Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John K. Rempel is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John K. Rempel.


Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 1985

Trust in close relationships.

John K. Rempel; John G. Holmes; Mark P. Zanna

A theoretical model describing interpersonal trust in close relationships is presented. Three dimensions of trust are identified, based on the type of attributions drawn about a partners motives. These dimensions are also characterized by a developmental progression in the relationship. The validity of this theoretical perspective was examined through evidence obtained from a survey of a heterogeneous sample of established couples. An analysis of the Trust Scale in this sample was consistent with the notion that the predictability, dependability, and faith components represent distinct and coherent dimensions. A scale to measure interpersonal motives was also developed. The perception of intrinsic motives in a partner emerged as a dimension, as did instrumental and extrinsic motives. As expected, love and happiness were closely tied to feelings of faith and the attribution of intrinsic motivation to both self and partner. Women appeared to have more integrated, complex views of their relationships than men: All three forms of trust were strongly related and attributions of instrumental motives in their partners seemed to be self-affirming. Finally, there was a tendency for people to view their own motives as less self-centered and more exclusively intrinsic in flavor than their partners motives.


Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 2001

Trust and communicated attributions in close relationships.

John K. Rempel; Michael Ross; John G. Holmes

The attributional statements intimate partners communicate to one another were examined as a function of trust. In discussions by 35 married couples, 850 attributions and corresponding events were coded on dimensions of valence, globality, and locus. Results of regression and contingency analyses indicate that attributional statements expressed in high-trust relationships emphasized positive aspects of the relationship. Medium-trust couples actively engaged issues but focused more on negative events and explanations. Low-trust couples expressed more specific, less affectively extreme attributional statements that minimized the potential for increased conflict. Results could not be accounted for by relationship satisfaction. These findings also highlight the importance of focusing on features of the events for which attributions are expressed.


Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 2004

It's the end of the world as we know it: threat and the spatial-symbolic self

Christopher T. Burris; John K. Rempel

According to amoebic self theory, the boundary defining the self encompasses 3 levels of self-representation--bodily, social, and spatial-symbolic. Study 1 related a newly developed measure of individual differences in sensitivity to boundary threat across these 3 domains to values and disgust sensitivity. Four subsequent studies focused on spatial-symbolic threat sensitivity and related it to right-wing authoritarianism, aversive reactions to unfamiliar out-groups, and revulsion to vermin. A final experiment illustrates how a salient spatial-symbolic threat (dust mites) can elicit reactions toward out-groups that closely parallel mortality salience effects observed in research inspired by terror management theory, even though dust mites do not elicit mortality concerns. The importance of preserving the familiar in order to preserve the self is discussed.


Journal of Human Lactation | 2011

The Breastfeeding Team: The Role of Involved Fathers in the Breastfeeding Family

Lynn A. Rempel; John K. Rempel

Fathers influence mothers’ breastfeeding decisions and experiences. Fathers’ perceptions of their roles as members of the breastfeeding family are likely important components of that influence. To explore that possibility, 21 involved fathers of breastfeeding babies volunteered to be interviewed regarding their fathering breastfed babies and their roles in the breastfeeding family. Fathers identified their unique roles as team members ensuring that their babies received the benefits of breastfeeding. A primary fathering role was that of supporting breastfeeding by becoming breastfeeding savvy, by using their knowledge to encourage and assist mothers in breastfeeding, by valuing the breastfeeding mothers, and by sharing housework and child care. Fathers’ nurturing roles involved fostering positive father-infant relationships in the face of limited opportunities to bond with their babies through feeding. The experiences of these fathers suggest the importance of assisting them to recognize their unique contributions to the nurture of their children as members of the breastfeeding team.


Journal of Social and Personal Relationships | 2004

Partner Influence on Health Behavior Decision-Making: Increasing Breastfeeding Duration

Lynn A. Rempel; John K. Rempel

This longitudinal study examined how male partners affect the breastfeeding decisions and behavior of first-time mothers. Based on the reasons model by Meichenbaum and Fong (1993), the breastfeeding reasons, intentions, and behavior of 317 first-time mothers were assessed prenatally and at six time points in the first year postpartum. In a prenatal assessment, men indicated their prescriptive beliefs about whether their partner should breastfeed at the same six time points. Men’s prescriptive breastfeeding beliefs predicted the strength of their partners’ breastfeeding intentions, over and above the women’s own breastfeeding reasons, and they predicted breastfeeding behavior over and above the women’s intentions. These results demonstrate the influence wielded by intimate partners and highlight the importance of focusing on partners’ beliefs when predicting and intervening in health behavior decisions.


Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin | 2004

Trust and Partner-Enhancing Attributions in Close Relationships

Paul J. E. Miller; John K. Rempel

A cross-lagged panel design was used to examine the links between trust and attributional processes in a sample of 75 married couples throughout a period of 2 years. During the first phase of the study, participants completed a measure of marital trust, engaged in a laboratory problem-solving discussion of a recurrent conflict-related issue, and then rated their partner’s behavior and motives. Approximately 2 years later, 54 couples were again contacted and measures of trust were obtained. Forty of these couples also viewed a videotape of their laboratory problem-solving discussion from 2 years previously and rated their partner’s behavior and motives. Results suggested a reciprocal causal pattern by which partner-enhancing attributions predict changes in trust and trust predicts changes in partner-enhancing attributions.


Archives of Sexual Behavior | 2003

The Relationship Between Attitudes Towards Menstruation and Sexual Attitudes, Desires, and Behavior in Women

John K. Rempel; Barbara Baumgartner

We studied 114 romantically involved women to examine empirically the psychological connections between menstruation and sexuality. As menstruation is a distinctive sign of both reproductive potential and sexual maturity, we hypothesized that the attitudes women have towards menstruation will correlate with their sexual attitudes, desires, and behavior. As predicted, a comfort with personal sexuality was associated with a comfort with menstruation as a normal, publicly acceptable event. This association remained after controlling for liberal attitudes and disgust sensitivity. In addition, women who had engaged in sexual relations with their current partner during menses were significantly more comfortable with menstruation, more aroused by romantic and unconventional sexual activities, and less sensitive to disgust.


Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin | 2013

More, More, More The Dark Side of Self-Expansion Motivation

Christopher T. Burris; John K. Rempel; Armand R. Munteanu; Patrick A. Therrien

Self-expansion without regard for others’ well-being may represent the dark side of an otherwise healthy motive. Guided by Amoebic Self-Theory (AST), we developed the Engulfing Self Scale (ESS) to measure acquisitive tendencies across AST’s three domains of the self. Four studies revealed that bodily engulfment appeared generally benign, and that the problematic aspects of social engulfment were generally restricted to interpersonal contexts. Spatial-symbolic engulfment motivation was linked to a breadth of problematic indices such as psychopathy, Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychological entitlement, social dominance orientation, economic system justification, greed, and valuation of power. It also predicted reluctance to expose a cheating group leader when doing so would threaten one’s own positive outcomes, greater justification of a looter’s behavior when prompted take his or her perspective, and greater justification of self-serving reward allocations after defeating an ostensible competitor. Spatial-symbolic engulfment may be a motivational fountainhead for behaviors that negate others’ well-being.


Basic and Applied Social Psychology | 2011

“Just Look at Him”: Punitive Responses Cued by “Evil” Symbols

Christopher T. Burris; John K. Rempel

Three studies examined the causes and consequences of labeling a target as “evil.” Results show that “evil” individuals are seen as dispositionally inclined to engage in “evil” behavior that matches a prototype of intentional, unjustifiable harm. Symbolic “evil” cues make a stereotype of the “truly evil” more accessible and polarize perceived applicability of the “evil” label depending on whether evil is seen as a potent, threatening force. The “evil” label predicts exceedingly punitive responses to the target and interpretive assimilation of the targets ambiguous behavior as being consistent with the evil behavior prototype. “Evil” thus appears to be a potent label with destructive consequences.


Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin | 2006

Push-You-Pull-You: The Boundaried Self in Close Relationships

John K. Rempel; Christopher T. Burris

Based on Amoebic Self Theory, the authors propose that the salience of different threats to the self affects the extent to which an intimate relationship partner is pushed away (excluded) or pulled closer (included). When social threat is salient among persons in relationships, it is hypothesized that partners will attempt to defuse the resulting sense of interpersonal vulnerability: offending partners may be pushed away, whereas offenders themselves may draw closer. When spatial-symbolic threat is salient and the relationship’s capacity to function as an identity marker is jeopardized, it is hypothesized that the partner—regardless of his or her role—will be pulled closer to maintain the perception that the relationship is secure. Self-report responses to hypothetical scenarios and perceptions of behaviors during a role-play were generally consistent with these hypotheses, suggesting that both an intimate partner and the relationship with that partner can be incorporated into the self.

Collaboration


Dive into the John K. Rempel's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Le Thi Vui

Hanoi School Of Public Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Toan Nang Khuc

Hanoi National University of Education

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge