John Iazzetta

A randomized double-blind trial of the effects of hormone therapy on delayed verbal recall in older women

We examined whether estradiol and norethindrone hormone therapy (HT) prevented decline in delayed verbal recall in older women with normal to mildly impaired memory functioning. This was a 2-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 142 women aged 61-87, randomly assigned to receive 1 mg 17-beta estradiol daily and 0.35 mg norethindrone 3 days/week or daily placebo for 2 years. The primary outcome was short-delay verbal recall of the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). To look for differences in response to HT by baseline short-delay recall, we examined the primary outcome in participants grouped according to whether their baseline scores were below average for the age group or greater than or equal to this score and according to whether they met criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or not. 133 women completed 1 year of the trial and 128 completed 2 years. Prespecified covariates in all repeated measures analyses of covariance (RANCOVA) included age, education, APOE epsilon4, and prior HT use. RANCOVA showed no overall significant treatment effects at year 1 or year 2. After testing for an interaction, which was significant (p=0.02), we found that women in the HT group who scored at or above the average showed significantly less decline than the placebo group in short-delay verbal recall after 1 year, p=0.007 and 2 years, p=0.01. No treatment effects were found in women below the average in either year. When grouped according to whether the participant met criteria for MCI, the interaction between treatment group and MCI subgroup was not significant. These results suggest that benefits of estrogen exposure may be limited to those with average to above average scores on the delayed verbal recall. HT dose and formulation may have contributed to these beneficial outcomes. Replication is warranted before recommendations can be made in the clinical setting.

Does warfarin use impact hospital length of stay? A retrospective study looking at patients treated for atrial fibrillation.

Abstract The authors received anecdotal practice information from clinicians indicating that when warfarin was initiated in the hospital setting, it may be associated with an increased length of stay (LOS): specifically to achieve a desired minimum international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 before discharge in a subset of patients where clinicians perceived follow-up after discharge was not deemed optimal. Given that oral thromboprophylactic anticoagulation with warfarin is the mainstay treatment for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF), the authors decided to look at hospitalized patients from this population to determine if a subset of these patients experienced an increased LOS. The study design entailed a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients admitted to a large, tertiary care, academic center. Patients were included if they were admitted with a primary, secondary, or most responsible diagnosis of paroxysmal or chronic AF. Medical records were audited over an 18-month period (February 1, 2009, to July 31, 2010) to determine the average LOS and to identify patients with a documented prolonged LOS secondary due to subtherapeutic INR at the time of potential discharge. Our final study cohort of 189 patients had an average LOS of 5.2 days (SD = 5.2). However, for eight (4.2%) of these patients discharge was delayed an additional 2.25 days (SD = 1.3) for reasons solely attributed to achieving a therapeutic INR.