John M. Roll

A within-subject comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar

In this experiment we compared three different schedules of reinforcement for promoting and sustaining short-term drug abstinence. For pragmatic reasons, cigarette smoking was studied as an exemplar of drug self-administration. The three schedules studied were a fixed magnitude of reinforcement for abstinence, a progressive increase in magnitude of reinforcement for abstinence with a reset contingency for drug use, and a progressive increase in magnitude of reinforcement for abstinence without a reset contingency. Eighteen cigarette smokers experienced the three schedules in a counterbalanced order. Each schedule was in effect for 5 consecutive days (M-F), during which time abstinence was reinforced according to the different schedules of reinforcement. The total amount of reinforcement (money) available was the same during each condition. The progressive magnitude with a reset schedule was more effective than the other two schedules in sustaining an initial period of abstinence. These results systematically replicate and extend those from prior studies demonstrating the efficacy of schedules incorporating a progressively increasing magnitude of reinforcement with a reset contingency for sustaining initial drug abstinence, and demonstrate the importance of the reset contingency to that effect.

The influence of exchange delays on cigarette versus money choice: a laboratory analog of voucher-based reinforcement therapy.

Contingency-management interventions that provide reinforcement in the form of exchangeable vouchers, contingent on drug abstinence, are among the most effective substance abuse treatment strategies available. Factors known to contribute to the efficacy of these interventions include voucher magnitude and the schedule with which vouchers are made available. Another potential factor may be the delay between earning a voucher and exchanging it for a desired good or service. The authors adapted a laboratory analog of a voucher program to examine the effects of immediacy of reinforcement and its interaction with reinforcer magnitude. Abstinent cigarette smokers made repeated choices between puffs on a cigarette and points worth a variety of monetary values (10 cents-2 dollars). The time at which these points could be exchanged for money varied from the end of the session to 1 or 3 weeks. Results indicated that longer exchange delays and tower magnitude reinforcers increased the number of choices for drug.

DO ANIMALS SATIATE OR HABITUATE TO REPEATEDLY PRESENTED REINFORCERS

Operant response rates may decrease within experimental sessions. The most likely explanation for the decrease is that satiation or habituation reduces the effectiveness of the repeatedly presented reinforcer. We argue that, contrary to intuition, both empirical and formal arguments favor habituation over satiation. Attributing the decreases in operant responding partly to habituation challenges the traditional assumption that habituation alters only reflexive behavior and does not occur to biologically significant stimuli. It preserves common terminology during operant and classical conditioning and when appetitive and aversive stimuli are used. It may provide a relatively general description of temporal changes in behavior in a wide variety of situations and may help to integrate motivational variables into theories of conditioning.

Reinforcement of counseling attendance and alcohol abstinence in a community-based dual-diagnosis treatment program: a feasibility study.

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a community-based contingency management (CM) protocol reinforcing punctual dual-diagnosis group counseling attendance and negative breath alcohol levels. Participants were 20 dual-diagnosis patients. The A-B-A within-subjects reversal design included a 4-week baseline phase (BL), a 12-week CM intervention, and a 4-week return-to-baseline phase (R-BL). Group counseling was provided twice weekly, with breath tests before each session. CM attendance rates were significantly higher (65%+-28%) than BL (45%+-32%, p<.05) and remained elevated in the R-BL phase (68%+-29%). Despite clinical reports of frequent intoxication, during the study all breath test results were negative, regardless of study phase. Thus, no contingency effect on alcohol use could be determined. Results suggest that CM interventions can be effective in increasing attendance in a community treatment program for the dually diagnosed.

Establishment of a diazepam preference in human volunteers following a differential-conditioning history of placebo versus diazepam choice.

This study examined whether preference for a drug (diazepam or placebo) could be switched using conditioning procedures. During the first 4 sessions of Phase 1, 6 participants received 5 mg of diazepam or placebo under double-blind conditions. During the remaining 5 sessions of Phase 1, participants selected the drug they wished to receive. The first 4 sessions of Phase 2 were a replication of Phase 1, except that following ingestion of the drug, participants completed a computer task for which they could earn money. Payment for the computer task was lowest following ingestion of the drug they preferred in Phase I and highest following the drug they had avoided. Preference was reassessed during the last 5 sessions of Phase 2. Five of the participants preferred placebo in Phase 1 but diazepam in Phase 2. Subjective responses to the drugs also changed across the 2 phases.

Improving On-Time Counseling Attendance in a Methadone Treatment Program: A Contingency Management Approach

Two studies were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of contingency management techniques in promoting punctual counseling attendance among methadone maintenance patients. In Study 1, 50 participants were recruited from an inner‐city methadone maintenance program. Study 1 used an A–B–A design with baseline, intervention, and return‐to‐baseline phases. On‐time attendance was reinforced during the intervention phase with a voucher that was redeemable for a draw out of a box containing 100 tokens with values varying from

Impulsivity and voucher versus money preference in polydrug-dependent participants enrolled in a contingency-management-based substance abuse treatment program

0.00 to

Relationship between tridimensional personality questionnaire scores and clinic attendance among cocaine abusing, buprenorphine maintained outpatients

100.00. Methadone maintenance patients who exhibited poor attendance during baseline showed a significant positive response during the contingency management intervention phase. Study 2 used the same design as Study 1 except that the 52 participants were randomized into reinforcement groups that received either the variable rate of reinforcement as in Study 1 or a fixed value reinforcer of

Cognitive function and nigrostriatal markers in abstinent methamphetamine abusers

3.25. As in Study 1, Poor Attenders significantly improved counseling attendance during the intervention. There were no differences between the variable and fixed reinforcement groups. Overall, results suggest that targeting Poor Attenders with contingency management techniques may be a cost‐effective method of improving counseling attendance. Targeting Poor Attenders early in treatment may be especially important for improving treatment outcomes.

Contingency management interventions for treating the substance abuse of adolescents: A feasibility study

Thirty-four polydrug-dependent participants enrolled in a voucher-based substance abuse treatment program were given choices between hypothetical amounts of money and hypothetical amounts of vouchers, which are traded for goods and services, to determine their preferences for the two payment modalities. It was hypothesized that the majority of participants would prefer money to voucher because under the circumstances of the treatment program, the delay associated with money exchange is shorter than the delay associated with voucher exchange. It was further hypothesized that those participants who selected money over voucher also would have greater levels of impulsivity as assessed by the Barratt Impulsiveness Rating Scale (BIS) (Barratt, 1965). The results show large individual differences in money/voucher preference with approximately half of the participants preferring money to voucher when the two amounts are equivalent. In addition, as the magnitude of the money/voucher comparisons increased from 0.50 dollars to 32.00 dollars, the percentage of participants that preferred money increased. No correlations were found between money/voucher preference and impulsivity scores.