John F. Angle
University of Virginia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John F. Angle.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2010
John F. Angle; Nasir H. Siddiqi; Michael J. Wallace; Sanjoy Kundu; LeAnn S. Stokes; Joan C. Wojak; John F. Cardella
THE membership of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Standards of Practice Committee represents experts in a broad spectrum of interventional procedures from both the private and academic sectors of medicine. Generally Standards of Practice Committee members dedicate the vast majority of their professional time to performing interventional procedures; as such they represent a valid broad expert constituency of the subject matter under consideration for standards production. Technical documents specifying the exact consensus and literature review methodologies as well as the institutional affiliations and professional credentials of the authors of this document are available upon request from SIR,
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 1995
Alan H. Matsumoto; Charles J. Tegtmeyer; Eric K. Fitzcharles; J. Bayne Selby; Curtis G. Tribble; John F. Angle; Irving L. Kron
PURPOSE To determine the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the visceral arteries. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the results of PTA performed in 20 visceral arteries in 19 patients (10 men, nine women; mean age, 63 years). Eleven patients had symptoms characteristic of mesenteric ischemia, four had atypical abdominal pain, and four were undergoing prophylactic dilation before undergoing another procedure involving the abdominal aorta. Clinical follow-up was possible in all patients. RESULTS PTA was technically successful in 15 of 19 patients (79%); among these 15 patients, 12 (80%) did well clinically. Of the seven PTA procedures that were immediate failures, five failed secondary to an occult malignancy or to extrinsic arterial compression by the median arcuate ligament. Ten (83%) of the 12 patients in whom the procedures were immediate clinical successes are still clinically improved at 4-73 months follow-up (mean, 25 months). PTA was successful in only one of the four patients who had symptoms atypical of mesenteric ischemia, but it was successful in 11 of the 15 patients who had symptoms of mesenteric ischemia or who underwent prophylactic dilation. Major complications occurred in three (16%) of the 19 patients. CONCLUSION PTA of visceral artery stenoses is effective in patients with symptoms of mesenteric ischemia. It is also effective as prophylaxis in patients undergoing additional procedures in the abdominal aorta.
Radiographics | 2011
Lucia Flors; Carlos Leiva-Salinas; Ismaeel M. Maged; Patrick T. Norton; Alan H. Matsumoto; John F. Angle; Hugo Bonatti; Auh Whan Park; Ehab Ali Ahmad; Ugur Bozlar; Ahmed M. Housseini; Thomas E. Huerta; Klaus D. Hagspiel
Vascular malformations and tumors comprise a wide, heterogeneous spectrum of lesions that often represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Frequent use of an inaccurate nomenclature has led to considerable confusion. Since the treatment strategy depends on the type of vascular anomaly, correct diagnosis and classification are crucial. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most valuable modality for classification of vascular anomalies because it accurately demonstrates their extension and their anatomic relationship to adjacent structures. A comprehensive assessment of vascular anomalies requires functional analysis of the involved vessels. Dynamic time-resolved contrast material-enhanced MR angiography provides information about the hemodynamics of vascular anomalies and allows differentiation of high-flow and low-flow vascular malformations. Furthermore, MR imaging is useful in assessment of treatment success and establishment of a long-term management strategy. Radiologists should be familiar with the clinical and MR imaging features that aid in diagnosis of vascular anomalies and their proper classification. Furthermore, they should be familiar with MR imaging protocols optimized for evaluation of vascular anomalies and with their posttreatment appearances. Supplemental material available at http://radiographics.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/rg.315105213/-/DC1.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2010
John F. Angle; Nasir H. Siddiqi; Michael J. Wallace; Sanjoy Kundu; LeAnn S. Stokes; Joan C. Wojak; John F. Cardella
THE membership of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Standards of Practice Committee represents experts in a broad spectrum of interventional procedures from both the private and academic sectors of medicine. Generally Standards of Practice Committee members dedicate the vast majority of their professional time to performing interventional procedures; as such they represent a valid broad expert constituency of the subject matter under consideration for standards production. Technical documents specifying the exact consensus and literature review methodologies as well as the institutional affiliations and professional credentials of the authors of this document are available upon request from SIR,
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2002
Louis G. Martin; John H. Rundback; Michael J. Wallace; John F. Cardella; John F. Angle; Sanjoy Kundu; Donald L. Miller; Joan C. Wojak
From the Department of Radiology (L.G.M.), Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia; Advanced Interventional Radiology Services (J.H.R.), Teaneck, New Jersey; Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (M.J.W.), Houston, Texas; System Radiology (J.F.C.), Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiology (J.F.A.), University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia; Department of Medical Imaging (S.K.), Scarborough General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiology and Radiologic Sciences (D.L.M.), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Department of Radiology (D.L.M.), National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland; and Department of Radiology (J.C.W.), Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, Lafayette, Louisiana. Received November 1, 2009; final revision received December 6, 2009; accepted December 28, 2009. Address correspondence to L.G.M., c/o Debbie Katsarelis, 3975 Fair Ridge Dr., Suite 400 N., Fairfax, VA 22033; E-mail: [email protected]
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2010
S.S. Sabri; Asim F. Choudhri; Gianluigi Orgera; Bulent Arslan; Ulku C. Turba; Nancy L. Harthun; Klaus D. Hagspiel; Alan H. Matsumoto; John F. Angle
PURPOSE To review the outcomes with the use of balloon-expandable covered iliac kissing stents as compared with bare metal stents in the treatment of atherosclerotic disease at the aortic bifurcation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A review of consecutive patients from a single institution with atherosclerotic occlusive disease at the aortic bifurcation treated with balloon-expandable kissing stents was performed between January 1, 2002, and September 1, 2007. Fifty-four patients were identified and divided into two groups: those with bare metal stents and those with covered stents. Technical and clinical success (Fontaine classification), complications, and patency at follow-up were documented. RESULTS Twenty-six patients (17 men, nine women; mean age, 61 years; age range, 39-79 years) received covered stents and 28 patients (15 men, 13 women; mean age, 61 years; age range, 38-82 years) received bare metal stents. Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients in both groups. Major complications occurred in three of the 26 (11%) with covered stents (P = .66) and two of the 28 patients (7%) with bare metal stents. The median follow-up was 21 months (20 months for covered stents vs 25 months for bare metal stents; range, 1-62 months). Twenty-two of the 26 patients (85%) with covered stents had sustained improvement in clinical symptoms during the follow-up period compared with 15 of the 28 patients (54%) with bare metal stents (P = .02). Primary patency rates at 1 and 2 years were 92% and 92%, respectively, for covered stents and 78% and 62% for bare metal stents (P = .023). CONCLUSIONS The use of covered balloon-expandable kissing stents for atherosclerotic aortic bifurcation occlusive disease provides superior patency at 2 years as compared with bare metal balloon-expandable stents.
American Journal of Roentgenology | 2007
Ming-Chen Paul Shih; John F. Angle; Daniel A. Leung; Kenneth J. Cherry; Nancy L. Harthun; Alan H. Matsumoto; Klaus D. Hagspiel
OBJECTIVE A number of surgical and endovascular options exist for the treatment of acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia. Both surgical and endovascular treatments necessitate close clinical and imaging follow-up because the consequences of acute occlusions can be catastrophic. MDCT angiography (CTA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) are the preferred imaging techniques in this setting. CONCLUSION We review the appearance of the normal and complicated surgical and endovascular treatment on CTA and MRA.
Abdominal Imaging | 2004
Klaus D. Hagspiel; Y. R. Hunter; Hossam K. Ahmed; P. Lu; David J. Spinosa; John F. Angle; Daniel A. Leung; Alan H. Matsumoto; John A. Kern
Primary aortic angiosarcomas are extremely rare. Clinically and radiographically, they mimic atherosclerosis and atheroembolic disease. For a definitive diagnosis, histologic evaluation of the tumor or of peripheral emboli is required. The imaging findings are frequently nonspecific and in most published cases did not allow a definitive preoperative diagnosis. This is the first report of the computed tomographic angiographic findings of a primary intimal abdominal aortic sarcoma and a review of previously described imaging findings in these tumors.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2014
S.S. Sabri; Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh; Warren Swee; Wael E. Saad; Ulku C. Turba; Stephen H. Caldwell; John F. Angle; Alan H. Matsumoto
PURPOSE To assess the short-term rebleeding rate associated with the use of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) compared with balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) for management of gastric varices (GV). MATERIALS AND METHODS A single-center retrospective comparison of 50 patients with bleeding from GV treated with a TIPS or BRTO was performed. Of 50 patients, 27 (17 men and 10 women; median age, 55 y; range, 31-79 y) received a TIPS with covered stents, and 23 (12 men and 11 women; median age, 52 y; range, 23-83 y) underwent a BRTO procedure with a foam sclerosant. All study subjects had clinical and endoscopic evidence of isolated bleeding GV and were hemodynamically stable at the time of the procedure. Clinical and endoscopic follow-up was performed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate rebleeding rates from the GV. RESULTS The technical success rate was 100% in the TIPS group and 91% in the BRTO group (P = .21). Major complications occurred in 4% of the patients receiving TIPS and 9% of patients the undergoing BRTO (P = .344). Encephalopathy was reported in 4 of 27 (15%) patients in the TIPS group and in none of the patients in the BRTO group (0%; P = .12). At 12 months, the incidence of rebleeding from a GV source was 11% in the TIPS group and 0% in the BRTO group (P = .25). CONCLUSIONS BRTO appears to be equivalent to TIPS in the short-term for management of bleeding GV. Further comparative studies are warranted to determine optimal management strategies in individual patients.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2013
Wael E.A. Saad; Cynthia E. Wagner; Allison Lippert; Abdullah Al-Osaimi; Mark G. Davies; Alan H. Matsumoto; John F. Angle; Stephen H. Caldwell
OBJECTIVES:The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of post-balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) ascites/hepatic hydrothorax and rebleeding rate (variceal and non-variceal) in the presence and absence of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).METHODS:A retrospective audit of consecutive patients undergoing BRTO was performed (August 2007–October 2010). The population was divided into two groups: patients who underwent BRTO only (BRTO-only group) and those who underwent BRTO in the presence of TIPS (BRTO+TIPS group). Post-BRTO rebleeding was categorized for the source of bleeding. Ascites and/or hepatic hydrothorax were categorized according to clinical severity. Comparisons, utilizing the Kaplan–Meier method, between both groups were made for patient survival, incidence of ascites/hydrothorax, and rebleeding.RESULTS:Thirty-nine patients underwent BRTO (three technical failures of BRTO-only group). Of the 36 technically successful BRTO procedures, 27 patients (75%) underwent BRTO-only and 9 patients (25%) underwent BRTO in the presence of a TIPS. Pre-BRTO ascites/hydrothorax resolved in BRTO-only vs. BRTO+TIPS in 7% (N=2/27) and 56% (N=5/9), respectively (P=0.006). The ascites/hydrothorax free rate at 6, 12, and 24 months after BRTO for BRTO-only vs. BRTO+TIPS was 58%, 43%, 29%, and 100%, 100%, 100%, respectively (P=0.01). Recurrent hemorrhage for BRTO-only vs. BRTO+TIPS groups, and for the same time periods was 9%, 9%, 21% vs. 0%, 0%, 0%, respectively (P=0.03). The 1-year patient survival of both groups (80–88%) was similar (P>0.05).CONCLUSIONS:This study concludes that the presence of TIPS has a protective value against the development of post-BRTO ascites/hydrothorax as well as recurrent hemorrhage but this does not translate to improved patient survival.