly variable among Level I trauma centers: Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios findings

BACKGROUND Damage control laparotomy (DCL) is intended to limit deleterious effects from trauma-induced coagulopathy. DCL has been associated with mortality reduction, but may increase complications including sepsis, abscess, respiratory failure, hernia, and gastrointestinal fistula. We hypothesized that (1) DCL incidence would vary between institutions; (2) mortality rates would vary with DCL rates; (3) standard DCL criteria of pH, international normalized ratio, temperature and major intra-abdominal vascular injury would not adequately capture all patients. METHODS Trauma patients at 12 Level 1 North American trauma centers were randomized based on transfusion ratios as described in the Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios trial. We analyzed outcomes after emergent laparotomy using a mixed-effects logistic model comparing DCL versus definitive surgical management with random effect for study site. Primary outcomes were 24-hour and 30-day mortality. RESULTS Three hundred twenty-nine patients underwent emergent laparotomy: 213 (65%) DCL and 116 (35%) definitive surgical management. DCL rates varied between institutions (33–83%), (p = 0.002). Median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was higher in the DCL group, 29 (interquartile range, 13–34) versus 21 (interquartile range, 22–41) (p < 0.001). Twenty-four-hour mortality was 19% with DCL versus 4% (p < 0.001); 30-day mortality was 28% with DCL versus 19% (p < 0.001). In a mixed-effects model, ISS and major intra-abdominal vascular injury were correlates of DCL (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.07 and OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4–5.2). DCL was not associated with 30-day mortality (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.97–5.60). Correlates included ISS (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02–1.09), PRBCs in 24 hours (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03–1.18), and age (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.06). No significant mortality difference was detected between institutions (p = 0.63). Sepsis and VAP occurred more frequently with DCL (p < 0.05). Eighty percent (135/213) of DCL patients met standard criteria. CONCLUSION Although DCL utilization varied significantly between institutions, there was no significant mortality difference between centers. This finding suggests tempering DCL use may not decrease mortality, but could decrease related complications. Level of Evidence Therapeutic study, level III.

Conscious sedation versus rapid sequence intubation for the reduction of native traumatic hip dislocation

BACKGROUND Traumatic hip dislocations (THD) are a medical emergency. There is debate whether the painful reduction of a dislocated hip should be first attempted using primary conscious sedation (PCS) or primary general anesthesia (PGA) METHODS: All cases of native THD from 2006 to 2015 in the trauma registry of a level 1 trauma center were reviewed. The primary outcome was successful reduction of the THD. RESULTS 67 patients had a native, meaning not a hip prosthesis, THD. 34 (50.7%) patients had successful PCS, 12 (17.9%) failed PCS and underwent reduction following PGA. 21 (31.3%) underwent PGA. Patients in the PGA group were more severely injured. Time to reduction greater than 6 h was associated with PCS failure (Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 19.75 (2.06,189.10) p = 0.01). CONCLUSION Clinicians treating patients with a THD can utilize either PCS or PGA with many patients safely reduced under PCS. However, patients whose hip have been dislocated for more than 6 h are at risk for failure with PCS, and are good candidates for PGA.

Update on the Massive Transfusion Guidelines on Hemorrhagic Shock: After the Wars

Over the past decade, crystalloid- and red blood cell-dominated massive resuscitation practices have largely been replaced with high-ratio transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells (RBCs) in massively bleeding trauma patients. Literature from military and civilian experiences with massive transfusion (MT) was reviewed, beginning with military transfusion practices at the onset of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and continuing through to present day. Early and balanced resuscitation (1:1:1 ratio of plasma, platelets, and RBCs) is superior to crystalloid- or red blood cell-driven resuscitation. Military research from Afghanistan and Iraq stimulated civilian investigations into ratio-based MT. 1:1:1 resuscitation carries the most benefit for massively bleeding trauma patients. Thrombelastography-guided MT can be used to supplement empiric 1:1:1 therapy in order to detect and address specific coagulopathies. Future directions in MT research presently include resuscitation with fresh whole blood and pre-hospital plasma-based resuscitation.