John M. Lasala
Washington University in St. Louis
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John M. Lasala.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2012
Patrick L. Whitlow; Ted Feldman; Wes R. Pedersen; D. Scott Lim; Robert Kipperman; Richard W. Smalling; Tanvir Bajwa; Howard C. Herrmann; John M. Lasala; James T. Maddux; Murat Tuzcu; Samir Kapadia; Alfredo Trento; Robert J. Siegel; Elyse Foster; Donald D. Glower; Laura Mauri; Saibal Kar
OBJECTIVES The EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) High Risk Study (HRS) assessed the safety and effectiveness of the MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) in patients with significant mitral regurgitation (MR) at high risk of surgical mortality rate. BACKGROUND Patients with severe MR (3 to 4+) at high risk of surgery may benefit from percutaneous mitral leaflet repair, a potentially safer approach to reduce MR. METHODS Patients with severe symptomatic MR and an estimated surgical mortality rate of ≥12% were enrolled. A comparator group of patients screened concurrently but not enrolled were identified retrospectively and consented to compare survival in patients treated by standard care. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients underwent the MitraClip procedure. Their mean age was 77 years, >50% had previous cardiac surgery, and 46 had functional MR and 32 degenerative MR. MitraClip devices were successfully placed in 96% of patients. Protocol-predicted surgical mortality rate in the HRS and concurrent comparator group was 18.2% and 17.4%, respectively, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons calculator estimated mortality rate was 14.2% and 14.9%, respectively. The 30-day procedure-related mortality rate was 7.7% in the HRS and 8.3% in the comparator group (p = NS). The 12-month survival rate was 76% in the HRS and 55% in the concurrent comparator group (p = 0.047). In surviving patients with matched baseline and 12-month data, 78% had an MR grade of ≤2+. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume improved from 172 ml to 140 ml and end-systolic volume improved from 82 ml to 73 ml (both p = 0.001). New York Heart Association functional class improved from III/IV at baseline in 89% to class I/II in 74% (p < 0.0001). Quality of life was improved (Short Form-36 physical component score increased from 32.1 to 36.1 [p = 0.014] and the mental component score from 45.5 to 48.7 [p = 0.065]) at 12 months. The annual rate of hospitalization for congestive heart failure in surviving patients with matched data decreased from 0.59 to 0.32 (p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS The MitraClip device reduced MR in a majority of patients deemed at high risk of surgery, resulting in improvement in clinical symptoms and significant left ventricular reverse remodeling over 12 months. (Pivotal Study of a Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair System [EVEREST II]; NCT00209274).
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2002
Deepak L. Bhatt; Michel E. Bertrand; Peter B. Berger; Philippe L. L’Allier; Issam Moussa; Jeffrey W. Moses; George Dangas; Megumi Taniuchi; John M. Lasala; David R. Holmes; Stephen G. Ellis; Eric J. Topol
OBJECTIVES We sought to determine whether clopidogrel is at least as efficacious as ticlopidine. BACKGROUND Several trials have supported the enhanced safety and tolerability of clopidogrel compared with ticlopidine after coronary stent deployment. However, none of these individual trials were powered to detect possible differences in the efficacy for reducing ischemic end points. METHODS Published data from trials and registries that compared clopidogrel with ticlopidine in patients receiving coronary stents were pooled, and a formal meta-analysis was performed. The rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as defined in each trial, was used as the primary end point. RESULTS There were a total of 13,955 patients. The pooled rate of major adverse cardiac events was 2.10% in the clopidogrel group and 4.04% in the ticlopidine group. After adjustment for heterogeneity in the trials, the odds ratio (OR) of having an ischemic event with clopidogrel, as compared with ticlopidine, was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 0.89, p = 0.002). Mortality was also lower in the clopidogrel group compared with the ticlopidine group-0.48% versus 1.09% (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.82; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Based on all available evidence from randomized clinical trials or registries, clopidogrel, in addition to better tolerability and fewer side effects, is at least as efficacious as ticlopidine in reducing MACE. This finding may be due to the more rapid onset of an antiplatelet effect seen with the loading dose of clopidogrel, which was used in most of these studies, or to better patient compliance with clopidogrel therapy. Therefore, clopidogrel plus aspirin should replace ticlopidine plus aspirin as the standard antiplatelet regimen after stent deployment.
Circulation | 2012
Matthew R. Reynolds; Elizabeth A. Magnuson; Kaijun Wang; Yang Lei; Katherine Vilain; Joshua Walczak; Susheel Kodali; John M. Lasala; William W. O'Neill; Charles J. Davidson; Craig R. Smith; Martin B. Leon; David J. Cohen
Background— In patients with severe aortic stenosis who cannot have surgery, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown to improve survival and quality of life compared with standard therapy, but the costs and cost-effectiveness of this strategy are not yet known. Methods and Results— The PARTNER trial randomized patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis who were not candidates for surgery to TAVR (n=179) or standard therapy (n=179). Empirical data regarding survival, quality of life, medical resource use, and hospital costs were collected during the trial and used to project life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and lifetime medical care costs to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of TAVR from a US perspective. For patients treated with TAVR, mean costs for the initial procedure and hospitalization were
Circulation | 2012
Matthew R. Reynolds; Elizabeth A. Magnuson; Kaijun Wang; Yang Lei; Katherine Vilain; Joshua Walczak; Susheel Kodali; John M. Lasala; William W. O'Neill; Charles J. Davidson; Craig R. Smith; Martin B. Leon; David J. Cohen
42 806 and
International Journal of Cardiology | 2013
Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Mario Bollati; Fabrizio Clementi; Davide Castagno; Bo Lagerqvist; José M. de la Torre Hernández; Juriën M. ten Berg; Bruce R. Brodie; Philip Urban; Lisette Okkels Jensen; Gabriel Sardi; Ron Waksman; John M. Lasala; Stefanie Schulz; Gregg W. Stone; Flavio Airoldi; Antonio Colombo; Gilles Lemesle; Robert J. Applegate; Piergiovanni Buonamici; Ajay J. Kirtane; Anetta Undas; Imad Sheiban; Fiorenzo Gaita; Giuseppe Sangiorgi; Maria Grazia Modena; Giacomo Frati; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
78 542, respectively. Follow-up costs through 12 months were lower with TAVR (
Circulation | 1996
Luigi Oltrona; Paul R. Eisenberg; John M. Lasala; David J. Sewall; Marc E. Shelton; Kenneth J. Winters
29 289 versus
Circulation-cardiovascular Interventions | 2009
John M. Lasala; David A. Cox; David Dobies; Kenneth Baran; William Bachinsky; Edwin W. Rogers; Jeffrey A. Breall; David H. Lewis; Aijun Song; Ruth M. Starzyk; Stephen R. Mascioli; Keith D. Dawkins; Donald S. Baim
53 621) because of reduced hospitalization rates, but cumulative 1-year costs remained higher (
Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions | 2012
Steven P. Marso; Paul S. Teirstein; Jeffrey W. Moses; John M. Lasala; J. Aaron Grantham
106 076 versus
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2008
John M. Lasala; David A. Cox; David Dobies; Joseph B. Muhlestein; John N. Katopodis; George Revtyak; Donald S. Baim
53 621). We projected that over a patients lifetime, TAVR would increase discounted life expectancy by 1.6 years (1.3 quality-adjusted life-years) at an incremental cost of
Circulation-cardiovascular Interventions | 2009
John M. Lasala; David A. Cox; David Dobies; Kenneth Baran; William Bachinsky; Edwin W. Rogers; Jeffrey A. Breall; David H. Lewis; Aijun Song; Ruth M. Starzyk; Stephen R. Mascioli; Keith D. Dawkins; Donald S. Baim
79 837. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for TAVR was thus estimated at