Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John Gulick is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John Gulick.


Anthropological Quarterly | 1976

Migrant and Native Married Women in the Iranian City of Isfahan

Margaret E. Gulick; John Gulick

The subject is 165 married women and the comparison of two groups among them: 63 migrants and 102 city natives. Virtually the same in average age (about 26) and average number of years married (11), the migrant and native groups are similar in most of the patterns of behavior studied, as suggested by average age at marriage (15.5 and 14.3 years), number of pregnancies (5.5 and 4.9), and number of living children (3.6 and 3.3). Types of household composition are similar, as are frequencies of contact with relatives generally. Differences between the two groups are: smaller proportion of natives illiterate (46.5% vs. 68.3%), native preference for somewhat fewer children and fewer natives not having practiced contraception, and more native emphasis on education for elementary-school-age daughters. These differences may indicate urban influences and incipient culture change. However, the differences are slight. We attribute the predominant similarities to the migrant womens move, mostly with their husbands, from a domestic, female-secluded, sexsegregated rural environment to a protected domestic environment in the city, similar to the one they left and to that of the city-native women.


Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 1973

VARIETIES OF DOMESTIC SOCIAL ORGANIZATION IN THE IRANIAN CITY OF ISFAHAN

John Gulick; Margaret E. Gulick

The two principal purposes of this paper are to present substantive information on some varities of domestic social organization in a major Middle Eastern city and to help clarify problems in defining varities of domestic social organization. A brief discussion of these problems of definition is necessary at the outset of this paper. Despite the existence of a vast literature on “the family,” imprecision continues to be a weakness of many studies that attempt to use varieties of domestic social organization as analytic variables. Inconclusive or confusing “findings” are often the consequence. For example, Burch and Gendell’ have shown how some studies attempting to correlate women’s fertility rates with the types of families of which they are members produce confusing or contradictory results because, among other things, the family types were defined too vaguely. If the problem were merely one of taxonomy for its own sake, yet another discussion of the subject might seem superffuous, for the major sources of the trouble have been recognized for some time. They include the failure to distinguish between coresident and non-coresident extended families and the very real difficulties of distinguishing, in a body of synchronic data, cyclic developmental phases within a single normative structure (e.g., coresident patrilocal extended family) from a plurality of normative structures (e.g., nuclear, stem, and extended families). However, resolutions of the problem in the abstract have not been carried over very well into specific analyses of data. Consequently, many studies that attempt to use “family types” as indices of urbanization, or modernization or social stratification, or some combination of these, often fail to sharpen our generally fuzzy conceptions of these important processes. Still groping in this fuzziness, many anthropologists are tempted to make shortcuts to clarity and rigor by statistically manipulating quantitative materials (e.g., “household size”). As any good quantitative analyst knows, however, such shortcuts can have insidious results unless the variables are precisely defined in the first place. The increasing availability of quantitative data, such as national censuses and surveys in countries where there has not been any such information until recently, intensifies the temptation to take shortcuts. Therefore, it becomes all the more important


Reviews in Anthropology | 1974

Still searching for urban anthropology

John Gulick

Abner Cohen, ed. Urban Ethnicity. London: Tavistock Publications. Association of Social Anthropologists, Monograph No. 12, 1974. xxiv + 391 pp. Tables, references, and index.


Social Forces | 1967

Tripoli: A Modern Arab City.

John Gulick

16.00. George M. Foster and Robert V. Kemper, eds. Anthropologists in Cities. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1974. viii + 261 pp. Charts and bibliography.


Comparative Education Review | 1985

Mothers' Influence on Daughters' Orientations toward Education: An Egyptian Case Study

Rebecca Bach; Saad M. Gadalla; Hind Khattab; John Gulick

6.95 (paper).


Journal of Comparative Family Studies | 1987

Mass education Islamic revival and the population problem in Egypt.

Kimberly A. Faust; Rebecca Bach; Saad M. Gadalla; Hind Khattab; John Gulick


Social Forces | 1974

From Madina to Metropolis : heritage and change in the Near Eastern city

John Gulick; L. Carl Brown


Iranian Studies | 1974

Private life and public face: cultural continuities in the domestic architecture of Isfahan

John Gulick


Muslim World | 1992

YOUNG WOMEN MEMBERS OF THE ISLAMIC REVIVAL MOVEMENT IN EGYPT

Kimberly A. Faust; John Gulick; Saad M. Gadalla; Hind Khattab


Review of the Middle East Studies | 1969

The Anthropology of the Middle East

John Gulick

Collaboration


Dive into the John Gulick's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Margaret E. Gulick

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Saad M. Gadalla

San Diego State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kimberly A. Faust

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge