John McCans

Aspirin, heparin, or both to treat acute unstable angina

We tested the usefulness of aspirin (325 mg twice daily), heparin (1000 units per hour by intravenous infusion), and a combination of the two in the early management of acute unstable angina pectoris in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 479 patients. The patients entered the study as soon as possible after hospital admission (at a mean [+/- SD] of 7.9 +/- 8.0 hours after the last episode of pain), and the study was ended after 6 +/- 3 days, when definitive therapy had been selected. Major end points--refractory angina, myocardial infarction, and death--occurred in 23, 12, and 1.7 percent of the 118 patients receiving placebo, respectively. Heparin was associated with a decrease in the occurrence of refractory angina (P = 0.002). The incidence of myocardial infarction was significantly reduced in the groups receiving aspirin (3 percent; P = 0.01), heparin (0.8 percent; P less than 0.001), and aspirin plus heparin (1.6 percent, P = 0.003), and no deaths occurred in these groups. There were too few deaths overall to permit evaluation of the effect of treatment on this end point. The combination of aspirin and heparin had no greater protective effect than heparin alone but was associated with slightly more serious bleeding (3.3 vs. 1.7 percent). We conclude that in the acute phase of unstable angina, either aspirin or heparin treatment is associated with a reduced incidence of myocardial infarction, and there is a trend favoring heparin over aspirin. Heparin treatment is also associated with a reduced incidence of refractory angina.

Reactivation of Unstable Angina after the Discontinuation of Heparin

BACKGROUND Heparin is an effective, widely used treatment for unstable angina. Among patients enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing intravenous heparin, aspirin, both treatments, and neither during the acute phase of unstable angina, we encountered patients in whom unstable angina was reactivated after heparin was discontinued. METHODS The study population included 403 of the original 479 patients in the trial who had completed six days of blinded therapy without refractory angina or myocardial infarction. After the discontinuation of therapy, clinical events, including reactivation of unstable angina and myocardial infarction occurring within 96 hours after hospitalization, were closely monitored. RESULTS Early reactivation occurred in 14 of the 107 patients who received heparin alone, as compared with only 5 patients in each of the other three study groups (P less than 0.01). These reactivations required urgent intervention (thrombolysis, angioplasty, or coronary-bypass surgery) in 11 patients treated with heparin alone, but in only 2 patients in the other groups combined (P less than 0.01). Four of the six patients who had a myocardial infarction during a reactivation of their disease were in the heparin group. Reactivations in this group occurred in a cluster a mean (+/- SD) of 9.5 +/- 5 hours after the discontinuation of the study drug but were randomly distributed over the initial 96 hours in the other three groups. CONCLUSIONS Although heparin is beneficial in treating unstable angina, the disease process may be reactivated within hours of the discontinuation of this drug. Concomitant therapy with aspirin may prevent this withdrawal phenomenon.

A comparison of management patterns after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States

BACKGROUND There are major differences in the organization of the health care systems in Canada and the United States. We hypothesized that these differences may be accompanied by differences in patient care. METHODS To test our hypothesis, we compared the treatment patterns for patients with acute myocardial infarction in 19 Canadian and 93 United States hospitals participating in the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) study, which tested the effectiveness of captopril in this population of patients after a myocardial infarction. RESULTS In Canada, 51 percent of the patients admitted to a participating coronary care unit had acute myocardial infarctions, as compared with only 35 percent in the United States (P < 0.001). Despite the similar clinical characteristics of the 1573 U.S. patients and 658 Canadian patients participating in the study, coronary arteriography was more commonly performed in the United States than in Canada (in 68 percent vs. 35 percent, P < 0.001), as were revascularization procedures before randomization (31 percent vs. 12 percent, P < 0.001). During an average follow-up of 42 months, these procedures were also performed more commonly in the United States than in Canada. These differences were not associated with any apparent difference in mortality (22 percent in Canada and 23 percent in the United States) or rate of reinfarction (14 percent in Canada and 13 percent in the United States), but there was a higher incidence of activity-limiting angina in Canada than in the United States (33 percent vs. 27 percent, P < 0.007). CONCLUSIONS The threshold for the admission of patients to a coronary care unit or for the use of invasive diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the early and late periods after an infarction is higher in Canada than in the United States. This is not associated with any apparent difference in the rate of reinfarction or survival, but is associated with a higher frequency of activity-limiting angina.

Prognostic value of neurohumoral activation in patients with an acute myocardial infarction: effect of captopril.

OBJECTIVES This study attempted to evaluate whether neurohumoral activation at the time of hospital discharge in postinfarction patients helps to predict long-term prognosis and whether long-term therapy with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril modifies this relation. BACKGROUND Neurohumoral activation persists at the time of hospital discharge in a large number of postinfarction patients. The Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) study demonstrated that the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril improves survival and decreases the development of severe heart failure in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%) but no overt postinfarction heart failure. METHODS In 534 patients in the SAVE study, plasma neurohormone levels were measured a mean of 12 days after infarction. Patients were then randomized to receive captopril or placebo and were followed up for a mean (+/- SD) of 38 +/- 6 months (range 24 to 55). The association between activation of plasma neurohormones at baseline and subsequent cardiovascular mortality or the development of heart failure was assessed with and without adjustment for other important prognostic factors. RESULTS By univariate analysis, activation of plasma renin activity and aldosterone, norepinephrine, atrial natriuretic peptide and arginine vasopressin levels were related to subsequent cardiovascular events, whereas epinephrine and dopamine levels were not. By multivariate analysis, only plasma renin activity (relative risk 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 2.5) and atrial natriuretic peptide (relative risk 2.2, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.8) were independently predictive of cardiovascular mortality, whereas the other neurohormones were not. Only plasma renin activity and aldosterone, atrial natriuretic peptide and arginine vasopressin were independent predictors of the combined end points of cardiovascular mortality, development of severe heart failure or recurrent myocardial infarction. Except for 1-year cardiovascular mortality, the use of captopril did not significantly modify these relations. CONCLUSIONS Neurohumoral activation at the time of hospital discharge in postinfarction patients is an independent sign of poor prognosis. This is particularly true for plasma renin activity and atrial natriuretic peptide. Except for 1-year cardiovascular mortality, captopril does not significantly modify these relations.

Activation of neurohumoral systems in postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVES This study was conducted to evaluate the degree of neurohumoral activation around the time of hospital discharge after myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND Because pharmacologic interventions that block the effects of neurohumoral activation improve the prognosis after infarction, we hypothesized that widespread neurohumoral activation persists in some patients until at least the time of hospital discharge and that the determinants of activation vary from one system to another. METHODS Five hundred nineteen patients in the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Study (SAVE) had plasma neurohormones measured before randomization at a mean of 12 days after infarction. All patients had left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%) but no overt heart failure. RESULTS Although all neurohormones except epinephrine were increased compared with values in age-matched control subjects, plasma norepinephrine (301 +/- 193 vs. 222 +/- 87 pg/ml, p < 0.001), renin activity (3.0 +/- 3.7 vs. 1.2 +/- 1.2 ng/ml per h, p < 0.001), arginine vasopressin (1.9 +/- 6.9 vs. 0.7 +/- 0.3 pg/ml, p < 0.001) and atrial natriuretic peptide (75 +/- 75 vs. 21 +/- 9 pg/ml, p < 0.001) values ranged from normal to very high, indicating a wide spectrum of neurohumoral activation. Activation of one system did not correlate with activation of another. The clinical and laboratory variables most closely associated with neurohumoral activation were Killip class, left ventricular ejection fraction, age and use of diuretic drugs. The association between neurohumoral activation and clinical and laboratory variables varied from one neurohormone to another. CONCLUSIONS Neurohumoral activation occurs in a significant proportion of patients at the time of hospital discharge after infarction. Which neurohormone is activated and which clinical and laboratory variables determine this activation vary from one neurohormone to another.

Activation of neurohumoral systems following acute myocardial infarction

Previous studies have indicated that patients with an acute myocardial infarction have marked activation of all neurohumoral systems on admission to the hospital. This activation begins to subside within the first 72 hours so that by 7-10 days, all plasma neurohormones have returned to normal. The only documented exceptions were found to occur in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and overt heart failure, where both plasma renin activity and atrial natriuretic peptide were increased, and in patients with left ventricular dysfunction but no overt heart failure, where only atrial natriuretic peptide was increased. Although these studies suggest that neurohumoral activation rarely occurs at the time of hospital discharge, they were small and may have missed an important subgroup of patients with persistent neurohumoral activation. In the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) study, 522 patients had plasma neurohumoral levels measured at a mean of 12 days postinfarction. All SAVE patients had left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 40%), but no overt heart failure. In this group of patients, all neurohumoral levels (plasma renin activity, norepinephrine, arginine vasopressin, and atrial natriuretic peptide) were found to be increased compared with age-matched control subjects. These results indicate that, in fact, a subgroup of patients without overt heart failure has persistent neurohumoral activation at the time of hospital discharge postinfarction, and that this activation involves several neurohumoral systems. Since patients with persistent neurohumoral activation postinfarction are likely those most at risk of developing complications and the ones most likely to benefit from pharmacologic interventions blunting the effects of neurohumoral activation, measurement of predischarge neurohumoral levels may be useful.

Serial exercise testing in patients with effort angina: Variable tolerance, fixed threshold

To investigate the frequency and mechanism of variable threshold angina, seven treadmill exercise tests were performed in each of 28 patients with stable effort angina and exercise-induced ST segment depression. Each patient had tests at 8 AM on 4 days within a 2 week period and on 1 of these days had three additional tests at 9 AM, 11 AM and 4 PM. Time to 1 mm ST depression increased from 277 +/- 172 seconds on day 1 to 319 +/- 186 seconds on day 2, 352 +/- 213 seconds on day 3 and 356 +/- 207 seconds on day 4 (p less than 0.05). Rate-pressure product at 1 mm ST depression remained constant. Similarly, time to 1 mm ST depression increased from 333 +/- 197 seconds at 8 AM to 371 +/- 201 seconds at 9 AM and to 401 +/- 207 seconds at 11 AM and decreased to 371 +/- 189 seconds at 4 PM (p less than 0.01). Again, rate-pressure product at 1 mm ST depression remained constant. The standard deviation for time to 1 mm ST depression, calculated as a percent of the mean for each patients seven tests and then averaged for the entire group, was 22 +/- 11%. The standard deviation for rate-pressure product at 1 mm ST depression, calculated in the same way, was significantly less at 8.4 +/- 2.8% (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Determinants and significance of diltiazem plasma concentrations after acute myocardial infarction

A total of 1,975 plasma diltiazem concentrations were obtained from 1,067 patients enrolled in a multicenter secondary intervention study of diltiazem after acute myocardial infarction. To evaluate the determinants and significance of diltiazem concentrations in this patient population, we related drug concentrations to a variety of clinical variables recorded on the case history forms. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that (1) time from the last drug dose, (2) drug dose taken, (3) patient height (an index of lean body weight), and (4) patient age were important determinants of plasma concentration. For an equivalent dose, plasma diltiazem concentrations in a 75-year-old patient were about double those of a 25-year-old patient. Total weight and drug dose prescribed did not significantly affect plasma concentrations. Whereas drug concentrations were higher (p = 0.01) among patients with left-sided heart failure, they were not altered by renal dysfunction, hepatic disease or beta blockers. Diltiazem concentrations were a significant determinant of diastolic arterial pressure (p less than 10(-9), but neither systolic pressure nor heart rate were significantly related to diltiazem concentration. The overall incidence of adverse experiences was not related to drug concentrations, but the occurrence of second- and third-degree atrioventricular block in the coronary care unit and the need for a temporary pacemaker were substantially higher among patients with a drug concentration greater than 150 ng/ml (7.4 and 1.9%, respectively) than among patients with lower concentrations (2.6% for atrioventricular block, 0.3% for pacemaker; p = 0.02 for each). The risk of atrioventricular block was particularly increased by high diltiazem concentrations in the face of acute inferior infarction. These results suggest that diltiazems pharmacologic and clinical effects in a large population are concentration-related, and that the consideration of patient size, age, and left ventricular function in selecting a diltiazem dose may allow for effective drug therapy with a reduced likelihood of adverse effects.