John Herbert Ainembabazi
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John Herbert Ainembabazi.
Environment and Development Economics | 2013
John Herbert Ainembabazi; Gerald Shively; Arild Angelsen
Previous research suggests that forest-dependent households tend to be poorer than other groups, and that extreme reliance on forest resources might constitute a poverty trap. We provide an example in which a non-timber forest product – charcoal – appears to be providing a pathway out of poverty for some rural households in Uganda. Data come from households living adjacent to natural forests, some of whom engage in charcoal production. We use a semi-parametric method to identify the determinants of participation in charcoal production and a quantile regression decomposition to measure the heterogeneous effect of participation on household income. We find that younger households and those with few productive assets are more likely to engage in charcoal production. We also show that, as a result of their participation, charcoal producers are better off than non-charcoal producers in terms of income, even though they are worse off in terms of productive assets.
Journal of Development Studies | 2014
John Herbert Ainembabazi; Johnny Mugisha
Abstract This article investigates the relationship between adoption of and experience with agricultural technologies. We use both non-parametric and parametric estimations on data from rural farmers in Uganda. We find an inverted-U relationship between adoption of and experience with agricultural technologies in banana, coffee and maize. This suggests that farming experience is useful in early stages of adoption of a given technology when farmers are still testing its potential benefits, which later determine its retention or disadoption over time. Thus, gradual advances in technology development and continuous retraining of farmers are essential for sustainable adoption of agricultural technologies for some crops.
Land Economics | 2016
John Herbert Ainembabazi; Arild Angelsen
Studies on the role of nonmarket land transactions remain limited. This paper addresses two questions: Is land inheritance driven by underdeveloped land markets? How does land inheritance influence land disposal and acquisition? We use a switching regression model on household data from rural Uganda. We find that the initially landless or nearlandless households, due to little or no land inheritance, obtain land through land markets, while those that are land rich dispose of land through land sales and bequests. The results suggest that a process of land equalization is unfolding within the sample. (JEL C14, Q15)
PLOS ONE | 2015
John Herbert Ainembabazi; Leena Tripathi; Joseph Rusike; Tahirou Abdoulaye; Victor M. Manyong
Background Credible empirical evidence is scanty on the social implications of genetically modified (GM) crops in Africa, especially on vegetatively propagated crops. Little is known about the future success of introducing GM technologies into staple crops such as bananas, which are widely produced and consumed in the Great Lakes Region of Africa (GLA). GM banana has a potential to control the destructive banana Xanthomonas wilt disease. Objective To gain a better understanding of future adoption and consumption of GM banana in the GLA countries which are yet to permit the production of GM crops; specifically, to evaluate the potential economic impacts of GM cultivars resistant to banana Xanthomonas wilt disease. Data Sources The paper uses data collected from farmers, traders, agricultural extension agents and key informants in the GLA. Analysis We analyze the perceptions of the respondents about the adoption and consumption of GM crop. Economic surplus model is used to determine future economic benefits and costs of producing GM banana. Results On the release of GM banana for commercialization, the expected initial adoption rate ranges from 21 to 70%, while the ceiling adoption rate is up to 100%. Investment in the development of GM banana is economically viable. However, aggregate benefits vary substantially across the target countries ranging from US
Journal of Development Economics | 2018
Oluwatoba J. Omotilewa; Jacob Ricker-Gilbert; John Herbert Ainembabazi; Gerald Shively
20 million to 953 million, highest in countries where disease incidence and production losses are high, ranging from 51 to 83% of production. Conclusion The findings support investment in the development of GM banana resistant to Xanthomonas wilt disease. The main beneficiaries of this technology development are farmers and consumers, although the latter benefit more than the former from reduced prices. Designing a participatory breeding program involving farmers and consumers signifies the successful adoption and consumption of GM banana in the target countries.
Environmental Science & Policy | 2013
Erika Romijn; John Herbert Ainembabazi; Arief Wijaya; Martin Herold; Arild Angelsen; Louis Verchot; Daniel Murdiyarso
We use panel data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) administered among 1200 smallholders in Uganda to evaluate input use and food security impacts of an improved maize storage technology. After two seasons, households who received the technology were 10 percentage points more likely to plant hybrid maize varieties that are more susceptible to insect pests in storage than traditional lower-yielding varieties. Treated smallholders also stored maize for a longer period, reported a substantial drop in storage losses, and were less likely to use storage chemicals than untreated cohorts. Our results indicate that policies to promote soft kernel high-yielding hybrid maize varieties in sub-Saharan Africa should consider an improvement in post-harvest storage as a complementary intervention to increase adoption of these varieties.
Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices | 2012
Martin Herold; Arild Angelsen; Louis Verchot; Arief Wijaya; John Herbert Ainembabazi
Forest Policy and Economics | 2014
John Herbert Ainembabazi; Arild Angelsen
Agricultural Economics | 2017
John Herbert Ainembabazi; Piet van Asten; Bernard Vanlauwe; E. Ouma; Guy Blomme; Eliud A. Birachi; Paul Martin Dontsop Nguezet; Djana B. Mignouna; Victor M. Manyong
World Development | 2018
John Herbert Ainembabazi; Tahirou Abdoulaye; Shiferaw Feleke; Arega D. Alene; Paul M. Dontsop-Nguezet; Pierre Celestin Ndayisaba; Cyrille Hicintuka; Sylvain Mapatano; Victor M. Manyong