John M. Abukhalil

Real-Time Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Wall Motion During Bicycle and Treadmill Exercise Echocardiography: Comparison With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the feasibility and accuracy of real-time imaging of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in detecting myocardial perfusion defects during exercise echocardiography compared with radionuclide tomography. BACKGROUND Ultrasound imaging at a low mechanical index and frame rate (10 to 20 Hz) after intravenous injections of perfluorocarbon containing microbubbles has the potential to evaluate myocardial perfusion and wall motion (WVM) simultaneously and in real time. METHODS One hundred consecutive patients with intermediate-to-high probability of coronary artery disease underwent treadmill (n = 50) or supine bicycle (n = 50) exercise echocardiography. Segmental perfusion with MCE and WM w ere assessed in real time before and at peak exercise using low mechanical index (0.3) and frame rates of 10 to 20 Hz after 0.3 ml bolus injections of intravenous Optison (Mallinckrodt Inc., San Diego, California). All patients had a dual isotope (rest thallium-201, stress sestamibi) study performed during the same exercise session, and 44 patients had subsequent quantitative coronary angiography. RESULTS In the 100 patients, agreement between MCE and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was 76%, while it was 88% between MCE and WM assessment. Compared with quantitative angiography, sensitivity of MCE, SPECT and WM was comparable (75%), with a specificity ranging from 81% to 100%. The combination of MCE and WM had the best balance between sensitivity and specificity (86% and 88%,respectively) with the highest accuracy (86%). CONCLUSIONS The real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion during exercise stress echocardiography can be achieved with imaging at low mechanical index and frame rates. The combination of WM and MCE correlates well with SPECT and is a promising important addition to conventional stress echocardiography.

Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography to visual estimates of lesion severity pre and post PTCA

Quantitative coronary angiographic measurements and visual estimates of coronary lesion severity were compared prospectively before, immediately following, and 6 months following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Mean percent diameter stenosis before angioplasty was 87.9 +/- 9.9% by visual analysis and 64.6 +/- 9.2% by quantitative coronary angiography (p = 0.0001). Differences between these two techniques were also found immediately post-angioplasty (visual analysis 29.5 +/- 11.8%, quantitative coronary angiography 22.8 +/- 11.8%, p = 0.0002) and at 6 months (visual analysis 46.5 +/- 27.4%, quantitative coronary angiography 30.2 +/- 20.4%, p = 0.0001). These differences significantly affected the determination of restenosis by three definitions. (1) Lesion recurrence with greater than or equal to 50% stenosis at follow-up: 38 of 92 (41%) by visual analysis versus 20 of 92 (22%) by quantitative coronary angiography (p less than 0.01). (2) Increase of greater than or equal to 30% stenosis: 34 of 92 (37%) by visual analysis versus 20 of 92 (22%) by quantitative coronary angiography (p less than 0.01). (3) Loss of 50% of previous improvement: 31 of 92 (34%) by visual analysis versus 24 of 92 (26%) by quantitative coronary angiography (p = 0.08). In addition, determination of success or failure of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was affected by the interpretative technique, but these differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that visual estimates of lesion severity are consistently and significantly higher than quantitative measurements. Consequently, restenosis rates, using currently applied definitions, differ considerably depending on the method of analyzing lesion severity.

A Randomized Cross-Over Study for Evaluation of the Effect of Image Optimization With Contrast on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Dobutamine Echocardiography in Coronary Artery Disease. The OPTIMIZE Trial

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of a contrast agent to dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) improves its diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease (CAD) and to determine the effect of image quality on the diagnostic impact of contrast agent use in this setting. BACKGROUND Contrast agents can improve endocardial border definition. To date, however, there are no randomized trials that have evaluated the impact of contrast agent use on the accuracy of DSE. METHODS Patients referred for stress testing with dobutamine echocardiography underwent 2 DSE studies: 1 with and 1 without a contrast agent, at least 4 h apart in a randomized order and within a 24-h period. RESULTS A total of 101 patients underwent both DSE studies. Similar hemodynamics were achieved during the 2 stress testing sessions. The use of a contrast agent improved the percentage of segments adequately visualized at baseline (from 72 +/- 24% to 95 +/- 8%) and more so at peak stress (67 +/- 28% to 96 +/- 7%); both p < 0.001. Interpretation of wall motion with high confidence also increased with contrast agent use from 36% to 74% (p < 0.001). Segment visualization with the use of a contrast agent improved in all views, but was more pronounced in the apical views. In unenhanced DSE, 36% of studies were normal, 51% had ischemia, and 8% were uninterpretable-all of which became interpretable with the use of a contrast agent. When compared with angiography (n = 92; 55 patients with CAD), accurate detection of ischemia was higher with contrast-enhanced studies versus nonenhanced studies (p = 0.02). As endocardial visualization and confidence of interpretation decreased in unenhanced studies, a greater impact of the use of a contrast agent on DSE accuracy was observed (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS During dobutamine stress echocardiography, contrast agent administration improves endocardial visualization at rest and more so during stress, leading to a higher confidence of interpretation and greater accuracy in evaluating CAD. The lesser the endocardial border visualization, the higher the impact of contrast echocardiography on accuracy.

Supine bicycle versus post-treadmill exercise echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia: a randomized single-blind crossover trial.

OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the comparative accuracy of supine bicycle exercise echocardiography (SBE) and posttreadmill exercise echocardiography (TME) in detecting myocardial ischemia in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND Supine bicycle echocardiography and TME have been used for evaluation of CAD. However, the comparative accuracy of these modalities in the detection of ischemia in the same patients is not known. METHODS Seventy-four patients (age 59 +/- 9 years [mean +/- SD]) referred for evaluation of coronary disease underwent SBE (starting at 25 to 50 W with 25-W increment every 3 min) and post-TME (Bruce protocol) in a random sequence. Digitized images at baseline and maximal exercise were interpreted in a random and blinded fashion. RESULTS Maximal heart rate was higher during TME, whereas systolic blood pressure was higher during SBE, resulting in a similar double product. At quantitative angiography (n = 67), 57 patients had coronary stenosis (>50%). During SBE, ischemia was detected in 47 patients compared with 38 patients by TME (p < 0.001). Wall motion score index at maximal exercise was higher with SBE than with TME (1.48 +/- 0.51 vs. 1.38 +/- 0.43; p < 0.001). The extent of myocardial ischemia (number of ischemic segments) was higher during SBE compared with TME (3.3 +/- 3.4 vs. 2.3 +/- 2.9 segments; p = 0.004), whereas severity of abnormal wall motion was similar. The sensitivity of SBE and TME for CAD was 82% and 75% with a specificity of 80% and 90%, respectively. Image quality was similar with both techniques. Patients and sonographers favored SBE over TME. CONCLUSIONS During SBE and TME exercise, patients achieve a similar double product. During SBE, however, the detection of ischemia is more frequent and more extensive which, along with patient and sonographer preference, makes supine bicycle exercise a valuable stress echocardiographic modality.

Fate of side branches after intracoronary implantation of the Gianturco-Roubin Flex-Stent for acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Side branch occlusion may occur in the course of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), particularly if complicated by site dissection. Concern that the additional placement of a stent may further jeopardize side branches is logical. Consequently, this study analyzed pre-PTCA, post-PTCA, poststent, and 6-month follow-up angiograms of 100 consecutive patients in whom 103 Gianturco-Roubin stents were implanted for acute or threatened closure after PTCA. Side branches were defined as major (> 50% of the stented vessel diameter) and minor (< 50%). Minor branches, often < 1 mm in diameter, were assessed only for patency. One hundred eight major branches, of which 33 were diseased (> 50% stenosis), and 129 minor branches were analyzed. Seven major branches (6%), all of which were diseased before PTCA, and 23 minor branches (18%) were lost after PTCA. Immediately after stent insertion, only 1 additional major and 1 minor branch were lost, whereas 2 of 7 major (29%) and 9 of 23 minor (39%) branches reappeared. At follow-up angiography, 7 major branches (6%) were more stenosed and 6 (6%) were improved compared with the angiogram before PTCA. Only 2 major (2%) and 5 minor (4%) branches remained occluded. Additionally, 2 major and 1 minor branch, which were patent after PTCA and stenting, were occluded at follow-up as a result of total occlusion of the stented segment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)