Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John L. Kelley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John L. Kelley.


Archive | 1988

Integrals* and Products

John L. Kelley; T. P. Srinivasan

It will be convenient to extend the domain of an integral to include certain ℝ* valued functions, and to extend the integral to an ℝ* valued functional on the larger domain. We make this extension and subsequently phrase the Beppo Levi theorem and Fatou’s lemma in this context. A more serious use of the new construct is then made in the study of product integrals and product measures.


Archive | 1988

Measures* and Mappings

John L. Kelley; T. P. Srinivasan

A measure in the extended sense, or just a measure*, is a non-negative, countably additive, ℝ* valued function μ on a δ-ring A with μ(∅) = 0. The function on A that is 0 at ∅ and ∞ elsewhere is a measure*, each measure is a measure*, and each finite valued measure* is a measure. Classical Lebesgue measure for ℝ (see note 4.13 (i)) is the prototypical example of a measure*. A function f is integrable (or integrable*) w.r.t. a measure* μ on A iff it is integrable (integrable*) w.r.t. the measure μ 0 = μ|{A: A ∈Aand μ(A) < ∞} and in this case ∫ f dμ = ∫ f dμ 0 . Thus the integral w.r.t. classical Lebesgue measure is indentical with the integral w.r.t. Λ1.


Archive | 1988

Measurability and σ-Simplicity

John L. Kelley; T. P. Srinivasan

We need further information on the structure of integrable functions if our theory of integration is to be conveniently usable. For example, if J on M is the Daniell extension of the pre-integral induced by a length function, must every continuous function with compact support belong to M? The answer is not self-evident, although it had certainly better be “yes”! We shall presently find criteria for integrability involving a set theoretic (measurability) requirement, and a magnitude requirement.


Archive | 1988

The Integral I μ on L 1 (μ)

John L. Kelley; T. P. Srinivasan

This section is devoted to the construction of an integral I μ from a measure μ, to the relationships between μ and I μ (especially for Borel measures μ for ℝ), and to a brief consideration of the vector spaces L p (μ), 1 ≦ p ≦∞, associated with μ.


Archive | 1988

Pre-Measure to Pre-Integral

John L. Kelley; T. P. Srinivasan

Each length function λ induces a rudimentary integration process as follows. If the function χ[a:b] is 1 on the interval [a:b] and 0 elsewhere, then its “integral” I λ (χ[a:b]) with respect to λ should be λ[a:b] and if f = ∑ i=1 n c i χ[a:b] then I λ (f) should be ∑ i=1 n c i λ[a i :b i ]. But is this assignment non-ambiguous? Stated in another way: does the function χ[a:b] ↦λ[a:b] have a linear extension to the vector space of linear combinations of functions of the form χ[a:b]? It turns out that this is the case, and that it is a consequence of the fact that λ has an additive extension to a ring of sets containing the closed intervals, as we presently demonstrate.


Archive | 1988

Signed Measures and Indefinite Integrals

John L. Kelley; T. P. Srinivasan

A real (finite) valued function f on X is locally μ integrable iff μ is a measure on a δ-ring A of subsets of X and f χ A ∈ L 1 (μ)for all A in A. In this case f.μ, the indefinite integral of f with respect to μ, is the function A↦∫ A A for A in A. This function is always countably additive and hence f.μ is a measure if f is non-negative. Consequently f.μ is the difference of two measures, f + .μ and f - .μ. These two measures have little to do with each other: one of them “lives on” the set {x:f(x) ≧ 0} and the other lives on {x:f(x) < 0}.


Archive | 1988

Integral to Measure

John L. Kelley; T. P. Srinivasan

A measure is a real valued, non-negative, countably additive function on a δ-ring A. A δ-ring is a ring A of sets such that if {A n } n is a sequence in A. then ∩ n A n ∈ A; that is, a δ-ring is a ring A that is closed under countable intersection. The family of all finite subsets of ℝ, the family of all countable subsets of ℝ, and the family of all bounded subsets of ℝ are examples of δ-rings. We observe that one of these families is closed under countable union but the other two are not.


Archive | 1963

The Category Theorems

John L. Kelley; Isaac Namioka; W. F. Donoghue; Kenneth R. Lucas; B. J. Pettis; Ebbe Thue Poulsen; G. Baley Price; Wendy Robertson; W. R. Scott; Kennan T. Smith

This short chapter is concerned with the concept of category and with its application to the theory of linear topological spaces. The results include some of the most profound and most useful theorems of the subject of linear topological spaces, and are among the most important of the applications of category.


Archive | 1963

Convexity in Linear Topological Spaces

John L. Kelley; Isaac Namioka; W. F. Donoghue; Kenneth R. Lucas; B. J. Pettis; Ebbe Thue Poulsen; G. Baley Price; Wendy Robertson; W. R. Scott; Kennan T. Smith

This chapter, which begins our intensive use of scalar multiplication in the theory of linear topological spaces, marks the definite separation of this theory from that of topological groups. The results obtained here do not have generalizations or even analogues in the theory of groups.


Archive | 1963

Linear Topological Spaces

John L. Kelley; Isaac Namioka; W. F. Donoghue; Kenneth R. Lucas; B. J. Pettis; Ebbe Thue Poulsen; G. Baley Price; Wendy Robertson; W. R. Scott; Kennan T. Smith

Collaboration


Dive into the John L. Kelley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Isaac Namioka

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge