John N. Eble

The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Five years after the last prostatic carcinoma grading consensus conference of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP), accrual of new data and modification of clinical practice require an update of current pathologic grading guidelines. This manuscript summarizes the proceedings of the ISUP consensus meeting for grading of prostatic carcinoma held in September 2019, in Nice, France. Topics brought to consensus included the following: (1) approaches to reporting of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 quantities, and minor/tertiary patterns, (2) an agreement to report the presence of invasive cribriform carcinoma, (3) an agreement to incorporate intraductal carcinoma into grading, and (4) individual versus aggregate grading of systematic and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies. Finally, developments in the field of artificial intelligence in the grading of prostatic carcinoma and future research perspectives were discussed.

The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder

In October 1997, Dr. F.K. Mostofi assembled a group of individuals interested in bladder neoplasia at a meeting in Washington DC. The participants included urologic pathologists, urologists, urologic oncologists, and basic scientists with an interest in bladder neoplasia. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss bladder terminology and make recommendations to the World Health Organization (WHO) Committee on urothelial tumors. Following this meeting, a group of the urologic pathologists who attended the Washington meeting decided to broaden the representation of the group and arranged a meeting primarily of the members of the International Society of Urologic Pathologists (ISUP) at the 1998 United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology Meeting held in Boston. Massachusetts. At this meeting. issues regarding terminology of bladder lesions, primarily neoplastic and putative preneoplastic lesions, were discussed, resulting in a consensus statement. The WHO/ ISUP consensus classification arises from this consensus conference committees recommendations to the WHO planning committee and their agreement with virtually all of the proposals presented herein. 29 The effort involved in reaching such a consensus was often considerable. Many of those involved in this process have compromised to arrive at a consensus. The aim was to develop a universally acceptable classification system for bladder neoplasia that could be used effectively by pathologists, urologists, and oncologists.

Xp11 Translocation renal cell carcinoma in adults: Expanded clinical, pathologic, and genetic spectrum

The recently recognized Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), all of which bear gene fusions involving the TFE3 transcription factor gene, comprise at least one-third of pediatric RCC. Only rare adult cases have been reported, without detailed pathologic analysis. We identified and analyzed 28 Xp11 translocation RCC in patients over the age of 20 years. All cases were confirmed by TFE3 immunohistochemistry, a sensitive and specific marker of neoplasms with TFE3 gene fusions, which can be applied to archival material. Three cases were also confirmed genetically. Patients ranged from ages 22 to 78 years, with a strong female predominance (F:M=22:6). These cancers tended to present at advanced stage; 14 of 28 presented at stage 4, whereas lymph nodes were involved by metastatic carcinoma in 11 of 13 cases in which they were resected. Previously not described and distinctive clinical presentations included dense tumor calcifications such that the tumor mimicked renal lithiasis, and obstruction of the renal pelvis promoting extensive obscuring xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Previously unreported morphologic variants included tumor giant cells, fascicles of spindle cells, and a biphasic appearance that simulated the RCC characterized by a t(6;11)(p21;q12) chromosome translocation. One case harbored a novel variant translocation, t(X;3)(p11;q23). Five of 6 patients with 1 or more years of follow-up developed hematogenous metastases, with 2 dying within 1 year of diagnosis. Xp11 translocation RCC can occur in adults, and may be aggressive cancers that require morphologic distinction from clear cell and papillary RCC. Although they may be uncommon on a percentage basis, given the vast predominance of RCC in adults compared with children, adult Xp11 translocation RCC may well outnumber their pediatric counterparts.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atria reduces inducibility and duration of atrial fibrillation in dogs

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to prevent induction of sustained atrial fibrillation (AF) by radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of the atria in an open-chest canine model. METHODS AND RESULTS In dogs randomized to acute studies, RFCA of the atria was performed after reproducible induction of sustained AF (lasting > 30 minutes) with burst stimulation or premature atrial pacing and perpetuation by low level cervical vagal stimulation or IV infusion of methacholine. Additionally, in four dogs, the long-term effectiveness of RFCA was assessed 7 to 21 days after ablation. Continuous discrete transmural lesions were produced with radiofrequency energy pulses (20 to 40 W for 60 seconds) delivered to five atrial epicardial sites and endovascularly to the coronary sinus wall. RFCA electrically isolated regions of the atria that became dissociated from the nonisolated parts. Atrial RFCA markedly attenuated vagally induced shortening of effective refractory period (ERP) at both isolated and nonisolated test sites located in the left and right atria (P < .001, n = 5). RFCA rendered noninducible sustained AF maintained by cervical vagal stimulation. The dose-response curve relating the dose of methacholine required to maintain AF was shifted down and to the right. AF was only inducible with high doses of methacholine. Atrial RFCA reduced the maximal sinus rate and prolonged the corrected sinus-node recovery time (P < .001, n = 6). However, RFCA did not affect atrial contractile function, AV-nodal ERP, or AV-nodal or His-Purkinje conduction times. In dogs in the chronic group, normal sinus rhythm and normal AV conduction were preserved and AF was only inducible with a high dose of methacholine. No atrial perforations resulted. CONCLUSIONS RFCA in open-chest dogs produces partial vagal denervation and reduces the inducibility of AF.

OCT4 staining in testicular tumors: A sensitive and specific marker for seminoma and embryonal carcinoma

OCT4 (POU5F1) is a transcription factor expressed in embryonic stem and germ cells and is involved in the regulation and maintenance of pluripotency. It has been detected in primary testicular germ cell tumors with pluripotent potential, seminoma, and embryonal carcinoma. We undertook immunohistochemical staining of OCT4 in a wide variety of primary testicular neoplasms (germ cell tumors and other tumors) to assess the specificity and usefulness of this marker as a diagnostic tool. We examined histologic sections from 91 primary testicular neoplasms, including 64 cases of mixed germ cell tumors containing embryonal carcinoma (54), seminoma (51), yolk sac tumor (38), mature teratoma (31), immature teratoma (20), and choriocarcinoma (15). In addition, we examined sections from spermatocytic seminomas (5), Leydig cell tumors (8), Sertoli cell tumors (6), unclassified sex-cord stromal tumors (4), adenomatoid tumors (2), testicular tumor of adrenogenital syndrome (1), and granulosa cell tumor (1). Each tumor was examined with hematoxylin and eosin staining and with antibodies to OCT4. In all cases of mixed germ cell tumor with components of embryonal carcinoma (54) and seminoma (51), there was greater than 90% nuclear staining of the embryonal carcinoma and seminoma tumor cells with little to no background staining. In all but 1 of these cases (embryonal carcinoma), there was strong (3+) staining intensity. The other germ cell tumor components (yolk sac tumor, mature teratoma, immature teratoma, and choriocarcinoma) showed no staining. Syncytiotrophoblast cells, which were present in 15 of the cases, were also completely negative, as were all 5 of the spermatocytic seminomas. The 22 cases of non-germ cell tumors were all immunohistochemically negative for OCT4. Fifteen of the 54 germ cell tumors containing embryonal carcinoma were also examined with antibodies to CD30. These embryonal carcinoma components were all positive for CD30 with staining of greater than 90% of the tumor cells but with variable staining intensity. We conclude that immunostaining with antibodies to OCT4 is a useful diagnostic tool in the identification of primary testicular embryonal carcinomas and “usual,” but not spermatocytic, seminomas. OCT4 immunostaining has comparable sensitivity but greater consistency compared with CD30 in the diagnosis of embryonal carcinoma.

Morphologic and molecular characterization of renal cell carcinoma in children and young adults

A new WHO classification of renal cell carcinoma has been introduced in 2004. This classification includes the recently described renal cell carcinomas with the ASPL-TFE3 gene fusion and carcinomas with a PRCC-TFE3 gene fusion. Collectively, these tumors have been termed Xp11.2 or TFE3 translocation carcinomas, which primarily occur in children and young adults. To further study the characteristics of renal cell carcinoma in young patients and to determine their genetic background, 41 renal cell carcinomas of patients younger than 22 years were morphologically and genetically characterized. Loss of heterozygosity analysis of the von Hippel-Lindau gene region and screening for VHL gene mutations by direct sequencing were performed in 20 tumors. TFE3 protein overexpression, which correlates with the presence of a TFE3 gene fusion, was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Applying the new WHO classification for renal cell carcinoma, there were 6 clear cell (15%), 9 papillary (22%), 2 chromophobe, and 2 collecting duct carcinomas. Eight carcinomas showed translocation carcinoma morphology (20%). One carcinoma occurred 4 years after a neuroblastoma. Thirteen tumors could not be assigned to types specified by the new WHO classification: 10 were grouped as unclassified (24%), including a unique renal cell carcinoma with prominently vacuolated cytoplasm and WT1 expression. Three carcinomas occurred in combination with nephroblastoma. Molecular analysis revealed deletions at 3p25-26 in one translocation carcinoma, one chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and one papillary renal cell carcinoma. There were no VHL mutations. Nuclear TFE3 overexpression was detected in 6 renal cell carcinomas, all of which showed areas with voluminous cytoplasm and foci of papillary architecture, consistent with a translocation carcinoma phenotype. The large proportion of TFE3 “translocation” carcinomas and “unclassified” carcinomas in the first two decades of life demonstrates that renal cell carcinomas in young patients contain genetically and phenotypically distinct tumors with further potential for novel renal cell carcinoma subtypes. The far lower frequency of clear cell carcinomas and VHL alterations compared with adults suggests that renal cell carcinomas in young patients have a unique genetic background.

Clear Cell Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma : A Distinct Histopathologic and Molecular Genetic Entity

A group of renal tumors composed mainly of cells with clear cytoplasm arranged in papillary patterns and arising in end-stage kidneys has recently been identified. The aim of our study is to investigate the cytogenetic and immunohistochemical phenotypes of these unusual renal tumors, and of morphologically similar tumors arising in kidneys unaffected by end-stage renal disease. Seven tumors from 5 patients (age range: 53 to 64 y, mean: 60 y; 3 men and 2 women) were identified. Sections were obtained from paraffin blocks, including the tumors and adjacent non-neoplastic renal parenchyma. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed with centromeric probes for chromosomes 3, 7, 17, Y, and with a subtelomeric probe for 3p25. Immunohistochemistry was performed with antibodies against cytokeratin 7, carbonic anhydrase IX, α-methylacyl-CoA racemase, CD10, and transcription factor E3. Four of the tumors were from patients who did not have end-stage renal disease. One patient had end-stage renal disease and presented with 3 morphologically identical tumors, composed of clear cells arranged in a mixture of cystic and papillary structures. Follow-up data were available from all patients and none showed recurrence or metastasis (mean follow-up: 24 mo). All 7 tumors (ranging from 4 to 50 mm in diameter) were stage pT1. All tumors lacked the gains of chromosome 7 and losses of chromosome Y that are typical of papillary renal cell carcinoma. Only 1 tumor showed gain of chromosome 17. Deletion of 3p, usually seen in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, was not detected. All tumors showed strongly positive immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin 7 and carbonic anhydrase IX and negative immunostaining with antibodies against α-methylacyl-CoA racemase, CD10, and transcription factor E3. In conclusion, clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma can arise in otherwise normal kidneys and in kidneys with end-stage renal disease. This tumor has immunophenotypic and genetic profiles distinct from those of either classic papillary or clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and should be considered a distinct entity in the spectrum of renal cell neoplasia.

Molecular Genetic Evidence for a Common Clonal Origin of Urinary Bladder Small Cell Carcinoma and Coexisting Urothelial Carcinoma

In most cases, small-cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder is admixed with other histological types of bladder carcinoma. To understand the pathogenetic relationship between the two tumor types, we analyzed histologically distinct tumor cell populations from the same patient for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and X chromosome inactivation (in female patients). We examined five polymorphic microsatellite markers located on chromosome 3p25-26 (D3S3050), chromosome 9p21 (IFNA and D9S171), chromosome 9q32-33 (D9S177), and chromosome 17p13 (TP53) in 20 patients with small-cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder and concurrent urothelial carcinoma. DNA samples were prepared from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections using laser-assisted microdissection. A nearly identical pattern of allelic loss was observed in the two tumor types in all cases, with an overall frequency of allelic loss of 90% (18 of 20 cases). Three patients showed different allelic loss patterns in the two tumor types at a single locus; however, the LOH patterns at the remaining loci were identical. Similarly, the same pattern of nonrandom X chromosome inactivation was present in both carcinoma components in the four cases analyzed. Concordant genetic alterations and X chromosome inactivation between small-cell carcinoma and coexisting urothelial carcinoma suggest that both tumor components originate from the same cells in the urothelium.

Eosinophilic and classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas have similar frequent losses of multiple chromosomes from among chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17, and this pattern of genetic abnormality is not present in renal oncocytoma

That chromophobe renal cell carcinoma has an uncommon eosinophilic variant has been recognized for more than a decade. In sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, the eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma are similar in appearance. While it is well established that chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma have different patterns of genetic anomalies, little is known of the genetics of the eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. This study was undertaken to elucidate the genetic lesions of eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and to compare them with those found in classic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and in renal oncocytoma. A total of 29 renal neoplasms—nine eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, 10 classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, and 10 oncocytomas—were investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization on 5 μm paraffin-embedded tissue sections with centromeric probes for chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17. Signals were counted in 100–200 neoplastic nuclei from each tumor. Chromophobe renal cell carcinomas frequently showed loss of chromosomes 1 (70% of classic, 67% of eosinophilic), 2 (90% classic, 56% eosinophilic), 6 (80% classic, 56% eosinophilic), 10 (60% classic, 44% eosinophilic), and 17 (90% classic, 78% eosinophilic); Among the classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, only one had no loss of any of the chromosomes, while 50% had loss of all five chromosomes. Among the eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, one of nine had no loss and 44% had loss of all five chromosomes. One oncocytoma had loss of chromosome 1. No other chromosomal loss was detected in the oncocytomas. In conclusion, losses of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17 are frequent in both eosinophilic and classic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. Loss of chromosome 1 occurs occasionally in oncocytoma but losses of chromosomes 2, 6, 10, and 17 are not found in oncocytomas. When the differential diagnostic problem is oncocytoma vs eosinophilic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, detection of losses of chromosomes 2, 6, 10, or 17 effectively excludes the diagnosis of oncocytoma and supports the diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Pathology of the Prostate

Embryology and Postnatal Development of the Prostate. Anatomy and Normal Histology of the Human Prostate. Aspiration Biopsy and Prostate Cytology. Critical Assessment of Inflammatory Lesions of the Prostate, Including Cytopathologic Appearances and Diagnosis. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Differential Diagnosis of Prostatic Intraglandular Proliferative Lesions. Small Glandular Patternsin the Prostate Gland: The Differential Diagnosis of Small Acinar Carcinoma. Basal Cell Proliferations and Tumours of the Prostate. Examination of Radical Prostactectomy Specimens: Therapeutic and Prognostic Significance. Grading Prostate Cancer. Pathologic Features that Predict Progression of Disease Following Radical Prostatectomy. Histologic Features of Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Relationships Between Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen and Histopathologic Appearances of Prostate Carcinoma. Histochemistry of the Prostate, Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Altered By Ionizing Radiation with and Without Neoadjuvant Antiandrogen Hormonal Ablation. DNA Flow Cytometry and Immunohistochemistry of P53 Pathway Genes as Predictive Modalities in Localized Prostate Cancer. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Carcinoma. Identification and Pathologic Significance of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Human Prostate Carcinoma. Soft Tissue Neoplasms and Other Unusual Tumours of Prostate, Including Uncommon Carcinomas. Significance of Neovascularity in Human Prostate Carcinoma. Chromosomal Abnormalities in Human Prostate Cancer: Their Detection and Pathologic Significance.