John E. Moulder
Medical College of Wisconsin
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John E. Moulder.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1984
John E. Moulder; Sara Rockwell
Hypoxic fractions are measured by indirect techniques, which compare the response of tumors to large single doses of radiation given under normal aeration and artificial hypoxia. This paper reviews hypoxic fraction measurements and measurement techniques, giving particular attention to the biological, technical, and statistical aspects of the assays; the implicit assumptions underlying the analyses; and the dependence of the determinations on the assay conditions and the tumor and host characteristics. The three major hypoxic fraction assay techniques (paired survival curve, clamped tumor control, and clamped growth delay) share common biological assumptions. They require that the survival curves of naturally and artificially hypoxic cells have the same slope and intercept. They assume that the majority of the cells are either fully oxic or fully hypoxic. They assume that the methods used to induce artificial hypoxia leave no oxygenated regions and that tumor cells rendered artificially hypoxic are no less viable than cells in normally-aerated tumors. The universal validity of these assumptions is questionable. Each technique uses additional special assumptions and each may measure a different population of hypoxic cells. This paper reviews 92 hypoxic fraction determinations in 42 tumor systems. Radiobiologically hypoxic cells appear to be present in the majority of macroscopic solid rodent tumors. The hypoxic fraction was found to increase as the tumor size increased from microscopic to macroscopic; the dependence of hypoxic fraction on tumor size at macroscopic sizes was less clear. The site of tumor implantation, the use of anesthesia, and certain host characteristics may influence the hypoxic fraction. The hypoxic fraction generally did not depend on the tumor growth rate, transplantation history, or histology. These findings indicate that hypoxic cells are a common feature of solid tumors in rodents and provide no evidence that hypoxic cells should not be present in human tumors.
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews | 1987
John E. Moulder; Sara Rockwell
The presence of radiation resistant cells in solid human tumors is believed to be a major reason why radiotherapy fails to eradicate some such neoplasms. The presence of unperfused regions containing hypoxic cells may also contribute to resistance to some chemotherapeutic agents. This paper reviews the evidence that radiation resistant hypoxic cells exist in solid tumors, the assumptions and results of the methods used to detect hypoxic cells, and the causes and nature of tumor hypoxia. Evidence that radiation resistant hypoxic cells exist in the vast majority of transplanted rodent tumors and xenografted human tumors is direct and convincing, but problems with the current methodology make quantitative statements about the magnitude of the hypoxic fractions problematic. Evidence that radiation resistant hypoxic cells exist in human tumors is considerably more indirect than the evidence for their existence in transplanted tumors, but it is convincing. However, evidence that hypoxic cells are a significant cause of local failure after optimal clinical radiotherapy or chemotherapy regimens is limited and less definitive. The nature and causes of tumor hypoxia are not definitively known. In particular, it is not certain whether hypoxia is a chronic or a transient state, whether hypoxic cells are proliferating or quiescent, or whether hypoxic cells have the same repair capacity as aerobic cells. A number of new methods for assessing hypoxia are reviewed. While there are still problems with all of the new techniques, some of them have the potential of allowing the assessment of hypoxia in individual human tumors.
Radiation Research | 2010
Jacqueline P. Williams; Stephen L. Brown; George E. Georges; Martin Hauer-Jensen; Richard P. Hill; Amy K. Huser; David G. Kirsch; Thomas J. MacVittie; Kathryn A. Mason; Meetha Medhora; John E. Moulder; Paul Okunieff; Mary F. Otterson; Michael E. Robbins; James B. Smathers; William H. McBride
Abstract Since September 11, 2001, there has been the recognition of a plausible threat from acts of terrorism, including radiological or nuclear attacks. A network of Centers for Medical Countermeasures against Radiation (CMCRs) has been established across the U.S.; one of the missions of this network is to identify and develop mitigating agents that can be used to treat the civilian population after a radiological event. The development of such agents requires comparison of data from many sources and accumulation of information consistent with the “Animal Rule” from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Given the necessity for a consensus on appropriate animal model use across the network to allow for comparative studies to be performed across institutions, and to identify pivotal studies and facilitate FDA approval, in early 2008, investigators from each of the CMCRs organized and met for an Animal Models Workshop. Working groups deliberated and discussed the wide range of animal models available for assessing agent efficacy in a number of relevant tissues and organs, including the immune and hematopoietic systems, gastrointestinal tract, lung, kidney and skin. Discussions covered the most appropriate species and strains available as well as other factors that may affect differential findings between groups and institutions. This report provides the workshop findings.
Radiation Research | 2004
Helen B. Stone; John E. Moulder; C. Norman Coleman; K. Kian Ang; Mitchell S. Anscher; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff; William S. Dynan; John R. Fike; David J. Grdina; Joel S. Greenberger; Martin Hauer-Jensen; Richard P. Hill; Richard Kolesnick; Thomas J. MacVittie; Cheryl Marks; William H. McBride; Noelle F. Metting; Terry C. Pellmar; Mary Purucker; Mike E. Robbins; Robert H. Schiestl; Thomas M. Seed; Joseph E. Tomaszewski; Elizabeth L. Travis; Paul E. Wallner; Mary Wolpert; Daniel W. Zaharevitz
Abstract Stone, H. B., Moulder, J. E., Coleman, C. N., Ang, K. K., Anscher, M. S., Barcellos-Hoff, M. H., Dynan, W. S., Fike, J. R., Grdina, D. J., Greenberger, J. S., Hauer-Jensen, M., Hill, R. P., Kolesnick, R. N., MacVittie, T. J., Marks, C., McBride, W. H., Metting, N., Pellmar, T., Purucker, M., Robbins, M. E., Schiestl, R. H., Seed, T. M., Tomaszewski, J., Travis, E. L., Wallner, P. E., Wolpert, M. and Zaharevitz, D. Models for Evaluating Agents Intended for the Prophylaxis, Mitigation and Treatment of Radiation Injuries. Report of an NCI Workshop, December 3–4, 2003. Radiat. Res. 162, 711–728 (2004). To develop approaches to prophylaxis/protection, mitigation and treatment of radiation injuries, appropriate models are needed that integrate the complex events that occur in the radiation-exposed organism. While the spectrum of agents in clinical use or preclinical development is limited, new research findings promise improvements in survival after whole-body irradiation and reductions in the risk of adverse effects of radiotherapy. Approaches include agents that act on the initial radiochemical events, agents that prevent or reduce progression of radiation damage, and agents that facilitate recovery from radiation injuries. While the mechanisms of action for most of the agents with known efficacy are yet to be fully determined, many seem to be operating at the tissue, organ or whole animal level as well as the cellular level. Thus research on prophylaxis/protection, mitigation and treatment of radiation injuries will require studies in whole animal models. Discovery, development and delivery of effective radiation modulators will also require collaboration among researchers in diverse fields such as radiation biology, inflammation, physiology, toxicology, immunology, tissue injury, drug development and radiation oncology. Additional investment in training more scientists in radiation biology and in the research portfolio addressing radiological and nuclear terrorism would benefit the general population in case of a radiological terrorism event or a large-scale accidental event as well as benefit patients treated with radiation.
International Journal of Radiation Biology | 2000
A. Molteni; John E. Moulder; E. F. Cohen; William F. Ward; Brian L. Fish; Joann M. Taylor; Lisa Wolfe; L. Brizio-Molteni; P. Veno
Purpose : This report summarizes our experiences on the protective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, especially captopril and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker on radiation-induced pulmonary injury. Method : In the first series of experiments, adult male Sprague Dawley rats were given a single dose of either 20 or 30 Gy of gamma rays to a 35 cm 2 right hemithorax port, whilst shielding the left, contralateral, lung. Perfusion scans and autopsies were performed at intervals up to 12 months post-radiation. Three different ACE inhibitors, penicillamine and pentoxifylline were given as radiation protectors and their activity compared. A model of irradiation for total bone marrow transplant (BMT) was used for the second group of experiments. Male WAC/Rij/MCW rats received total-body irradiation and a regimen of cyclophosphamide (CTX) in preparation for bone marrow transplant. The modifiers were two ACE inhibitors, captopril and enalapril, and L-158,809, an angiotensin II (A II) type 1 receptor blocker. All drugs were administered in the rats‚ drinking water and all were well-tolerated. Results : In the irradiated rats, pulmonary damage progressed from the presence of blebs and detachment from basement membranes of endothelial cells a few days after injury, to severe arteritis and interstitial collagen deposition at 3 months, and then on to severe pneumonitis and extensive pulmonary fibrosis at 6 months. Marked increase of hydroxyproline was also found in the lungs at 6 months. These morphological changes were associated with significant decrease of ACE and plasminogen activator activity (PLA) and a marked increase of prostaglandins (PG12) and thromboxane (Txa2), substances considered as indicators of endothelial pulmonary damage. ACE inhibitors captopril, CL 24817, enalapril and CGS 13945 prevented the markers of endothelial dysfunction. Captopril and CL 24817, which contain a sulphydryl (-SH) radical in their moiety and the AII type 1 receptor blocker, L-158,809, were the most efficient in protecting the lung parenchyma from the inflammatory response and subsequent fibrosis. Penicillamine, an SH-containing compound with weak ACE inhibitory activity was also a strong antifibrotic agent but showed only modest anti-inflammatory properties. Additionally, in the irradiated rats, captopril also reduced the incidence of squamous cell skin carcinomas and subcutaneous sarcomas consequent to the highest doses of radiation. Conclusion : ACE inhibitors and one AII type 1 receptor blocker were effective in protecting lungs from radiation-induced pneumonitis and the development of lung fibrosis in two models of rat radiation injury. In the first series of experiments (unilateral irradiation), those ACE inhibitors containing a sulphydryl radical were more effective than those without it. This observation led to the question of whether this protective effect is related to inhibition of AII synthesis or rather to some of the collateral pharmacologic properties of these drugs, such as anti-oxidation or protease inhibition. The AII receptor blocker, however, was shown to be equally effective, if not better, in its antifibrotic capacity than any ACE inhibitor with or without an SH radical, reaffirming the role of AII in modulation of collagen synthesis.
International Journal of Radiation Biology | 2005
John E. Moulder; Kenneth R. Foster; Ls Erdreich; James P. McNamee
There have been reports in the media and claims in the courts that radiofrequency (RF) emissions from mobile phones are a cause of cancer, and there have been numerous public objections to the siting of mobile phone base antennas because of a fear of cancer. This review summarizes the current state of evidence concerning whether the RF energy used for wireless communication might be carcinogenic. Relevant studies were identified by searching MedLine with a combination of exposure and endpoint terms. This was supplemented by a review of the over 1700 citations assembled by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety as part of their updating of the IEEE C95.1 RF energy safety guidelines. Where there were multiple studies, preference was given to recent reports, to positive reports of effects and to attempts to confirm such positive reports. Biophysical considerations indicate that there is little theoretical basis for anticipating that RF energy would have significant biological effects at the power levels used by modern mobile phones and their base station antennas. The epidemiological evidence for a causal association between cancer and RF energy is weak and limited. Animal studies have provided no consistent evidence that exposure to RF energy at non-thermal intensities causes or promotes cancer. Extensive in vitro studies have found no consistent evidence of genotoxic potential, but in vitro studies assessing the epigenetic potential of RF energy are limited. Overall, a weight-of-evidence evaluation shows that the current evidence for a causal association between cancer and exposure to RF energy is weak and unconvincing. However, the existing epidemiology is limited and the possibility of epigenetic effects has not been thoroughly evaluated, so that additional research in those areas will be required for a more thorough assessment of the possibility of a causal connection between cancer and the RF energy from mobile telecommunications.
Radiation Research | 2003
C. Norman Coleman; William F. Blakely; John R. Fike; Thomas J. MacVittie; Noelle F. Metting; James B. Mitchell; John E. Moulder; R. Julian Preston; Thomas M. Seed; Helen B. Stone; Philip J. Tofilon; Rosemary Wong
Abstract Coleman, C. N., Blakely, W. F., Fike, J. R., MacVittie, T. J., Metting, N. F., Mitchell, J. B., Moulder, J. E., Preston, R. J., Seed, T. M., Stone, H. B., Tofilon, P. J. and Wong, R. S. L. Molecular and Cellular Biology of Moderate-Dose (1–10 Gy) Radiation and Potential Mechanisms of Radiation Protection: Report of a Workshop at Bethesda, Maryland, December 17–18, 2001. Radiat. Res. 159, 812–834 (2003). Exposures to doses of radiation of 1–10 Gy, defined in this workshop as moderate-dose radiation, may occur during the course of radiation therapy or as the result of radiation accidents or nuclear/radiological terrorism alone or in conjunction with bioterrorism. The resulting radiation injuries would be due to a series of molecular, cellular, tissue and whole-animal processes. To address the status of research on these issues, a broad-based workshop was convened. The specific recommendations were: (1) Research: Identify the key molecular, cellular and tissue pathways that lead from the initial molecular lesions to immediate and delayed injury. The latter is a chronic progressive process for which postexposure treatment may be possible. (2) Technology: Develop high-throughput technology for studying gene, protein and other biochemical expression after radiation exposure, and cytogenetic markers of radiation exposure employing rapid and accurate techniques for analyzing multiple samples. (3) Treatment strategies: Identify additional biological targets and develop effective treatments for radiation injury. (4) Ensuring sufficient expertise: Recruit and train investigators from such fields as radiation biology, cancer biology, molecular biology, cellular biology and wound healing, and encourage collaboration on interdisciplinary research on the mechanisms and treatment of radiation injury. Communicate knowledge of the effects of radiation exposure to the general public and to investigators, policy makers and agencies involved in response to nuclear accidents/events and protection/treatment of the general public.
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 1997
Colleen A. Lawton; Eric P. Cohen; Kevin Murray; Sw Derus; James T. Casper; William R. Drobyski; Mary M. Horowitz; John E. Moulder
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of partial renal shielding used in conjunction with total body irradiation (TBI) on the incidence of bone marrow transplantation nephropathy (BMT Np) seen as a late sequelae after transplantation. Of 402 patients who have undergone bone marrow transplantation (BMT) at the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) 157 were greater than 18 years of age, received 14 Gy TBI and survived at least 100 days post-transplant. The incidence of BMT nephropathy was evaluated in these patients by dose to the kidneys. In the 72 patients who received 14 Gy TBI with no renal shielding, the actuarial risk of developing BMT Np at 2½ years (30 months) post-BMT was 29 ± 7%. Sixty-eight patients received 14 Gy TBI with partial renal shielding of 15% (renal dose = 11.9 Gy), the actuarial risk of developing BMT Np was 14 ± 5% at 2½ years. Seventeen patients received 14 Gy TBI with renal shielding of 30% (renal dose = 9.8 Gy); none of this group have developed BMT Np despite a median follow-up of over 2½ years (985 days). The trend of decreasing BMT Np with increasing shielding is statistically significant (P = 0.012). Prognostic factors such as age, type of transplant and good-risk vs poor-risk disease status were evaluated and were similar in each cohort of patients described above. We conclude that given the statistically significant benefit seen here in the reduced incidence of BMT Np by the use of selective renal shielding, this should be seriously considered for all patients who receive TBI, but especially for patients whose renal doses exceed 10 Gy.
Cancer | 1991
Colleen A. Lawton; Kevin Murray; Susan Barber-Derus; John E. Moulder; Eric P. Cohen; Robert C. Ash; James T. Casper
Until recently long‐term renal toxicity has not been considered a major late complication of bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Late renal dysfunction has been described in a pediatric population status post‐BMT which was attributable to the radiation in the preparatory regimen. A thorough review of adults with this type of late renal dysfunction has not previously been described. Fourteen of 103 evaluable adult patients undergoing allogeneic (96) or autologous (7) bone marrow transplantation, predominantly for leukemia and lymphomas, at the Medical College of Wisconsin (Milwaukee, WI) have had a syndrome of renal insufficiency characterized by increased serum creatinine, decreased glomerular filtration rate, anemia, and hypertension. This syndrome developed at a median of 9 months (range, 4.5 to 26 months) posttransplantation in the absence of specific identifiable causes. The cumulative probability of having this renal dysfunction is 20% at 1 year. Renal biopsies performed on seven of these cases showed the endothelium widely separated from the basement membrane, extreme thickening of the glomerular basement membrane, and microthrombi. Previous chemotherapy, antibiotics, and antifungals as well as cyclosporin may add to and possibly potentiate a primary chemoradiation marrow transplant renal injury, but this clinical syndrome is most analogous to clinical and experimental models of radiation nephritis. This late marrow transplant‐associated nephritis should be recognized as a potentially limiting factor in the use of some intensive chemoradiation conditioning regimens used for BMT. Some selective attenuation of the radiation to the kidneys may decrease the incidence of this renal dysfunction.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1989
Sara Rockwell; John E. Moulder
Transplanted tumors in rats and mice have been used extensively in radiobiology studies examining the biological basis and therapeutic implications of hypoxia in solid tumors, and in studies evaluating new agents and regimens which may circumvent the radioprotective effects of hypoxic cells. This use of rodent tumors assumes that data obtained using rapidly-growing transplanted tumors arising in inbred rodents can be extrapolated meaningfully to the treatment of primary and/or metastatic lesions in heterozygous humans. The studies reported here examine one facet of this critical assumption by comparing the hypoxic fractions of transplanted rodent tumors with those of human tumor cell lines xenografted into immune deficient mice. No significant differences were found between the hypoxic fractions of the xenografts and those of mouse tumors. This finding eliminates several possible bases for predicting that the oxygenation of human tumors might be systematically different from that of the rodent tumors often used in preclinical radiobiology studies, and supports the hypothesis that human tumors contain hypoxic cells which may be critical in determining their response to therapy.