John M. Hill

Group Medical Appointments: Organization and Implementation in the Bone Marrow Transplantation Clinic

Group medical appointments provide patients with prompt access to care, greater attention to their psychosocial needs, and increased time with their medical team. Care providers evaluate more patients with similar needs in a shorter period. Eligible patients (between 100 days and 3 years after autologous stem cell transplantation) were contacted to participate. The laboratory and radiographic results of each patients completed reevaluation were entered into the electronic template office note before their visit. A group medical visit model, called a Physical Shared Medical Appointment (PSMA), was employed because this uses individual patient examinations followed by a group meeting. On the day of the visit, brief physical examinations were performed on each patient. A transplantation physician then met with the group of patients and answered questions. Patient satisfaction surveys were distributed upon completion of the group session. Each PSMA was limited to 10 patients to facilitate patient participation. Questions during the group meeting were general and applicable to all patients. At completion of the 2-hour visit, patient surveys indicated an extremely high level of satisfaction and the preference to attend a future PSMA. Issues discussed during the group meeting were pertinent to all transplant recipients, regardless of diagnosis. The PSMA model allows the patient to spend extended time with their care providers while providing the care providers an opportunity to discuss health issues with numerous patients during 1 appointment. The Dartmouth Transplant PSMA model is expanding to pretransplantation and postallogeneic transplant recipients.

Implementation of peripheral blood CD34 analyses to initiate leukapheresis: marked reduction in resource utilization

BACKGROUND:  Analysis of the peripheral blood (PB) C34 value may determine the optimal time to initiate leukapheresis.

Ex vivo expansion of non-MHC-restricted cytotoxic effector cells as adoptive immunotherapy for myeloma

BACKGROUND PBMC can be expanded ex vivo into aggressive cytotoxic effector cells (CEC) comprising T, NK and NKT cells. We identified the phenotype, cytotoxicity and mechanisms of killing of these CEC. METHODS CY- and G-CSF-mobilized PBMC from myeloma patients were placed in Aim-V serum-free medium, IL-2 (50 IU/mL) and OKT-3 (50 ng/mL). Cytotoxicity was evaluated by selectively blocking the TCR, MHC class I or NKG2D receptor. RESULTS The CEC expanded three-fold by day 7 and aggressively lysed myeloma cells (41.9%) compared with day 0 (4%; P=0.012). CD8+ CD56+ NKT cells performed the majority of lysis. The CD8+ cells greatly increased NKG2D expression during culture (P=0.005). Cytotoxicity correlated with target NKG2D ligand expression (P=0.0002). Blocking the TCR or MHC class I did not affect cytotoxicity (P>0.22). CD8+ cell-mediated lysis dropped 48% when the NKG2D receptor was blocked. Day 7 CEC aggressively lysed myeloma cells in an MHC- and non-MHC-restricted fashion, through the NKG2D receptor. DISCUSSION Because MHC expression is often down-regulated on tumor cells and the NKG2D ligands are generally specific to malignant cells, the adoptive transfer of CEC that kill through different pathways may circumvent tumor-resistant mechanisms and improve outcomes.

Adoptive Cellular Therapy using Cells Enriched for NKG2D+CD3+CD8+T Cells after Autologous Transplantation for Myeloma

The number of circulating lymphocytes on day 15 after transplantation correlates with improved survival in patients with myeloma, but the lymphocyte subset responsible is unknown. NKG2D is a natural killer (NK) cell activating receptor that mediates non-MHC restricted and TCR-independent cell lysis. Our preliminary results indicate that CD3(+)CD8(+) T cells expressing NKG2D may be a critical lymphocyte population. A phase II trial examined the feasibility of infusing ex vivo-expanded cells enriched for NKG2D(+)CD3(+)CD8(+) T cells at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 after an autologous transplantation. In addition, low-dose IL-2 (6 × 10(5) IU/m(2)/day) was administered for 4 weeks, beginning on the day of transplantation. Twenty-three patients were accrued and 19 patients are evaluable. There were no treatment-related deaths. All patients completed their course of IL-2 and demonstrated normal engraftment. When compared with patients with myeloma who underwent transplantation not receiving posttransplantation immune therapy, the treated patients demonstrated an increase in the number of circulating NKG2D(+)CD3(+)CD8(+) T cells/μL (P < .004), CD3(+)CD8(+) T cells/μL (P < .04), CD3(+)CD8(+)CD56(+) T cells/μL (P < .004), and NKG2D(+)CD3(-)CD56(+) T cells/μL (P < .003). Myeloma cell-directed cytotoxicity by the circulating mononuclear cells increased after transplantation (P < .002). When compared to posttransplantation IL-2 therapy alone in this patient population, the addition of cells enriched for NKG2D(+)CD3(+)CD8(+) T cells increased tumor-specific immunity, as demonstrated by enhanced lysis of autologous myeloma cells (P = .02). We postulate that this regimen that increased the number and function of the NKG2D(+)CD3(+)CD8(+) T cells after transplantation may improve clinical outcomes by eliminating residual malignant cells in vivo.

Immune mobilization of autologous blood progenitor cells: direct influence on the cellular subsets collected

BACKGROUND AIMS A phase I trial examined the ability of immunotherapy to mobilize progenitor and activated T cells. METHODS Interleukin (IL)-2 was administered subcutaneously for 11 days, with granulocyte (G)-colony-stimulating factor (CSF) (5 mcg/kg/day) and granulocyte-macrophage (GM)-CSF (7.5 mcg/kg/day) added for the last 5 days. Leukapheresis was initiated on day 11. Thirteen patients were treated (myeloma n = 11, non-Hodgkins lymphoma n = 2). RESULTS Toxicities were minimal. IL-2 was stopped in two patients because of capillary leak (n = 1) and diarrhea (n = 1). Each patient required 2.5 leukaphereses (median; range 1-3) to collect 3.2 x 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg (median; range 1.9-6.6 x 10⁶/kg). Immune mobilization increased the number of CD3+ CD8+ T cells (P = 0.002), CD56+ natural killer (NK) cells (P = 0.0001), CD8+ CD56+ T cells (P = 0.002) and CD4+ CD25+ cells (P = 0.0001) compared with cancer patients mobilized with G-CSF alone. There was increased lysis of myeloma cells after 7 days (P = 0.03) or 11 days (P = 0.02). The maximum tolerated dose of IL-2 was 1 x 10⁶ IU/m²/day. CONCLUSIONS Immune mobilization is well tolerated with normal subsequent marrow engraftment. As cells within the graft influence lymphocyte recovery, an increased number of functional lymphocytes may result in more rapid immune reconstitution.

The practical application of chimerism analyses in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients: Blood chimerism is equivalent to marrow chimerism

BACKGROUND Chimerism defines the amount of donor versus recipient hematopoiesis following allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). PCR-based analyses of short tandem repeats (STRs) are commonly used and are accurate and applicable to allogeneic transplant recipients. These analyses are performed on blood and marrow aspirates, but it is unknown if analyses of both are required. We performed a retrospective analysis of 42 consecutive adult allogeneic SCT recipients at our institution to determine if both sample types are needed. METHODS Chimerism status was determined by multiplex PCR and capillary electrophoresis of STRs. Analyses were performed at 30, 60, and 90days after SCT on both unfractionated blood and unfractionated marrow aspirate. RESULTS PCR analyses of STRs for chimerism performed on unfractionated blood highly correlated with results obtained using unfractionated marrow aspirates at 30, 60, or 90days following transplant (p<0.0001 for each time point). Overall and relapse-free survival of patients experiencing full donor chimerism was not statistically different from patients demonstrating mixed chimerism at days 30, 60, and 90 following SCT. CONCLUSIONS PCR-based chimerism analyses on blood provide similar information as marrow aspirate analyses. These are unique results suggesting that chimerism analyses may be assessed on peripheral blood alone.