Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John M. Kulicki.
NCHRP Web Document | 2014
Wagdy G. Wassef; John M. Kulicki; Hani Nassif; Dennis R. Mertz; Andrzej S. Nowak
The notion of limit state is fundamental in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO LRFD). A limit state is defined as the boundary between acceptable and unacceptable performance of the structure or its component. The strength, or ultimate, limit states (ULS) of the AASHTO LRFD are calibrated through structural-reliability theory to achieve a certain level of safety. Exceeding the strength limit state results in a collapse or failure, an event that should not occur any time during the lifetime of the structure. Therefore, there is a need for an adequate safety margin expressed in the form of a target reliability index, βT. For bridge girders, the target reliability is taken as, βT = 3.5. The strength limit states do not consider the integration of the daily, seasonal, and long-term service stresses that directly affect long-term bridge performance and subsequent service life. The current service limit states (SLS) of the AASHTO LRFD are intended to ensure a serviceable bridge for the design life; assumed to be 75 years in AASHTO LRFD. When the SLS is exceeded, repair or replacement of components may be needed, repeatedly exceeding SLS can lead to deterioration and eventually collapse or failure (ULS). In general, SLS can be exceeded but the frequency and magnitude have to be within acceptable limits. The current service limit states are based upon the traditional serviceability provisions of the Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. They are formulated to achieve component proportions similar to those of the Standard Specifications. However, these service limit states were not calibrated using reliability theory to truly achieve uniform probability of exceedence as the tools and data necessary to accomplish this calibration were not available to the code writers when AASHTO LRFD was developed. Currently, the development of calibrated service limit states remains a difficult task due to the lack of clear consequences of exceeding the SLS. This report presents the work performed on calibrating the service limit states related to concrete bridges in AASHTO LRFD.
NCHRP Report | 2010
Eric B. Williamson; Oguzhan Bayrak; G. Daniel Williams; Carrie Davis; Kirk A. Marchand; Aldo McKay; John M. Kulicki; Wagdy G. Wassef
NCHRP Report | 2006
John M. Kulicki; Wagdy G. Wassef; Danielle D Kleinhans; Chai H. Yoo; Andrzej S. Nowak; Mike Grubb
Transportation research circular | 2006
John M. Kulicki; Dennis R. Mertz
Building an International Community of Structural Engineers | 1996
Wagdy G. Wassef; John M. Kulicki; Philip A. Ritchie
Transportation Research Board 91st Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board | 2012
Andrzej S. Nowak; Przemyslaw Rakoczy; John M. Kulicki
Building an International Community of Structural Engineers | 1996
Dennis R. Mertz; John M. Kulicki
Restructuring: America and Beyond | 1995
John M. Kulicki; Wagdy G. Wassef
Building to Last | 1997
John M. Kulicki; Wagdy G. Wassef; Philip A. Ritchie
Building to Last | 1997
Dennis R. Mertz; John M. Kulicki