Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John N. Sofos is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John N. Sofos.


Journal of Food Protection | 2000

Microbial Populations on Animal Hides and Beef Carcasses at Different Stages of Slaughter in Plants Employing Multiple-Sequential Interventions for Decontamination

R. T. Bacon; K. E. Belk; John N. Sofos; R. P. Clayton; James O. Reagan; G. C. Smith

Multiple-sequential interventions were applied commercially to reduce beef carcass contamination in eight packing plants. The study evaluated microbial populations on animal hides and changes in carcass microbial populations at various stages in the slaughtering process. Sponge swab samples yielded mean (log CFU/100 cm2) total plate counts (TPC), total coliform counts (TCC), and Escherichia coli counts (ECC) on the exterior hide in the ranges of 8.2 to 12.5, 6.0 to 7.9, and 5.5 to 7.5, respectively, while corresponding contamination levels on carcass surfaces, after hide removal but before application of any decontamination intervention, were in the ranges of 6.1 to 9.1, 3.0 to 6.0, and 2.6 to 5.3, respectively. Following the slaughtering process and application of multiple-sequential decontamination interventions that included steam vacuuming, pre-evisceration carcass washing, pre-evisceration organic acid solution rinsing, hot water carcass washing, postevisceration final carcass washing, and postevisceration organic acid solution rinsing, mean TPC, TCC, and ECC on carcass surfaces were 3.8 to 7.1, 1.5 to 3.7, and 1.0 to 3.0, respectively, while corresponding populations following a 24 to 36 h chilling period were 2.3 to 5.3, 0.9 to 1.3, and 0.9, respectively. The results support the concept of using sequential decontamination processes in beef packing plants as a means of improving the microbiological quality of beef carcasses.


International Journal of Food Microbiology | 1998

Nonacid meat decontamination technologies: model studies and commercial applications.

John N. Sofos; G. C. Smith

Increased consumer awareness and concern about microbial foodborne diseases has resulted in intensified efforts to reduce contamination of raw meat, as evidenced by new meat and poultry inspection regulations being implemented in the United States. In addition to requiring operation of meat and poultry slaughtering and processing plants under the principles of the hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) system, the new regulations have established microbiological testing criteria for Escherichia coli and Salmonella, as a means of evaluating plant performance. These developments have renewed and intensified interest in the development and commercial application of meat and poultry decontamination procedures. Technologies developed and evaluated for decontamination include live animal cleaning/washing, chemical dehairing, carcass knife-trimming to remove physical contaminants, steam/hot water-vacuuming for spot-cleaning/decontamination of carcasses, spray washing/rinsing of carcasses with water of low or high pressures and temperatures or chemical solutions, and exposure of carcass sides to pressurized steam. Under appropriate conditions, the technologies applied to carcasses may reduce mean microbiological counts by approximately one-three log colony forming units (cfu)/cm2, and some of them have been approved and are employed in commercial applications (i.e., steam-vacuuming; carcass spray-washing with water, chlorine, organic acid or trisodium phosphate solutions; hot water deluging/spraying/rinsing, and pressurized steam). The contribution of these decontamination technologies to the enhancement of food safety will be determined over the long term, as surveillance data on microbial foodborne illness are collected. This review examines carcass decontamination technologies, other than organic acids, with emphasis placed on recent advances and commercial applications.


Journal of Food Protection | 1996

Trimming and Washing of Beef Carcasses as a Method of Improving the Microbiological Quality of Meat

James O. Reagan; G. R. Acuff; Dennis R. Buege; Marietta J. Buyck; James S. Dickson; Curtis L. Kastner; James L. Marsden; J. Brad Morgan; Ranzell Nickelson; G. C. Smith; John N. Sofos

A study to compare procedures and interventions for removing physical and bacterial contamination from beef carcasses was conducted in six carcass conversion operations that were representative of modern, high-volume plants and located in five different states. Treatment procedures included trimming, washing, and the current industry practice of trimming followed by washing. In addition, hot (74 to 87.8°C at the pipe) water washing and rinsing with ozone (0.3 to 2.3 ppm) or hydrogen peroxide (5%) were applied as intervention treatments. Beef carcasses were deliberately contaminated with bovine fecal material at >4.0 log colony-forming units (CFU)/cm2 in order to be better able to observe the decontaminating effects of the treatments. Carcasses were visually scored by 2 to 3 trained personnel for the level of gross contamination before and after treatment. Samples (10 by 15 cm, 0.3 to 0.5 cm thick) for microbiological testing were excised as controls or after application of each procedure or intervention and analyzed for aerobic mesophilic plate counts, Escherichia coli Biotype I counts, and presence or absence of Listeria spp., Salmonella spp., and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Average reductions in aerobic plate counts were 1.85 and 2.00 log CFU/cm2 for the treatments of trimming-washing and hot-water washing, respectively. Hydrogen peroxide and ozone reduced aerobic plate counts by 1.14 and 1.30 log CFU/cm2, respectively. In general, trimming and washing of beef carcasses consistently resulted in low bacterial populations and scores for visible contamination. However, the data also indicated that hot- (74 to 87.8°C at the pipe) water washing was an effective intervention that reduced bacterial and fecal contamination in a consistent manner.


Journal of Food Protection | 1999

Sources and Extent of Microbiological Contamination of Beef Carcasses in Seven United States Slaughtering Plants

John N. Sofos; Kochevar Sl; G.R Bellinger; Dennis R. Buege; Hancock Dd; Ingham Sc; Morgan Jb; James O. Reagan; G. C. Smith

This study determined microbiological loads of beef carcasses at different stages during the slaughtering to chilling process in seven (four steer/heifer and three cow/bull) plants. Potential sources of contamination (feces, air, lymph nodes) were also tested. Each facility was visited twice, once in November through January (wet season) and again in May through June (dry season). Carcasses were sampled by aseptic excision of surface tissue (100 cm2) from the brisket, flank, and rump (30 samples each) after hide removal (pre-evisceration), after final carcass washing, and after 24-h carcass chilling. The samples were analyzed individually by standard procedures for aerobic plate counts (APC), total coliform counts (TCC), Escherichia coli biotype I counts (ECC), and presence of Salmonella. Incidence of Salmonella was higher on dry feces of older compared to younger animals, fresh feces of younger compared to older animals, and on cow/bull carcasses compared to steer/heifer carcasses. Most factors and their interactions had significant (P < or = 0.05) effects on the bacterial counts obtained. Depending on plant and season, APC, TCC, and ECC were < or =10(4), < or =10(2), and < or =10(1) CFU/cm2 in 46.7 to 93.3, 50.0 to 100.0, and 74.7 to 100.0% of the samples, respectively. TCC exceeded 10(3) CFU/cm2 in 2.5% (wet season) and 1.5% (dry season) of the samples. ECC exceeded 10(2) CFU/cm2 in 8.7%, 0.3%, and 1.5% of the pre-evisceration, final carcass-washing, and 24-h carcass-chilling samples, respectively, during the wet season; the corresponding numbers during the dry season were 3.5%, 2.2%, and 3.0%, respectively. These data should serve as a baseline for future comparisons in measuring the microbiological status of beef carcasses, as the new inspection requirements are implemented.


Journal of Food Protection | 2002

Comparison of Sampling Methods for Microbiological Testing of Beef Animal Rectal/Colonal Feces, Hides, and Carcasses

J. R. Ransom; K. E. Belk; R. T. Bacon; John N. Sofos; John A. Scanga; G. C. Smith

This study compared sampling methods for detecting Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella in beef cattle feces and on hides and carcasses and for enumerating E. coli biotype I counts (ECC) on carcasses. Fecal samples were collected by rectal/colonal palpation and colonal sponge swabbing. Hides were sampled by sponge swabbing three sites, hair clipping, excision, rinsing, and gauze swabbing, whereas carcasses were sampled by three-site thoracic and pattern-mark sponge swabbing and tissue excision. Overall, irrespective of sampling method, 36.7, 13.3, and 0.0% of lots contained at least one E. coli O157:H7-positive hide, fecal, and carcass sample, respectively, while the corresponding prevalence of Salmonella was 70.0, 16.7, and 6.7%, respectively. For hide sampling, excision and gauze swabbing yielded the fewest (13.3%) E. coli O157:H7-positive samples, while hair clipping and sponge swabbing yielded the most (23.3%). None of the carcass-sampling methods detected E. coli O157:H7 or differed (P > 0.05) in their ability to enumerate ECC. Colonal swabbing was the most effective (10.0%) method for detecting E. coli O157:H7 in feces. No differences (P > 0.05) in Salmonella prevalence were observed between carcass-sampling methods, although three-site sponge swabbing and tissue excision detected the most (3.3%). Hide rinsing was the most effective (P < 0.05) Salmonella detection method (63.3%), but dangers associated with its application may preclude its use by industry; there were no differences (P > 0.05) among other hide-sampling methods. No differences (P > 0.05) in Salmonella detection were observed between fecal-sampling methods. Overall, three-site sponge swabbing was the most feasible and effective sampling method for the detection of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella on hides and carcasses.


Meat Science | 2000

Microbiological contamination of raw beef trimmings and ground beef.

John A. Scanga; A.D Grona; K. E. Belk; John N. Sofos; G.R Bellinger; G. C. Smith

To survey the microbiological quality of beef trimmings and final-ground beef, samples were collected from eight commercial grinding facilities, including trimmings from fed-cattle, culled-beef cows, culled-dairy cows, imported-beef trimmings and finished-ground products. Trim samples (core and purge) and ground product samples (n=586) were evaluated for aerobic plate (APC), total coliform (TCC), Escherichia coli (ECC) and Staphylococcus aureus counts and the presence of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes. As fat content in the trimmings increased, APC also increased. Trimmings from fed-cattle had higher (P<0.05) APC and TCC than trimmings from culled-beef cows, culled-dairy cows and imported trimmings. Purge samples produced higher (P<0.05) APC, TCC and ECC than core samples, but there were no difference (P>0.05) across fat percentages in APC, TCC, ECC or S. aureus counts. Final-ground beef samples had a 13.6 and 1.5 % incidence of L. monocytogenes and Salmonella spp., respectively. The results of this study indicate specific areas of potential that ground beef processors could capitalize upon to further improve the microbiological quality of their finished product. Ground beef processors should focus their efforts on reducing the microbial counts on incoming raw materials, especially those containing large proportions of subcutaneous fat, and processors should no longer incorporate the purge component of raw materials into ground beef. From this study, it is also apparent that ground beef processors should implement sanitation and manufacturing procedures that address L. monocytogenes contamination.


Animal Feed Science and Technology | 1996

Supplemental vitamin E in beef cattle diets to improve shelf-life of beef

G. C. Smith; J.B. Morgan; John N. Sofos; J. D. Tatum

Quality deterioration in meat occurs because of oxidation of lipids and muscle pigments. Lipid oxidation causes development of off-odors and off-flavors; muscle-pigment oxidation negatively affects color, appearance and acceptability. Lipid and muscle-pigment oxidation are closely associated such that delaying lipid breakdown will delay meal discoloration. Supplementation of cattle diets with enough vitamin E to achieve about 4 μg g−1 of alpha-tocopherol in muscle extended the time beef was of acceptable quality. Feeding supplemental vitamin E to feedlot steers and heifers produced beef with higher tissue alpha-tocopherol, slower metmyoglobin formation, fewer oxidation products and 24–48 h longer acceptable appearance during display. Growth of spoilage and pathogenic (Escherichia coli 0157:H7; Listeria monocytogenes) bacteria did not differ on beef cuts from cattle fed vs. not-fed supplemental vitamin E. Field studies documented that supplementing diets of feedlot cattle with 500–1000 IU per head per day of vitamin E for 90–100 days prior to harvest was efficacious for beef marketed in both domestic and export trades.


Journal of Animal Science | 1996

Growth and fresh meat quality characteristics of pigs supplemented with vitamin E.

J.E. Cannon; J.B. Morgan; G R Schmidt; J. D. Tatum; John N. Sofos; G. C. Smith; R.J. Delmore; S.N. Williams


Journal of Food Science | 1998

Decontamination of Inoculated Beef with Sequential Spraying Treatments

L.R. Graves Delmore; John N. Sofos; G.R. Schmidt; G. C. Smith


Archive | 2001

2. Sampling Plans, Sample Collection, Shipment, and Preparation for Analysis

T. Matthew Taylor; John N. Sofos; Peter Bodnaruk; G. R. Acuff

Collaboration


Dive into the John N. Sofos's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. C. Smith

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James O. Reagan

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. D. Tatum

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.B. Morgan

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. E. Belk

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dennis R. Buege

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G R Schmidt

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John A. Scanga

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A.D Grona

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge