John H. Hitchcock
American Institutes for Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John H. Hitchcock.
Journal of Mixed Methods Research | 2007
Bonnie K. Nastasi; John H. Hitchcock; Sreeroopa Sarkar; Gary J. Burkholder; Kristen Varjas; Asoka Jayasena
The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the application of mixed methods research designs to multiyear programmatic research and development projects whose goals include integration of cultural specificity when generating or translating evidence-based practices. The authors propose a set of five mixed methods designs related to different phases of program development research: (a) formative research, Qual →/+ Quan; (b) theory development or modification and testing, Qual → Quan →/+ Qual → Quan ... Qual → Quan; (c) instrument development and validation, Qual → Quan; (d) program development and evaluation, Qual →/+ Quan →/+ Qual →/+ Quan ... Qual →/+ Quan, or Qual →← Quan; and (e) evaluation research, Qual + Quan. We illustrate the application of these designs to creating and validating ethnographically informed psychological assessment measures and developing and evaluating culturally specific intervention programs within a multiyear research program conducted in the country of Sri Lanka.
School Psychology International | 2007
Bonnie K. Nastasi; John H. Hitchcock; Gary J. Burkholder; Kristen Varjas; Sreeroopa Sarkar; Asoka Jayasena
This article expands on an emerging mixed-method approach for validating culturally-specific constructs (see Hitchcock et al., 2005). Previous work established an approach for dealing with cultural impacts when assessing psychological constructs and the current article extends these efforts into studying stress reactions among adolescents in Sri Lanka. Ethnographic data collection and analysis techniques were used to construct scenarios that are stressful to Sri Lankan youth, along with survey items that assess their related coping mechanisms. The data were factor analysed, results were triangulated with qualitative findings, and reliability estimates of resulting scales were obtained. This in turn generated a pilot assessment approach that can be used to measure stress and coping reactions in a distinct culture. Use of the procedures described here could be replicated to generate culturally-specific instruments in international contexts, or when working with ethnic minorities within a given nation. This should in turn generate information needed to develop culturally relevant intervention work.
Archive | 2018
Colleen E. Chesnut; John H. Hitchcock; Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
By moving from broad definitions of policy, policy inquiry, and mixed methods to the paradigmatic and analytical choices involved in conducting mixed methods research, this chapter provides guidance to education policy scholars interested in mixed methods. Recent peer-reviewed mixed methods studies on complex education policy problems illustrate how researchers have used mixed methods to interrogate these issues while attending to various perspectives and contexts. Ultimately, by outlining how to conceptualize a mixed methods inquiry for a hypothetical policy problem, we present an example of the decision-making processes essential to effective mixed methods research design. The guidance serves as a useful starting point for novices considering whether and how mixed methods research can inform their work to alleviate the complicated policy problems facing today’s education leaders.
International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches | 2018
Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie; John H. Hitchcock; R. Burke Johnson; Brigitte Smit; Vanessa Scherman; Donggil Song
aDepartment of Educational Leadership, Sam Houston State University, TX, USA and Department of Educational Leadership and Management/Department of Educational Psychology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa; bDepartment of Instructional Systems Technology, Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, USA; cDepartment of Counseling and Instructional Sciences, College of Education and Professional Studies, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA; dDepartment of Educational Leadership and Management, College of Education, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa; eDepartment of Psychology of Education, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa; fDepartment of Computer Science, Sam Houston State University, TX, USA
Archive | 2010
Bonnie K. Nastasi; John H. Hitchcock; Lisa M. Brown
Journal of School Psychology | 2005
John H. Hitchcock; Bonnie K. Nastasi; David Yun Dai; Joan Newman; Asoka Jayasena; Rachel Bernstein-Moore; Sreeroopa Sarkar; Kristen Varjas
Mid-Western educational researcher | 2010
John H. Hitchcock; Bonnie K. Nastasi; Meredith Summerville
Archive | 2011
John H. Hitchcock; Bonnie K. Nastasi
International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches | 2018
Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie; John H. Hitchcock; Prathiba Natesan; Isadore Newman
International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches | 2018
Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie; John H. Hitchcock