Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John G. Myers is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John G. Myers.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2003

Seven hundred fifty-three consecutive deaths in a level I trauma center: the argument for injury prevention

Ronald M. Stewart; John G. Myers; Daniel L. Dent; Peter Ermis; Gina A. Gray; Roberto Villarreal; Osbert Blow; Brian Woods; Marilyn J. McFarland; Jan Garavaglia; Harlan D. Root; Basil A. Pruitt

BACKGROUND The past century has seen improvement in trauma care, with a resulting decrease in therapeutically preventable deaths. We hypothesize that further major reduction in injury mortality will be obtained through injury prevention, rather than improvements in therapy. METHODS Seven hundred fifty-three deaths in an American College of Surgeons-verified, Level I trauma center were reviewed as they occurred. Deaths were classified as therapeutically not preventable, possibly preventable, or preventable. These charts were also reviewed for factors that might have prevented or lessened the severity of the injury. RESULTS Mean age was 43, mean Glasgow Coma Scale score was 5, mean Revised Trauma Score was 4, mean Injury Severity Score was 41, and mean probability of survival was 0.25 (according to TRISS). Forty-six percent underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the field, 52% died within 12 hours, 74% died within 48 hours, and 86% died within 7 days. Primary causes of death included central nervous system injury in 51%, irreversible shock in 21%, multiple injuries (shock plus central nervous system injury) in 9%, multiple organ failure/sepsis and other causes in 3%, and pulmonary embolus in 0.1%. Seven hundred one (93%) were classified as not preventable with a change in therapy, 32 (4.2%) were classified as potentially preventable with a change in therapy, and 20 were classified as preventable with a change in therapy (2.6%). Forty-six percent had cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed before or immediately on arrival to the hospital. Another 23% had vital signs present on arrival, but had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <or= 4. Of the 546 unintentionally injured patients, 58% had an identifiable factor that contributed to the presence and/or severity of the injury (intoxication, restraint and helmet use), with 28% of patients having a positive blood alcohol level. Of the 206 patients with intentional injuries, 44% were intoxicated at the time of their death. Commensurate with driving-while-intoxicated prevention program(s), the percentage of intoxicated patients significantly ( p= 0.03) decreased from 45% to 34% over the same 7-year period. CONCLUSION Dramatically improving therapy (no errors, cure for multiple organ failure, sepsis, and pulmonary embolus) in a modern trauma system would decrease trauma mortality by 13%. In contrast, more than half of all deaths are potentially preventable with preinjury behavioral changes. Injury prevention is critical to reducing deaths in the modern trauma system.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2000

Blunt splenic injuries: Dedicated trauma surgeons can achieve a high rate of nonoperative success in patients of all ages

John G. Myers; Daniel L. Dent; Ronald M. Stewart; Gina A. Gray; Doug S. Smith; Jeff E. Rhodes; H. David Root; Basil A. Pruitt; William E. Strodel

BACKGROUND Selective nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injuries is becoming a more prevalent practice. Inclusion criteria for NOM, which have been a source of controversy, continue to evolve. Age > or = 55 years has been proposed as a predictor for failure of and even a contraindication to NOM of blunt splenic trauma. Additionally, the high rate of NOM in children (up to 79%) has been attributed to their management by pediatric surgeons. We evaluated our experience with NOM of blunt splenic injury with special attention to these age groups. METHODS By using our trauma registry, all patients with blunt splenic injuries (documented by computed tomography, operative findings, or both) cared for over a 36-month period, at a single American College of Surgeons verified Level I trauma center were reviewed. Detailed chart reviews were performed to examine admission demographics, laboratory data, radiologic findings, outcome measures, and patient management strategy. All patients were managed by nonpediatric trauma surgeons. We then compared our adult data with that in the recent literature and our pediatric data with that of the National Pediatric Trauma Registry over the same time period. RESULTS We identified 251 consecutive patients with blunt splenic injuries. Eighteen patients who expired in the immediate postinjury period were excluded from statistical evaluation. No deaths occurred as a result of splenic injury. Of the remaining 233 patients, 73 patients (31%) required early celiotomy, 160 patients (69%) were selected for NOM, with 151 patients (94%) being successfully managed without operation. Blunt splenic injury occurred in 23 patients age 55 years or older. Eighteen patients (78%) were selected for NOM and 17 patients (94%) were successfully treated without operation. Blunt splenic injury occurred in 35 patients less than 16 years of age. Thirty-two patients (91%) were selected for NOM. Thirty-one patients (89% of all pediatric patients) were successfully treated without operation. CONCLUSION Age > or = 55 years is not a contraindication to nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries. Children with blunt splenic injuries can be successfully managed nonoperatively by nonpediatric trauma surgeons.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2013

Clinical and mechanistic drivers of acute traumatic coagulopathy.

Mitchell J. Cohen; Matthew E. Kutcher; Britt Redick; Mary F. Nelson; Mariah Call; M. Margaret Knudson; Martin A. Schreiber; Eileen M. Bulger; Peter Muskat; Louis H. Alarcon; John G. Myers; Mohammad H. Rahbar; Karen J. Brasel; Herb A. Phelan; Deborah J. del Junco; Erin E. Fox; Charles E. Wade; John B. Holcomb; Bryan A. Cotton; Nena Matijevic

BACKGROUND Acute traumatic coagulopathy (ATC) occurs after severe injury and shock and is associated with increased bleeding, morbidity, and mortality. The effects of ATC and hemostatic resuscitation on outcome are not well-explored. The PRospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) study provided a unique opportunity to characterize coagulation and the effects of resuscitation on ATC after severe trauma. METHODS Blood samples were collected upon arrival on a subset of PROMMTT patients. Plasma clotting factor levels were prospectively assayed for coagulation factors. These data were analyzed with comprehensive PROMMTT clinical data. RESULTS There were 1,198 patients with laboratory results, of whom 41.6% were coagulopathic. Using international normalized ratio of 1.3 or greater, 41.6% of patients (448) were coagulopathic, while 20.5% (214) were coagulopathic using partial thromboplastin time of 35 or greater. Coagulopathy was primarily associated with a combination of an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of greater than 15 and a base deficit (BD) of less than −6 (p < 0.05). Regression modeling for international normalized ratio–based coagulopathy shows that prehospital crystalloid (odds ratio [OR], 1.05), ISS (OR, 1.03), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (OR, 0.93), heart rate (OR, 1.08), systolic blood pressure (OR, 0.96), BD (OR, 0.92), and temperature (OR, 0.84) were significant predictors of coagulopathy (all p < 0.03). A subset of 165 patients had blood samples collected and coagulation factor analysis performed. Elevated ISS and BD were associated with elevation of aPC and depletion of factors (all p < 0.05). Reductions in factors I, II, V, VIII and an increase in aPC drive ATC (all p < 0.04). Similar results were found for partial thromboplastin time–defined coagulopathy. CONCLUSION ATC is associated with the depletion of factors I, II, V, VII, VIII, IX, and X and is driven by the activation of the protein C system. These data provide additional mechanistic understanding of the drivers of coagulation abnormalities after injury. Further understanding of the drivers of ATC and the effects of resuscitation can guide factor-guided resuscitation and correction of coagulopathy after injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level IV.


American Journal of Surgery | 2010

The use of laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy: evaluation of safety and efficacy

Michael G. Corneille; Theresa M. Gallup; Thomas Bening; Steven E. Wolf; Caitlin Brougher; John G. Myers; Daniel L. Dent; Gabriel Medrano; Elly Marie-Jeanne Xenakis; Ronald M. Stewart

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery in pregnant women has become increasingly more common since the 1990s; however, the safety of laparoscopy in this population has been widely debated, particularly in emergent and urgent situations. METHODS A retrospective chart review of all pregnant women following a nonobstetric abdominal operation at a University hospital between 1993 and 2007. Perioperative morbidity and mortality for the mother and fetus were evaluated. RESULTS Ninety-four subjects were identified; 53 underwent laparoscopic procedures and 41 underwent open procedures. Cholecystectomy and appendectomy were performed in both groups with salpingectomy/ovarian cystectomy only in the laparoscopic group. No maternal deaths occurred, while fetal loss occurred in 3 cases within 7 days of the operation and in 1 case 7 weeks postoperatively. This and other perinatal complications occurred in 36.7% of the laparoscopic group and 41.7% of the open group. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy appear to be as safe as the respective open procedures in pregnant patients; however, this population in particular remains at risk for perinatal complications regardless of the method of abdominal access.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2013

Defining when to initiate massive transfusion: A validation study of individual massive transfusion triggers in PROMMTT patients

Rachael A. Callcut; Bryan A. Cotton; Peter Muskat; Erin E. Fox; Charles E. Wade; John B. Holcomb; Martin A. Schreiber; Mohammad H. Rahbar; Mitchell J. Cohen; M. Margaret Knudson; Karen J. Brasel; Eileen M. Bulger; Deborah J. del Junco; John G. Myers; Louis H. Alarcon; Bryce R.H. Robinson

BACKGROUND Early predictors of massive transfusion (MT) would prevent undertriage of patients likely to require MT. This study validates triggers using the Prospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) study. METHODS All enrolled patients in PROMMTT were analyzed. The initial emergency department value for each trigger (international normalized ratio [INR], systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, base deficit, positive result for Focused Assessment for the Sonography of Trauma examination, heart rate, temperature, and penetrating injury mechanism) was compared for patients receiving MT (≥10 U of packed red blood cells in 24 hours) versus no MT. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for MT are reported using multiple logistic regression. If all triggers were known, a Massive Transfusion Score (MTS) was created, with 1 point assigned for each met trigger. RESULTS A total of 1,245 patients were prospectively enrolled with 297 receiving an MT. Data were available for all triggers in 66% of the patients including 67% of the MTs (199 of 297). INR was known in 87% (1,081 of 1,245). All triggers except penetrating injury mechanism and heart rate were valid individual predictors of MT, with INR as the most predictive (adjusted OR, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.7–3.7). For those with all triggers known, a positive INR trigger was seen in 49% receiving MT. Patients with an MTS of less than 2 were unlikely to receive MT (negative predictive value, 89%). If any two triggers were present (MTS ≥ 2), sensitivity for predicting MT was 85%. MT was present in 33% with an MTS of 2 greater compared with 11% of those with MTS of less than 2 (OR, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.6–5.8; p < 0.0005). CONCLUSION Parameters that can be obtained early in the initial emergency department evaluation are valid predictors for determining the likelihood of MT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic, level II.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2013

Prehospital intravenous fluid is associated with increased survival in trauma patients.

David A. Hampton; Loic Fabricant; Jerry Differding; Brian S. Diggs; Samantha J. Underwood; Dodie De La Cruz; John B. Holcomb; Karen J. Brasel; Mitchell J. Cohen; Erin E. Fox; Louis H. Alarcon; Mohammad H. Rahbar; Herb A. Phelan; Eileen M. Bulger; Peter Muskat; John G. Myers; Deborah J. Del Junco; Charles E. Wade; Bryan A. Cotton; Martin A. Schreiber

BACKGROUND Delivery of intravenous crystalloid fluids (IVF) remains a tradition-based priority during prehospital resuscitation of trauma patients. Hypotensive and targeted resuscitation algorithms have been shown to improve patient outcomes. We hypothesized that receiving any prehospital IVF is associated with increased survival in trauma patients compared with receiving no prehospital IVF. METHODS Prospective data from 10 Level 1 trauma centers were collected. Patient demographics, prehospital IVF volume, prehospital and emergency department vital signs, lifesaving interventions, laboratory values, outcomes, and complications were collected and analyzed. Patients who did or did not receive prehospital IVF were compared. Tests for nonparametric data were used to assess significant differences between groups (p ⩽ 0.05). Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the independent influence of IVF on outcome and complications. RESULTS The study population consisted of 1,245 trauma patients; 45 were excluded owing to incomplete data; 84% (n = 1,009) received prehospital IVF, and 16% (n = 191) did not. There was no difference between the groups with respect to sex, age, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). The on-scene systolic blood pressure was lower in the IVF group (110 mm Hg vs. 100 mm Hg, p < 0.04) and did not change significantly after IVF, measured at emergency department admission (110 mm Hg vs. 105 mm Hg, p = 0.05). Hematocrit/hemoglobin, fibrinogen, and platelets were lower (p < 0.05), and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio and partial thromboplastin time were higher (p < 0.001) in the IVF group. The IVF group received a median fluid volume of 700 mL (interquartile range, 300–1,300). The Cox regression revealed that prehospital fluid administration was associated with increased survival (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–0.98; p = 0.03). Site differences in ISS and fluid volumes were demonstrated (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Prehospital IVF volumes commonly used by PRospective Observational Multicenter Massive Transfusion Study (PROMMTT) investigators do not result in increased systolic blood pressure but are associated with decreased in-hospital mortality in trauma patients compared with patients who did not receive prehospital IVF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level IV.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2013

Early resuscitation intensity as a surrogate for bleeding severity and early mortality in the PROMMTT study.

Elaheh Rahbar; Erin E. Fox; Deborah J. del Junco; John A. Harvin; John B. Holcomb; Charles E. Wade; Martin A. Schreiber; Mohammad H. Rahbar; Eileen M. Bulger; Herb A. Phelan; Karen J. Brasel; Louis H. Alarcon; John G. Myers; Mitchell J. Cohen; Peter Muskat; Bryan A. Cotton

BACKGROUND The classic definition of massive transfusion, 10 or more units of red blood cells (RBCs) in 24 hours, has never been demonstrated as a valid surrogate for severe hemorrhage and can introduce survival bias. In addition, the definition fails to capture other products that the clinician may have immediately available, and may use, during the initial resuscitation. Assuming that units of resuscitative fluids reflect patient illness, our objective was to identify a rate of resuscitation intensity (RI) that could serve as an early surrogate of sickness for patients with substantial bleeding after injury. METHODS Adult patients surviving at least 30 minutes after admission and receiving one or more RBCs within 6 hours of admission from 10 US Level 1 trauma centers were enrolled in the PRospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) study. Total fluid units were calculated as the sum of the number of crystalloid units (1 L = 1 U), colloids (0.5 L = 1 U), and blood products (1 RBC = 1 U, 1 plasma = 1 U, 6 pack platelets = 1 U). Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate associations between RI and 6-hour mortality, adjusting for age, center, penetrating injury, weighted Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS A total of 1,096 eligible patients received resuscitative fluids within 30 minutes, including 620 transfused with blood products. Despite varying products used, the total fluid RI was similar across all sites (3.2 ± 2.5 U). Patients who received four or more units of any resuscitative fluid had a 6-hour mortality rate of 14.4% versus 4.5% in patients who received less than 4 U. The adjusted odds ratio of 6-hour mortality for patients receiving 4 U or more within 30 minutes was 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.2–3.5). CONCLUSION Resuscitation with four or more units of any fluid was significantly associated with 6-hour mortality. This study suggests that early RI regardless of fluid type can be used as a surrogate for sickness and mortality in severely bleeding patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level III.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2011

Pediatric radiation exposure during the initial evaluation for blunt trauma.

Deborah L Mueller; Mustapha R. Hatab; Rani Al-Senan; Stephen M. Cohn; Michael G. Corneille; Daniel L. Dent; Joel E. Michalek; John G. Myers; Steven E. Wolf; Ronald M. Stewart

BACKGROUND Increased utilization of computed tomography (CT) scans for evaluation of blunt trauma patients has resulted in increased doses of radiation to patients. Radiation dose is relatively amplified in children secondary to body size, and children are more susceptible to long-term carcinogenic effects of radiation. Our aim was to measure radiation dose received in pediatric blunt trauma patients during initial CT evaluation and to determine whether doses exceed doses historically correlated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer. METHODS A prospective cohort study of patients aged 0 years to 17 years was conducted over 6 months. Dosimeters were placed on the neck, chest, and groin before CT scanning to measure surface radiation. Patient measurements and scanning parameters were collected prospectively along with diagnostic findings on CT imaging. Cumulative effective whole body dose and organ doses were calculated. RESULTS The mean number of scans per patient was 3.1 ± 1.3. Mean whole body effective dose was 17.43 mSv. Mean organ doses were thyroid 32.18 mGy, breast 10.89 mGy, and gonads 13.15 mGy. Patients with selective CT scanning defined as ≤2 scans had a statistically significant decrease in radiation dose compared with patients with >2 scans. CONCLUSIONS Thyroid doses in 71% of study patients fell within the dose range historically correlated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer and whole body effective doses fell within the range of historical doses correlated with an increased risk of all solid cancers and leukemia. Selective scanning of body areas as compared with whole body scanning results in a statistically significant decrease in all doses.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2013

Resuscitate early with plasma and platelets or balance blood products gradually: findings from the PROMMTT study.

Deborah J. del Junco; John B. Holcomb; Erin E. Fox; Karen J. Brasel; Herb A. Phelan; Eileen M. Bulger; Martin A. Schreiber; Peter Muskat; Louis H. Alarcon; Mitchell J. Cohen; Bryan A. Cotton; Charles E. Wade; John G. Myers; Mohammad H. Rahbar

BACKGROUND The trauma transfusion literature has yet to resolve which is more important for hemorrhaging patients, transfusing plasma and platelets along with red blood cells (RBCs) early in resuscitation or gradually balancing blood product ratios. In a previous report of PROMMTT results, we found (1) plasma and platelet:RBC ratios increased gradually during the 6 hours following admission, and (2) patients achieving ratios more than 1:2 (relative to ratios <1:2) had significantly decreased 6-hour to 24-hour mortality adjusting for baseline and time-varying covariates. To differentiate the association of in-hospital mortality with early plasma or platelet transfusion from that with delayed but gradually balanced ratios, we developed a separate analytic approach. METHODS Using PROMMTT data and multilevel logistic regression to adjust for center effects, we related in-hospital mortality to the early receipt of plasma or platelets within the first three to six transfusion units (including RBCs) and 2.5 hours of admission. We adjusted for the same covariates as in our previous report: Injury Severity Score (ISS), age, time and total number of blood product transfusions upon entry to the analysis cohort, and bleeding from the head, chest, or limb. RESULTS Of 1,245 PROMMTT patients, 619 were eligible for this analysis. Early plasma was associated with decreased 24-hour and 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratios of 0.47 [p = 0.009] and 0.44 [p = 0.002], respectively). Too few patients (24) received platelets early for meaningful assessment. In the subgroup of 222 patients receiving no early plasma but continuing transfusions beyond Hour 2.5, achieving gradually balanced plasma and platelet:RBC ratios of 1:2 or greater by Hour 4 was not associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratios of 0.9 and 1.1, respectively). There were no significant center effects. CONCLUSION Plasma transfusion early in resuscitation had a protective association with mortality, whereas delayed but gradually balanced transfusion ratios did not. Further research will require considerably larger numbers of patients receiving platelets early. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level IV.


Annals of Surgery | 2005

Trauma Surgery Malpractice Risk: Perception Versus Reality

Ronald M. Stewart; Joe Johnston; Kathy Geoghegan; Tiffany Anthony; John G. Myers; Daniel L. Dent; Michael G. Corneille; Daren Danielson; H. David Root; Basil A. Pruitt; Stephen M. Cohn

Objective:We set out to compare the malpractice lawsuit risk and incidence in trauma surgery, emergency surgery, and elective surgery at a single academic medical center. Summary and Background Data:The perceived increased malpractice risk attributed to trauma patients discourages participation in trauma call panels and may influence career choice of surgeons. When questioned, surgeons cite malpractice risk as a rationale for not providing trauma care. Little data substantiate or refute the perceived high trauma malpractice risk. We hypothesized that the malpractice risk was equivalent between an elective surgical practice and a trauma/emergency practice. Methods:Three prospectively maintained institutional databases were used to calculate and characterize malpractice incidence and risk: a surgical operation database, a trauma registry, and a risk management/malpractice database. Risk groups were divided into elective general surgery (ELECTIVE), urgent/emergent, nontrauma general surgery (URGENT), and trauma surgery (TRAUMA). Malpractice claims incidence was calculated by dividing the total number of filed lawsuits by the total number of operative procedures over a 12-year period. Results:Over the study period, 62,350 operations were performed. A total of 21 lawsuits were served. Seven were dismissed. Three were granted summary judgments to the defendants. Ten were settled with payments to the plaintiffs. One went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict in favor of the defendants. Total paid liability was

Collaboration


Dive into the John G. Myers's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald M. Stewart

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel L. Dent

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles E. Wade

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John B. Holcomb

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen J. Brasel

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Muskat

University of Cincinnati

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bryan A. Cotton

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge