Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John J. Brandabur is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John J. Brandabur.


Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2012

Laparoscopy–assisted versus balloon enteroscopy–assisted ERCP in bariatric post–Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients

Mitchal Schreiner; Lily Chang; Michael Gluck; Shayan Irani; S. Ian Gan; John J. Brandabur; Richard C. Thirlby; Ravi Moonka; Richard A. Kozarek; Andrew S. Ross

BACKGROUND Data on balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (BEA-ERCP) versus laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) in post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients are lacking. OBJECTIVES To compare BEA-ERCP with LA-ERCP in post-RYGB patients and to identify factors that predict therapeutic success with BEA-ERCP. DESIGN Retrospective chart review. SETTING A single North American tertiary referral center. PATIENTS The review included 56 bariatric post-RYGB patients who underwent ERCP. INTERVENTIONS BEA-ERCP or LA-ERCP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Cannulation rate, therapeutic success, hospital stay, complications, procedure duration, endoscopist time, and cost. RESULTS A total of 32 patients underwent BEA-ERCP, and 24 underwent LA-ERCP. LA-ERCP was superior to BEA-ERCP in papilla identification (100% vs 72%, P = .005), cannulation rate (100% vs 59%, P < .001), and therapeutic success (100% vs 59%, P < .001). The total procedure time was shorter (P < .001) and endoscopist time was longer (P = .006) for BEA-ERCP. There was no difference in postprocedure hospital stay (P = .127) or complication rate (P = .392) between the 2 groups. In the BEA-ERCP group, in patients having a Roux limb + biliopancreatic (from ligament of Treitz to jejunojejunal anastomosis), a limb length less than 150 cm was associated with therapeutic success. Starting with BEA-ERCP and continuing with LA-ERCP after a failed BEA-ERCP saved


Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 1994

Endoscopic pancreatic duct sphincterotomy: Indications, technique, and analysis of results

Richard A. Kozarek; Terrance J. Ball; David J. Patterson; John J. Brandabur; L. William Traverso; Shirley L. Raltz

1015 compared with starting with LA-ERCP. LIMITATIONS Single center, retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS In centers with expertise in deep enteroscopy and ERCP, post-RYGB patients with a Roux + ligament of Treitz to jejunojejunal anastomosis limb length less than 150 cm should first be offered deep enteroscopy-assisted ERCP. In patients with Roux + ligament of Treitz to jejunojejunal anastomosis (LTJJ) limb length 150 cm or longer, LA-ERCP should be the preferred approach because of the lack of need for a second procedure, equivalent morbidity and hospital stay, decreased endoscopist time, and decreased cost.


Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 1995

Expandable versus conventional esophageal prostheses: easier insertion may not preclude subsequent stent-related problems

Richard A. Kozarek; Terrance J. Ball; John J. Brandabur; David J. Patterson; Donald E. Low; Luke Hill; Shirley L. Raltz

Fifty-six patients, 54 of whom had chronic pancreatitis, underwent endoscopic pancreatic duct sphincterotomy during a 4-year period from 1988 to 1992. Acute complications noted in 10% of patients included exacerbation of pancreatitis (4) and cholangitis (2). Chronic complications included induction of asymptomatic ductal changes in 16%, thought to be related to endoprosthesis placement, and stenosis of the sphincterotomy site in 14%, requiring repeated endoscopic or surgical sphincter section. When combined with a number of ancillary procedures, including removal of obstructing ductal calculi and stent placement for ductal disruption or stenosis, pancreatic duct sphincterotomy was associated with amelioration of chronic pain or decreased number of clinical attacks of pancreatitis in a subset of patients. The authors conclude that endoscopic pancreatic duct sphincterotomy enlarges our endotherapeutic armamentarium and deserves additional evaluation.


Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2002

Clinical outcomes in patients who undergo extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for chronic calcific pancreatitis.

Richard A. Kozarek; John J. Brandabur; Terrence J. Ball; Michael Gluck; David J. Patterson; Fouad Attia; L. William Traverso; Paul Koslowski; Robert P. Gibbons

BACKGROUND Although expandable esophageal endoprostheses may be easier to insert and are associated with fewer procedure-related perforations, data comparing clinical results with these stents to those obtained with conventional prostheses are sparse. METHODS We reviewed the records of all patients undergoing esophageal stent placement at our institution between October 1983 and July 1995 to define relative risks, clinical results, and need for reintervention prior to death, contrasting conventional to a variety of expandable esophageal endoprostheses. RESULTS Over the period of review, 47 patients had conventional prostheses (CP) and 38 had expandable prostheses (EP) placed. Fifteen of 44 patients with CP and 14 of 38 with EP for malignancy also had esophago-airway fistulas. Insertion complications, prestent and poststent dysphagia scores, and complete fistula occlusion rates were comparable. Subacute complications were higher in the patients receiving EP (80%) than in those receiving CP (60%), possibly related to the prospective accumulation of data in patients receiving EP. Survival data were virtually identical and approximated 3 months for either group. CONCLUSIONS Although both CP and EP improve dysphagia and occlude tracheoesophageal fistulae, patients ill enough to require a prosthesis do poorly regardless of prosthesis design. Moreover, although EP may be easier to insert than CP, stent- and patient-related problems persist and may require additional intervention.


Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology | 2008

A twenty-year experience with endoscopic therapy for symptomatic primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Michael Gluck; Nico Cantone; John J. Brandabur; David J. Patterson; James E. Bredfeldt; Richard A. Kozarek

BACKGROUND There is controversy as to whether extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy fragmentation and ERCP retrieval of pancreatic stones are associated with relief of chronic pain or relapsing attacks of pancreatitis. Our most recent experience with this technology is reviewed. METHODS Forty patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis who required extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy between 1995 and 2000 to facilitate pancreatic duct stone removal were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included patient presentation, number of lithotripsy and ERCP sessions required, complications, and outcomes measures to include pre- and post-ESWL pain scale, monthly oxycodone (5 mg)-equivalent pills ingested, yearly hospitalizations, and need for subsequent surgery. RESULTS A single extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy session was required for 35 patients who underwent a total of 86 ERCPs to achieve complete stone extraction from the main pancreatic duct. Minor complications occurred in 20%. There was one episode of pancreatic sepsis that was treated with antibiotics and removal of an occluded pancreatic prosthesis. At a mean [SD] follow-up of 2.4 (0.6) years, 80% of patients had avoided surgery and there was a statistically significant decrease in pain scores (6.9 [1.3] vs. 2.9 [1.1]; p = 0.001), yearly hospitalizations for pancreatitis (3.9 [1.9] vs. 0.9 [0.9]; p = 0.001), and oxycodone-equivalent narcotic medication ingested monthly (125 [83] vs. 81 [80]; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy fragmentation of pancreatic duct calculi in conjunction with endoscopic clearance of the main pancreatic duct is associated with significant improvement in clinical outcomes in most patients with chronic pancreatitis.


Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2009

Papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm: results of a single referral center over a 10-year period

Shayan Irani; Andrew Arai; Kamran Ayub; Thomas Biehl; John J. Brandabur; Russell Dorer; Michael Gluck; Geoffrey C. Jiranek; David J. Patterson; Drew Schembre; L. William Traverso; Richard A. Kozarek

Goals The current study presents 1 tertiary endoscopy centers 20-year experience using endoscopic therapy to treat patients with symptomatic primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Background Endoscopic therapy for patients with PSC and dominant strictures has been used for more than 20 years, but there is concern that instrumenting a sclerotic biliary tree induces risks that outweigh anticipated benefits. Study In this retrospective chart review, 117 patients with PSC were identified using ICD-9 codes. Patients had a mean age of 47 years (range: 15 to 86 y). Mean duration of follow-up was 8 years (range: 2 to 20 y). Of the 117 identified patients, 106 underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography on one or more occasions (for a total of 317 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies), and a subset of 84 patients received endoscopic therapy for treatment of dominant strictures and/or deteriorating clinical status. Actual survival for endoscopically treated patients was compared with predicted survival using the Mayo Clinic natural history model for PSC. Results Our chart review revealed 23 recognized complications among the 317 procedures performed (7.3%), and no procedure-related deaths. Observed patient survival at years 3 and 4 was significantly higher than that predicted by the Mayo Clinic natural history model for PSC (P=0.021). Conclusions Patients with PSC who have a deteriorating clinical course benefited from endoscopic therapy to provide drainage of bile ducts, removal of stones, and/or temporary relief from obstructions, with acceptable procedure-related complications and higher than expected 3-year and 4-year survival.


Digestive Diseases and Sciences | 1995

Endoscopic approach to pancreas divisum

Richard A. Kozarek; Terrence J. Ball; David J. Patterson; John J. Brandabur; Shirley L. Raltz

BACKGROUND Tumors arising from the duodenal papilla account for approximately 5% of GI neoplasms, but are increasingly identified. OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes in a large single-center experience with patients referred for ampullary lesions. DESIGN A retrospective review of the Virginia Mason Medical Center endoscopy and hospital service database. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS One hundred ninety-three patients referred for ampullary lesions from 1997 to 2007. INTERVENTIONS Endoscopic management of ampullary lesions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS The relationship of demographic and clinical data with endoscopic treatment and clinical outcomes in these patients. RESULTS One hundred ninety-three patients underwent endoscopy for ampullary lesions. Fifteen juxta-ampullary lesions and 10 normal variants were excluded. Among 168 patients, there were 112 (67%) adenomas, 38 (23%) adenocarcinomas, and 18 (10%) nonadenomatous lesions. There were 88 men and 80 women, with a mean age of 64 years. Clinical presentation included cholestasis/cholangitis (72 patients), abdominal pain (54 patients), incidental/asymptomatic (51 patients), pancreatitis (9 patients), and bleeding (7 patients). Of the 57 patients referred to surgery, 42 were sent directly without papillectomy, and 16 were sent after papillectomy. Papillectomies were performed in 102 patients with adenomatous lesions. The mean tumor size was 2.4 cm (range 0.5-6 cm). The papillectomy complication rate was 21%: mild pancreatitis in 10 (10%) patients, cholangitis in 1, retroperitoneal perforation in 1 (adenocarcinoma), intraperitoneal perforation in 1 (lateral extension), bleeding in 5 (lateral extension in 2 of these 5), and delayed papillary stenosis in 3. Recurrences were seen in 8%. The endoscopic success rate was 84%. Factors affecting success were a smaller adenoma size and the absence of dilated ducts. CONCLUSIONS Most ampullary adenomas are amenable to endoscopy. Underlying malignancy and lateral extension may be risk factors for bleeding and perforation. Smaller lesion size and the absence of dilated ducts are factors favorably affecting success.


The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2009

Improved oral intake after palliative duodenal stenting for malignant obstruction: a prospective multicenter clinical trial.

Michael Piesman; Richard A. Kozarek; John J. Brandabur; Douglas K. Pleskow; Ram Chuttani; Viktor E. Eysselein; William B. Silverman; John J. Vargo; Irving Waxman; Marc F. Catalano; Todd H. Baron; Willis G. Parsons; Adam Slivka; David L. Carr-Locke

Pancreas divisum has been claimed to be a harmless congenital variant or to occasionally cause acute relapsing pancreatitis (ARP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), or a chronic abdominal pain (CAP) syndrome. Both surgical and endoscopic approaches to accessory papilla decompression have been promulgated and widely disparate results reported in the literature. We retrospectively reviewed a five-year experience with dorsal pancreatic duct decompression at our institution utilizing a variety of endotherapeutic techniques. Data collected included procedural complications; patient interpretation of pre- and posttherapy pain, frequency, and intensity graded on an analog pain scale; frequency of hospitalization; and patient perception of “global” improvement to endotherapy. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, there was a statistically significant decrease in pancreatitis incidence in 15 patients with ARP (P=0.016) and 19 patients with CP (P=0.025). The frequency and intensity of chronic pain was also significantly improved (P<0.001) in the latter group. In contrast, only one of five patients with CAP and normal dorsal pancreatography and secretin tests experienced global improvement, and there was no improvement utilizing an analog pain scale (P=0.262) in the group as a whole. There was a 20% incidence of mild procedure or subsequent stent-related pancreatitis and an 11.5% accessory papilla restenosis rate. It is concluded that a subset of carefully selected patients with pancreas divisum may respond to endotherapy but that long-term follow-up will be required to define its ultimate place in the management of symptomatic patients with this anomaly.


American Journal of Surgery | 1994

Cystic duct leaks in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Michael S. Woods; John L. Shellito; Gilbert S. Santoscoy; Robert C. Hagan; W. Ransom Kilgore; L. William Traverso; Richard A. Kozarek; John J. Brandabur

OBJECTIVES:We sought to test the hypothesis that placement of a new nitinol duodenal self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction is effective and safe in allowing patients to tolerate an oral diet.METHODS:In a prospective multicenter study, SEMSs (Duodenal WallFlex, Boston Scientific) were placed to alleviate gastroduodenal obstruction in inoperable patients without the ability to tolerate solid food. The primary study end point was improvement in oral intake monitored according to the 4-point Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) up to 24 weeks after stent placement.RESULTS:Forty-three patients received SEMSs, which were successfully deployed on the first attempt in 41 cases (95%) and the second attempt in two (5%). Within 1 day and 7 days after SEMS placement, 52% and 75% of patients, respectively, benefited from a GOOSS increase ≥1. Resumption of solid food intake (GOOSS 2–3) was attained by 56% of patients within 7 days and 80% by 28 days. Of the patients attaining GOOSS 2–3, 48% remained on solid food until death or last follow-up. Device-related adverse events included stent occlusion/malfunction in 9% of patients and perforation in 5% of patients.CONCLUSIONS:Duodenal WallFlex stent placement promptly improves oral intake in a majority of inoperable patients with malignant gastroduodenal obstruction. In approximately half the patients achieving GOOSS 2–3, the capacity for solid food intake endures until death or last follow-up.


American Journal of Surgery | 1993

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

L. William Traverso; Richard A. Kozarek; Terence J. Ball; John J. Brandabur; Jeffrey A. Hunter; Philip C. Jolly; David J. Patterson; John A. Ryan; Richard C. Thirlby; Debra Wechter

BACKGROUND Cystic duct leak (CDL) appears to complicate laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) more often than open cholecystectomy (OC). No mention of CDL was found in a literature review that covered 48,822 OCs and their complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-four patients who developed biliary tract injuries following LC were reviewed for: the time from LC to presentation, presenting symptoms, method of diagnosis, treatment, outcome, and follow-up. RESULTS Seventeen of 54 biliary tract complications (31%) were CDLs. The CDLs presented at a median of 4 days after LC with pain (76%) and nausea and/or vomiting (35%). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) defined the diagnosis and the anatomy of the leak in 11 patients (65%). Biliary endoprosthesis placement was employed in 8 patients, with concomitant sphincterotomy in 5 (63%), and resolved CDL in every case. Seven (88%) of these patients were asymptomatic at a median interval of 10 months after stent retrieval. Six patients (35%) underwent reoperation. Five had laparotomy with ligation of the cystic duct stump and 1 underwent laparoscopic examination with reclipping of the cystic duct stump. Five (83%) were asymptomatic at a median follow-up of 26 months. CDLs may result from inaccurate clip placement, perforations proximal to the clips, and stump necrosis, as documented at reoperation. CONCLUSIONS CDLs occur more frequently in LC than in the OCs reported in the literature. Most leaks require intervention. ERCP with stent placement is the diagnostic and therapeutic procedure of choice and has a high success rate of resolving leaks. To forestall CDLs, it is important to place clips accurately and avoid electrocautery in the vicinity of the cystic duct.

Collaboration


Dive into the John J. Brandabur's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard A. Kozarek

Virginia Mason Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Gluck

Virginia Mason Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Drew Schembre

Virginia Mason Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shirley L. Raltz

Virginia Mason Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shayan Irani

Virginia Mason Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L. William Traverso

Virginia Mason Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Terrence J. Ball

Virginia Mason Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew S. Ross

Virginia Mason Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge