John E. Gough

Assessment of Breath Sounds During Ambulance Transport

STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine whether the environment of a moving ambulance affects the ability of our-of-hospital care providers to auscultate breath sounds. METHODS Out-of-hospital care providers assessed breath sounds with a previously described breath-sounds model in a quiet environment (control) and in a moving ambulance. The setting was a nonurban emergency medical services system and an interhospital transport agency based at a 600-plus-bed tertiary care center. The participants were physicians, transport nurses, and advanced life support EMS providers routinely involved in the emergency out-of-hospital treatment and transportation of the ill and injured. The accuracy with which participants identified the presence or absence of breath sounds in the two environments was compared with the use of the chi 2 test, with the alpha-value set at .05. RESULTS The accuracy of breath-sounds assessment in the control environment was 96% (251 of 260); the sensitivity was 96% and the specificity 97%. The accuracy of breath-sounds assessment in the experimental environment was 54% (140 of 260); the sensitivity was .09% and the specificity 98%. Participants were significantly less likely to hear breath sounds in the moving ambulance than in the quiet room (P < .001). CONCLUSION Assessment of breath sounds is hampered by the environment of a moving ambulance.

Determination of prehospital blood glucose: A prospective, controlled study

STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine if emergency medical personnel can effectively rule out hypoglycemia in the prehospital setting. DESIGN During a 10-week period, emergency medical personnel determined the fingerstick glucose on all prehospital patients with altered mental status using the Chemstrip bG. Statistical comparisons were made to serum glucose levels performed by hospital laboratory personnel on blood samples obtained prior to glucose administration. A serum glucose level less than 60 mg/dL was considered a positive test for hypoglycemia. PARTICIPANTS 170 consecutive patients with altered mental status (AMS) ranging in age from 13 to 90 years were enrolled. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of these patients, 158 were normal or hyperglycemic, 12 were hypoglycemic, and one patient was hypoglycemic but had only a borderline negative fingerstick test. Thus, a sensitivity of 91.7% and a negative predictive value of 99.3% were obtained. The specificity was 92.4%, and positive predictive value was 47.8%. CONCLUSION The Chemstrip bG may be used safely in the prehospital setting to rule out hypoglycemia.

Children and Adults With Frequent Hospitalizations for Asthma Exacerbation, 2012-2013: A Multicenter Observational Study.

BACKGROUND Earlier studies reported that many patients were frequently hospitalized for asthma exacerbation. However, there have been no recent multicenter studies to characterize this patient population with high morbidity and health care utilization. OBJECTIVE To examine the proportion and characteristics of children and adults with frequent hospitalizations for asthma exacerbation. METHODS A multicenter chart review study of patients aged 2 to 54 years who were hospitalized for asthma exacerbation at 1 of 25 hospitals across 18 US states during the period 2012 to 2013 was carried out. The primary outcome was frequency of hospitalizations for asthma exacerbation in the past year (including the index hospitalization). RESULTS The cohort included 369 children (aged 2-17 years) and 555 adults (aged 18-54 years) hospitalized for asthma exacerbation. Over the 12-month period, 36% of the children and 42% of the adults had 2 or more (frequent) hospitalizations for asthma exacerbation. Among patients with frequent hospitalizations, guideline-recommended outpatient management was suboptimal. For example, among adults, 32% were not on inhaled corticosteroids at the time of index hospitalization and 75% had no evidence of a previous evaluation by an asthma specialist. At hospital discharge, among adults with frequent hospitalizations who had used no controller medications previously, 37% were not prescribed inhaled corticosteroids. Likewise, during a 3-month postdischarge period, 64% of the adults with frequent hospitalizations were not referred to an asthma specialist. Although the proportion of patients who did not receive these guideline-recommended outpatient care appeared higher in adults, these preventive measures were still underutilized in children; for example, 38% of the children with frequent hospitalizations were not referred to asthma specialist after the index hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS This multicenter study of US patients hospitalized with asthma exacerbation demonstrated a disturbingly high proportion of patients with frequent hospitalizations and ongoing evidence of suboptimal longitudinal asthma care.

Underuse of guideline-recommended long-term asthma management in children hospitalized to the intensive care unit: a multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND Despite the significant burden of childhood asthma, little is known about prevention-oriented management before and after hospitalizations for asthma exacerbation. OBJECTIVE To investigate the proportion and characteristics of children admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for asthma exacerbation and the frequency of guideline-recommended outpatient management before and after the hospitalization. METHODS A 14-center medical record review study of children aged 2 to 17 years hospitalized for asthma exacerbation during 2012-2013. Primary outcome was admission to the ICU; secondary outcomes were 2 preventive factors: inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use and evaluation by asthma specialists in the pre- and posthospitalization periods. RESULTS Among 385 children hospitalized for asthma, 130 (34%) were admitted to the ICU. Risk factors for ICU admission were female sex, having public insurance, a marker of chronic asthma severity (ICS use), and no prior evaluation by an asthma specialist. Among children with ICU admission, guideline-recommended outpatient management was suboptimal (eg, 65% were taking ICSs at the time of index hospitalization, and 19% had evidence of a prior evaluation by specialist). At hospital discharge, among children with ICU admission who had not previously used controller medications, 85% were prescribed ICSs. Furthermore, 62% of all children with ICU admission were referred to an asthma specialist during the 3-month posthospitalization period. CONCLUSION In this multicenter study of US children hospitalized with asthma exacerbation, one-third of children were admitted to the ICU. In this high-risk group, we observed suboptimal pre- and posthospitalization asthma care. These findings underscore the importance of continued efforts to improve prevention-oriented asthma care at all clinical encounters.

Potential time savings by prehospital administration of activated charcoal

OBJECTIVE Activated charcoal (AC) has been proven useful in many toxic ingestions. Theoretically, administration of AC in the prehospital environment could save valuable time in the treatment of patients who have sustained potentially toxic oral ingestions. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of prehospital AC administration and to identify time savings that could potentially result from field AC administration. METHODS Adult patients with a chief complaint of toxic ingestion who had complete emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency department (ED) records and no medical treatment (gastric emptying, AC administration) prior to EMS arrival were eligible for inclusion. Data obtained from EMS and ED records included time of EMS departure from the scene, time of EMS arrival at the ED, and time of administration of AC in the ED. Since most EMS agencies in this system do not insert gastric tubes, patients requiring gastric tube placement for administration of AC were excluded. RESULTS Twenty-nine of 117 (24.8%) adult patients received oral AC with no other intervention. None of the 117 patients received AC in the prehospital setting. The EMS transport time for these patients ranged from 5 to 43 minutes (mean 16.2 +/- 9.7 minutes). The delay from ED arrival to AC administration ranged from 5 to 94 minutes (mean 48.8 +/- 24.1 minutes), and was more than 60 minutes for 14 (48.2%) of the patients. The total time interval from scene departure to ED AC administration ranged from 17 to 111 minutes (mean 65.0 +/- 25.9 minutes). CONCLUSIONS In a selected subset of patients who tolerate oral AC, prehospital administration of AC could result in earlier and potentially more efficacious AC therapy. Prospective study of the benefits and feasibility of prehospital AC administration is indicated.

Does the ambulance environment adversely affect the ability to perform oral endotracheal intubation

OBJECTIVE Oral endotracheal intubation (ETI) is the preferred method of controlling the airway in critically ill or injured patients. It was postulated that time could be saved if intubation was performed in the ambulance en route to the hospital. This study was designed to determine whether the ambulance environment adversely affected the ability of emergency medical technicians at the advanced-intermediate level (EMT-AI) to perform oral ETI. HYPOTHESIS The restrictive environment of a moving ambulance would affect adversely the ability of EMT-AIs to perform ETI compared with a controlled setting. This would result in a significant increase in the time necessary to perform ETI in the ambulance compared with a controlled setting not complicated by restrictive space and motion. METHODS Twenty on-duty EMT-AIs were recruited to volunteer for this prospective, nonrandomized, nonblinded trial. All participants performed three consecutive oral ETIs on an airway mannequin in two settings: 1) in the back of a moving ambulance; and 2) on a table in the rescue squad station. Of the participants, 10 performed the intubations in the ambulance first; the remainder performed the intubations at the station first. Time for intubation with the mannequin was recorded by stopwatch. The mean times for intubation in both settings were compared by Students t-test (p < 0.05). RESULTS All intubation attempts were successful. The mean time for intubation in the station was 13.0 +/- 3.4 seconds. The mean time in the ambulance setting was 13.2 +/- 5.3 seconds. There was no significant difference between the intubation times in the two settings (p = 0.88). CONCLUSION The environment of a moving ambulance does not appear to hinder the ability of EMT-AIs to perform oral ETI in a laboratory setting with a mannequin model.

Prehospital consideration of sildenafil-nitrate interactions

OBJECTIVE To determine whether paramedics and on-line physicians screen patients for use of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) prior to prehospital administration of nitrates. METHODS A prospective, observational study was performed over a one-month period in three EMS systems. Consecutive radio communications between on-line physicians and paramedics concerning male patients with cardiac complaints were monitored. Investigators observed the frequency with which on-line physicians screened for sildenafil use prior to ordering nitrates. After observation of the radio communications was completed, a written survey was distributed to all paramedics in the three EMS systems. RESULTS Seventy-six physician-paramedic interactions were monitored. Nitrates were ordered by on-line physicians in 56 cases. No paramedic reported sildenafil use/nonuse, and no on-line physician inquired about the patients potential use of the drug. Only half of the surveyed paramedics reported that they routinely screen for sildenafil use, and approximately a fourth reported that its use would not alter their management of chest pain patients. CONCLUSION In this study, on-line physicians in three EMS settings did not screen for sildenafil use prior to ordering nitrates. While some paramedics do screen for sildenafil use, practice patterns among paramedics in these three systems were inconsistent.

Accuracy of rural EMS provider interpretation of three-lead ECG rhythm strips

OBJECTIVE To measure the accuracy of lead II rhythm strip interpretations performed by advanced life support (ALS) emergency medical technicians (EMTs) in a rural emergency medical services (EMS) system. METHODS An electronic rhythm simulator was used to produce 24 three-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythm strips. The rhythms were shown to 57 ALS EMTs participating in regularly scheduled continuing education classes. The participants were asked to identify the rhythms. RESULTS The three-lead ECG interpretations were generally accurate, although there was some difficulty in distinguishing between specific types of tachydysrhythmia and atrioventricular (AV) block. The overall accuracy of the rhythm interpretations was 79.2%, ranging from 45.6% (second-degree type II heart block) to 98.2% (sinus bradycardia). The sensitivity for specific tachydysrhythmias ranged from 68.4% (supraventricular tachycardia) to 86.0% (atrial fibrillation); the sensitivity for specific types of AV block ranged from 45.6% (second-degree, type II) to 71.9% (third-degree). CONCLUSION In this EMS system, ECG interpretations are generally accurate, with tachydysrhythmias and AV blocks being the source of most discrepancies.

EMS knowledge and skills in rural North Carolina: a comparison with the National EMS Education and Practice Blueprint.

INTRODUCTION Many state and local emergency medical services (EMS) systems may wish to modify provider levels and their scope of practice to align their systems with the recommendations of the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint. To determine any changes that may be needed in a typical EMS system, the knowledge and skills of EMS providers in one rural area of North Carolina were compared with the knowledge and skills recommended in the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint. METHODS A survey listing 175 items of patient care-oriented knowledge and skills described in the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint was developed. EMS providers from five rural eastern North Carolina counties were asked to identify on the survey those items of knowledge and skills they believed they possessed. The skills and knowledge selected by the respondents at the five different North Carolina levels of certification were compared with the knowledge and skills listed for comparable provider levels delineated by the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint. The proportions of the recommended skills reported to be possessed by the respondents were compared to determine which North Carolina certification levels best correlate with the Blueprint. RESULTS One hundred forty-five EMS providers completed the survey. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) ranked significantly lower than did the skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in five of the 10 Blueprint elements. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Defibrillator-level personnel ranked lower than did those reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in seven of the 10 Blueprint elements. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Intermediates ranked lower than did those reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in nine of the 10 Blueprint elements. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Advanced Intermediates ranked lower than were the skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in two of the 10 Blueprint elements. Finally, the proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Paramedics ranked lower than were those reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in one of the 10 Blueprint elements. CONCLUSION In North Carolina, combining the EMT and EMT-Defibrillator levels and eliminating the EMT-Intermediate level would create three levels of certification, which would be more consistent with levels recommended by the Blueprint. The results of this study should be considered in any effort to revise the levels of EMS certification in North Carolina and in planning the training curricula for bridging those levels. Other states may require similar action to align with the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint.

Do pulse checks cause a significant delay in the initial defibrillation sequence

This study was undertaken to determine if checking for a pulse between initial defibrillations causes a clinically significant delay in the administration of the defibrillations. Ten emergency department nurses and 10 emergency medicine resident physicians were timed delivering three successive defibrillations (200, 300 and 360 J) to a manikin under three randomly assigned scenarios: (1) without pulse checks; (2) with pulse checks performed by an assistant; and (3) with pulse checks performed by the participant. All participants performed the three defibrillation scenarios using three different models of defibrillators. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare mean defibrillation times for the three scenarios. The mean time was 20.4 +/- 1.0 s for defibrillation without pulse checks; 20.2 +/- 1.2 s with pulse checks by an assistant and 22.0 +/- 2.0 s with pulse checks by the participant. There was a statistically significant difference between no pulse checks and pulse checks by the participant. No statistically significant difference was noted between no pulse checks and pulse checks by an assistant. We conclude that checking for a pulse does cause a statistically significant delay in the administration of defibrillations. This difference, however, is not likely to be clinically relevant.