John F. Patton
ENVIRON
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John F. Patton.
European Journal of Applied Physiology | 1991
John F. Patton; J. Kaszuba; Robert P. Mello; K. L. Reynolds
SummaryLimited information is available regarding the physiological responses to prolonged load carriage. This study determined the energy cost of prolonged treadmill walking (fixed distance of 12 km) at speeds of 1.10 m·s−1, 1.35 m·s−1, and 1.60 m·s−1, unloaded (clothing mass 5.2 kg) and with external loads of 31.5 and 49.4 kg. Fifteen male subjects performed nine trials in random order over a 6-week period. Oxygen uptake (VO2) was determined at the end of the first 10 min and every 20 min thereafter. A 10-min rest period was allowed following each 50 min of walking. No changes occurred in VO2 over time in the unloaded condition at any speed. The 31.5 and 49.4 kg loads, however, produced significant increases (ranging from 10 to 18%) at the two fastest and at all three speeds, respectively, even at initial exercise intensities less than 30% VO2max. In addition, the 49.4 kg load elicited a significantly higher (P<0.05) VO2 than did the 31.5 kg load at all speeds. The measured values of metabolic cost were also compared to those predicted using the formula of Pandolf et al. In trials where VO2 increased significantly over time, predicted values underestimated the actual metabolic cost during the final minute by 10–16%. It is concluded that energy cost during prolonged load carriage is not constant but increases significantly over time even at low relative exercise intensities. It is further concluded that applying the prediction model which estimates energy expenditure from short-term load carriage efforts to prolonged load carriage can result in significant underestimations of the actual energy cost.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise | 2002
Marilyn A. Sharp; John F. Patton; Joseph J. Knapik; Keith G. Hauret; Robert P. Mello; Max Ito; Peter N. Frykman
PURPOSE To compare the physical fitness levels of recruits entering the U.S. Army in 1998 to those entering in 1978 and 1983. METHODS In 1998, 182 men and 168 women were tested before beginning basic training at Fort Jackson, SC. The measurements were 1) skin-fold estimation of percent body fat (%BF); 2) maximum oxygen uptake by treadmill running (VO2max); and 3) upper-body (UB), lower-body (LB), and upright pulling (UP) isometric strength. These data were compared to data from basic trainees at Fort Jackson in 1978 (skin folds, VO2max, UB, and LB) and 1983 (skin folds and UP). RESULTS Body weight (BW) of 1998 recruits was greater (P < 0.05) than 1978 recruits (men, 12%; women, 6%) and 1983 recruits (men, 8%; women, 7%). %BF of 1998 recruits was greater (P < 0.05) than 1978 recruits (men, 15%; women, 5%) and 1983 recruits (men, 15%; women, 17%). The 1998 men had more fat-free mass (FFM) (P < 0.05) than men in 1978 (8%) or 1983 (5%), whereas 1998 women were only different from those measured in 1978 (4%, P < 0.05). The VO2max of men (50.6 +/- 6.2 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was equivalent to men in 1978, whereas that of women (39.7 +/- 5.2 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was 6% greater (P < 0.05). The 1998 recruits were stronger (P < 0.05) on all measures of muscle strength than recruits measured in 1978 (men, UB = 16%, LB = 12%; women, UB = 18%, LB = 6%) and 1983 (men, UP = 7%; women, UP = 6%). CONCLUSION The aerobic capacity, muscle strength, and FFM of 1998 recruits is comparable to or greater than that of 1978 and 1983 recruits; however, 1998 recruits tended to have more BW and a greater %BF.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise | 1995
Bradley C. Nindl; Matthew T. Mahar; Everett A. Harman; John F. Patton
Little data exist for upper and lower body mechanical power capability of adolescent athletes. This study compared arm (A) and leg (L) anaerobic peak and mean power (PP and MP) of 20 male and 20 female adolescent athletes after normalization for body mass (BM), fat-free mass (FFM), and lean A and L cross-sectional area (CSA). Power outputs were assessed by the Wingate anaerobic test. FFM and CSA were estimated via anthropometry. No significant (P > 0.05) differences existed between the sexes in Tanner sexual maturity, chronological age, or overall training activity. Males had higher (P < 0.001) absolute PP (W) (L 694 vs 442; A 494 vs 309) and MP (L 548 vs 307; A 337 vs 214). Ratio normalization and ANCOVA were used to remove the influence of body size differences. Ratio normalization showed that males had greater leg PP/BM, MP/BM, MP/FFM, MP/CSA, as well as arm PP/BM and MP/BM, whereas all leg and arm PP and MP ANCOVA adjusted means for BM, FFM, and CSA, except arm MP adjusted for FFM, were significantly (P < 0.01) higher for males than females. We conclude that factors other than muscle mass, possibly qualitative in nature, are responsible for the sex difference in anaerobic performance of adolescent athletes.
European Journal of Applied Physiology | 1982
John F. Patton; James A. Vogel; Robert P. Mello
SummaryA maximal predictive cycle ergometer (CE) test for estimating maximal oxygen uptake (
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise | 1984
John F. Patton; James A. Vogel
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise | 2009
Bradley C. Nindl; Joseph A. Alemany; Alexander P. Tuckow; Mark D. Kellogg; Marilyn A. Sharp; John F. Patton
\dot V
European Journal of Applied Physiology | 1997
Bradley C. Nindl; Marilyn A. Sharp; Robert P. Mello; Valerie J. Rice; Michelle Murphy; John F. Patton
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting | 1996
Marilyn A. Sharp; John F. Patton; James A. Vogel
O2 max) was evaluated in 15 male and 12 female subjects. The test consisted of pedalling a cycle ergometer (Monark) at 75 rev·min−1, beginning at an intensity of 37.5 watts and increasing by this amount each min until the subject could no longer maintain pedal rate. The highest work rate achieved was recorded as the endpoint of the test and used to construct regression equations to predict
Work & Stress | 1989
John F. Patton; James A. Vogel; Andrew I. Damokosh; Robert P. Mello
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise | 2014
Bradley C. Nindl; Joseph R. Pierce; Kevin R. Rarick; Alexander P. Tuckow; Joseph A. Alemany; Marilyn A. Sharp; Mark D. Kellogg; John F. Patton
\dot V
Collaboration
Dive into the John F. Patton's collaboration.
United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
View shared research outputsUnited States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
View shared research outputsUnited States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
View shared research outputsUnited States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
View shared research outputsUnited States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
View shared research outputsUnited States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
View shared research outputs